Jump to content


World of Tanks Blitz Chat: Comments, Reviews, and Suggestions


  • Please log in to reply
146 replies to this topic

Nakedsnake14 #21 Posted 22 July 2016 - 05:45 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 4763 battles
  • 74
  • [LOL26]
  • Member since:
    10-13-2014
That's how I feel about THIS stupidity

Thom_Bomb #22 Posted 04 August 2016 - 09:45 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 6122 battles
  • 106
  • [US-2]
  • Member since:
    05-14-2016

My suggestions: Don't let tanks disappear from someone's view when they're shooting. It's super annoying and limits a player's ability to react to a situation eg the enemy moved when they were invisible.

Give players the option of setting up their own battles outside of the training rooms.

More customization on tanks would be great, especially if they can design their own skins and logos..FOR FREE. NO credits. NO gold



Richard_priestley #23 Posted 06 August 2016 - 08:24 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 16980 battles
  • 4
  • Member since:
    12-22-2015
I'd like to suggest that the matchmaking function consider player skill as part of the formula - I've been experiencing matches where the player skill was so lopsided (not the vehicle type) that there was no hope of one side prevailing.  Perhaps "personal rating" and "win rate" could be part of the matchmaking equation.  If they already are considerations; 1) I'd be shocked, and 2) maybe they should carry more weight

gibboinwa #24 Posted 06 August 2016 - 09:57 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 17032 battles
  • 20
  • [TEX]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

Hello team!

 

I would like to suggest a review of the Tortise armor thinkness and possible adjustments to a more historic pereprctive, especially given other tanks are allowed to stick their gun inside of these ares in close combat situations in the game, whereas its hard to program a more realistic and challenging scenario where gun barrels could not traverse in game through solid objects:

 

-Hull Armor for sides in game shows 152mm, Kenneth Estes' Super Heavy Tanks of WWII shows the side armor specification was 176-156mm; please consider increasing?

-Hull armor for rear in game shows 101mm, Kenneth Estes' Super Heavy Tanks of WWII shows the rear armor specification was 120mm; please consider increasing?

 

Thanks for the consideration!

 

 

 



jlovald747 #25 Posted 10 August 2016 - 07:34 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 5189 battles
  • 2
  • [ARLAN]
  • Member since:
    03-30-2015
 

 

I am always put in mathches where people are always doing there own thing and then we get picked off one by one and then we lose because nobody is working together and then it takes forever to gert experience and credits, and sometimes lose credits.



jlovald747 #26 Posted 10 August 2016 - 07:35 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 5189 battles
  • 2
  • [ARLAN]
  • Member since:
    03-30-2015

View PostRichard_priestley, on 06 August 2016 - 08:24 PM, said:

I'd like to suggest that the matchmaking function consider player skill as part of the formula - I've been experiencing matches where the player skill was so lopsided (not the vehicle type) that there was no hope of one side prevailing.  Perhaps "personal rating" and "win rate" could be part of the matchmaking equation.  If they already are considerations; 1) I'd be shocked, and 2) maybe they should carry more weight

 



Woody36327 #27 Posted 10 August 2016 - 12:47 PM

    Thorn in XJS' side since 2016!

  • Players
  • 19437 battles
  • 314
  • [ST2RM]
  • Member since:
    01-02-2016

View PostWoody36327, on 08 July 2016 - 09:31 AM, said:

To reiterate again, CHAT APP, NOT BLITZ THE GAME. Can we keep this on topic for actual improvement please? 

Ehem........... 

 

CHAT APP

CHAT APP

CHAT APP

 

Anyone care to actually read the subject matter before commenting?

 

 

 

@Sly, is the app on backburners now since the whole 'found some error so we need to disable the app for the time being?'


"14? My scotch is older than that............"


Woodman6 #28 Posted 20 August 2016 - 05:41 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 7485 battles
  • 1
  • Member since:
    05-29-2015

The one shot kill is really getting old.  Add to that being killed from a location where there isn't even a tank makes this game, which I once really liked, a waste of time.  You use points to get camouflage and then get shot from a location where there isn't a tank.  This is becoming a real noob game.

 



mikesd1 #29 Posted 23 August 2016 - 11:31 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8332 battles
  • 200
  • [WTFOX]
  • Member since:
    01-04-2015
It is even worse when you are destroyed in a single shot and you NEVER saw where it came from. This just destroyed the game. I can sit still in the brush with a net and they will shoot me to pieces. Why is it I can be destroyed and lose credits from an invisible tank. At the distances you say they are at, one shot should not take you out and allow you to see the shot fired so you can at least tack action to keep from getting blasted. Common guys this is a topic talked about all the time. Do something!!!!

Xerophane #30 Posted 24 August 2016 - 12:46 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 13230 battles
  • 17
  • [CFE-R]
  • Member since:
    03-20-2014
Back in 2014 when I started playing Blitz I had made an account under an email with a typo making me unable to verify it but it was bound to my game center account. When I found out the email was bad I had already played several thousand games in it. I know the problems I could get into if I kept it so I immediately made a new account with a proper email. Afterwards I submitted a ticket asking if I could merge the two accounts into one or at least transfer the tanks. I was told that I was unable to do so. So now I am wondering if there is any work being done to enable account merging or transference of in game items. I am pretty sure there are others who have done something like I did and would like to have the option to recover their progress instead of having it go to waste.

Woody36327 #31 Posted 24 August 2016 - 01:04 AM

    Thorn in XJS' side since 2016!

  • Players
  • 19437 battles
  • 314
  • [ST2RM]
  • Member since:
    01-02-2016

View PostWoody36327, on 10 August 2016 - 06:47 AM, said:

Ehem........... 

 

CHAT APP

CHAT APP

CHAT APP

 

Anyone care to actually read the subject matter before commenting?

 


"14? My scotch is older than that............"


ashsport1984 #32 Posted 24 August 2016 - 01:21 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 8370 battles
  • 52
  • [B-I-T]
  • Member since:
    10-05-2014
Hi im aindrey i was ask about American tank the m24 chaffee if you bring it to the game thats will be cool

Woody36327 #33 Posted 24 August 2016 - 03:45 PM

    Thorn in XJS' side since 2016!

  • Players
  • 19437 battles
  • 314
  • [ST2RM]
  • Member since:
    01-02-2016

View PostWoody36327, on 10 August 2016 - 06:47 AM, said:

Ehem........... 

 

CHAT APP

CHAT APP

CHAT APP

 

Anyone care to actually read the subject matter before commenting?

 


"14? My scotch is older than that............"


Spicy_Mac #34 Posted 31 August 2016 - 09:49 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 5177 battles
  • 2
  • [SSTR]
  • Member since:
    12-13-2014

Deleted cuz I'm stupid.


Edited by Spicy_Mac, 31 August 2016 - 09:50 PM.


PersingGG10 #35 Posted 01 September 2016 - 01:44 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2741 battles
  • 12
  • [PDF]
  • Member since:
    11-10-2015

When will wargaming add American light tanks and spg''s to blitz. There should t49s derping all over

 


Edited by PersingGG10, 01 September 2016 - 01:46 AM.


PersingGG10 #36 Posted 01 September 2016 - 01:49 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2741 battles
  • 12
  • [PDF]
  • Member since:
    11-10-2015

View PostWoodman6, on 20 August 2016 - 05:41 PM, said:

The one shot kill is really getting old.  Add to that being killed from a location where there isn't even a tank makes this game, which I once really liked, a waste of time.  You use points to get camouflage and then get shot from a location where there isn't a tank.  This is becoming a real noob game.

 

You do know other enemys spotted you right



Woody36327 #37 Posted 01 September 2016 - 01:53 AM

    Thorn in XJS' side since 2016!

  • Players
  • 19437 battles
  • 314
  • [ST2RM]
  • Member since:
    01-02-2016

View PostWoody36327, on 10 August 2016 - 06:47 AM, said:

Ehem........... 

 

CHAT APP

CHAT APP

CHAT APP

 

Anyone care to actually read the subject matter before commenting?

 


"14? My scotch is older than that............"


spgilboy #38 Posted 01 September 2016 - 03:49 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14090 battles
  • 151
  • [HOOD]
  • Member since:
    03-01-2016

A way to scale the mini map so you can make it larger if you want.

A reticle  like wot pc version.

A platoon light indicator. Lephturn put me up to it ;)

More gameplay options

Change MM to only allow so many of each type of tank so we stop getting 6 heavies vs 6 tds with a single light or medium.

Post color of player winrate on your team for winrate. so you can support the players that aren't as good. myself included.

 

 



spgilboy #39 Posted 01 September 2016 - 03:50 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14090 battles
  • 151
  • [HOOD]
  • Member since:
    03-01-2016

A way to scale the mini map so you can make it larger if you want.

A reticle  like wot pc version.

A platoon light indicator. Lephturn put me up to it ;)

More gameplay options

Change MM to only allow so many of each type of tank so we stop getting 6 heavies vs 6 tds with a single light or medium.

Post color of player winrate on your team so you can support the players that aren't as good. myself included.

 

 


Edited by spgilboy, 01 September 2016 - 03:51 PM.


willy_pet #40 Posted 15 September 2016 - 03:51 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 11611 battles
  • 10
  • [Z06]
  • Member since:
    05-11-2015

Different reticles to choose from in settings! 

And a damage counter during battle so you can have goals to get to a certain amount of damage each game. Huge motivator.!






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users