Jump to content


Petition For +2/-2 Back


  • Please log in to reply
273 replies to this topic

Vino4Ever #261 Posted 21 March 2017 - 02:50 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8225 battles
  • 141
  • Member since:
    09-04-2016

View Post_GhostHuey, on 21 March 2017 - 12:32 AM, said:

To be honest the people that really are against 2/2 are just a bunch of stat padding insecure babies. I mean come on 2/2 requires skill. If you don't have any skill get some

 

Ah yes.  The skill required to deftly stomp tanks two tiers lower than your own.  Takes a long tome to master.

Sorimka #262 Posted 21 March 2017 - 03:02 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12613 battles
  • 181
  • [501DV]
  • Member since:
    07-08-2014

You guys are spinning your wheels here!

 

There is no way WG is going to re-introduce +2/-2 at this point.  Think of the sheer amount of time they will have to spend (literally, time is money as far as they're concerned) on re-balancing, re-introducing tier exceptioned tanks, and ALL OF THE COMPLAINING from customers that their beloved tanks have been nerfed/ruined/etc.

 

It WILL NOT be worth it, from WG's perspective.  It's a lose/lose from a financial and public relations perspective.


Game on.

 

-o7



__Crusader6__ #263 Posted 21 March 2017 - 03:12 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 36287 battles
  • 4,803
  • [III]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostVino4Ever, on 21 March 2017 - 09:50 AM, said:

 

Ah yes.  The skill required to deftly stomp tanks two tiers lower than your own.  Takes a long tome to master.

 

It is +/-2 not -2...

 

Unless you only play tier 9/10 and only pref MM tanks you will be -2 at times.  Secondly when the server population is over 10k MM tries to make +/-0.  

  Currently +/-1 makes so many landslides that the game is loosing interest for me at least. 

 

The only tier 6-8 tanks what would need gun rebalancing is the US T57 line with their lackluster penetration. 

 

 

 

 

 


Rethink Chat changes 3.6, #global&unmutethedead

 

 

Certified Tank Hoarder: 269 tanks in Garage (they repo'd the MkI), 232 aced, and unrepentant wallet warrior

 


SemiNomadic #264 Posted 21 March 2017 - 03:13 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 40 battles
  • 36
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016
Im sick of your [edited]wmd.

shiekyerbooti2 #265 Posted 21 March 2017 - 03:18 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 10297 battles
  • 54
  • Member since:
    08-17-2014
+-2 was great....as long as you had the high tier. 

WMd76 #266 Posted 21 March 2017 - 03:45 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 30459 battles
  • 1,823
  • [DFNT]
  • Member since:
    01-28-2012

View PostSemiNomadic, on 21 March 2017 - 10:13 AM, said:

Im sick of your [edited]wmd.

o whats this a failed reroll? 


My tier 10: IS-7, IS-4 T-62a, Obj140, Obj268, Obj263, E-100, Maus, JgPzE-100, E-50m, Leopard1, M48 Patton, T110E3, T110E4,  T110E5, Fv215b(183), Fv4202                                                    Top Damage Done In Type 59 (6718)! And it was a Fadin's game

Currently On:Conqueror, T69, and WT Pz IV   Top 5 Favourite Tanks:​ Leopard 1, Obj 268, STB1, Dracula, and T34-85 Victory 

Feel free to check out my YouTube channel: Here

Happy Hunting!


SpartacusDiablo #267 Posted 21 March 2017 - 03:53 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3673 battles
  • 761
  • [BNKR]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
Still wish we had +2/-2. At the very least I think light tanks should see +2/-1 mm.

#lightsintierX

If you want to talk tanks then head on over to the Bunker.

http://thebunker.freeforums.net

​If you are always on the losing team it may be time to admit that "the team" isn't the problem...


WMd76 #268 Posted 21 March 2017 - 03:59 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 30459 battles
  • 1,823
  • [DFNT]
  • Member since:
    01-28-2012

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 21 March 2017 - 10:53 AM, said:

Still wish we had +2/-2. At the very least I think light tanks should see +2/-1 mm.

#lightsintierX

give them their pen and yeah i think it would work out with the lights ike that, but we need a full +2/-2  back 


My tier 10: IS-7, IS-4 T-62a, Obj140, Obj268, Obj263, E-100, Maus, JgPzE-100, E-50m, Leopard1, M48 Patton, T110E3, T110E4,  T110E5, Fv215b(183), Fv4202                                                    Top Damage Done In Type 59 (6718)! And it was a Fadin's game

Currently On:Conqueror, T69, and WT Pz IV   Top 5 Favourite Tanks:​ Leopard 1, Obj 268, STB1, Dracula, and T34-85 Victory 

Feel free to check out my YouTube channel: Here

Happy Hunting!


_GhostHuey #269 Posted 21 March 2017 - 04:16 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20827 battles
  • 350
  • [SRT]
  • Member since:
    09-28-2013

View PostDirk_The_Dragon_Slayer, on 21 March 2017 - 02:03 PM, said:

 

Suck it.

 

Suck what?
M60 owner AND PROUD TO OWN A FEARLESS

WMd76 #270 Posted 22 March 2017 - 03:32 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 30459 battles
  • 1,823
  • [DFNT]
  • Member since:
    01-28-2012
bump

My tier 10: IS-7, IS-4 T-62a, Obj140, Obj268, Obj263, E-100, Maus, JgPzE-100, E-50m, Leopard1, M48 Patton, T110E3, T110E4,  T110E5, Fv215b(183), Fv4202                                                    Top Damage Done In Type 59 (6718)! And it was a Fadin's game

Currently On:Conqueror, T69, and WT Pz IV   Top 5 Favourite Tanks:​ Leopard 1, Obj 268, STB1, Dracula, and T34-85 Victory 

Feel free to check out my YouTube channel: Here

Happy Hunting!


tankcrunch #271 Posted 23 March 2017 - 12:23 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 102 battles
  • 2,098
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011

View Post_GhostHuey, on 21 March 2017 - 04:16 PM, said:

 

Suck what?

 

don't even respond.

KeenGear #272 Posted 23 March 2017 - 05:56 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9784 battles
  • 158
  • [ISSP]
  • Member since:
    10-01-2015

Why not asking for -3/+3 MM? WG may think about it and cut down to -2/+2.

How about asking for 0/0 MM? That way you fight within your tier.

 

This topic is getting old.... and people keep bringing it up.

 



Indiana__Jones #273 Posted 23 March 2017 - 01:24 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 41402 battles
  • 2,276
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014

When they changed the matchmaking to +1/-1 they specifically said in the announcement that if you wanted to play with a wider spread you were free to do so in the training rooms.

Since they have never once seen you playing a -2 tank in a training room they rightly assume that this is not something you truly want.


Edited by Indiana__Jones, 23 March 2017 - 01:25 PM.


Bellatormonk #274 Posted 23 March 2017 - 03:28 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8478 battles
  • 164
  • [AGOGO]
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011
If the MM system with current high amounts of crap players is already bad enough, how much worse do you think matches would be when you have 5 40%ers on your team at -2??  They might as well be AFK..and I don't mean the Clan.




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users