Jump to content


Pershing needs a buff

Pershing USA buff russian bias

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Blackduckfury #1 Posted 27 February 2019 - 02:27 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2458 battles
  • 91
  • [BL-UE]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2018

 The meadium tank M26 was a historic beast however the WOTB adaptation is a bit underpowered and here’s why.

1. It’s a 90mm freaking gun and 8.8s have more pen and damage 

2. It needs better pen like 215mm would make it much

3. Make it unrealistically fast like the T-44 so it can compete

  


Edited by Blackduckfury, 27 February 2019 - 05:22 PM.

When The commies pop up, I knock em’ down! - Blackduckfury 

MudkipAtWar #2 Posted 27 February 2019 - 03:02 PM

    T1 best heavy tank

  • Players
  • 21437 battles
  • 1,468
  • [FL-TH]
  • Member since:
    10-30-2015
Id rather have a turret armor buff 

Hello

https://www.blitzsta.../1016605416.png

Clan list in order of join date: TBNT, 22ND, 22ND2, FSA, FSX, ZNTH, FLEET, FL-TH

 

 


Blackduckfury #3 Posted 27 February 2019 - 03:09 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2458 battles
  • 91
  • [BL-UE]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2018
That would be good too
When The commies pop up, I knock em’ down! - Blackduckfury 

Pittoors_ #4 Posted 27 February 2019 - 03:49 PM

    Killer Queen has already touched this forum title

  • Players
  • 35354 battles
  • 2,399
  • [MAHOU]
  • Member since:
    02-05-2015
You are asking for too much honestly.

https://www.blitzstars.com/player/com/Pittoors_

Current garage: M48A1 Patton, IS-4, T110E5, E 50 Ausf. M, Leopard 1, T-62A, M46 Patton, T54E1, IS-8, IS-5, IS-6, Rheinmetall Borsig Waffentrager, T49, T23E3Type 62, Helsing, T-34-1, Kuro Mori MineAC IV Sentinel, SU-100YStridsvagn 74A2, Panzer IV Anko SP, Churchill III, T-34, Hetzer Kame SP, A-32, DW 2, Panzer S35, BT-SV, BT-7 Artillery, SU-76i, T-15M3 LightT2 LightT7 Combat CarLight Mk. VIC.


WrenchThrower281 #5 Posted 27 February 2019 - 03:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20011 battles
  • 310
  • [T_W_O]
  • Member since:
    04-18-2017
350 alpha every 6.5 seconds in a tier 8  med...thats not broke at all.:rolleyes: Pershing needs basically sta-1 gun. 220 pen, 5.9 sec reload and done.

MSGTGlitterGlue #6 Posted 27 February 2019 - 04:00 PM

    Challenge(r) Accepted

  • Players
  • 13979 battles
  • 324
  • [CHEF]
  • Member since:
    02-24-2016

Yeah... thats quite a lot of buffs

 

also, 88s most definitely do not do more damage than 90s

 

88 ———220 alpha

90———225 alpha


I’m a 46.96 percenter

But I’m an IMPROVING 46.96 percenter

 

Don’t be a political dissident, because then I’ll have to sacrifice you.

 


__Crusader6__ #7 Posted 27 February 2019 - 05:46 PM

    Annoying Mod

  • Players
  • 58748 battles
  • 11,467
  • [-C6-]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

Pershing is fine.   It’s not OP - but it’s effective when ridge fighting. 

 I’d totally take a buff though. 

 

Historically the Pershing was a Heavy tank -late WW2, realistically a tier 6/7 era tank.  

Designed to fight Tigers and King Tigers 

 It make short work of T series Russian too in Korea. 

 

 

 


 
Tank Hoarder: 365 tanks in Garage:  366/368 aced (AMX 30B, Mk1 and T49A repo),    wallet warrior.  Loyal M60 owner
I think 5.5 was good for the game - But I also want my Kenny OP nerfed. 
Sorry I haven’t aced the Smasher yet - So I’m still ruining tier 6-8 

 


Blackduckfury #8 Posted 27 February 2019 - 07:54 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2458 battles
  • 91
  • [BL-UE]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2018

View Post__Crusader6__, on 27 February 2019 - 05:46 PM, said:

Pershing is fine.   It’s not OP - but it’s effective when ridge fighting. 

 I’d totally take a buff though. 

 

Historically the Pershing was a Heavy tank -late WW2, realistically a tier 6/7 era tank.  

Designed to fight Tigers and King Tigers 

 It make short work of T series Russian too in Korea. 

 

 

 

 

It was a heavy for morale purposes and in Korea it was considered a medium.
When The commies pop up, I knock em’ down! - Blackduckfury 

fangs58 #9 Posted 27 February 2019 - 09:08 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 37139 battles
  • 861
  • [WHC]
  • Member since:
    10-11-2016
It sounds like you want the Pershing to be an Indian Panzer. That being said I will take a gun buff. I am with wrenchthrower I would like to see the gun stats closer to the STA-1. Just no heat round. 

ANOTHER COMMENT OR QUESTION BROUGHT TO YOU BY A BLISSFULLY ABOVE AVERAGE PLAYER.

 

https://www.blitzsta.../1022508815.png

 

 


Blackduckfury #10 Posted 27 February 2019 - 09:18 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2458 battles
  • 91
  • [BL-UE]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2018
Didn’t the indien used to be the worst med in the tier?
When The commies pop up, I knock em’ down! - Blackduckfury 

fangs58 #11 Posted 27 February 2019 - 10:13 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 37139 battles
  • 861
  • [WHC]
  • Member since:
    10-11-2016

check out DarkMagicianGirl's post from Sunday

 

http://forum.wotblit...edium-feb-2019/

 

It is an amazing medium tank. One of my favorites. 


ANOTHER COMMENT OR QUESTION BROUGHT TO YOU BY A BLISSFULLY ABOVE AVERAGE PLAYER.

 

https://www.blitzsta.../1022508815.png

 

 


MudkipAtWar #12 Posted 28 February 2019 - 01:31 PM

    T1 best heavy tank

  • Players
  • 21437 battles
  • 1,468
  • [FL-TH]
  • Member since:
    10-30-2015

View PostBlackduckfury, on 27 February 2019 - 05:18 PM, said:

Didn’t the indien used to be the worst med in the tier?

 

So I thought, either the playerbase realised its strength or it got a ninja buff

Hello

https://www.blitzsta.../1016605416.png

Clan list in order of join date: TBNT, 22ND, 22ND2, FSA, FSX, ZNTH, FLEET, FL-TH

 

 


Blackduckfury #13 Posted 28 February 2019 - 02:09 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2458 battles
  • 91
  • [BL-UE]
  • Member since:
    09-23-2018
Indien is next, however I’ve met many recently and cracked em’ like a peanut.
When The commies pop up, I knock em’ down! - Blackduckfury 





Also tagged with Pershing, USA, buff, russian bias

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users