Jump to content


New Wargaming Rules Violation Policy


  • Please log in to reply
286 replies to this topic

RedBarchetta3 #21 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:09 PM

    Verified √

  • Players
  • 25293 battles
  • 2,057
  • [DFNT_]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014
Bravo! This is good news. 

I strip away the old debris that hides a shining car, a brilliant red barchetta from a better vanished time

My not so helpful WOTB videos are on YouTube

The problem will solve itself with time.

 


CptCheez #22 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:11 PM

    This Space Intentionally Left Blank

  • Players
  • 15037 battles
  • 6,709
  • [III]
  • Member since:
    07-08-2014

View PostAkagiZillo15, on 01 August 2016 - 03:00 PM, said:

As much as i like it. Im afraid it will be abused. Random strikes for something someone didnt do. Report because they dont like a person. I hope it doesnt get abused

 

A report doesn't automatically = a strike.  Reports are reviewed by the forum moderators, who then decide whether to edit the post, issue a strike, etc.

"When the going gets tough and the stomach acids flow, 
The cold wind of conformity is nipping at your nose.
When some trendy new atrocity has brought you to your knees
Come with us we'll sail the Seas of Cheese."


ThemasterTanker1 #23 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:18 PM

    No, this is Patrick

  • Players
  • 18134 battles
  • 4,990
  • Member since:
    01-01-2012

I haven't been yelled at since February and the 11 other times before that. :)

I will always be proud of this, however. The good ol' days of getting a 48 day ban. 3 warning points still haven't been taken off yet either :p


Edited by ThemasterTanker1, 01 August 2016 - 08:20 PM.


Marc13Bautista #24 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:20 PM

    AH NU CHEEKI BREEKI IV DAMKE!!!!!!!

  • Players
  • 10345 battles
  • 993
  • [ANEKI]
  • Member since:
    04-07-2014
Ayo! I now have a clean profile. 

~{"Drinking Vodka a day keeps the radiation away!"}{Signature created by Panbun}~

~{"In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine." -Erwin Rommel}~

~{My Steam and Youtube}{Just your average inconsistent Unicum from MAHOU ANEKI}{Check out Maddox's mods at MadWoTBMods!}~


NikoPower #25 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:22 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 132 battles
  • 456
  • [WGA]
  • Member since:
    06-15-2013

View Post_1204_, on 01 August 2016 - 11:00 AM, said:

Since this wonderful idea has come to us, the forum report system could use some work. People honestly could report for uses of the simple words butt or stupid and get the comment a warning (yes those words are a bit of a lower level, but I dont want it tested on me:D)

 

We will be looking into each one and checking. If something goes too far, we will look into it. Butt wouldn't be a strikable word. :)

 

View PostAkagiZillo15, on 01 August 2016 - 11:00 AM, said:

As much as i like it. Im afraid it will be abused. Random strikes for something someone didnt do. Report because they dont like a person. I hope it doesnt get abused

 

We won't be handing out blind strikes here. We will be looking into reports. There is nothing automated in this process.

 

View PostCptCheez, on 01 August 2016 - 11:11 AM, said:

 

A report doesn't automatically = a strike.  Reports are reviewed by the forum moderators, who then decide whether to edit the post, issue a strike, etc.

 

^This

CustardCreme #26 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:24 PM

    C'est La Vie

  • Players
  • 13549 battles
  • 2,492
  • [ATLS]
  • Member since:
    06-12-2015

View PostNikoPower, on 01 August 2016 - 12:22 PM, said:

 

We will be looking into each one and checking. If something goes too far, we will look into it. Butt wouldn't be a strikable word. :)

 

 

We won't be handing out blind strikes here. We will be looking into reports. There is nothing automated in this process.

 

 

^This

 

NikoPowerful! Please view the message I sent you; I also posted the same question but seems like an Admin deleted it. Thanks.

TZqWCQ9.png

 


Woody36327 #27 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:24 PM

    Thorn in XJS' side since 2016!

  • Players
  • 19438 battles
  • 314
  • [ST2RM]
  • Member since:
    01-02-2016
A sincere thank you to Niko & Rat for this. Thanks and I'm sorry for all the trash in-game I'll be sending your way in tickets (please don't block me hahaha)

"14? My scotch is older than that............"


Gitgudm9 #28 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:26 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7507 battles
  • 2,684
  • [MAHOU]
  • Member since:
    11-03-2015
That'll give trolls a heckin' fun time.

"Anime girls were made to be lewded." - Klaus_Klavier

 


Shockey_ #29 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:29 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 34838 battles
  • 1,165
  • [WDG4F]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

That's pretty good stuff. I'm sure someone will push the limit with 4 strikes in each category. 

 

Now the trolls will have to be creative. 



Loserville27 #30 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:38 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 22281 battles
  • 751
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

View PostAkagiZillo15, on 01 August 2016 - 07:00 PM, said:

As much as i like it. Im afraid it will be abused. Random strikes for something someone didnt do. Report because they dont like a person. I hope it doesnt get abused

We still need to submit a screenshot don't we???  

 



_Tigre #31 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:41 PM

    Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.

  • Players
  • 20466 battles
  • 839
  • [PRAMO]
  • Member since:
    08-14-2014
when wargaming realizes that the player base is so screwed that the only way to fix it is to run pointless contests like these...

 

 

      

           


worldoftanksblitzcanada #32 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:41 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 20693 battles
  • 15
  • [BTANK]
  • Member since:
    01-25-2015
I find the new policy a good one but i hqve a question how do we let WGING know the positive players? Will they record our chat logs? Or do we have to report them with screenshot like we report players, appeal or a ticket? I hope someone can explain. Good Luck in the Battlefield

AkagiTachibana #33 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:49 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16743 battles
  • 1,622
  • [IRH]
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View Postkrownski, on 01 August 2016 - 11:41 AM, said:

when wargaming realizes that the player base is so screwed that the only way to fix it is to run pointless contests like these...

 

the more i read it the more annoyed i get. Really you have to bribe the player base to be good? How childish. Its literally getting a cookie for being a good little boy but instead you may not even get a cookie..... This game is doomed if you have to rely on goodies tocget a. Playerbase to behave.

 

 


Edited by AkagiZillo15, 01 August 2016 - 07:49 PM.

"Strike swift As lightning!"

ScumbagJuJu #34 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:51 PM

    Community Scumbag

  • Players
  • 21453 battles
  • 3,210
  • [DD]
  • Member since:
    07-13-2014
I also think that there should be a reward scale based on skill levels. 55%+ get something, then 60%+, 65%+ and so on. Maybe these 48% derelicts will actually learn to drive their tank facing front!

"I Shoot Gold Rounds To Show My Contempt For The Enemy's Poverty"

Star1- 1.6587(Super Unicum) WN8- 3795(Super Unicum)

65 From The Top

Loyal M60 & IS-6 Fearless Owner


CustardCreme #35 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:52 PM

    C'est La Vie

  • Players
  • 13549 battles
  • 2,492
  • [ATLS]
  • Member since:
    06-12-2015

View PostxJuJu, on 01 August 2016 - 12:51 PM, said:

I also think that there should be a reward scale based on skill levels. 55%+ get something, then 60%+, 65%+ and so on. Maybe these 48% derelicts will actually learn to drive their tank facing front!

 

Pffft. The rear armor is the strongest.

TZqWCQ9.png

 


AkagiTachibana #36 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:57 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16743 battles
  • 1,622
  • [IRH]
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

View PostKairi12, on 01 August 2016 - 11:04 AM, said:

All the little forumers need their safe space

 

i guess animal kingdoms was a precurser. Now i never joined one but still. They kept to the TR yeahcsome rukes were broken BUT so many people complained about it. Safe soace indeed
"Strike swift As lightning!"

crazychimp69 #37 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:58 PM

    Clubs Wargaming

  • Players
  • 23846 battles
  • 7,192
  • [IRD]
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014

View PostxJuJu, on 01 August 2016 - 11:51 AM, said:

I also think that there should be a reward scale based on skill levels. 55%+ get something, then 60%+, 65%+ and so on. Maybe these 48% derelicts will actually learn to drive their tank facing front!

 

what does the forum and in-game rule violation policy have to do with player skill in game...

Wolfpack355

 
 

Vater_Von_Tom #38 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:58 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14593 battles
  • 679
  • [SPUDX]
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016
How are reports made? Do you have to have a screen shot of the offensive comment with the player's name visible, or what?

"The way I understand it, the Russians are sort of a combination of evil and incompetence... sort of like the Post Office with tanks." - Emo Philips


Ookla_the_Mok #39 Posted 01 August 2016 - 08:00 PM

    Team Brisket

  • Players
  • 21735 battles
  • 4,138
  • [BRSKT]
  • Member since:
    07-03-2014

View PostxJuJu, on 01 August 2016 - 01:51 PM, said:

I also think that there should be a reward scale based on skill levels. 55%+ get something, then 60%+, 65%+ and so on. Maybe these 48% derelicts will actually learn to drive their tank facing front!

No, I'd rather not conflate skill with guys that are good members of the community and out there trying to win, without raging, blocking, etc. No need to add rewards based on performance.


 Rather than worry too much about the details of the new policy, I'll just say kudos to WG for implementing a new policy that may actually curb behaviours. The forum and chat stuff bothers me less than the blocking and sabotaging, but the game environment will be improved if all facets are cleaned up.


AkagiTachibana #40 Posted 01 August 2016 - 08:03 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16743 battles
  • 1,622
  • [IRH]
  • Member since:
    03-16-2014

Basically what i think about the good boy cookie reward system.

 

Basically. I say again this game is doomed if they have to bribe players with premium time just to be a good little boy and get a cookie. 90 days wow. 


Edited by AkagiZillo15, 01 August 2016 - 08:05 PM.

"Strike swift As lightning!"




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users