Jump to content


Thoughts on the M-VI-Yoh?

M-VI-Yoh

  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

Vantablack12 #1 Posted 08 April 2021 - 06:11 PM

    Ready, Fire, Aim!

  • Players
  • 18646 battles
  • 2,544
  • [K9]
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

Of course I know its a test tank, but I want to hear your guy's opinions, expectations, and concerns about it anyway.

 

Just by looking at it in Armor Inspector, it looks like it has pretty decent frontal armor and gun depression. 

The turrent in some areas, when angled right, reached around 850mm. 

Its upper glacis was 220-300+ when facing it head on on flat ground.

The gun seems alright at first glance, but I didn't spend too much time looking at the stats.

 

 


Edited by Vantablack12, 08 April 2021 - 06:33 PM.

                                                         "Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid" - John Wayne.

 

                                                       

                                                                            Bring back the in-game Forum link!

 


daREAL_trainboi #2 Posted 08 April 2021 - 06:20 PM

    The one (and only) M26 Pershing Fanatic!

  • Players
  • 17046 battles
  • 891
  • [PRD]
  • Member since:
    01-08-2019

You mean the M-VI-Yoh.

 

The gun looks nearly broken with 3k DPM but it doesn't look insanely OP. The armor for a heavy is ok, but not great. It has some really good parts, but very obvious weak spots.

 

It's also funny to note that when using the smaller (105mm) gun, the cupolas become weaker.


 


Vantablack12 #3 Posted 08 April 2021 - 06:34 PM

    Ready, Fire, Aim!

  • Players
  • 18646 battles
  • 2,544
  • [K9]
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

View PostdaREAL_trainboi, on 08 April 2021 - 10:20 AM, said:

You mean the M-VI-Yoh.

 

The gun looks nearly broken with 3k DPM but it doesn't look insanely OP. The armor for a heavy is ok, but not great. It has some really good parts, but very obvious weak spots.

 

It's also funny to note that when using the smaller (105mm) gun, the cupolas become weaker.

Fixed it.

Interesting. I didn't notice that about the cupolas.

 


                                                         "Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid" - John Wayne.

 

                                                       

                                                                            Bring back the in-game Forum link!

 


KempBushThe3rd #4 Posted 08 April 2021 - 06:49 PM

    my words sometimes mean things

  • Players
  • 23663 battles
  • 3,559
  • [MAPLE]
  • Member since:
    08-29-2014

The tank has two guns. The top gun is an inferior T57 Heavy gun but with shorter magazine reload, while the stock gun is... 900 damage in 1.4 seconds.

 

There's literally no excuse for how broken overpowered the tank is. There was a time when the SP I C was my favorite tank in the game (and it proudly remains my tank with the highest winrate on Blitzstars) because it pumped out 440 damage in 2 seconds, and WG thought the tank was overperforming and nerfed the intraclip to 3.5 seconds. So why did they think it would be a good idea to give a heavy tank more alpha than the Jageroo, spread out over only 1.4 seconds, and have a reload shorter than the E 100?


 


Vantablack12 #5 Posted 08 April 2021 - 06:59 PM

    Ready, Fire, Aim!

  • Players
  • 18646 battles
  • 2,544
  • [K9]
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

View PostKempBushThe3rd, on 08 April 2021 - 10:49 AM, said:

The tank has two guns. The top gun is an inferior T57 Heavy gun but with shorter magazine reload, while the stock gun is... 900 damage in 1.4 seconds.

 

There's literally no excuse for how broken overpowered the tank is. There was a time when the SP I C was my favorite tank in the game (and it proudly remains my tank with the highest winrate on Blitzstars) because it pumped out 440 damage in 2 seconds, and WG thought the tank was overperforming and nerfed the intraclip to 3.5 seconds. So why did they think it would be a good idea to give a heavy tank more alpha than the Jageroo, spread out over only 1.4 seconds, and have a reload shorter than the E 100?

You make a fair point.


                                                         "Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid" - John Wayne.

 

                                                       

                                                                            Bring back the in-game Forum link!

 


Zuke76 #6 Posted 08 April 2021 - 07:35 PM

    Get zuked

  • Players
  • 19660 battles
  • 2,806
  • [FL-TH]
  • Member since:
    06-25-2017
I hope they adda legendary camo to it called "Mama"

7ero #7 Posted 08 April 2021 - 09:21 PM

    That fine line between constructive criticism and a forum strike

  • Players
  • 51176 battles
  • 2,007
  • [SRT]
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016
Don’t spend too much time thinking about it right now.   All you can do is let the testers pad their stats until it gets nerfed before it’s available in the tech tree. 


 

“ Mm sucks just like u r face. Now Go cry on tissue not here.” ~ raj

 

 

 


7ero #8 Posted 08 April 2021 - 09:26 PM

    That fine line between constructive criticism and a forum strike

  • Players
  • 51176 battles
  • 2,007
  • [SRT]
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016

View PostKempBushThe3rd, on 08 April 2021 - 12:49 PM, said:

 why did they think it would be a good idea to give a heavy tank more alpha than the Jageroo, spread out over only 1.4 seconds, and have a reload shorter than the E 100?


Because it’s the same development team that brought you the annihilator.  2/2
 



 

“ Mm sucks just like u r face. Now Go cry on tissue not here.” ~ raj

 

 

 


Rev_ianc_bell #9 Posted 09 April 2021 - 02:14 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 35934 battles
  • 3,757
  • [PRD]
  • Member since:
    12-05-2014
interesting to see a blitz-exclusive line.

Commandant of Predator Corps [PRD] (formerly  [PDR-R])

Check out my youtube channel

My profile at wotbstars, wblitz.net  and blitzstars

PRD/PDR-R Website: http://www.predatorswotbclan.org or visit our recruitment thread or our discussion thread RED IN TOOTH AND CLAW 


Player_0000000007 #10 Posted 09 April 2021 - 04:07 AM

    Theorist of Dubiously Coincidental Events

  • Players
  • 35670 battles
  • 9,638
  • [DEF_6]
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014

View Post7ero, on 08 April 2021 - 03:21 PM, said:

All you can do is let the testers pad their stats until it gets nerfed before it’s available in the tech tree.


crates


Anni is more overpowered than missiles were...will it get removed, too?

Just another demo account, nothing to see here

"Say what you like, but stop pissing on my back and telling me it's raining." Blartch


rosgrim #11 Posted 09 April 2021 - 05:17 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 121640 battles
  • 811
  • [COD]
  • Member since:
    04-23-2016
This is another kind of tread that should be deleted automatically: speculate about tank in test that will be largely modified before the release.

7ero #12 Posted 09 April 2021 - 01:48 PM

    That fine line between constructive criticism and a forum strike

  • Players
  • 51176 battles
  • 2,007
  • [SRT]
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016

View PostPlayer_5773117413, on 08 April 2021 - 10:07 PM, said:


crates


Nope.  It’s gonna be in the Tech Tree



 

“ Mm sucks just like u r face. Now Go cry on tissue not here.” ~ raj

 

 

 


KempBushThe3rd #13 Posted 09 April 2021 - 03:27 PM

    my words sometimes mean things

  • Players
  • 23663 battles
  • 3,559
  • [MAPLE]
  • Member since:
    08-29-2014

View Post7ero, on 08 April 2021 - 04:26 PM, said:

Because it’s the same development team that brought you the annihilator.  2/2

 

It actually resembles the Annihilator quite a bit IMO. They both look ugly and weird, both have stupidly troll armor, and both do ridiculous damage.


 


thenerfdude #14 Posted 14 April 2021 - 09:30 AM

    Ramming Speed!

  • Players
  • 42685 battles
  • 628
  • [_AUS_]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014
I am going to snipe those cupolas harder than I snipe the chieftains cupolas :justwait:

I want to bring my pet teir 2 to teir 10 one more time - Visit my website!


_EmPulse #15 Posted 08 June 2021 - 09:25 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 6181 battles
  • 9
  • [-FNF-]
  • Member since:
    05-04-2020

Well now, the Yoh's are out. The M-VI-Yoh imo is basically a buffed T57 with a 2-shell reload (1.7sec interload) of 14sec, or 3-shell of around 19.

There are the two massive cupolas on either side of its ugly mosquito face which can easily be penned. Same with the hull which is a weaker. But, the best thing about it is, obviously, the tracks. When your tracks are destroyed, you can move backwards at a pace of -5kph for a few seconds as your main tracks are being repaired. This pisses people off lol.

Also, the 3-shell stock gun is the better of the two, you can get in 900ish if you high roll. (But this is all my opinion)


Edited by _EmPulse, 08 June 2021 - 09:26 PM.

Partial Wallet Warrior

[4NRKY], [KMS], [FSX], [FSL1], [-SNT-], [VGN]  [WDBD]

60 / 51 WR


Padre_ShadowRider #16 Posted 05 July 2021 - 03:44 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 55375 battles
  • 613
  • [GETIT]
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

Well, is the tier X much better or about the same as the IX for its class?  I remember the test tank was creating imbalances like crazy for the team that had one. I lost every match.  Seems  they reduced the tank from 4 shells to 3.    Now I can upgrade to it, or AMX 50 B, Kranvagn, Or Vickers Light      I find the slow reloads put me at a real disadvantage unless I'm support  in most of these magazine tanks.  The Yoh has the best win rate of the lot by a smidgen. But may be as frustrating as the IX.  

Thoughts? 







Also tagged with M-VI-Yoh

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users