Jump to content


WG staff keeps supporting BOTTERS

anti-afk anti-bot fail perma-ban

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

acrisis #1 Posted 11 March 2017 - 09:18 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18395 battles
  • 8,332
  • [EQ-TR]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

Sure enough, he is still in game ...

Why is this individual allowed to continue to bot day after day, ruining the games for whomever's team he ends up on, costingnthem credits and win-rate to try to fight six vs seven?

 

How many times dow we  have to report afks and bots?!?!?!

 

Where is the disconnect between the rules, and us sending in tickets, and wg not seeing these blatant violations? 

 


Edited by acrisis, 11 March 2017 - 09:23 PM.

 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
 BCC Forum Thread | BCC Discord invite

 Mission Poll  |  Goose Event Poll  | ... 
Looney Tooners  ||  Triarii  ||  Blitz University  ||  Basic Training  ||  Mentor

2.8 Blitz Economy - A visual of the credit coefficients | Got lag? =>  Pingplotter thread


christian1470 #2 Posted 11 March 2017 - 09:25 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31748 battles
  • 3,608
  • [III-H]
  • Member since:
    10-05-2014
WG probably owns the account and inserts it into your games to keep your WR down. Oh wait. Did I say that? I meant to say keep your interest up. :sceptic:

Edited by christian1470, 11 March 2017 - 09:25 PM.


acrisis #3 Posted 11 March 2017 - 09:27 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18395 battles
  • 8,332
  • [EQ-TR]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014
It has the total adverse effect with me, I get disgusted that a game could have been a win if it hadn't been for that (...) AFK or BOT, and I wonder how much longer I will put up with it. 

 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
 BCC Forum Thread | BCC Discord invite

 Mission Poll  |  Goose Event Poll  | ... 
Looney Tooners  ||  Triarii  ||  Blitz University  ||  Basic Training  ||  Mentor

2.8 Blitz Economy - A visual of the credit coefficients | Got lag? =>  Pingplotter thread


Vosan #4 Posted 11 March 2017 - 09:37 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9944 battles
  • 745
  • [WEAK]
  • Member since:
    02-23-2016
I can't tell scrubs to uninstall anymore as I'm chat banned ._.


dayton07277 #5 Posted 11 March 2017 - 09:39 PM

    (SMH)

  • Players
  • 10845 battles
  • 2,849
  • [CROWN]
  • Member since:
    09-13-2015

View PostNatusCurse, on 11 March 2017 - 01:37 PM, said:

I can't tell scrubs to uninstall anymore as I'm chat banned ._.

The na server has 36k players between 45/50% what happens if they all deleted?  Wotb goes dead.


Edited by dayton07277, 11 March 2017 - 09:40 PM.


WMd76 #6 Posted 11 March 2017 - 09:53 PM

    Why Am I Never On The Red Team?

  • Players
  • 32238 battles
  • 2,096
  • [DFNT]
  • Member since:
    01-28-2012
Noobs are good but bots are just a waste, I'm with OP, how can they allow this when its been stated even by WG that afking of botting is a "bannable offence"...

3 Years of happiness is what blitz brought to me

 

What Has It Done For You?

(PM me cuz I have no friends)


tankcrunch #7 Posted 11 March 2017 - 10:32 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 195 battles
  • 3,551
  • Member since:
    04-21-2011
Image result for remove kebab memebots are kebab, must remove them.

ALHAU84 #8 Posted 11 March 2017 - 10:38 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 25338 battles
  • 780
  • [AUWDE]
  • Member since:
    08-05-2014
Remove them, war gaming 


BrickSniper33 #9 Posted 11 March 2017 - 11:03 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 354 battles
  • 1,852
  • Member since:
    02-06-2016

Even though it's against the rules to Bot WG doesn't actually enforce the rule, I guess they think that if they just "say" it's against the rules that people won't do it and the ones who do will be few and fare between 


 

  my stats: (http://www.blitzstar...ru/legoeinstein) I never said they where good.

Current Garage: Type 62, Type 59, KV-2, BT-7, luchs, leopard VK 16.02, Ru 251,Tiger II, AC 1 sentinel, AC IV sentinel, BT-SV, AT-15A, Pz. IV S, M4A3E8 Fury, Strv 74A2, Cromwell Berlin, KV-5, IS-3D, FCM 50 t, BT-7 arty, Pz. II J, Pz. S35, Pz. B2, A-32, Luchs, SU-122-44, T6 Dracula, E25, Ram II, Type 3 Chi-Nu Kai Shinobi, Tetrarch, T14, SU-76I, TOG II, WZ-112, WZ-135G FT, Self Propelled 17pdr Valentine Mk I Archer aka Angry Conner. Grosstraktor-Krupp, Blitzs' resident Dr. Who, Lego loving anime hater (    WoT/blitz/WS/WPs' #1 anime hater and proud of it!)

11th best AC 4 Sentinel driver on Ru

How can you tell if someone has morals and/or a conscience? Just ask one question, Do they own a Pz II J? (Guilty as charged)


Player_5773117413 #10 Posted 11 March 2017 - 11:52 PM

    Professional Tinfoil Hatter

  • Players
  • 22972 battles
  • 6,035
  • [IRD]
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014
Funny how his eWR's are higher. He "earned" that win by not playing. 

Now @ 15 Tier 10s: E50M, E100, FV215B, FV4202, IS-4, IS-7, JagdPanzer E100, M48 Patton, Obj. 140, Obj. 268, STB-1, T110E3, T110E4, T110E5, T-62A

Just another demo account, nothing to see here

T34/T3(1776) got buffed hard. I paid $$$ for that @&#%£¥ so WG better not realize their mistake and nerf it back to Tier 8


someguyfromPitt #11 Posted 12 March 2017 - 01:14 AM

    Jeez Louise that one bounced

  • Players
  • 35998 battles
  • 3,323
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    07-12-2014
Time for Pitt to play the Vickers Medium 2  and knock him down to 679 on the rankings. 

Tier 10's: FV 183, T110E3, T110E4, T110E5, T57, Patton M48, IS-4, IS-7, T-62a, Obj 140

 

There is only one TD, and 183 is her name. 


Andrew4U #12 Posted 12 March 2017 - 05:45 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 9785 battles
  • 8
  • [ID3]
  • Member since:
    10-16-2016

I think the only reason that WoT does not truly ban these players is because of the potential income from Gold.  I fight 6 vs 7, 5 vs 6, 7 vs 7, etc, battles all the time.  When I fight a battle that has a tank that just fires 1 or 2 shots, I report it.  Because of the game's privacy policy, I also believe nothing is ever done.  I suggest that the person that does this have points removed and a temporary ban.  If it continues, the ban becomes permanent.

Guess what the response was.  I know nothing.  Recall the confidentiality policy.



acrisis #13 Posted 12 March 2017 - 02:46 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18395 battles
  • 8,332
  • [EQ-TR]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

There's a few different AFK & BOT schemes out there (some farm credits, some farm xp, some actually have tanks they play, some don't play at all) but it doesn't matter if they bought one or more premium tanks or have premium time.

 

BOT IS BOT.  SERIAL AFK is SERIAL AFK.  TROLL is TROLL.  RULES are RULES.  

 

We have been complaining about this stuff quite publicly for over a year.  How much longer do we have to suffer this inaction?  We're not talking about somebody who AFKs once a week. We're talking hundreds and thousands and tens of thousands of games ... 

 

Why are a few dozen rotten apples allowed to spoil the fun and be a stain on the game for thousands upon thousands of games?

Why do the rules state on thing, do we have publicized videos and accounts that action will be and is being taken.  Yet, we have all this unfair business going on. 

 

Every ticket gets the "we'll investigate and we'll take action" reply.

 

Is that just a blatant lie?  

Do the ticket guys simply never alert HQ?

Is our proof with screenshots and BOT / SERIAL AFK profiles not enough?

... 

 


 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
 BCC Forum Thread | BCC Discord invite

 Mission Poll  |  Goose Event Poll  | ... 
Looney Tooners  ||  Triarii  ||  Blitz University  ||  Basic Training  ||  Mentor

2.8 Blitz Economy - A visual of the credit coefficients | Got lag? =>  Pingplotter thread





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users