Jump to content

Why not M1 Abrams?

  • Please log in to reply
87 replies to this topic

bumblemoose #81 Posted 24 March 2017 - 07:19 PM


  • Players
  • 13324 battles
  • 379
  • [SWAMP]
  • Member since:

Taken from the Blitz website:


The Abrams is from what is considered the late 20th century.

LastRoman #82 Posted 24 March 2017 - 09:04 PM


  • Players
  • 7567 battles
  • 15
  • Member since:
Not only would the Abrams be the fastest tank in the game, no other current tank could pen it other than another abrams and even then there are issues, it could pen every tank in the game from any angle on any piece of armor without fail it's accuracy/rof/alpha/gun handling would be unrivaled. Simply put it would break the game in every possible way and then some. It would be the equivalent of putting an e100 vs tier 1 tanks, With the e100 having triple the horsepower it has now. 
"D-oh" - everyone's favorite dumbf**k

michaeltsoon #83 Posted 24 March 2017 - 09:13 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13840 battles
  • 1,985
  • [501DV]
  • Member since:
OP.... learn punctuation and multiquoting.... About ur inquiry I doubt WG would introduce a tank that can absolutely roflstomp every vehicle in game. It'd be acceptable, however if they gave them their own special MM-just like what they did with the mk1

Founder of the 3rd Panzer Division/The Unofficially Official Sealclubber Of the 501st

Nothing can stop the 501st!!!

Proudly ranked 7th in T2 Light, 13th in T-28, 18th in JagdPanzer 4, 19th in Strv 74A2, 27th in Pz Kpfw II, 29th in Pz Kpfw III/IV, 39th in T82, and 42nd in Pz IV Schmaltrum on NA!

Rockracer #84 Posted 24 March 2017 - 09:24 PM


  • Players
  • 3070 battles
  • 33
  • [MITO]
  • Member since:
If they added Abrams, they would need to add something similar to tier 11-12...

tankcrunch #85 Posted 24 March 2017 - 09:27 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 102 battles
  • 2,098
  • Member since:

View Postbumblemoose, on 24 March 2017 - 07:19 PM, said:

Taken from the Blitz website:


The Abrams is from what is considered the late 20th century.



wrec #86 Posted Yesterday, 10:33 PM


  • Players
  • 1349 battles
  • 13
  • [GLS]
  • Member since:

View Postetword, on 19 March 2017 - 03:29 PM, said:


 I'm just curious and wondering they're bringing in all these fantasy tanks I mean who really made a glacial who really made a blaze I'm just asking that's all I hope I don't get a warning or a band for this I'm just wandering the AMX 30 B has been used in recent Wars past 1960 looking to new French line that came out with a lot of these tanks were developed after 1960

AMX 50B not 30B and the glacial isnt made up it just has a texture and a changed name. The 113 can be found in the PC wot. Also lets say they do add modern tanks such as the Leopard 2(Not the pta or the 1), Challenger II, M1 Abrams, and more do you think old tanks can penetrate active armor that practically blows up before the shell even touches the armor. Also they use guns that have too high of a penetration value that only things that dont bounce the shot is when its aiming at another modern tank. This both unfair to the other WW2 tanks and doesn't fit with the game's purpose. Have you noticed that the "made up" tanks are PREMIUM so only few people who WORKED for it get it.

_Semi_ #87 Posted Today, 01:02 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 32409 battles
  • 856
  • Member since:

WG doesn't glitch out player accounts, I play my best games during bans. Shortcomings in game play are self-inflicted, or connection issues. Sometimes both. Sometimes I think the mm is rigged, but I don't feel like it's specific to myself. I just don't like the algorithm being used. 


That is really unhealty thinking for someone to be considering. Not yourself, but possibly anyone who could buy that theory. 

Edited by _Semi_, Today, 01:05 AM.

Gitgudm9 #88 Posted Today, 01:05 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5945 battles
  • 2,303
  • [MAHOU]
  • Member since:
OP, if you want the Abrams, just play Armored Warfare ffs.

"Anime girls were made to be lewded." - Klaus_Klavier


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users