Jump to content


The Power Of Maus 8: Your Argument Has NEVER Been So Invaild

PowerofMaus MausOP RNJesussaidyes WheresthatRussianBias 1v5soez

  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

Steeby141 #21 Posted 26 July 2016 - 12:47 AM

    Loyal M60 Owner

  • Players
  • 45368 battles
  • 3,204
  • [STEEB]
  • Member since:
    01-28-2015

The Maus sucks. Plain and simple. And I'm sure most good players would agree.

 

You are free to play 2000 battles in Maus everyday if you love it so much, but don't come on the forum every other day to try and convince us the Maus isn't a big pile of trash just because you had one good game in your last 300 battles.

 

Congrats on your good game and a 7-Kill in Maus, btw.

 

 

 



Praeceladon #22 Posted 26 July 2016 - 12:51 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19234 battles
  • 1,641
  • Member since:
    01-25-2015
Ugly tank. needs to be redsigned to look cool.
E100 needs henschel turret as well

_DragonKRIEG #23 Posted 26 July 2016 - 12:51 AM

    LetsMakeTheForumsBurnSomeMore

  • Players
  • 31453 battles
  • 2,284
  • [RGN]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2015

The gun is the main reason why the Maus is considered bad. Seriously, the gun is absolute trash. I believe even the E 75 has better gun stats than the Maus. (.38 accuracy at same aim time?). The penetration is sub-par for tier 9, and this is a tier 10 machine. In addition the damage per minute is abysmally bad, even a Comet at tier 7 has better damage per minute numbers. The reason why I say the gun is the main reason why Maus is considered bad even though it's slower than a glacier is because the E 100 is pretty slow as well but the gun has a special 640 avg dmg in a tank with good armor and a fully traversable turret.



_DragonKRIEG #24 Posted 26 July 2016 - 12:54 AM

    LetsMakeTheForumsBurnSomeMore

  • Players
  • 31453 battles
  • 2,284
  • [RGN]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2015

View PostPraeceladon, on 25 July 2016 - 07:51 PM, said:

Ugly tank. needs to be redsigned to look cool.
E100 needs henschel turret as well

 

Why the Henschel turret? It just makes it impossible to angle the cheeks which are sloped at pretty much the same angle because now you'' be exposing a shoulder. Krupp is the best of the three turrets

icu8some2 #25 Posted 26 July 2016 - 12:55 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 15828 battles
  • 263
  • Member since:
    12-16-2014
Can we stop trying to prove to each other if the Maus is a "good" or "bad" tank honestly it doesn't matter. What matters is that a tank can only be good depending on the driver. This guy got a crazy good game in the Maus and you should be congratulating him and not trying to bash or prove him wrong.

Spinee #26 Posted 26 July 2016 - 01:08 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 257 battles
  • 1,019
  • Member since:
    05-12-2013

View Posticu8some2, on 26 July 2016 - 01:40 AM, said:

 

Yeah that's because most players that get the Maus either haven't practiced enough with it or even are just horrible drivers and that's alright the Maus takes a lot of skill to drive. Instead of bashing this guy you should be congratulating him for winning an epic game in "the worst tier 10"

 

I replied to his/her quote about trying to justify the Maus being good. That post was meant to justify why the Maus is a bad tank, which it is. I used facts and proved my point, even if it was in a "Bashable" manner.

Edited by Spinee, 26 July 2016 - 01:08 AM.

The EU lurker (I play on EU if that's not any more obvious). Click here to see my stats
Proud British (Excuses for) tanks hater

Waiting to come: AMX 50 100, AMX 50B, WZ-111 1-4, 121

Click here to go to my YouTube channel

Click here to send me a donation via PayPal. All donations are appreciated 

Click here to go to my Twitter page and give me a follow


Praeceladon #27 Posted 26 July 2016 - 01:19 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19234 battles
  • 1,641
  • Member since:
    01-25-2015

View PostTheFluffyPinkDragon, on 26 July 2016 - 12:54 AM, said:

 

Why the Henschel turret? It just makes it impossible to angle the cheeks which are sloped at pretty much the same angle because now you'' be exposing a shoulder. Krupp is the best of the three turrets

 

it looks about 100 times cooler than the the krupp turret and makes the tank look like a proper king tiger/e75 successor.

tmp_3604-wXBWY24386787.jpg

 

 

 



_THECRIMSONCHIN #28 Posted 26 July 2016 - 01:24 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 30283 battles
  • 283
  • [PRAMO]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014
I love playing against a maus. 2500 free damage + free rage after you side hug in a Russian medium and they don't have the gun depression to shoot you. Or I could reverse circle of death to make it a challenge. 

I suck. 

 

 

 


r4zrbl4de #29 Posted 26 July 2016 - 01:26 AM

    Camo Fetish

  • Players
  • 14268 battles
  • 2,632
  • Member since:
    10-05-2014

View PostRH_131, on 25 July 2016 - 06:00 PM, said:

Alright so called Super Unicums...Tell me more about how the Maus is the worst tier X

 

I don't know if it's the worst but it's definitely not the best. I'd feel more comfortable being in a tier 9 than a Maus. It's very, VERY situational. You can't thrive in a hilly area, it's very slow, and you can only bounce shots if you angle your turret, meaning you get fewer opportunities to hit targets. If you're playing peekaboo with, let's say, an IS-4, by the time he shoots at your turret and you point your gun at him, he's already behind the wall. Same issue with any hull-down Russian tanks, or even American tanks. You're in serious trouble if there's an E3 hiding his lower glacis. If you're alone vs. multiple enemies, you're pretty much dead because of how slow the turret turns. People can just keep peeking out in front and behind you to rip you apart. The armor is godly but only in those few battles where you're in the perfect environment and the enemy team isn't very smart. A buff to the rate of fire might make it better, you'd have to expose your turret cheeks more, but at the same time, you'd be dishing out a lot more damage. Most of the time, when I drive a Maus, I'm too busy trying to angle my turret than shoot, so I end up with poor damage and I don't get any compensation for bouncing shots.

 

I'd like to say that the Maus isn't as bad as everyone says, because it's my first tier X and my only tier X, but honestly, the Vk 45.02 B was a lot easier to play, and that was before the buff. The Maus is just too inflexible, and I think that's what makes it less appealing than other tanks. 


Edited by r4zrbl4de, 26 July 2016 - 01:31 AM.

 

 

 


Praeceladon #30 Posted 26 July 2016 - 01:28 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19234 battles
  • 1,641
  • Member since:
    01-25-2015

View PostTheFluffyPinkDragon, on 26 July 2016 - 12:51 AM, said:

The gun is the main reason why the Maus is considered bad. Seriously, the gun is absolute trash. I believe even the E 75 has better gun stats than the Maus. (.38 accuracy at same aim time?). The penetration is sub-par for tier 9, and this is a tier 10 machine. In addition the damage per minute is abysmally bad, even a Comet at tier 7 has better damage per minute numbers. The reason why I say the gun is the main reason why Maus is considered bad even though it's slower than a glacier is because the E 100 is pretty slow as well but the gun has a special 640 avg dmg in a tank with good armor and a fully traversable turret.

 

I think the maus and e100 shpuld have a long 12.8 the russians have all sorts of versions of the 122m, but they basically get the ferd jp2 gun fro, t8. They should have a longer better penning 12.8 if not the long 12.8 that is the top gun on the jagtiger. It doesnt need to have crazy reload or pen like the jagtiger but the 12.8 at maus and e100 arent even a step up really. Make it like a medium 12.8 so the guns can pen since theyre big slow tanks that cant reposition easily or flank.

 

 

 

 



Beander #31 Posted 26 July 2016 - 02:08 AM

    Professional Edgelord

  • Players
  • 28925 battles
  • 236
  • [SCAMO]
  • Member since:
    08-11-2014

View Posticu8some2, on 25 July 2016 - 04:55 PM, said:

Can we stop trying to prove to each other if the Maus is a "good" or "bad" tank honestly it doesn't matter. What matters is that a tank can only be good depending on the driver. This guy got a crazy good game in the Maus and you should be congratulating him and not trying to bash or prove him wrong.

 

If he hadn't tried to undermine the unicum then maybe it wouldn't have been a problem. The game was great I just don't appreciate the fact he's trying to call us all out for no reason

_DragonKRIEG #32 Posted 26 July 2016 - 03:06 AM

    LetsMakeTheForumsBurnSomeMore

  • Players
  • 31453 battles
  • 2,284
  • [RGN]
  • Member since:
    04-26-2015

View PostPraeceladon, on 25 July 2016 - 08:19 PM, said:

 

 

I don't really care how cool the Henschel turret looks but its probably worse in protection, which is the whole point of tanks. If you want a cool motorized machine get a Ferrari or something





Also tagged with PowerofMaus, MausOP, RNJesussaidyes, WheresthatRussianBias, 1v5soez

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users