Jump to content


Cromwell Berlin Imbalances Competitive Blitz, Needs Rebalancing

#BanBromwell #AllTiersMatter

  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

unicoizulu #21 Posted 20 March 2017 - 09:14 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 16630 battles
  • 18
  • [180TH]
  • Member since:
    01-25-2015

I think the Bromwell was a reasonable price. Anyone remember the price.

Wish Wargaming would do more camo like the Berlin.



Mall_ninja42 #22 Posted 20 March 2017 - 09:17 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10394 battles
  • 240
  • [SKXLL]
  • Member since:
    07-15-2016

View PostMSixteen, on 20 March 2017 - 08:54 AM, said:

 

We get it. You're salty. Now go to sleep, child.

No, I'm going to sit here in my mom's basement eating chicken nuggets to replenish my salt content and keep it flowing. 


much noob, working on recovery


GET_RlGHT #23 Posted 20 March 2017 - 09:57 AM

    Based Stickman

  • Players
  • 14357 battles
  • 2,710
  • [PURPL]
  • Member since:
    12-29-2014
LOL Great post Stealy

_CH3F #24 Posted 20 March 2017 - 10:04 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 41154 battles
  • 2,551
  • [HATED]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2014
7 kv2's would settle that in no time at all!

Gladsfur #25 Posted 20 March 2017 - 10:37 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 47608 battles
  • 284
  • [INRI]
  • Member since:
    03-22-2015
This game is like life. It's not fair. Wipe your tears, and get over it. Yes I'm a proud owner of a M60 and the loyalty camo. Good point STEALY. 

Edited by Gladsfur, 20 March 2017 - 10:41 AM.


MayoNasalSpray #26 Posted 20 March 2017 - 11:06 AM

    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Players
  • 24031 battles
  • 3,482
  • [MSELF]
  • Member since:
    01-27-2015

Everyone knows the new Meta for Clan Wars 3 is bringing 7 Togs.



Davedt #27 Posted 20 March 2017 - 12:16 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17647 battles
  • 194
  • [_OPS_]
  • Member since:
    01-19-2015
see M60 post :popcorn:

1966MustangFastBack #28 Posted 20 March 2017 - 12:20 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7962 battles
  • 905
  • [THXS]
  • Member since:
    01-01-2013
As long as it doesn't get needed then sure. #DontNerfMyBromwell

 

1966 Fastback 427 FE swap, 2003 R53 Mini JCW


Grayghost2000 #29 Posted 20 March 2017 - 12:48 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16294 battles
  • 1,865
  • [MBTS]
  • Member since:
    09-27-2015

View PostLoweExpectations, on 20 March 2017 - 04:06 AM, said:

Well, the Cromwell Berlin was available to everyone. If you snooze, you lose. The M60 was given out randomly, so it gave people the advantage and others the disadvantage without their choice.

 

+1.

DeadlyAZNS #30 Posted 20 March 2017 - 12:55 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4129 battles
  • 617
  • [KRONO]
  • Member since:
    11-23-2016
I prefer the Cromwell over the berlin. Bromwell has the worst gun bloom, accuracy, and dispersion. Idk what it is, the cromwell gets more shots in.

TengenToppaPotatoLagann #31 Posted 20 March 2017 - 01:04 PM

    ᵐʸ ʰᵉˢʰ ʷᶦᶫᶫ ᵖᶦᵉʳᶜᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ʰᵉᵃᵛᵉᶰˢ﹗

  • Players
  • 45176 battles
  • 3,055
  • [RNSF]
  • Member since:
    03-31-2015

Valid points in both threads. I'd just like to mention that during one particular blitz brawl, after facing an all Russian lineup with their own mix of loyalty Patton's and various other tanks... C4 ran seven IS-7s and just rammed that stalinium down the red teams throat.

 

The m60 probably wasn't nerfed, as WG didn't know right away how the pen nerfs would play out. If they keep the low pen for more than a few patches I would say nerf the m60.  If they give a few tanks higher pen again, leave it. 

 

Either way, while it's obviously a very strong tank, there are always other choices a team can make, strat wise.

Tier six is easy, there are a bunch of tanks that can be as imbalanced as the brommy. Flat panzer at the back would be annoying as hell if the driver had lvl6 camo, paint, and a net. Nobody has even mentioned how unfair it is that some people have every crew skill maxed.

 

Idk enough about competitive play in blitz to be setting strategy for top clans, that much I do know, so feel free to ignore what I've said.


Edited by TengenToppaPotatoLagann, 20 March 2017 - 01:12 PM.

ZIoydd, on 16 November 2017 - 09:47 AM, said:

Fixed.

Narrator, on 16 November 2017 - 09:48 AM, said:

​ The problem had not been fixed.

 

 


__Boomer2__ #32 Posted 20 March 2017 - 01:34 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13220 battles
  • 1,483
  • [501RV]
  • Member since:
    01-03-2015
Keep crying.  I don't fear a Bromwell anymore than I fear a Cromwell.

Tier Xs: M48 Patton, E100, T110E4

 


BoomMfer #33 Posted 20 March 2017 - 02:15 PM

    This space for rent

  • Players
  • 46273 battles
  • 1,542
  • [KR0N0]
  • Member since:
    01-13-2013
Seems to me that premium tanks shouldn't be allowed in tournament play. Why should someone who has money, or in the case of the M60 luck, have an advantage over other participants.


Never_Forget_ #34 Posted 20 March 2017 - 03:44 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14098 battles
  • 290
  • [DIRE]
  • Member since:
    01-01-2016

 You can't ban premiums (except the m60 which wasn't available to all). Some players only have premiums in their garage at tiers 2-8. 

 



pastore123 #35 Posted 20 March 2017 - 04:05 PM

    Community Italian Stallion

  • Players
  • 19498 battles
  • 1,580
  • [LXE]
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014
I'm so surprised to see serious answers here

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               #FREEPROMPT_N_CRITICAL

RES, NON VERBA 

LoyalEnoughForAnM60


woof_defender #36 Posted 20 March 2017 - 04:11 PM

    ⚔️Fallen Guardian⚔️

  • Players
  • 27707 battles
  • 1,350
  • [ANEKI]
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014
why not just ban premiums from clan wars and tournaments for all tiers.

Favourite tank: T95


WriterDude #37 Posted 20 March 2017 - 04:22 PM

    My Posts Are Forum Prammo

  • Players
  • 21986 battles
  • 4,236
  • [III-Z]
  • Member since:
    10-09-2014

View PostDerf19, on 19 March 2017 - 09:08 PM, said:

Ban the Fearless too! Not everyone has access to it.

 

I saw my first Fearless in a battle the other day. I focused it just because.

Worthy of focus fire by SPUDX.  Potato Cred Link

  

"In Blitz, there's a certain value in expeditiously moving to the inevitable." -WriterDude


WriterDude #38 Posted 20 March 2017 - 04:38 PM

    My Posts Are Forum Prammo

  • Players
  • 21986 battles
  • 4,236
  • [III-Z]
  • Member since:
    10-09-2014

View Postr4zrbl4de, on 19 March 2017 - 09:18 PM, said:

This is the reason why I'm starting to hate this game. No one on the forums can seem to hold a reasonable discussion without resorting to insults and mockery. Everyone's dug their own little hole of an opinion and won't leave it, they just want to sling mud at each other.

 

This place has stopped being a hub for people who enjoy playing a game. This is what I'd want to bring back most from the early year of Blitz - not old maps, not pre-nerfed tanks, but a friendly environment.

 

This is a little off-topic, but for the most part, I agree. LookedSquirrel7 ruined my green team in game the other day, and I didn't launch myself into the forums to complain, or pick a fight, or throw salt, because I deliberately keep the two things separate. Well, except for that giggly fanboi thing that I do when I see a forum player, try too hard, and ammorack myself. But that's just how I roll, baby.

 

I don't know if it's useful to imagine an idyllic time when players danced their tanks through fields of daisies and sang upbeat disco while they were shooting flowers and unicorn dust at one another, and then came to the forums to cover one another with effusive praise. I think ragers have always raged, noobs have always noobed, and carriers carried. The only thing I'll say for certain is that players have always played. Here on the forums, snarky people have always snarked, constructive people have always constructed, mocking people have always mocked, and posters have always posted.

 

All of these problems remind me of an old story about an aging couple. The man felt that he needed to stay youthful for his wife, so every morning he plucked out some of his gray hairs. His wife wanted him to look older so they could grow old together, so every night she plucked out some of his dark hairs. It didn't take long before he was completely bald.

 

We can play whack-a-mole all we want to get rid of what we don't like, but that's not the right approach. That's the problem with the chat ban and contention on the forums. If we ban enough people, or ostracize enough people, eventually we'll be wondering where everyone went.


Worthy of focus fire by SPUDX.  Potato Cred Link

  

"In Blitz, there's a certain value in expeditiously moving to the inevitable." -WriterDude


NaDa_22 #39 Posted 20 March 2017 - 06:07 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 23272 battles
  • 522
  • [_V_]
  • Member since:
    03-27-2016

View PostWriterDude, on 20 March 2017 - 04:38 PM, said:

 

This is a little off-topic, but for the most part, I agree. LookedSquirrel7 ruined my green team in game the other day, and I didn't launch myself into the forums to complain, or pick a fight, or throw salt, because I deliberately keep the two things separate. Well, except for that giggly fanboi thing that I do when I see a forum player, try too hard, and ammorack myself. But that's just how I roll, baby.

 

I don't know if it's useful to imagine an idyllic time when players danced their tanks through fields of daisies and sang upbeat disco while they were shooting flowers and unicorn dust at one another, and then came to the forums to cover one another with effusive praise. I think ragers have always raged, noobs have always noobed, and carriers carried. The only thing I'll say for certain is that players have always played. Here on the forums, snarky people have always snarked, constructive people have always constructed, mocking people have always mocked, and posters have always posted.

 

All of these problems remind me of an old story about an aging couple. The man felt that he needed to stay youthful for his wife, so every morning he plucked out some of his gray hairs. His wife wanted him to look older so they could grow old together, so every night she plucked out some of his dark hairs. It didn't take long before he was completely bald.

 

We can play whack-a-mole all we want to get rid of what we don't like, but that's not the right approach. That's the problem with the chat ban and contention on the forums. If we ban enough people, or ostracize enough people, eventually we'll be wondering where everyone went.

 

Good stuff!

Leadf00t #40 Posted 20 March 2017 - 06:11 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8520 battles
  • 2,280
  • [STR8R]
  • Member since:
    03-26-2016

View PostWriterDude, on 20 March 2017 - 11:38 AM, said:

 

I don't know if it's useful to imagine an idyllic time when players danced their tanks through fields of daisies and sang upbeat disco while they were shooting flowers and unicorn dust at one another, and then came to the forums to cover one another with effusive praise.

 

This sentence deserves induction into the WoTB hall of fame right next to the less effusive "Eat my dust, snail thumbs!"

 

Strong work, WD.  Very strong.

 

:)


Edited by Leadf00t, 20 March 2017 - 06:14 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users