25 replies to this topic

[BARAKKUKIRA]

This is all too common, and makes this game unbearably unfun!!!! I would pay a monthly fee to be on a server that had serious players and were we needed to be vetted every 30 days based on wins, play style etc. to have an equally matched and GREAT game experience. I am by far not the best player, but I you cant win like this, u cant carry like this, I find myself back on my PS5 play 2k and Madden and I used to love this game. SMH

 

Attached Files

•   gameclip30.png   86K

Edited by TripDiesel, 07 April 2021 - 02:23 PM.

[Gojira1150]

A pay to play server full of "serious" players would never work. Simply put, one of the problems in this game are people buying higher tier stuff (like gold to get a Tier 8 premium tank for example) and not having the basics down that would allow them to play at that tier well. There would be players who think that playing on this "elite" server would somehow make them better, and thus they would pay to play in it, and make it probably be just like the normal servers

 

 

Edit: Even if you vetted players, you'd end up with incredibly long queue times

Edited by Gojira1150, 07 April 2021 - 02:17 PM.

[Ronin_23]

TripDiesel, on 07 April 2021 - 09:14 AM, said:

This is all too common, and makes this game unbearably unfun!!!! I would pay a monthly fee to be on a server that had serious players and were we needed to be vetted every 30 days based on wins, play style etc. to have an equally matched and GREAT game experience. I am by far not the best player, but I you cant win like this, u cant carry like this, I find myself back on my PS5 play 2k and Madden and I used to love this game. SMH

 

LOL you'd rather play the EA sports moneysinks? You just have awful taste in video games don't you? Don't talk to me about a great game experience with that trash in your post.

 

By the way you'd have about 300 active players if those were the criteria.

[Mika_The_Vampire]

Ronin_23, on 07 April 2021 - 02:20 PM, said:

 

LOL you'd rather play the EA sports moneysinks? You just have awful taste in video games don't you? Don't talk to me about a great game experience with that trash in your post.

 

By the way you'd have about 300 active players if those were the criteria.

you need to spend $200 in order to upgrade your tank and then another $50 per crew mate

[BARAKKUKIRA]

@Ronin_73 Like I said definitely not the best player, a 55%'er definitely no excuses, but to have 2- 3 players constantly getting no HPts is crazy. And yeah I like to play to have fun and not be overly frustrated. If the players play then it would be okay to lose. But when you have a med sitting by a Grille in a game and an E100 camping at the base behind a house, that's not fun.

 

Edited by TripDiesel, 07 April 2021 - 02:28 PM.

[_Crusader6_]

Carry Harder.

 

 

[Mika_The_Vampire]

btw OP, your LITTERALLY asking for a P2W system. but also, this wouldnt be possible. no matter what, 7 players are going to be pooped on and there is no way to change that unless you want to make this a PvAI game.

[KempBushThe3rd]

Everybody gets bad games, but the difference between a 50%er and a 70%er is that when they get the chance to influence the outcome of a game, they take it. Just accept that these games will happen and there's nothing you can do about it, and instead work on bettering yourself.

[__V_O_P__]

Define a great game experience? Seems to me that for you it’s winning? Ok then carry harder because Red and Green get the same teams. If it’s not winning - and it’s about playing with competent people then play tournaments. I totally get that three zeros is unacceptable but it happens so often now I just accept it as an factor.

[acrisis]

It all evens out over time. You win some. You lose some. You lose a lot. You win a lot. 

 

Oh and you forgot a couple things:

Most people won’t pay extra. MM will be limited and slow.

Only playing against good players is going to make you win less, and everybody will inch towards 50% wr. 

You should try joining a top clan, and on top of getting these flip-flop teams, catch a whole bunch of focus fire ... 

 

[twirlingtowardsfreedom]

Agree that a serious mode or pay for play levels thing really wouldn't work. 

 

But!! I'm all for experimentation. Maybe a weekend event around the game anniversary with some extra filters, whether they be games played or years played or winrate/slash damage. Probably have to have it be skirmish mode or something so queues aren't outrageous. And once everyone complains about how much it sucks, wargaming will have a never-ending trump card to play when people start whining about how they want it later on.

[thenerfdude]

In the past 30, 60, 90 days my winrate is going down, but average damage is going up...

 

 

[wrecker1968]

I'd be happy with a single solo player game of blitz.

[_TheKidd_]

wrecker1968, on 07 April 2021 - 05:10 PM, said:

I'd be happy with a single solo player game of blitz.

Reroll every 5000 games?

[_Crusader6_]

http://forum.wotblitz.com/index.php?/topic/58239-anatomy-of-a-loss/page__hl__anatomy__fromsearch__1

 

use some self introspection 

[acrisis]

wrecker1968, on 07 April 2021 - 12:10 PM, said:

I'd be happy with a single solo player game of blitz.

I have wanted to try that !!! 

Let me do the 1 v x thing against basic AI. 

[Morphman11]

So you want a game that wouldn’t include you?

[ZebraUp]

Make it so Ratings Battles are for only players with a 50% or better winrate.. that would provide both incentive for the 40%'ers (& 30%'ers!) to get better as well as provide a haven for better players to truly see quality competition!

 

Heck,  make it just 1 tier (8/9/10) on a rotating basis maybe?

Edited by ZebraUp, 08 April 2021 - 02:23 AM.

[WipWapJaws]

just a terrible idea.....

[Underdawg67]

It wasn’t three zeros.   How did the Maus get 1 point of damage?