mike82198, on 28 February 2017 - 09:24 PM, said:
I don't wish to disinter the leper corpse here, but the M60 "fiasco" was WG wanting to give a free tier 10 tank to those who have spent a lot of money on this game. There may have been a bug in the code but every person I recognize as a true big spender got one. There's nothing wrong with giving a 40% noob with 800 battles who has bought 30 premium tanks and never grinded past tier 4 a free tier 10 while not giving me one. It's neither game breaking or unfair, and the fact people feel so butthurt and entitled about it is sad. More importantly, precious few outside the 200-300 people on the forums who didn't get one care.
Confirmation bias. Correlation does not mean causation. I know many individuals who have spent far more than I have who didn't receive an M60 (I didn't receive one either). And there are tons and tons of individuals who have spent very little, plus the new accounts, that received an M60. I didn't win the M60 lotto and neither did you. Stinks, doesn't it? WG came out and said there was no criteria for who received one, after saying for a while they weren't going to disclose the secret criteria of how they were distributed. Water under the bridge.
iRaikkonen, on 28 February 2017 - 10:04 PM, said:
What about giving us the IS-5 as a substitute? Considering you've already devalued the Fearless what's the point of owning it? I played against people who I beat in clan wars, driving their own fearless. You've ruined it entirely and everything that it stood for. You honestly might as well just openly sell it now that hundreds of random people have one. What a disgrace. I know this doesn't happen in World of Tanks PC
You might want to edit your post and change "you/you've" to "WG". When you quote CC_Sly and then use "you/you've" in your post, you are talking specifically to CC_Sly. Don't shoot the messenger; Sly is an emissary between us and WG. He does not have a say in the solution to WG's problems and to what WG decides to do.