62 replies to this topic

[minitel_NA]

My opinion of premiums is that they should be nerfed versions and sub equivalent to the tech tree, just like they were.

that every new premium is more op than the previous, and that they can’t be nerfed is killing the game.
 

but guess what, we used to see premium once in a while and now any game can have half the field in premiums.

so it’s certainly a rational choice for business to have switched to this new policy.

 

now how about turnaments ? 
 

i would agree premiums don’t have anything to do in tournaments.

Of course some are not so OP, but as a rule, it would be simple and clear.

but does the same logic apply somehow ?

arent tournaments full of premiums some kind of advertising ?

arent banning them admitting they are OP ?

 

again, the frontier with pay to win is slightly blurred, and the desire to have a clear vision upon that is Clearly lacking both from WG and the playerbase.

[__V_O_P__]

Banning Premium tanks from tournaments would be an explicit admission that something was wrong with them - OP, P2W, whatever.

I don’t see WG taking that decision, ever. It really doesn’t matter what our personal views are.  

Whether there might be special events with tech tree only tanks remains to be seen. But in twister... it ain’t happening.

[j_rod]

minitel_NA, on 23 November 2019 - 04:20 AM, said:

again, the frontier with pay to win is slightly blurred, and the desire to have a clear vision upon that is Clearly lacking both from WG and the playerbase.

Which is exactly what they want. Enough ambiguity that they can claim both sides off the discussion