Jump to content


My First 4 Battles In The DPM King


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

MarBearCat #1 Posted 16 February 2019 - 04:32 AM

    Pennsylvania's Favorite Cat!

  • Players
  • 22329 battles
  • 11,473
  • [SDWA]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2015

I'll just leave this here.

 

 

 

Spoiler

 


 

 

Heavy Is The Cat That's Carried!


Absolute_Sniper #2 Posted 16 February 2019 - 05:22 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 33941 battles
  • 2,349
  • [CRU2L]
  • Member since:
    11-05-2015
Play more MBC. That battle count is too low for you to worry about your win rate. Secondly, who cares about your winrate? Just have fun and play what you enjoy.  Might I suggest a small does of catnip before your roll out to the battlefield? Your stats may suffer but your enjoyment levels will increase. :)

Meat_Locker #3 Posted 16 February 2019 - 05:24 AM

    Large Member

  • Players
  • 35728 battles
  • 924
  • [TITAN]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014
That tank totally doesn’t work for me and I like non-turreted TDs. 

 


wwing #4 Posted 16 February 2019 - 05:36 AM

    Either We Win Or They Do

  • Players
  • 39056 battles
  • 247
  • Member since:
    08-31-2014

A cat has nine lives.  I am sure you still have plenty in reserve.  So tank on!



MarBearCat #5 Posted 16 February 2019 - 05:40 AM

    Pennsylvania's Favorite Cat!

  • Players
  • 22329 battles
  • 11,473
  • [SDWA]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2015

View PostAbsolute_Sniper, on 16 February 2019 - 12:22 AM, said:

Play more MBC. That battle count is too low for you to worry about your win rate. Secondly, who cares about your winrate? Just have fun and play what you enjoy. Might I suggest a small does of catnip before your roll out to the battlefield? Your stats may suffer but your enjoyment levels will increase. :)

 

With this tank I'm more concerned with using it to up my overall damage average. I'm also concerned with

WN8 of this tank, not so much the win rate.

 

Littlefinger said you will see a good amount of bounces with this tank. So far I have been hit 22 times with only

2 bounces. I led in damage 1 time, 1178 with a 7-1 loss. Second in damage once with 1523 in a win.

 

I'm trying to stay in the back until mid - end game where my hit point retained + dpm will rule but

this stupid gun misses shots and once I'm spotted, forget it. I'm dead quickly.

 

 


 

 

Heavy Is The Cat That's Carried!


MarBearCat #6 Posted 16 February 2019 - 05:46 AM

    Pennsylvania's Favorite Cat!

  • Players
  • 22329 battles
  • 11,473
  • [SDWA]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2015

View PostMeat_Locker, on 16 February 2019 - 12:24 AM, said:

That tank totally doesn’t work for me and I like non-turreted TDs. 

 

So far in 4 battles I've fired 25 shots, hitting with 14 of them.

Of the 14 hits, 11 pens. The pen ratio is 78.5% of my hits.

 

I don't have any clue if that's a good ratio or not.

But as we know, we can pen with 0 damage so there's that.

 

 


 

 

Heavy Is The Cat That's Carried!


swampydoodle #7 Posted 16 February 2019 - 06:19 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20388 battles
  • 533
  • [FUSAG]
  • Member since:
    12-16-2016
Kitten... Slow your roll. That is not a valid sample size. Just give it some time. Your fascination with stats is sending you to full tilt land. Disneyland, Gilligan's Island and Fantasy Island, are all better than that land. Just chill. New tank honeymoon period can go either good of bad. Have some tuna, take a nap in the sun. 

Vater_Von_Tom #8 Posted 16 February 2019 - 05:11 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24875 battles
  • 876
  • [SPUDX]
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016
I'm behind you MarBearCat. And by that I mean, I'm behind you in of those stats. The past few months have been dismal for me.Toward the end of last year I was hoping to break 52% total WR and now I'm clinging to 51% by my fingernails. 


Morphman11 #9 Posted 16 February 2019 - 06:43 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26 battles
  • 650
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011

14/25 and you want to win? Learn how to hit the barn from the inside before making inquiries.

 

 



anonym_2ZNiJLJL8ln2 #10 Posted 16 February 2019 - 06:47 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 940
  • Member since:
    06-16-2019

SU-122-54 is actually still a bad tank, because all that got buffed was the DPM, not the platform that was making the tank bad in the first place.

 

It shows in the stats by proceeding to show it is trash.

 

It's like a one trick pony (Cent 1) except you remove the ability of the tank to reliably work the trick, but give it DPM it doesn't have the flexibility to use.

 

 

Sort of like why no one plays T-62 competitively.

 

 

Don't feel bad, it sucks, just not as much as the SU-101.

 

People will say it's Russian and thus good, but this is why SU-101 hasn't been buffed. People say the DPM is good, except the gun doesn't have alpha, bloom, or acc. It barely even has good pen for the tier, and at the same time the vehicle cannot run quickly or have good gun arc. Also the vehicle gets penned by basically everything.



MarBearCat #11 Posted 16 February 2019 - 08:24 PM

    Pennsylvania's Favorite Cat!

  • Players
  • 22329 battles
  • 11,473
  • [SDWA]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2015

View PostOicraftian, on 16 February 2019 - 01:47 PM, said:

SU-122-54 is actually still a bad tank, because all that got buffed was the DPM, not the platform that was making the tank bad in the first place.

 

It shows in the stats by proceeding to show it is trash.

 

It's like a one trick pony (Cent 1) except you remove the ability of the tank to reliably work the trick, but give it DPM it doesn't have the flexibility to use.

 

 

Sort of like why no one plays T-62 competitively.

 

 

Don't feel bad, it sucks, just not as much as the SU-101.

 

People will say it's Russian and thus good, but this is why SU-101 hasn't been buffed. People say the DPM is good, except the gun doesn't have alpha, bloom, or acc. It barely even has good pen for the tier, and at the same time the vehicle cannot run quickly or have good gun arc. Also the vehicle gets penned by basically everything.

 

I'm 60% with the 101 :facepalm:

 

 

Heavy Is The Cat That's Carried!


Player_5773117413 #12 Posted 17 February 2019 - 04:25 AM

    Professional Tinfoil Hatter

  • Players
  • 28528 battles
  • 8,681
  • [IRD]
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014

View PostMeat_Locker, on 15 February 2019 - 11:24 PM, said:

That tank totally doesn’t work for me and I like non-turreted TDs. 

 

I think the lack of gun depression further harms it. Also, DPM relies on time, but this thing has inadequate armor to buy that time. The object 263 can make a stand and unload rounds onto enemies, this thing can't stay out for too long or else the attention it'll draw will result in its doom.


"HULK SMASH[er]!!!"

^ Gotta derp around in Tier 7 before the inevitable nerf! ^

Just another demo account, nothing to see here

"Say what you like, but stop pissing on my back and telling me it's raining." Blartch


anonym_2ZNiJLJL8ln2 #13 Posted 17 February 2019 - 10:45 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 940
  • Member since:
    06-16-2019

View PostMarBearCat, on 16 February 2019 - 08:24 PM, said:

 

I'm 60% with the 101 :facepalm:

 

And at one point I had over 2.4k DPG in SU-101, 1.2+ spot rate, and 40% WR.

 

[edited]happens.

 

Doesn't mean the tank is good, or has secret 'lol [edited]you' MM stat. It is just trash.

It can't carry for its life, and it shows.

There is a reason why it is so bad. And its simple. Choose between good tier 7 gun, and [edited]tier 8 TD gun.

 

Oh look, both options suck.

 

Do you even know what the JP II is?

 

 

 

+40 alpha, +500 DPM (lol RIP SU-101) vastly better gun arc, a gun structure that bounces everything, unlike SU-101 which has 'lotsa armor coverage' but not enough to 'actually bounce [edited]', it might have worse camo but with how much you have to move it may as well have better camo then you.

 

At least you have better acceleration you can barely use because of the 'lol what positions are you able to work anyway' and... like 5mm of pen.

 

If you want SU-101 DPM you lose basically everything else, but with the alpha you are out DPM'd and have less HP than light tanks.

 

 

JP II pays almost nothing in penalty for everything it has over SU-101. The main loss is that when you are caught in the open like a retard you are more likely to die.

 

But that's not a useful feature. Actually it has to do with being slightly more 'defective human decision' proof.



Gavidoc01 #14 Posted 18 February 2019 - 04:23 AM

    Platinum Card Wallet Warrior

  • Players
  • 39023 battles
  • 3,486
  • [III]
  • Member since:
    10-12-2014

MBC

Stop focusing on your damn stats. It’s just causing you to dislike the game more and in turn complain more. 


My Blitzstars

 

I'm a Platinum Card Wallet Warrior.

You’re welcome for supporting the game. 


MarBearCat #15 Posted 18 February 2019 - 10:24 AM

    Pennsylvania's Favorite Cat!

  • Players
  • 22329 battles
  • 11,473
  • [SDWA]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2015

View PostOicraftian, on 17 February 2019 - 05:45 PM, said:

 

And at one point I had over 2.4k DPG in SU-101, 1.2+ spot rate, and 40% WR.

 

[edited]happens.

 

Doesn't mean the tank is good, or has secret 'lol [edited]you' MM stat. It is just trash.

It can't carry for its life, and it shows.

There is a reason why it is so bad. And its simple. Choose between good tier 7 gun, and [edited]tier 8 TD gun.

 

Oh look, both options suck.

 

Do you even know what the JP II is?

 

 

 

+40 alpha, +500 DPM (lol RIP SU-101) vastly better gun arc, a gun structure that bounces everything, unlike SU-101 which has 'lotsa armor coverage' but not enough to 'actually bounce [edited]', it might have worse camo but with how much you have to move it may as well have better camo then you.

 

At least you have better acceleration you can barely use because of the 'lol what positions are you able to work anyway' and... like 5mm of pen.

 

If you want SU-101 DPM you lose basically everything else, but with the alpha you are out DPM'd and have less HP than light tanks.

 

 

JP II pays almost nothing in penalty for everything it has over SU-101. The main loss is that when you are caught in the open like a retard you are more likely to die.

 

But that's not a useful feature. Actually it has to do with being slightly more 'defective human decision' proof.

 

I've had the JP II for a few years, at least

 

 

Heavy Is The Cat That's Carried!


MarBearCat #16 Posted 18 February 2019 - 10:25 AM

    Pennsylvania's Favorite Cat!

  • Players
  • 22329 battles
  • 11,473
  • [SDWA]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2015

View PostGavidoc01, on 17 February 2019 - 11:23 PM, said:

MBC

Stop focusing on your damn stats. It’s just causing you to dislike the game more and in turn complain more. 

 

:(

 

 

Heavy Is The Cat That's Carried!


DickerDallas #17 Posted 18 February 2019 - 01:41 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31899 battles
  • 155
  • Member since:
    09-05-2014

View PostMarBearCat, on 15 February 2019 - 10:40 PM, said:

 

Littlefinger said you will see a good amount of bounces with this tank. So far I have been hit 22 times with only

2 bounces. I led in damage 1 time, 1178 with a 7-1 loss. Second in damage once with 1523 in a win.

 

 

Don't ever count on getting a bounce in that tank.  Ever.  You will get hit and penned by everything out there.  Count any bounce as pure luck.

 

Just like the rest of the tanks in this line, either run with the mediums, or snipe and close in towards end-game.  



MarBearCat #18 Posted 18 February 2019 - 02:06 PM

    Pennsylvania's Favorite Cat!

  • Players
  • 22329 battles
  • 11,473
  • [SDWA]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2015

View PostDickerDallas, on 18 February 2019 - 08:41 AM, said:

 

Don't ever count on getting a bounce in that tank.  Ever.  You will get hit and penned by everything out there.  Count any bounce as pure luck.

 

Just like the rest of the tanks in this line, either run with the mediums, or snipe and close in towards end-game.  

 

Sniping for me kinda stinks. This gun was hitting nothing.

 

My set up, for the gun is Rammer, GLD and refined gun because I was sniping, or trying to.

I also used the camo net.


 

 

Heavy Is The Cat That's Carried!


MarBearCat #19 Posted 18 February 2019 - 02:43 PM

    Pennsylvania's Favorite Cat!

  • Players
  • 22329 battles
  • 11,473
  • [SDWA]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2015

View PostMarBearCat, on 18 February 2019 - 05:24 AM, said:

 

I've had the JP II for a few years, at least

 

File this under, "Isn't That Amazing?!"

 

Spoiler

 


 

 

Heavy Is The Cat That's Carried!


DickerDallas #20 Posted 18 February 2019 - 05:51 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31899 battles
  • 155
  • Member since:
    09-05-2014

View PostMarBearCat, on 18 February 2019 - 07:06 AM, said:

 

Sniping for me kinda stinks. This gun was hitting nothing.

 

My set up, for the gun is Rammer, GLD and refined gun because I was sniping, or trying to.

I also used the camo net.

 

Yeah, it isn't a great sniper.  You'll miss a ton of shots and generally not be effective for your team.  It was built to be an assault TD and follow the mediums.  If you can't make that work, or have fun with that play style, then the tank will probably not make you happy.

 

The great thing about Blitz, you don't have to enjoy playing every tank.  Play more of the tanks that make you happy.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users