Jump to content


Lopsided tier match making still issue.


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

_Weeping_Angel_ #1 Posted 09 April 2016 - 04:38 PM

    Don’t Blink

  • Players
  • 59481 battles
  • 1,736
  • [501DV]
  • Member since:
    02-09-2015
Sorry but a bunch of defenders with weak penetration doesn't make up for 3 T54s. How hard is it to put two vs two tier 9s?  I have reported it before and worse I am always on the crappy side of these match ups. It is getting old. 

DysfunctionalDiversion #2 Posted 09 April 2016 - 04:41 PM

    I throw games so you don't have to carry.

  • Players
  • 14787 battles
  • 2,281
  • [MAHOU]
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

Sorry to 1 up you, but...


"I try too hard... to not try at all."

PURPL + Weeb


Chavalitos_De_Guerra #3 Posted 09 April 2016 - 04:52 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Banned
  • 11542 battles
  • 1,254
  • [NCPD]
  • Member since:
    08-06-2015

View Post_Weeping_Angel_, on 09 April 2016 - 11:38 AM, said:

Sorry but a bunch of defenders with weak penetration doesn't make up for 3 T54s. How hard is it to put two vs two tier 9s?  I have reported it before and worse I am always on the crappy side of these match ups. It is getting old. 

But look at their lower tiers, they don't even have a tier 8. So I think it's pretty even. And IS-3D is actually not that bad


My YouTube Channel

Favorite Tanks: Obj.140Kenny Otsu - IS-6

Most Hated Tanks: Doom Turtle - Death Star - Type 59

 


RussianBear62 #4 Posted 09 April 2016 - 04:53 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 8033 battles
  • 56
  • Member since:
    12-05-2015
Affirmative - the last half hour MM has been quite temperamental. Getting tired of having my Tiger get shot up by T-54s and the likes. Time for a break.

EastTexasVet #5 Posted 09 April 2016 - 05:08 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 14747 battles
  • 24
  • [WHAWG]
  • Member since:
    01-05-2016
The +2/-2 battles are unfair to the lower tier tanks regardless of level.  So far the higher level tanks have used the -2 as fodder and then scored points only to lose the game.  This is frustrating and becoming boring.  I don't care if it is III vs V or any combination above.  This is, at least, my current experience.

LHibbitts #6 Posted 09 April 2016 - 05:50 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 19726 battles
  • 2
  • [MARIN]
  • Member since:
    07-17-2014
Agree with comments above.  For those with the lower tier trying to work up to a nicer tank, this just makes the game frustrating and unplayable.  I despise being in a battle with a bunch of tanks I can't even penetrate, with no hope of getting credits..usually it's two shots and I'm done.  Huge step backwards in my opinion.

Edited by LHibbitts, 09 April 2016 - 05:51 PM.


BattChiefJoe241 #7 Posted 11 April 2016 - 02:22 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10644 battles
  • 454
  • [MCFD]
  • Member since:
    12-02-2015

View Post_Weeping_Angel_, on 09 April 2016 - 11:38 AM, said:

Sorry but a bunch of defenders with weak penetration doesn't make up for 3 T54s. How hard is it to put two vs two tier 9s?  I have reported it before and worse I am always on the crappy side of these match ups. It is getting old. 

 

I am with you not only are the matches one sided but it appears that teams are also. I can't believe how many battles are over in under two minutes with the reds loosing zero or one tank. Also my ping is all over the place. I had a nice 20-30 ping range, since the updates it goes over 200.

1017288795.png

derK1nderPanzer #8 Posted 11 April 2016 - 03:30 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 17431 battles
  • 73
  • [SEAL]
  • Member since:
    03-23-2015

MM totally NOT what it should be.

 

No accounting for players ability.....? 

 

Or their ability in that particular tank?

 

Or the ability of the vehicle they are driving?

 

+2/-2 is the playground of tier ten drivers. Who doesn't want a bush of tanks two tiers below them in every match? I luv it when I get that and rave about the great MMing. But let me face a bunch of tanks two tiers above and I cry like a baby. +1/-1 was soooo much better. 


T-62A, E-100, IS-7, T110E4

WareJC #9 Posted 11 April 2016 - 05:18 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13522 battles
  • 1,371
  • Member since:
    06-08-2015
Maybe I am thinking of this wrong but what I have been doing is trying to have three styles of play for my tanks.one for each mm level.. Top teir, mid-tier and bottom-tier makes me feel a little schizophrenic or that might just be the new economy in the game.
"Your lack of effort or your death is not my concern. However lack of effort will lead to your death by their hand or mine."

BattChiefJoe241 #10 Posted 12 April 2016 - 09:01 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10644 battles
  • 454
  • [MCFD]
  • Member since:
    12-02-2015
I just finished a battle where our highest tier tank was VIII but red team had two T 54 tier ix tanks. Can you guess which two tanks survived. I've been playing 15 minutes and I'm done already. The match making looks like a mob controlled boxing match. Joe

1017288795.png

BattChiefJoe241 #11 Posted 12 April 2016 - 09:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10644 battles
  • 454
  • [MCFD]
  • Member since:
    12-02-2015

View Post_Weeping_Angel_, on 09 April 2016 - 11:38 AM, said:

Sorry but a bunch of defenders with weak penetration doesn't make up for 3 T54s. How hard is it to put two vs two tier 9s?  I have reported it before and worse I am always on the crappy side of these match ups. It is getting old. 

 

View PostBattChiefJoe241, on 10 April 2016 - 09:22 PM, said:

 

I am with you not only are the matches one sided but it appears that teams are also. I can't believe how many battles are over in under two minutes with the reds loosing zero or one tank. Also my ping is all over the place. I had a nice 20-30 ping range, since the updates it goes over 200.

 

I just finished another battle exactly like this' what is going on the products we purchased are not worth what we paid for. You can shoot 20 gold shells at a tier IX from a tier VII and it makes no difference.

1017288795.png

Pasta_e_Patate #12 Posted 16 April 2016 - 08:44 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 18703 battles
  • 52
  • Member since:
    09-10-2015

Please go back to +\-1.

The new MM is too lopsided for Tiers 8 and below, as there is no way that you can contribute, make any credits and XP or improve your stats.

The game is becoming quite frustrating to play most of the time... and as a regular Tier 8 player, I feel that I am just there as cannon-fodder for the higher tiers.



BattChiefJoe241 #13 Posted 19 April 2016 - 04:31 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10644 battles
  • 454
  • [MCFD]
  • Member since:
    12-02-2015

View PostPasta_e_Patate, on 16 April 2016 - 03:44 PM, said:

Please go back to +\-1.

The new MM is too lopsided for Tiers 8 and below, as there is no way that you can contribute, make any credits and XP or improve your stats.

The game is becoming quite frustrating to play most of the time... and as a regular Tier 8 player, I feel that I am just there as cannon-fodder for the higher tiers.

 

I rarely battle tier VIII anymore for the same reason, I was told by wargamming it helps you to learn how to defeat tier X tanks. I have a bridge in Brooklyn too sell

1017288795.png

conrad07277 #14 Posted 19 April 2016 - 05:03 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 1533 battles
  • 858
  • [KI_NG]
  • Member since:
    03-10-2016
I'm a noob tier1-3 lost 10 in a row.. Carried 7 of them using only my tier 1Japanese tank avg damage 299 - 514.  Kills 2 - 5 I called it a day most games were +1...I called it a night...but man if that's what upper tiers look like...fug... Good night.. I feel for u guys... 

k1m4h #15 Posted 19 April 2016 - 03:03 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 17012 battles
  • 2
  • [C0BR4]
  • Member since:
    10-14-2015
Fail MM

Hello guys, as possible and play with hum starting manufacturer .. please Developers IN SO Pack This is please look Enemy time , it CAN as joke Being with the players , and not First que isto happens . How to play 3 layer X Enemy no time and level 9. No Our time of 1 X 1 and XV and the rest No Comments . 03/19/2016

 


Edited by k1m4h, 19 April 2016 - 03:04 PM.


VikkoTheTusken #16 Posted 19 April 2016 - 04:07 PM

    URoRRuR'R'R

  • Players
  • 19639 battles
  • 3,558
  • [III-H]
  • Member since:
    01-03-2015

This old school MM has its problems but it's not that bad...


Rage Quit? Bad Teams? MM got you down? Click HERE for my Blitz Guide to better tanking

Twitter     Facebook     YouTube

 


conrad07277 #17 Posted 19 April 2016 - 04:59 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 1533 battles
  • 858
  • [KI_NG]
  • Member since:
    03-10-2016
Stupid.. to much jumping around....didn't seem to make your point...to selective..

Edited by conrad07277, 19 April 2016 - 05:01 PM.


Guderian5266 #18 Posted 20 April 2016 - 01:26 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31781 battles
  • 593
  • [III-S]
  • Member since:
    07-07-2014

This one was before 7AM Eastern daylight time, but pretty lopsided.

 


Community Pledge Signer


 


Gambit_o7 #19 Posted 22 April 2016 - 07:00 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 40647 battles
  • 337
  • [NORM]
  • Member since:
    11-30-2015
My new strategy as a -2 tier 8: tier 10's are my meat shield. ' I got yer back!'

Gambit_o7 #20 Posted 22 April 2016 - 07:01 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 40647 battles
  • 337
  • [NORM]
  • Member since:
    11-30-2015
My new strategy as a -2 tier 8: tier 10's are my meat shield. ' I got yer back!' :P




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users