Jump to content


Update 1.7.0 Feedback

1.7.0 update 1.7 patch 1.7 US tank destroyers

  • Please log in to reply
62 replies to this topic

thumb_warrior #61 Posted 15 April 2015 - 07:11 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 30410 battles
  • 25
  • [SRT]
  • Member since:
    12-29-2014

View PostCptCheez, on 27 February 2015 - 07:08 AM, said:

 

Having worked in the world of software development and gaming, yes, I do make that assumption.  What do you think actually happens?  They're just all sitting around a table drinking vodka and suddenly go, "Hey guys, you know what?  In the next patch, let's change this variable from 0.34 to 0.29.  Why? WHY NOT, Comrade? HAHAHAHA"

 

C'mon.  That's not how this works.

 

Actually, that exactly the way I envision the developers behave because so very little of what they do makes any sense whatsoever.

Proaaron27 #62 Posted 21 April 2015 - 12:20 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 1443 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    12-15-2014
Hello, and welcome to WoTB, where we like to think that 2tier spreads on 7v7 is a genius idea and that mm is something that should be kept as is. You know, for extra $$$ when they buy premium tanks with 1 tier spread.

Please donate all your $$$ to us for a game that isn't worth it. Thanks

-WG

this is what I'm getting after playing this game

Praeceladon #63 Posted 22 April 2015 - 01:49 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19234 battles
  • 1,641
  • Member since:
    01-25-2015

T44, t54, and t62a are still massively op and need to have one of their stats massively nerfed.

 

 

 

If they're going to be fast and heavily armed they need to have no armor, if they're gonna have a strong gun and good armor, they need to be slow, if they're gonna have good armor and speed they need weaker guns. 

 

no medium should have higher damage and armor than an equivalent tier heavy of any race and the fact they're so fast just makes them even more op than they are already. 

 

 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users