Jump to content


Kpfpz 70 Needs a serious buffing


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

Jest33 #1 Posted 29 December 2020 - 09:24 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 5654 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    10-24-2016
Idk if I need to explain what's wrong on the kpfpz 70, just by looking at the stats you can tell it doesn't fit as a tier 9 tank. buff it or drop 1 tier down.

AstoIfo #2 Posted 29 December 2020 - 09:58 PM

    Beware of Traps

  • Players
  • 13650 battles
  • 414
  • [ZELDA]
  • Member since:
    11-14-2014
It just got buffed in the recent patch. What else can they do with it?

 

Failure is life's greatest teacher. Once you accept failure, and learn from it, you will know success.


_Wikipedia #3 Posted 29 December 2020 - 10:06 PM

    Official advocate for 40%ers

  • Players
  • 12379 battles
  • 724
  • [KR0N0]
  • Member since:
    10-28-2018
Don’t be one of these guys that cry for 640 alpha.

The legend himself: https://www.twitch.tv/dsteves

Do not have an average tier of 6-8 if you want to cry.


_Baroness #4 Posted 29 December 2020 - 10:14 PM

    Left the forums

  • Players
  • 14287 battles
  • 422
  • [NHP]
  • Member since:
    10-17-2018

Welcome to the forums!

 

I'm sure WG will take your suggestion into consideration.  Please allow a few updates for it to take effect.  


http://www.blitzstars.com/player/com/_Baroness

Well, I supposed that's it for me.  It's been a fun ride and I truly appreciate all the tanking advice I've been given.  I'll be taking my Dr. Seuss books and Mr. Potato head and moving on to other pastures.  I have not tried the discord, but I think I'll give that a go next.  I wish everyone here the best and perhaps I'll see you on the battlefield.  o7


Kiwi_Kebab #5 Posted 29 December 2020 - 10:22 PM

    Low-Calorie Snack

  • Players
  • 10108 battles
  • 1,965
  • [ENDDZ]
  • Member since:
    06-04-2014

View PostJest33, on 29 December 2020 - 03:24 PM, said:

Idk if I need to explain what's wrong on the kpfpz 70, just by looking at the stats you can tell it doesn't fit as a tier 9 tank. buff it or drop 1 tier down.

How would you recommend we buff the tank? Just saying "buff it" adds nothing. 


Kiwi_Kebab's Signature

BorisBaddenov #6 Posted 29 December 2020 - 10:34 PM

    3.8 Made me quit

  • Players
  • 27070 battles
  • 9,425
  • Member since:
    12-11-2015

View PostKiwi_Kebab, on 29 December 2020 - 03:22 PM, said:

How would you recommend we buff the tank? Just saying "buff it" adds nothing. 

 

Turtle Was and a lint free cloth ...

 

 

Peace-

Boris


I’ve noticed a strong lack of Spare Parts. Is that intended?

No, it is not. This problem will solve itself with time. Many players have several dozens of vehicles in their Garages, so they don’t have enough Spare Parts for the entire vehicle fleet. But you will gradually collect enough Spare Parts to unlock new slots for purchased tanks in time.


boris55555 #7 Posted 29 December 2020 - 10:46 PM

    BORii Full Badge Society Member, and First Minister of FUNK

  • Players
  • 33812 battles
  • 4,927
  • [MINC]
  • Member since:
    11-30-2016

View PostJest33, on 29 December 2020 - 04:24 PM, said:

Idk if I need to explain what's wrong on the kpfpz 70, just by looking at the stats you can tell it doesn't fit as a tier 9 tank. buff it or drop 1 tier down.


welcome to the forum. Ignore the rabble (mainly me). What would you like buffed? And why?


Proud Owner of 2 separate Jagdtiger10.5’s

 


TengenToppaPotatoLagann #8 Posted 29 December 2020 - 10:55 PM

    ᵐʸ ʰᵉˢʰ ʷᶦᶫᶫ ᵖᶦᵉʳᶜᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ʰᵉᵃᵛᵉᶰˢ﹗

  • Players
  • 66357 battles
  • 4,228
  • [CRYBB]
  • Member since:
    03-31-2015

View Postboris55555, on 29 December 2020 - 05:46 PM, said:


What would you like buffed? And why?

 

rate of fire & top speed; memes

 


#2 TOG captain (na) (retired)

View Postminitel_NA, on 13 January 2018 - 03:06 AM, said:

when I’m tired I think I’m good.


Jest33 #9 Posted 29 December 2020 - 11:35 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 5654 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    10-24-2016
Well, To answer some of the replies, First of, The tank is autoloader(in real life). I don't care if the alpha is lowered as long as it resembles the real life tank. About the mobility, We know the tank is  medium class in real life and in-game it doesn't have the best armor for a T9 heavy besides the frontal turret armor of it. I think WG overthink of building this tank, It could have been similar to T54e1 with a bit higher alpha and better mobility.

CatFromMars11 #10 Posted 30 December 2020 - 12:20 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3020 battles
  • 328
  • [LEGO_]
  • Member since:
    03-27-2020

View PostJest33, on 29 December 2020 - 03:35 PM, said:

Well, To answer some of the replies, First of, The tank is autoloader(in real life). I don't care if the alpha is lowered as long as it resembles the real life tank. About the mobility, We know the tank is  medium class in real life and in-game it doesn't have the best armor for a T9 heavy besides the frontal turret armor of it. I think WG overthink of building this tank, It could have been similar to T54e1 with a bit higher alpha and better mobility.


in real life, it loads in 6 seconds and has atgms 


I have converted to T-15ism

 


Jest33 #11 Posted 30 December 2020 - 12:45 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 5654 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    10-24-2016

View PostCatFromMars11, on 30 December 2020 - 12:20 AM, said:


in real life, it loads in 6 seconds and has atgms 

That's why we'll just follow the game mechanics on how autoloader works. About ATGM there's really no need to mention about that since they just removed it.



_Wikipedia #12 Posted 30 December 2020 - 02:04 AM

    Official advocate for 40%ers

  • Players
  • 12379 battles
  • 724
  • [KR0N0]
  • Member since:
    10-28-2018

View PostJest33, on 29 December 2020 - 05:35 PM, said:

Well, To answer some of the replies, First of, The tank is autoloader(in real life). I don't care if the alpha is lowered as long as it resembles the real life tank. About the mobility, We know the tank is  medium class in real life and in-game it doesn't have the best armor for a T9 heavy besides the frontal turret armor of it. I think WG overthink of building this tank, It could have been similar to T54e1 with a bit higher alpha and better mobility.


Nobody cared about realism in WoT even before Blitz even got released.


The legend himself: https://www.twitch.tv/dsteves

Do not have an average tier of 6-8 if you want to cry.


KempBushThe3rd #13 Posted 30 December 2020 - 04:54 AM

    my words sometimes mean things

  • Players
  • 20286 battles
  • 3,412
  • [-PYX-]
  • Member since:
    08-29-2014

View PostJest33, on 29 December 2020 - 06:35 PM, said:

Well, To answer some of the replies, First of, The tank is autoloader(in real life). I don't care if the alpha is lowered as long as it resembles the real life tank. About the mobility, We know the tank is  medium class in real life and in-game it doesn't have the best armor for a T9 heavy besides the frontal turret armor of it. I think WG overthink of building this tank, It could have been similar to T54e1 with a bit higher alpha and better mobility.

 

You basically just described the K-91.



Jest33 #14 Posted 30 December 2020 - 02:16 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 5654 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    10-24-2016

View PostNoob666_, on 30 December 2020 - 02:04 AM, said:


Nobody cared about realism in WoT even before Blitz even got released.

If this is true then let's remove the auto-reloader of the italian tanks and we'll see what you gonna say about it. The fact that we have autoloader mechanics in this game already, Then why deny the fact that kpfpz 70 is an autoloader? I'm not even asking to make the tank OP but stick to what the gun can do instead of making it different, And don't forget that this tank was the replacement of m60 and leopard 1.



_Wikipedia #15 Posted 30 December 2020 - 11:34 PM

    Official advocate for 40%ers

  • Players
  • 12379 battles
  • 724
  • [KR0N0]
  • Member since:
    10-28-2018

View PostJest33, on 30 December 2020 - 08:16 AM, said:

If this is true then let's remove the auto-reloader of the italian tanks and we'll see what you gonna say about it. The fact that we have autoloader mechanics in this game already, Then why deny the fact that kpfpz 70 is an autoloader? I'm not even asking to make the tank OP but stick to what the gun can do instead of making it different, And don't forget that this tank was the replacement of m60 and leopard 1.

The autoloader is more of a nerf if anything. Would you take 3.6 second reload or a 3 second intraclip with a long magazine reload?


The legend himself: https://www.twitch.tv/dsteves

Do not have an average tier of 6-8 if you want to cry.


Jest33 #16 Posted 31 December 2020 - 01:33 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 5654 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    10-24-2016

View PostNoob666_, on 30 December 2020 - 11:34 PM, said:

The autoloader is more of a nerf if anything. Would you take 3.6 second reload or a 3 second intraclip with a long magazine reload?

I'm looking to get it more in line with the actual tank. The actual tank was a medium tank with high speeds and an autoloader. I think the in-game tank could easily reflect this with a few changes. Any actual numbers on reload times would need to be tested by wargaming.


Edited by Jest33, 31 December 2020 - 01:34 AM.


CommanderSean_2014 #17 Posted 03 January 2021 - 03:45 PM

    Yukari Ma Best Waifu

  • Players
  • 19245 battles
  • 742
  • [COD]
  • Member since:
    12-15-2014

tell us where do you think it needed a buff 

then maybe WG would take into consideration


Edited by CommanderSean_2014, 03 January 2021 - 03:46 PM.

  A   Proud        

  Taiwanese     

1011921428

Wg should Ban the BOTS and AFKERS PERMANTLY

 

 

Jest33 #18 Posted 10 January 2021 - 01:46 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 5654 battles
  • 6
  • Member since:
    10-24-2016

View PostCommanderSean_2014, on 03 January 2021 - 03:45 PM, said:

tell us where do you think it needed a buff 

then maybe WG would take into consideration

As I said before, I would like the in-game stats to reflect the historical tank.  The classification should be changed to medium, either the gun should be changed to or have the option added for an auto-loader, and the gun depression should be expanded to match historical; to name a few.

 



CommanderSean_2014 #19 Posted 12 January 2021 - 06:52 AM

    Yukari Ma Best Waifu

  • Players
  • 19245 battles
  • 742
  • [COD]
  • Member since:
    12-15-2014

View PostJest33, on 10 January 2021 - 09:46 AM, said:

As I said before, I would like the in-game stats to reflect the historical tank.  The classification should be changed to medium, either the gun should be changed to or have the option added for an auto-loader, and the gun depression should be expanded to match historical; to name a few.

 

Sheri should also get atgms

 


  A   Proud        

  Taiwanese     

1011921428

Wg should Ban the BOTS and AFKERS PERMANTLY

 

 

_Crusader6_ #20 Posted 12 January 2021 - 05:53 PM

    There is no Society- go back to sleep.

  • Players
  • 74955 battles
  • 17,090
  • [-EXP-]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

The planned 120mm was going to be an autoloader - the 152mm was a mechanical load assist (rammer), as the 152mm was to fire the Shillelagh ATGM.

 

The Kzp as noted above just got a buff - and is a fantastic tank if you can play to its strengths (not sitting in open).

 


I hate Annihilator spammers...  

 
Tank Hoarder: 437 tanks in Garage:  453/456 Played Tanks Aced
 
I need more tanks...
 
    Wallet Warrior: Loyal Original M60 owner
 

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users