

Why all British heavies suck alot on battlefield except conqueror ?
#41 Posted 30 September 2016 - 01:19 AM
E 50 M: "Gungnir" T-62A: "Charon" Leopard 1: "Tyrfing" Obj. 140: "Deimos" E 100: "Gram" M48 Patton: "Justice" STB-1: "Muramasa" FV4202: "Narsil" FV 215b: "Anduril" Grille 15: "Mystletainn" IS-4: "Scamander" IS-7 "Ionia" T110E5: "Eclipse" Maus: "Tarnhelm" Obj. 263: "Aristeia" AMX 50 B: "Durandel" Foch 155: "Joyeuse" M60: "Traveller"
#42 Posted 06 October 2016 - 09:13 AM
#43 Posted 06 October 2016 - 09:19 AM
#44 Posted 06 October 2016 - 09:54 AM
Block Quote
Why all British heavies suck a lot on the battlefield ?
Because
- people don't know how to drive them. They do more or less ok in Matilda. Suck in Churchill. Suck in the next Churchill. Suck in black Prince. And they think it's the tanks.... Lol...
- Teams ignore slow tanks and YOLO rush towards insta death leaving them alone against four meds or better alone against entire red team. (Depending on which side reds will attack. Oh, I know, it happened to me this morning in my Matilda BP. I spawn hillside. I say all up. Yet six greens go to town. Before I'm halfway. Seven reds jump at me. Game lost from first second)
- all of the aforementioned combined. yeah, that does suck even more.
Seriously.
Other than that, they are borderline OP. Especially Black Prince can survive nearly anything. Including meeting an ISU or 3 meds. That is, if you know how to angle your armor and where to shoot. But if you don't know any of these two points, what game is it you are playing ?
Minitelrose visiting from EU, occasional player/forumer in the NA
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users