Jump to content


Glacial 112 New Moon Tank


  • Please log in to reply
22 replies to this topic

chingadeara #1 Posted 10 February 2017 - 08:53 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 11258 battles
  • 2
  • [BSB]
  • Member since:
    11-15-2016
I'm very Un happy with the 112.....Takes 11- 12 seconds to reload. The side armor gets you killed fast. Only the front and turret are well protected. For a 60% protection rating. It sure acts like a 30%. They need to fix this tank and modify it. DON'T BUY IT!!!! SAVE YOUR MONEY....If you win it mine as well just sell it....GARBAGE TANK. VERY DISAPPOINTED IN THE BUILD OF THIS SO CALLED PREMIUM TANK!!!! My tier IV PZB2 is a better premium tank this this level VIII. Tell me WOT didn't build this 112 like it surely deserves. Only thing cool about the tank is the Camo. They spent more time on the design then the did the tank operations. 12 seconds to reload while your hit 3 times and dead. YOU MESSED UP BIG TIME WOT!!!!!!!!!

sjhbrown09 #2 Posted 10 February 2017 - 09:18 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 12358 battles
  • 92
  • [IRD]
  • Member since:
    07-05-2015
http://wotbstars.com...&geo=NA&lng=eng

War_Vet_1 #3 Posted 10 February 2017 - 09:49 AM

    Major Disaster

  • Players
  • 11592 battles
  • 936
  • [4ROG]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014

View Postsjhbrown09, on 10 February 2017 - 06:18 PM, said:

 

I think this explains it.

Edited by War_Vet_1, 10 February 2017 - 09:59 AM.

Ignoring life 7 minutes at a time!


Dan_Deerso #4 Posted 10 February 2017 - 10:39 AM

    Tankologist

  • Players
  • 13224 battles
  • 628
  • [MOMS]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2013

View Postchingadeara, on 10 February 2017 - 03:53 AM, said:

I'm very Un happy with the 112.....Takes 11- 12 seconds to reload. The side armor gets you killed fast. Only the front and turret are well protected. For a 60% protection rating. It sure acts like a 30%. They need to fix this tank and modify it. DON'T BUY IT!!!! SAVE YOUR MONEY....If you win it mine as well just sell it....GARBAGE TANK. VERY DISAPPOINTED IN THE BUILD OF THIS SO CALLED PREMIUM TANK!!!! My tier IV PZB2 is a better premium tank this this level VIII. Tell me WOT didn't build this 112 like it surely deserves. Only thing cool about the tank is the Camo. They spent more time on the design then the did the tank operations. 12 seconds to reload while your hit 3 times and dead. YOU MESSED UP BIG TIME WOT!!!!!!!!!

 

Seems like you spent more time writing this post than you did learning how to play the tank.

T110E4 (9th), A-20 (9th), Angry Connor (8th), T69 (8th), T-34 (2nd), Type 98 Ke-Ni (3rd), T34 Independance (6th), Ram II (9th), Pz. IV Schmalturm (4th)

Top 100: KV-2, Cruiser Mk. IV, Spähpanzer Ru 251, T-46, Spähpanzer SP I C, M4A2E4 Sherman, Type 5 Chi-Ri, VK 16.02 Leopard, M4A3E2 Sherman Jumbo, T-54 ltwt., Pz.Kpfw. V/IV, Helsing HO, SU-152, SU-100M1, T54E1, Hetzer, T34


oicram1 #5 Posted 10 February 2017 - 11:08 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24049 battles
  • 121
  • [TFL1]
  • Member since:
    11-27-2014
I  like it! 21 battles so far, 66% win rate....sitll has that new tank smell....

Edited by oicram1, 10 February 2017 - 12:01 PM.


_Maho_Nishizumi_212 #6 Posted 10 February 2017 - 11:21 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3959 battles
  • 569
  • [A-R-C]
  • Member since:
    12-25-2014

Get your stats up to the yellow and green. Then post again. U have 9 battles played for crying out loud!:facepalm:)

I don't want to stat shame you, but if you are whining about a tank being bad, look at your win rate first. If it's 45% or lower(probably more like 50% or lower),

consider changing your play style.



epicheeru #7 Posted 10 February 2017 - 11:29 AM

    Meme Lord of the 21st Century

  • Players
  • 13287 battles
  • 1,732
  • [501RV]
  • Member since:
    07-07-2014

View PostDan_Deerso, on 10 February 2017 - 05:39 AM, said:

 

Seems like you spent more time writing this post than you did learning how to play the tank.

 

OP: mad cuz bad


Edited by epicheeru, 10 February 2017 - 11:29 AM.

Garage: E 50 M, Jagdpanzer E 100, Leopard 1, IS-7

Premium: T34 (1776), Panzer IV. Ankō, Kuro Mori Mine, Hetzer Kame SP, T6 DRACULAHelsing, Pz4S, Glacial 112, Type 62 Dragon

AMX M4 45 Damage Record Holder!


LtPork #8 Posted 10 February 2017 - 12:10 PM

    Why can't I shoot green tanks?

  • Players
  • 19813 battles
  • 2,414
  • [DFNT]
  • Member since:
    01-18-2015
It's not the tank, it's the driver. If you're bad (which you obviously are) then any tank you play will be bad. 

YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://www.youtube....6k28UAEZ7UgGIBg

Proud owner of the IS-6 Fearless

 


MayoNasalSpray #9 Posted 10 February 2017 - 12:14 PM

    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Players
  • 22491 battles
  • 3,213
  • [MSELF]
  • Member since:
    01-27-2015
112 is OP, that's like saying KV-2 is terrible and to get rid of it.

_Maho_Nishizumi_212 #10 Posted 10 February 2017 - 12:23 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3959 battles
  • 569
  • [A-R-C]
  • Member since:
    12-25-2014
112 is a support heavy. It's mobile enough to help flank, and the armour is good enough to troll mediums. It plays like an IS08 at t8. Decent armour, but not outstanding, but mobile and quick.

awesomeplayer9690 #11 Posted 10 February 2017 - 01:10 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18949 battles
  • 2,672
  • Member since:
    12-25-2014
Reload is 11seconds? Get a KV-2

 

"The greatest gift is time. Giving time is giving away part of your life that you'll never get back." - Anonymous

 "Can't get ammo-racked if I bring no ammo"

[HOW TO] Stat Signature |


MASTERCHEESECAKE #12 Posted 10 February 2017 - 01:25 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 2460 battles
  • 134
  • [SDACE]
  • Member since:
    09-08-2015

View PostLtPork, on 10 February 2017 - 06:10 AM, said:

It's not the tank, it's the driver. If you're bad (which you obviously are) then any tank you play will be bad. 

 

^^^

Premiums:

Fearless - Tankenstein - Pz. IV Hydro - M4A3E4 - Pz. 38H

Garage:

E50 - T-43 - Cromwell Football - Chi-Nu - MS-1


Alphatriton #13 Posted 10 February 2017 - 01:43 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8180 battles
  • 330
  • [PAN]
  • Member since:
    12-15-2015

View Postchingadeara, on 10 February 2017 - 01:53 AM, said:

Takes 11- 12 seconds to reload.

11-12 seconds of reload time is extremely short compared to some other tanks like the KV-2 or an IS-3 Defenders clip reload



WipWapJaws #14 Posted 10 February 2017 - 02:26 PM

    Clanless Scrub

  • Players
  • 29792 battles
  • 1,922
  • [ZBLUE]
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014

View Postsjhbrown09, on 10 February 2017 - 07:18 PM, said:

 

sounds like user error to me....

Howitzer_155 #15 Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:19 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 41230 battles
  • 2,990
  • [DD]
  • Member since:
    01-11-2015

View Postchingadeara, on 10 February 2017 - 03:53 AM, said:

I'm very Un happy with the 112.....Takes 11- 12 seconds to reload. The side armor gets you killed fast. Only the front and turret are well protected. For a 60% protection rating. It sure acts like a 30%. They need to fix this tank and modify it. DON'T BUY IT!!!! SAVE YOUR MONEY....If you win it mine as well just sell it....GARBAGE TANK. VERY DISAPPOINTED IN THE BUILD OF THIS SO CALLED PREMIUM TANK!!!! My tier IV PZB2 is a better premium tank this this level VIII. Tell me WOT didn't build this 112 like it surely deserves. Only thing cool about the tank is the Camo. They spent more time on the design then the did the tank operations. 12 seconds to reload while your hit 3 times and dead. YOU MESSED UP BIG TIME WOT!!!!!!!!!

 

you literally have no business playing tier 8.....it wouldn't matter if you had the best tier 8 tank in the game, you still wouldn't do well...you have failed at every tier thus far...how is it even possible to play 920 games in the tier5 Leopard and play it at 41%?  The VK Leopard is arguably the best tier5 in the game....my advice to you is to start watching gameplay videos released by good players to help you out........do some research.......your pzb2 stats are god awful as well and it has premium match making and you never see tier5......its definitely not the 112 that's bad, It's you....

_UrgleMcPurfle_ #16 Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:23 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4770 battles
  • 494
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    07-19-2016
GUYS. THIS MAN IS CORRECT. His 41% win rate, 641 WN8, and 371 damage per battle is just absolutely stellar. If even a professional Blitz player like chingadeara can't play this tank, then it is obviously a bad tank. http://www.blitzstar...om/chingadeara 

                                              

Google "succulent chins" and click on the first result past the pictures. I'm legit on Google. This is insane.


Airborne_Jawbreaker #17 Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:34 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 42221 battles
  • 239
  • [____]
  • Member since:
    10-14-2015

View Postchingadeara, on 10 February 2017 - 08:53 AM, said:

I'm very Un happy with the 112.....Takes 11- 12 seconds to reload. The side armor gets you killed fast. Only the front and turret are well protected. For a 60% protection rating. It sure acts like a 30%. They need to fix this tank and modify it. DON'T BUY IT!!!! SAVE YOUR MONEY....If you win it mine as well just sell it....GARBAGE TANK. VERY DISAPPOINTED IN THE BUILD OF THIS SO CALLED PREMIUM TANK!!!! My tier IV PZB2 is a better premium tank this this level VIII. Tell me WOT didn't build this 112 like it surely deserves. Only thing cool about the tank is the Camo. They spent more time on the design then the did the tank operations. 12 seconds to reload while your hit 3 times and dead. YOU MESSED UP BIG TIME WOT!!!!!!!!!

 

Spend more time at lower tiers learning how to play, everyone wants to race to the top only to find they are outclassed.  Not the tanks fault.

slayer_____ #18 Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:48 PM

    Spray and Pray

  • Players
  • 31174 battles
  • 1,747
  • [ATA2D]
  • Member since:
    07-10-2014
He made his first post grand with this one. Way to land on the forums, face first!

_UrgleMcPurfle_ #19 Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4770 battles
  • 494
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    07-19-2016

View Postslayer2261, on 10 February 2017 - 10:48 AM, said:

He made his first post grand with this one. Way to land on the forums, face first!

 

My first post was like this as well XD

                                              

Google "succulent chins" and click on the first result past the pictures. I'm legit on Google. This is insane.


_UrgleMcPurfle_ #20 Posted 10 February 2017 - 04:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4770 battles
  • 494
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    07-19-2016

View Postchingadeara, on 10 February 2017 - 02:53 AM, said:

GARBAGE TANK. VERY DISAPPOINTED IN THE BUILD OF THIS SO CALLED PREMIUM TANK!!!! !!

Premium tanks are supposed to be inferior to regular tanks.


                                              

Google "succulent chins" and click on the first result past the pictures. I'm legit on Google. This is insane.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users