Jump to content


Developers PLEASE READ Tank icon improvement


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

Poll: Developers PLEASE READ Tank icon improvement (15 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 5 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should developers improve?

  1. Yes (12 votes [75.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 75.00%

  2. No (4 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

Vote Hide poll

Amphitrek #1 Posted 27 February 2017 - 01:43 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 3574 battles
  • 23
  • [LION]
  • Member since:
    12-17-2016

The icon of tank on scroll list should change with upgrades of tank. Garage look of tank should match icon of tank. Look at these images to understand what I am talking about. 

https://s8.postimg.org/v76put7zl/IMG_0518.png https://s8.postimg.org/ys2le1cj5/IMG_0517.png https://s8.postimg.org/5e6uyg9td/IMG_0516.jpg 

 

P.S.This is on my Ipad. I don't know about other platforms.


Edited by Amphitrek, 27 February 2017 - 02:05 AM.


NinjasInPajamas #2 Posted 27 February 2017 - 02:21 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 2833 battles
  • 420
  • [FLEET]
  • Member since:
    05-21-2016
Would be a nice improvement.

                                                                                          .

           Credits: SweatyFalcon

"There are two types of problems, math problem, and real-life ones. A calculator will solve most of the first. The rest can be solved with a tank."


Thatguyujustmet #3 Posted 27 February 2017 - 02:28 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 6004 battles
  • 301
  • [XWING]
  • Member since:
    06-14-2016

Awhile back I saw the icons and thought they did account for that... Then realized they didn't and was like "oh."

 

Thanks for posting this!  I'd love that idea!


Blitz Community Coalition Blitz University Instructor

 

             

 


woof_defender #4 Posted 27 February 2017 - 02:39 AM

    ⚔️Fallen Guardian⚔️

  • Players
  • 23649 battles
  • 1,067
  • [FAC]
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014
Great idea, but it would take a long time, havering to do every tank with every single module combination. That time could be better spent doing other things correct?

Signature made by Panbun

Owner of the original E-25 "#1"

 

 

 


razernaga2014 #5 Posted 27 February 2017 - 03:10 AM

    I drink and I know things.

  • Players
  • 11516 battles
  • 1,396
  • [SPUDX]
  • Member since:
    09-03-2014

View Postwoof_defender, on 26 February 2017 - 09:39 PM, said:

Great idea, but it would take a long time, havering to do every tank with every single module combination. That time could be better spent doing other things correct?

 

like what?  Removing some chat functionality?  1/1 MM?  Premiumizations?  Boosters?  Buying modules with gold?  You want WG to spend time on what again?  "Other things"?  That's too loose in WG's book. 

 

Seriously why are so many people adverse to QoL improvements when a lot of updates seem to make the game less enjoyable?  Ahh they don't need to spend time making everything simpler, lets tack on some more goodies?  WG has done one thing for QoL recently, and that was (kinda) expand garage search functionality.  And that was after months of player feedback.  


IS-7 «» FV4202 «» Obj. 140 «» T-54 «» M103 «» Centurion 7/1 «»​ Type 59 «»​ IS-3D «» T32 «» T28 Prot. «» RU251 «» T6 Dracula «»​ Tankenstein «»​ SU-122-44 «»​ T25 AT «» T20 «» Comet «» KV-3 «» SU-100M1 «» Tiger I «» VK 32.02 D «» MT-25 «» Cromwell B «»​ T-25 «» SU-85i «»​ Ki-Ni «» Tetrarch «» T-2 Light

How To Crossfire

[SPUD] and [SPUDX] Local Spudist Pastor

 


batteriesincluded #6 Posted 27 February 2017 - 04:30 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16575 battles
  • 1,993
  • [WOLFX]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

Is it a good idea? Yes. Will it be implemented? No. Why?

Devs create updates based on...

Will it make us money?

Is it needed?

How much time does it need?

I just don't see this as more important than not having a bug in the game. Cough cough BDR....



V1n2002 #7 Posted 27 February 2017 - 04:56 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4035 battles
  • 1,142
  • [FURY]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2015

View Postbatteriesincluded, on 26 February 2017 - 11:30 PM, said:

Is it a good idea? Yes. Will it be implemented? No. Why?

Devs create updates based on...

Will it make us money?

Is it needed?

How much time does it need?

I just don't see this as more important than not having a bug in the game. Cough cough BDR....

BDR is junk if I can slash it with a SU100Y firing all HE because new ammo icons suck


much yummy :popcorn:

batteriesincluded #8 Posted 28 February 2017 - 02:52 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16575 battles
  • 1,993
  • [WOLFX]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

View PostV1n2002, on 26 February 2017 - 09:56 PM, said:

BDR is junk if I can slash it with a SU100Y firing all HE because new ammo icons suck

 

I never said it was OP or junk. I said it has a bug.

Amphitrek #9 Posted 08 March 2017 - 09:34 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 3574 battles
  • 23
  • [LION]
  • Member since:
    12-17-2016
Do developers respond to posts? I am reviving my topic.

__Boomer2__ #10 Posted 09 March 2017 - 01:04 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12036 battles
  • 1,264
  • [501RV]
  • Member since:
    01-03-2015
M48 Patton's icon still shows it having the giant tumor and using the 90mm gun, both of which were permanently removed.

Tier Xs: M48 Patton, E100, T110E4

 


Amphitrek #11 Posted 11 March 2017 - 07:06 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 3574 battles
  • 23
  • [LION]
  • Member since:
    12-17-2016
Revival until a developer replies.

V1n2002 #12 Posted 11 March 2017 - 07:07 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4035 battles
  • 1,142
  • [FURY]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2015

View Postbatteriesincluded, on 27 February 2017 - 09:52 PM, said:

 

I never said it was OP or junk. I said it has a bug.

but the BDR is junk lol


much yummy :popcorn:

batteriesincluded #13 Posted 11 March 2017 - 11:03 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16575 battles
  • 1,993
  • [WOLFX]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

View PostV1n2002, on 11 March 2017 - 12:07 PM, said:

but the BDR is junk lol

 

Key word is I

Amphitrek #14 Posted 26 May 2017 - 02:45 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 3574 battles
  • 23
  • [LION]
  • Member since:
    12-17-2016
REVIVAL DEVOLOPERS RESPOND 

acrisis #15 Posted 26 May 2017 - 12:48 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17260 battles
  • 7,712
  • [EQ-TR]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

View PostAmphitrek, on 08 March 2017 - 04:34 PM, said:

Do developers respond to posts? I am reviving my topic.

 

View PostAmphitrek, on 11 March 2017 - 02:06 PM, said:

Revival until a developer replies.

 

View PostAmphitrek, on 25 May 2017 - 09:45 PM, said:

REVIVAL DEVOLOPERS RESPOND 

 

Please S T O P.

 

Developers do NOT respond here. There are NO developers in NA. Developers may respond on the Russian forum. 

 

As far as the idea ... good idea, but too resource intensive to spend weeks redesigning images for every tiny change and too resource intensice for the game to have x multiples of the same thing to account for all the tiny variations. 


 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
 BCC Forum Thread | BCC Discord invite

 Mission Poll  |  Goose Event Poll  | ... 
Looney Tooners  ||  Triarii  ||  Blitz University  ||  Basic Training  ||  Mentor

2.8 Blitz Economy - A visual of the credit coefficients | Got lag? =>  Pingplotter thread





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users