Jump to content


Finnish TDs (maybe?)


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

Poll: Poll (14 members have cast votes)

Do you want Finnish TDs in the game?

  1. Yes (7 votes [50.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  2. No (2 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  3. Cookie? (5 votes [35.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.71%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

Major_Sweatpants #1 Posted 05 June 2020 - 03:10 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 6597 battles
  • 911
  • [CCII]
  • Member since:
    01-03-2017

So I have a proposal for Finnish Tank Destroyers.

 The line branches off at tier 3 from the 14TP. it then goes to a Finnish version of the T-28, with a 76mm gun. 
 

it then goes to the BT-42, a Finnish tank with the hull of a BT-7, an oversized turret, and a 107mm gun.

 

at tier 6, a StuG with an 85mm gun (we’ll call this the StuF for now) same armor and speed as StuG III G, but has a penetrative 85mm gun (lets go with the one on LTTB, or maybe a German 88mm KWK L/71.

 

At tier 7,  well there up WG can design some fake *** OP tank. Just a suggestion, and no, I’m not trolling.


If you see me online I’m probably escaping War Thunder’s cancerous ways

Floridian Gator Cavalryman


BorisBaddenov #2 Posted 05 June 2020 - 03:28 PM

    3.8 Made me quit

  • Players
  • 28443 battles
  • 9,556
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    12-11-2015

Only if they have a turret.    

 

 

Peace-

Boris 


I’ve noticed a strong lack of Spare Parts. Is that intended?

No, it is not. This problem will solve itself with time. Many players have several dozens of vehicles in their Garages, so they don’t have enough Spare Parts for the entire vehicle fleet. But you will gradually collect enough Spare Parts to unlock new slots for purchased tanks in time.


Kiwi_Kebab #3 Posted 05 June 2020 - 03:37 PM

    Low-Calorie Snack

  • Players
  • 11291 battles
  • 2,034
  • [ENDDZ]
  • Member since:
    06-04-2014

"Apologize to the Finnish!"

 

Finland definitely needs the BT-42, but it would make much more sense to have it be a single premium light tank. Finnish armored forces were woefully under resourced throughout WW2, only having access to FTs and Vicker 6-tons till 1941 when they yielded to the Germans for support. Any tank they had after that was given to them by Germany (Pv 4, StuG III) or taken from the Soviets in battle (SU-76, SU-152, KV-1, T-34, BT-5, a single T-50). 


Kiwi_Kebab's Signature

_Yohtician #4 Posted 05 June 2020 - 04:00 PM

    The Best Tactician

  • Players
  • 31737 battles
  • 3,176
  • [REGI]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2015
I’d be down, but maybe they could dig for blueprints instead of fake tanks

Member of the Training Room Police Department

My YouTube:https://m.youtube.com/channel/UChFwqqu30_epeLO0q-BKEFw 

 

Give us the IRON CROSS


Major_Sweatpants #5 Posted 05 June 2020 - 05:56 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 6597 battles
  • 911
  • [CCII]
  • Member since:
    01-03-2017

View PostKiwi_Kebab, on 05 June 2020 - 10:37 AM, said:

"Apologize to the Finnish!"

 

Finland definitely needs the BT-42, but it would make much more sense to have it be a single premium light tank. Finnish armored forces were woefully under resourced throughout WW2, only having access to FTs and Vicker 6-tons till 1941 when they yielded to the Germans for support. Any tank they had after that was given to them by Germany (Pv 4, StuG III) or taken from the Soviets in battle (SU-76, SU-152, KV-1, T-34, BT-5, a single T-50). 

“THE ASSAULT 3 WAS A GREAT TANK!”

 


If you see me online I’m probably escaping War Thunder’s cancerous ways

Floridian Gator Cavalryman


BlitzAssassin #6 Posted 05 June 2020 - 08:15 PM

    Kool Aid Drinker

  • Players
  • 32229 battles
  • 732
  • [-CFE-]
  • Member since:
    09-18-2015
What kind of cookie we talkin?

Vantablack12 #7 Posted 05 June 2020 - 09:56 PM

    Ready, Fire, Aim!

  • Players
  • 18646 battles
  • 2,545
  • [K9]
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

View PostBlitzAssassin, on 05 June 2020 - 03:15 PM, said:

What kind of cookie we talkin?

IDK, but I'm craving a Ghirardelli chocolate chip cookie right now.


                                                         "Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid" - John Wayne.

 

                                                       

                                                                            Bring back the in-game Forum link!

 


Mako__Reizei___ #8 Posted 06 June 2020 - 12:55 AM

    Sleepyhead

  • Players
  • 9054 battles
  • 837
  • Member since:
    07-03-2016
Bt-42 when.

Must. Have. 60%. Winrate. Under. 0.5%. Platoon. Rate!!! (30 day)

 

Maus addict, might play alt account more just to play Maus... (Nano_Virus)


RedOctopus #9 Posted 06 June 2020 - 01:47 AM

    Banned - for Good

  • Players
  • 5012 battles
  • 684
  • [ROTI]
  • Member since:
    08-02-2019

View PostMajor_Sweatpants, on 05 June 2020 - 03:10 PM, said:

So I have a proposal for Finnish Tank Destroyers.

 The line branches off at tier 3 from the 14TP. it then goes to a Finnish version of the T-28, with a 76mm gun. 
 

it then goes to the BT-42, a Finnish tank with the hull of a BT-7, an oversized turret, and a 107mm gun.

 

at tier 6, a StuG with an 85mm gun (we’ll call this the StuF for now) same armor and speed as StuG III G, but has a penetrative 85mm gun (lets go with the one on LTTB, or maybe a German 88mm KWK L/71.

 

At tier 7,  well there up WG can design some fake *** OP tank. Just a suggestion, and no, I’m not trolling.

Yes, we actually need copy-paste tanks for the Germans given how many copy-paste tanks the Russkies have. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users