Jump to content


Developers PLEASE READ Tank icon improvement


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Poll: Developers PLEASE READ Tank icon improvement (13 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 5 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should developers improve?

  1. Yes (11 votes [78.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 78.57%

  2. No (3 votes [21.43%])

    Percentage of vote: 21.43%

Vote Hide poll

Amphitrek #1 Posted 27 February 2017 - 01:43 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2992 battles
  • 20
  • [LION]
  • Member since:
    12-17-2016

The icon of tank on scroll list should change with upgrades of tank. Garage look of tank should match icon of tank. Look at these images to understand what I am talking about. 

https://s8.postimg.org/v76put7zl/IMG_0518.png https://s8.postimg.org/ys2le1cj5/IMG_0517.png https://s8.postimg.org/5e6uyg9td/IMG_0516.jpg 

 

P.S.This is on my Ipad. I don't know about other platforms.


Edited by Amphitrek, 27 February 2017 - 02:05 AM.


NinjasInPajamas #2 Posted 27 February 2017 - 02:21 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 2388 battles
  • 269
  • [LX]
  • Member since:
    05-21-2016
Would be a nice improvement.

.

 

"There are two types of problems, math problem, and real-life ones. A calculator will solve most of the first. The rest can be solved with a tank."


Thatguyujustmet #3 Posted 27 February 2017 - 02:28 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5443 battles
  • 258
  • [XWING]
  • Member since:
    06-14-2016

Awhile back I saw the icons and thought they did account for that... Then realized they didn't and was like "oh."

 

Thanks for posting this!  I'd love that idea!


The Biggest Noob From:

woof_defender #4 Posted 27 February 2017 - 02:39 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 21896 battles
  • 889
  • [FAC]
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014
Great idea, but it would take a long time, havering to do every tank with every single module combination. That time could be better spent doing other things correct?

Signature made by Panbun On my way to 60% w/r

Favourite tank:T-54 mod1,Jagdtiger,T-25, and IS-4

 

 

 


razernaga2014 #5 Posted 27 February 2017 - 03:10 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11395 battles
  • 1,316
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    09-03-2014

View Postwoof_defender, on 26 February 2017 - 09:39 PM, said:

Great idea, but it would take a long time, havering to do every tank with every single module combination. That time could be better spent doing other things correct?

 

like what?  Removing some chat functionality?  1/1 MM?  Premiumizations?  Boosters?  Buying modules with gold?  You want WG to spend time on what again?  "Other things"?  That's too loose in WG's book. 

 

Seriously why are so many people adverse to QoL improvements when a lot of updates seem to make the game less enjoyable?  Ahh they don't need to spend time making everything simpler, lets tack on some more goodies?  WG has done one thing for QoL recently, and that was (kinda) expand garage search functionality.  And that was after months of player feedback.  


IS-7 «» FV4202 «» Obj. 140 «» T-54 «» M103 «» Centurion 7/1 «»​ Type 59 «»​ IS-3D «» T32 «» T28 Prot. «» RU251 «» T6 Dracula «»​ Tankenstein «»​ SU-122-44 «»​ T25 AT «» T20 «» Comet «» KV-3 «» SU-100M1 «» Tiger I «» VK 32.02 D «» MT-25 «» Cromwell B «»​ T-25 «» SU-85i «»​ Ki-Ni «» Tetrarch «» T-2 Light

How To Crossfire

[SPUD] and [SPUDX] Local Spudist Pastor

 


batteriesincluded #6 Posted 27 February 2017 - 04:30 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16346 battles
  • 1,978
  • [XENON]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

Is it a good idea? Yes. Will it be implemented? No. Why?

Devs create updates based on...

Will it make us money?

Is it needed?

How much time does it need?

I just don't see this as more important than not having a bug in the game. Cough cough BDR....



V1n2002 #7 Posted 27 February 2017 - 04:56 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3799 battles
  • 708
  • [FURY]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2015

View Postbatteriesincluded, on 26 February 2017 - 11:30 PM, said:

Is it a good idea? Yes. Will it be implemented? No. Why?

Devs create updates based on...

Will it make us money?

Is it needed?

How much time does it need?

I just don't see this as more important than not having a bug in the game. Cough cough BDR....

BDR is junk if I can slash it with a SU100Y firing all HE because new ammo icons suck


much yummy :popcorn:

batteriesincluded #8 Posted 28 February 2017 - 02:52 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16346 battles
  • 1,978
  • [XENON]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

View PostV1n2002, on 26 February 2017 - 09:56 PM, said:

BDR is junk if I can slash it with a SU100Y firing all HE because new ammo icons suck

 

I never said it was OP or junk. I said it has a bug.

Amphitrek #9 Posted 08 March 2017 - 09:34 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2992 battles
  • 20
  • [LION]
  • Member since:
    12-17-2016
Do developers respond to posts? I am reviving my topic.

__Boomer2__ #10 Posted 09 March 2017 - 01:04 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11429 battles
  • 1,082
  • [SE7EN]
  • Member since:
    01-03-2015
M48 Patton's icon still shows it having the giant tumor and using the 90mm gun, both of which were permanently removed.

Tier Xs: M48 Patton, T110E5, T110E4

 

PROUD ANTI-RUSSIAN TANKER


Amphitrek #11 Posted 11 March 2017 - 07:06 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 2992 battles
  • 20
  • [LION]
  • Member since:
    12-17-2016
Revival until a developer replies.

V1n2002 #12 Posted 11 March 2017 - 07:07 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3799 battles
  • 708
  • [FURY]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2015

View Postbatteriesincluded, on 27 February 2017 - 09:52 PM, said:

 

I never said it was OP or junk. I said it has a bug.

but the BDR is junk lol


much yummy :popcorn:

batteriesincluded #13 Posted 11 March 2017 - 11:03 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16346 battles
  • 1,978
  • [XENON]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

View PostV1n2002, on 11 March 2017 - 12:07 PM, said:

but the BDR is junk lol

 

Key word is I




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users