Jump to content


Umm this is still here? Why?

2.6 feedback

  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

boomtankrival #1 Posted 14 February 2016 - 03:23 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13433 battles
  • 141
  • [CYCLN]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2014

Okay now I'm annoyed with this one map and I have already seen it a lot in high tiers when I shouldn't be. Could anyone guess what it is? Yeahhh I'm talking about Copperfield. The one map I cannot stand at high tiers. Although it is indeed fun to run around it in my Leopard (the tier 5 one) I'm sick of it at high tiers. Too one sided and I have won on it before but by bum rushing one side full on all 7. Yet I seemed to be on the recieving of that a lot and in higher tiers. 

http://imgur.com/e5KTyJn
http://imgur.com/vPELE4o

I am going to call out Wargaming and I have all respect for them don't get me wrong and yes I am irritated by this but I'm going to respectably call them out and say 'Hey, back in 2.5 update notes (http://imgur.com/YD0YBZE) it says that Copperfield was restricted to tier 2 to 5 and I still am getting this map at tier 10. I don't recall getting it in 2.5 which strikes me as confused as the update seemed to reverse it?' 

Thank you and happy tanking 07 

 


 

 

'And on this day..... Shots were fired' 

Professional popcorn maker for sitting back and watching flame wars 


tedg5 #2 Posted 14 February 2016 - 04:00 PM

    Tater salad

  • Players
  • 46928 battles
  • 4,677
  • [AGOGO]
  • Member since:
    07-04-2014
It never left us, guess they just forgot to restrict it.

slayer_____ #3 Posted 14 February 2016 - 04:02 PM

    Spray and Pray

  • Players
  • 39421 battles
  • 3,036
  • [ATA2D]
  • Member since:
    07-10-2014
So, let's get this straight. You put up 348 in a tier X tank and you are blaming WG and Copperfield still being a viable map to play on? What am I missing here?

Edited by slayer2261, 14 February 2016 - 10:20 PM.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users