Jump to content


Clans to Watch out For?


  • Please log in to reply
120 replies to this topic

Poll: Clans to Watch out For? (176 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 5 battles in order to participate this poll.

These clans stronk?

  1. DD (73 votes [16.44%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.44%

  2. MOM (MOM2) (20 votes [4.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.50%

  3. (BLSE) (9 votes [2.03%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.03%

  4. MNLX (6 votes [1.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.35%

  5. SPARTA (61 votes [13.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.74%

  6. GRIM (83 votes [18.69%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.69%

  7. COMPANY (35 votes [7.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.88%

  8. KORPS (5 votes [1.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.13%

  9. TITAN (50 votes [11.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.26%

  10. AZUL (38 votes [8.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.56%

  11. BALA (5 votes [1.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.13%

  12. DEFIANT (59 votes [13.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.29%

Vote Hide poll

pasfire101 #41 Posted 24 September 2015 - 07:15 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 17657 battles
  • 2
  • Member since:
    12-28-2012

all the clans that represent a nation are really op be scared

 


ily

tankboss41 #42 Posted 24 September 2015 - 07:32 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24307 battles
  • 1,508
  • [MFW]
  • Member since:
    11-29-2014

View Postpasfire101, on 24 September 2015 - 02:15 AM, said:

all the clans that represent a nation are really op be scared

 

 

pffffffffttt i aint scared of no clan!

 

                                    Si vis pacem para bellum

 

 

 


PRIMO412 #43 Posted 24 September 2015 - 08:12 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27055 battles
  • 298
  • [-DD-]
  • Member since:
    03-11-2015
Atlas/Azul/TITAN are One group. So when you see a player with an Atlas or Azul tag on your screen, know that you were destroyed by a TITAN. 

Edited by DeadNinjaStorage, 24 September 2015 - 08:28 AM.


mike82198 #44 Posted 24 September 2015 - 10:02 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 39113 battles
  • 1,995
  • [CRATE]
  • Member since:
    11-04-2014

View PostSilevern, on 23 September 2015 - 07:04 PM, said:

This thread will quickly turn first into a giant list of clans, followed by an argument over which clans really deserve to be considered the "most dangerous" and then the forum will become malice-edited and locked.

 

Nope, most of the animus and inferiority feelings seem to have been channeled into hilarious poll results via the ability to anonymously vote for one's own clan.

SPARTA: 0 votes.
RAIDER: 2 votes. 
Nothing fishy going on at all. Carry on. :trollface:
 

To the OP,

http://wotbstars.com...?lng=eng&geo=NA

One or two good clans are absent, but the best are present. Who should you watch out for depends on how good you are in relation to what you see there. 

Edited by mike82198, 24 September 2015 - 10:03 AM.


hatedfate #45 Posted 24 September 2015 - 02:15 PM

    Reality continues to ruin my life.

  • Players
  • 26772 battles
  • 1,384
  • [RGN]
  • Member since:
    10-17-2011
yay! obvious on BIAS here :P 

HereFishyFishy #46 Posted 24 September 2015 - 03:36 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11517 battles
  • 2,365
  • [BRSKT]
  • Member since:
    06-30-2014

I fear TOG.  

 

Every clan will just vote for themselves, boring.  And some of the top clans are missing.



Excel_Spreadsheet #47 Posted 24 September 2015 - 05:04 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19009 battles
  • 1,042
  • Member since:
    07-27-2014
I'll respect anyone wearing a clan tag I recognize from the forums, but the only tags that really scare me are GRIM, KRIEG, and certain members of RGE / SRT. 

_VEDDER_ #48 Posted 24 September 2015 - 05:34 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 36744 battles
  • 673
  • [501DV]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014

View Postmike82198, on 24 September 2015 - 02:02 AM, said:

 

http://wotbstars.com...?lng=eng&geo=NA

One or two good clans are absent, but the best are present. Who should you watch out for depends on how good you are in relation to what you see there. 

 

Can someone explain to me how the Clan list Star1 is calculated? It shows AZUL, 501 & Storm all below average which makes no sense. When you look at the clan rosters for those clans as an example not a single player in those clans has a below average Star1. It's no big deal, just curious

The Tanker formerly known as RorakSZ13

Tier X: IS-4, IS-7, Obj 268, E 100, M48A1. T110E5, Obj. 140, FV215b, Leo 1. STB-1, Obj. 263, Grille, M60, T57, AMX 50B

Premium$: Ke-Ni Otsu, Shinobi, T-35-85-Victory, SU-100Y, Tankenstein,SU-122-44, T34 Indy, IS-6, Type 62 Dragon, IS-3D, Löwe, Rudy, Nomad, Dracula, Hel$ing, Glacial, T54 Mod

"I gather speed, from you f*ckin' with me"


ahredstealth #49 Posted 24 September 2015 - 05:38 PM

    King Tater

  • Players
  • 19022 battles
  • 8,705
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    01-25-2015

View PostRorakSZ13, on 24 September 2015 - 11:34 AM, said:

 

Can someone explain to me how the Clan list Star1 is calculated? It shows AZUL, 501 & Storm all below average which makes no sense. When you look at the clan rosters for those clans as an example not a single player in those clans has a below average Star1. It's no big deal, just curious

 

Could be a case of enough members not having over 100 battles in tier 10.

Today I went to the bathroom and forgot my phone.

 

There are 256 tiles in the bathroom...


_clyde #50 Posted 24 September 2015 - 08:27 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31579 battles
  • 1,763
  • [SRT-]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

View PostRorakSZ13, on 24 September 2015 - 09:34 AM, said:

 

Can someone explain to me how the Clan list Star1 is calculated? It shows AZUL, 501 & Storm all below average which makes no sense. When you look at the clan rosters for those clans as an example not a single player in those clans has a below average Star1. It's no big deal, just curious

 

I would imagine it is due to the fact that if you do not have a tier X above 50% and 100 games you do not get a star rating.  So those players get a star rating of 0 and drag the average down.  

BR1XT0N #51 Posted 24 September 2015 - 10:05 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11164 battles
  • 492
  • [CMPNY]
  • Member since:
    11-07-2014
Typically, I worry about clans in the top ten on red. Then, I worry about clans in the bottom 9000 or so on green.

"Come and take your medicine."

 Recruiting: HERE Stats: BR1XT0N Tank Videos: HERE

Proud Member of the

//©// COMPANY \\©\\


anonym_wLQzfg2hCW8K #52 Posted 25 September 2015 - 03:03 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    10-07-2018

View PostScumbagJuJu, on 24 September 2015 - 12:03 AM, said:

Hmm..... Sparta, Grim, Company

 

Juju is currently on heavy drugs do to his in game stress induced histaria. CMPNY is certainly one to look out for though....

 



Sethroskull #53 Posted 25 September 2015 - 10:57 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 36768 battles
  • 491
  • [GLDG]
  • Member since:
    01-19-2015
Hey hey, we got some good players in Blouses (BLSE).  Don't sleep on us.

 

Tier 10 - E-100, IS-4, IS-7, Obj. 268

Tier 9 - E-75, IS-8, M103, ST-I, Obj. 704, T-54

Full Stats -  http://www.blitzstar...com/sethroskull


Junk_Fuel #54 Posted 25 September 2015 - 11:34 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11544 battles
  • 915
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    12-21-2014
Ha good to see that you know [SPUD] is a gentle bunch of good sports. No one needs to watch us. ;)
But you forgot to add [BDSM] never let thoes guys out of my sight. As its not the shells i fear lol!

Edited by Dead_Fr0g, 25 September 2015 - 11:35 AM.

New Sig ^^ Stats

 


__Serial_Killer__ #55 Posted 25 September 2015 - 02:18 PM

    Wallet Warrior

  • Players
  • 14804 battles
  • 596
  • [_PREM]
  • Member since:
    08-20-2014

Defiant is defenetely a good clan ... Mine is not the best (focussed on premiums tanks):(

 World Of Tanks Premium [-W0T-]

 



mike82198 #56 Posted 25 September 2015 - 02:29 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 39113 battles
  • 1,995
  • [CRATE]
  • Member since:
    11-04-2014

View PostClydeman72, on 24 September 2015 - 03:27 PM, said:

 

I would imagine it is due to the fact that if you do not have a tier X above 50% and 100 games you do not get a star rating.  So those players get a star rating of 0 and drag the average down.  

 

It's exactly this. If members of the clan have a STAR1 rating that doesn't qualify for top 100 (no T10 with 100 battles/avg tier below 6), then for the purposes of clan average their rating is 0. 

HereFishyFishy #57 Posted 25 September 2015 - 04:58 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11517 battles
  • 2,365
  • [BRSKT]
  • Member since:
    06-30-2014

View Postmike82198, on 25 September 2015 - 08:29 AM, said:

 

It's exactly this. If members of the clan have a STAR1 rating that doesn't qualify for top 100 (no T10 with 100 battles/avg tier below 6), then for the purposes of clan average their rating is 0. 

 

IMO the 0 rating should be omitted on the calculation of a full clan rating.

 

Big surprise this has turned into a pissing contest.



_clyde #58 Posted 25 September 2015 - 06:13 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31579 battles
  • 1,763
  • [SRT-]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

View PostOnemeaus, on 25 September 2015 - 08:58 AM, said:

 

IMO the 0 rating should be omitted on the calculation of a full clan rating.

 

Big surprise this has turned into a pissing contest.

 

Is it really a pissing contest?  Many simply posted the link to the list of the top clans.  The numbers speak for themselves.



HereFishyFishy #59 Posted 25 September 2015 - 07:07 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11517 battles
  • 2,365
  • [BRSKT]
  • Member since:
    06-30-2014

View PostClydeman72, on 25 September 2015 - 12:13 PM, said:

 

Is it really a pissing contest?  Many simply posted the link to the list of the top clans.  The numbers speak for themselves.

 

It is, because every clan is just going to vote for themselves.  

cashcashme #60 Posted 26 September 2015 - 12:12 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 6602 battles
  • 708
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2015

View PostLibereco, on 23 September 2015 - 06:12 PM, said:

 And some SPUD folks gave me a bad time when playing against them.

Sorry.


Ahredstealth, on 01 July 2016 said:

I love the new economy.  It's stupid.

 

 "If you can't take the pain, then don't play the game"

   #YOLOboy                                                                                                                                                                   Worst timing of anyone in [SPUD(X)]





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users