Bravo! This is good news.
6
New Wargaming Rules Violation Policy
Started by SuperNikoPower, Aug 01 2016 06:12 PM
287 replies to this topic
#21 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:09 PM
-
- Players
- 25578 battles
-
2,119
- [DFNT]
-
Member since:
06-28-2014
Verified √
I strip away the old debris that hides a shining car, a brilliant red barchetta from a better vanished time
My not so helpful WOTB videos are on YouTube
The problem will solve itself with time.
#22 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:11 PM
-
- Players
- 15398 battles
-
6,798
-
Member since:
07-08-2014
This Space Intentionally Left Blank
AkagiZillo15, on 01 August 2016 - 03:00 PM, said:
As much as i like it. Im afraid it will be abused. Random strikes for something someone didnt do. Report because they dont like a person. I hope it doesnt get abused
A report doesn't automatically = a strike. Reports are reviewed by the forum moderators, who then decide whether to edit the post, issue a strike, etc.
"When the going gets tough and the stomach acids flow,
The cold wind of conformity is nipping at your nose.
When some trendy new atrocity has brought you to your knees
Come with us we'll sail the Seas of Cheese."
#23 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:18 PM
-
- Players
- 18745 battles
-
5,012
- [CRATE]
-
Member since:
01-01-2012
No, this is Patrick
I haven't been yelled at since February and the 11 other times before that. 
I will always be proud of this, however. The good ol' days of getting a 48 day ban. 3 warning points still haven't been taken off yet either :p
Edited by ThemasterTanker1, 01 August 2016 - 08:20 PM.
Swanky
#24 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:20 PM
-
- Players
- 10382 battles
-
997
- [ANEKI]
-
Member since:
04-07-2014
AH NU CHEEKI BREEKI IV DAMKE!!!!!!!
Ayo! I now have a clean profile.
~{"Drinking Vodka a day keeps the radiation away!"}{Signature created by Panbun}~
~{"In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine." -Erwin Rommel}~
~{My Steam and Youtube}{Just your average inconsistent Unicum from MAHOU ANEKI}{Check out Maddox's mods at MadWoTBMods!}~
#25 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:22 PM
-
- Players
- 132 battles
-
456
-
Member since:
06-15-2013
Sergeant
_1204_, on 01 August 2016 - 11:00 AM, said:
Since this wonderful idea has come to us, the forum report system could use some work. People honestly could report for uses of the simple words butt or stupid and get the comment a warning (yes those words are a bit of a lower level, but I dont want it tested on me
)
)
We will be looking into each one and checking. If something goes too far, we will look into it. Butt wouldn't be a strikable word.
AkagiZillo15, on 01 August 2016 - 11:00 AM, said:
As much as i like it. Im afraid it will be abused. Random strikes for something someone didnt do. Report because they dont like a person. I hope it doesnt get abused
We won't be handing out blind strikes here. We will be looking into reports. There is nothing automated in this process.
CptCheez, on 01 August 2016 - 11:11 AM, said:
A report doesn't automatically = a strike. Reports are reviewed by the forum moderators, who then decide whether to edit the post, issue a strike, etc.
^This
#26 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:24 PM
-
- Players
- 13738 battles
-
2,547
- [ATLS]
-
Member since:
06-12-2015
C'est La Vie
NikoPower, on 01 August 2016 - 12:22 PM, said:
We will be looking into each one and checking. If something goes too far, we will look into it. Butt wouldn't be a strikable word.
We won't be handing out blind strikes here. We will be looking into reports. There is nothing automated in this process.
^This
NikoPowerful! Please view the message I sent you; I also posted the same question but seems like an Admin deleted it. Thanks.
#27 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:24 PM
-
- Players
- 31651 battles
-
317
- [TYPHN]
-
Member since:
01-02-2016
Thorn in XJS' side since 2016!
A sincere thank you to Niko & Rat for this. Thanks and I'm sorry for all the trash in-game I'll be sending your way in tickets (please don't block me hahaha)
"14? My scotch is older than that............"
#28 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:26 PM
-
- Players
- 15286 battles
-
3,133
- [MAHOU]
-
Member since:
11-03-2015
First Sergeant
That'll give trolls a heckin' fun time.
"Anime girls were made to be lewded." - Klaus_Klavier
#29 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:29 PM
-
- Players
- 43258 battles
-
1,165
-
Member since:
06-28-2014
First Sergeant
That's pretty good stuff. I'm sure someone will push the limit with 4 strikes in each category.
Now the trolls will have to be creative.
#30 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:38 PM
-
- Players
- 23457 battles
-
754
-
Member since:
12-27-2014
Senior Sergeant
AkagiZillo15, on 01 August 2016 - 07:00 PM, said:
As much as i like it. Im afraid it will be abused. Random strikes for something someone didnt do. Report because they dont like a person. I hope it doesnt get abused
We still need to submit a screenshot don't we???
#31 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:41 PM
-
- Players
- 22936 battles
-
849
-
Member since:
08-14-2014
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
when wargaming realizes that the player base is so screwed that the only way to fix it is to run pointless contests like these...
#32 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:41 PM
-
- Players
- 41364 battles
-
18
- [-GLXY]
-
Member since:
01-25-2015
Lance-corporal
I find the new policy a good one but i hqve a question how do we let WGING know the positive players? Will they record our chat logs? Or do we have to report them with screenshot like we report players, appeal or a ticket? I hope someone can explain. Good Luck in the Battlefield
#33 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:49 PM
-
- Players
- 18767 battles
-
1,690
- [IRH]
-
Member since:
03-16-2014
First Sergeant
krownski, on 01 August 2016 - 11:41 AM, said:
when wargaming realizes that the player base is so screwed that the only way to fix it is to run pointless contests like these...
the more i read it the more annoyed i get. Really you have to bribe the player base to be good? How childish. Its literally getting a cookie for being a good little boy but instead you may not even get a cookie..... This game is doomed if you have to rely on goodies tocget a. Playerbase to behave.
Edited by AkagiZillo15, 01 August 2016 - 07:49 PM.
"Strike swift As lightning!"
#34 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:51 PM
-
- Players
- 25916 battles
-
3,556
- [BE4ST]
-
Member since:
07-13-2014
Community Scumbag
I also think that there should be a reward scale based on skill levels. 55%+ get something, then 60%+, 65%+ and so on. Maybe these 48% derelicts will actually learn to drive their tank facing front!
2 Time Twister Cup NA Finalist
Las Vegas 17/Seattle 18 Mobile Masters Finalist
Spring Season Professional Champion
Too Many Tourney Championship Rings To Count
#35 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:52 PM
-
- Players
- 13738 battles
-
2,547
- [ATLS]
-
Member since:
06-12-2015
C'est La Vie
xJuJu, on 01 August 2016 - 12:51 PM, said:
I also think that there should be a reward scale based on skill levels. 55%+ get something, then 60%+, 65%+ and so on. Maybe these 48% derelicts will actually learn to drive their tank facing front!
Pffft. The rear armor is the strongest.
#36 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:57 PM
-
- Players
- 18767 battles
-
1,690
- [IRH]
-
Member since:
03-16-2014
First Sergeant
Kairi12, on 01 August 2016 - 11:04 AM, said:
All the little forumers need their safe space
i guess animal kingdoms was a precurser. Now i never joined one but still. They kept to the TR yeahcsome rukes were broken BUT so many people complained about it. Safe soace indeed
"Strike swift As lightning!"
#37 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:58 PM
-
- Players
- 31316 battles
-
7,369
- [_V2_]
-
Member since:
07-24-2014
Clubs Wargaming
xJuJu, on 01 August 2016 - 11:51 AM, said:
I also think that there should be a reward scale based on skill levels. 55%+ get something, then 60%+, 65%+ and so on. Maybe these 48% derelicts will actually learn to drive their tank facing front!
what does the forum and in-game rule violation policy have to do with player skill in game...
#38 Posted 01 August 2016 - 07:58 PM
-
- Players
- 27549 battles
-
902
- [SPUDX]
-
Member since:
03-26-2016
Senior Sergeant
How are reports made? Do you have to have a screen shot of the offensive comment with the player's name visible, or what?
#39 Posted 01 August 2016 - 08:00 PM
-
- Players
- 28767 battles
-
5,639
- [BRSKT]
-
Member since:
07-03-2014
Team Brisket
xJuJu, on 01 August 2016 - 01:51 PM, said:
I also think that there should be a reward scale based on skill levels. 55%+ get something, then 60%+, 65%+ and so on. Maybe these 48% derelicts will actually learn to drive their tank facing front!
No, I'd rather not conflate skill with guys that are good members of the community and out there trying to win, without raging, blocking, etc. No need to add rewards based on performance.
Rather than worry too much about the details of the new policy, I'll just say kudos to WG for implementing a new policy that may actually curb behaviours. The forum and chat stuff bothers me less than the blocking and sabotaging, but the game environment will be improved if all facets are cleaned up.
#40 Posted 01 August 2016 - 08:03 PM
-
- Players
- 18767 battles
-
1,690
- [IRH]
-
Member since:
03-16-2014
First Sergeant
Basically what i think about the good boy cookie reward system.
Basically. I say again this game is doomed if they have to bribe players with premium time just to be a good little boy and get a cookie. 90 days wow.
Edited by AkagiZillo15, 01 August 2016 - 08:05 PM.
"Strike swift As lightning!"
6 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users
