Jump to content


New 3.8 Equipment System Complicated?


  • Please log in to reply
362 replies to this topic

_Sterben_ #1 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:26 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7232 battles
  • 1,384
  • [ANIME]
  • Member since:
    01-21-2015

If you already watch the new Heads Up video for 3.8 Blitz, they explained the

new changes of Equipment, 

it became complicated too me instead mounting 3 Equipments will be mounting 9 Equipment now and you need to grind this other levels of equipment using Spare Parts that can be earned from missions,

so the new Equipment System, do you find this complicated or will do better from the current we have now?


 

Rip Wallet Warrior Journey

2015 - 2017

 


Gib_Savages #2 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:28 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27924 battles
  • 1,742
  • Member since:
    10-04-2014

Overly complicating a simple system for little reason. And notice there is no mention of costs??



Bronyman50 #3 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:31 PM

    Offical Horse Guy (Platinum Legacy Forum Title Holder)

  • Players
  • 26509 battles
  • 4,251
  • [TISM]
  • Member since:
    09-26-2013
Why would you do this wargaming. The current system works fine

"The Mountain Goat Strikes Again" -Anonymous (Ingame)

I Swear It's Like A Potato Farm With The Current Playerbase

Bronyman50 A.K.A TheOriginalHorseGuy


Brundog #4 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:33 PM

    Woof Woof

  • Players
  • 46202 battles
  • 909
  • [CCCCC]
  • Member since:
    08-04-2014
If I have to grind equipment on all my tanks that will not be fun at all... games are supposed to be fun right?

Putins_Chariot #5 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:34 PM

    Admiral Kitty

  • Players
  • 22246 battles
  • 6,166
  • Member since:
    08-24-2014

So if I am allergic to peanut butter (Enhanced torsion bars) and so I only eat jelly sandwiches (rammer, gld, and vert stab), you are now forcing me to use whatever [edited]equip you want (enhanced torsion bars, grousers, wet rack on a non-russian). IMO its changing a already fine system.

 

My guess is it will be 1000 spare parts for 15 bucks



tedg5 #6 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:35 PM

    Tater salad

  • Players
  • 48074 battles
  • 4,757
  • [AGOGO]
  • Member since:
    07-04-2014
Ok, wow, WG must be Rube Goldberg's cousin. First the goose competition, now this. :facepalm:

PixelRage #7 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:35 PM

    Professional Easter Egg Hunter

  • Players
  • 15170 battles
  • 2,357
  • Member since:
    11-19-2013
I don't know about you but I'm buying every tier 1, 2 and 3 and loading it up with equipment.

Your friendly banned forumer

 

https://www.youtube..../PixelRageGames

 


Putins_Chariot #8 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:37 PM

    Admiral Kitty

  • Players
  • 22246 battles
  • 6,166
  • Member since:
    08-24-2014

View PostPixelRage, on 06 April 2017 - 07:35 AM, said:

I don't know about you but I'm buying every tier 1, 2 and 3 and loading it up with equipment.

 

Its probably tier dependent

Rocket_From_The_Tomb #9 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:37 PM

    I Blame Rocket

  • Players
  • 17008 battles
  • 3,777
  • [SCSC]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

WG Rule 1. -Somewhere hidden in this new system is a way for WG to separate you from some money.

 



Tomio_Hara #10 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:38 PM

    Monteagle madness

  • Players
  • 22545 battles
  • 3,465
  • [SR-72]
  • Member since:
    07-31-2014

View Posttedg5, on 06 April 2017 - 06:35 AM, said:

Ok, wow, WG must be Rube Goldberg's cousin. First the goose competition, now this. :facepalm:

 

Lol, and wargaming is forgetting one major factor: This is a mobile game. No one wants to download an extremely complicated game on their phone they can't figure out how to work on themselves.

 

Tomio Hara was the chief of Japanese tank development during the pre war period and WWII

Want to cap base? Read this!


PixelRage #11 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:38 PM

    Professional Easter Egg Hunter

  • Players
  • 15170 battles
  • 2,357
  • Member since:
    11-19-2013

View Post_1204_, on 06 April 2017 - 10:37 PM, said:

 

Its probably tier dependent

 

It said in the video that all existing equipment would be changed into them cog things, never mentioned tier dependency 

Your friendly banned forumer

 

https://www.youtube..../PixelRageGames

 


JotheGr3at #12 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:39 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 7140 battles
  • 55
  • [NRA]
  • Member since:
    04-19-2013
This looks pointless. The system we have right now is perfect...

_ImUrHuckleberry #13 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:40 PM

    You're a daisy if you do

  • Players
  • 14055 battles
  • 790
  • Member since:
    08-07-2016
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt since it could make for interesting game-play with 9 enhancements as opposed to the 3 max. I believe they said one could not buy the extra slots but could earn them through missions? Could be good, could be bad...more info needed.

Putins_Chariot #14 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:40 PM

    Admiral Kitty

  • Players
  • 22246 battles
  • 6,166
  • Member since:
    08-24-2014

View PostPixelRage, on 06 April 2017 - 07:38 AM, said:

 

It said in the video that all existing equipment would be changed into them cog things, never mentioned tier dependency 

 

Seems implied. Idk tho

 

@dogface or sly needs to make a official Q and A. 



slayer_____ #15 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Spray and Pray

  • Players
  • 39554 battles
  • 3,065
  • [ATA2D]
  • Member since:
    07-10-2014
My Russian is a little rusty, I didn't understand a word. Looks like we to embrace for more frustration and expect to pay for better game play......

Pittoors_ #16 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:46 PM

    Killer Queen has already touched this forum title

  • Players
  • 35354 battles
  • 2,399
  • [MAHOU]
  • Member since:
    02-05-2015

Why change something that works just perfect as it is right now?


https://www.blitzstars.com/player/com/Pittoors_

Current garage: M48A1 Patton, IS-4, T110E5, E 50 Ausf. M, Leopard 1, T-62A, M46 Patton, T54E1, IS-8, IS-5, IS-6, Rheinmetall Borsig Waffentrager, T49, T23E3Type 62, Helsing, T-34-1, Kuro Mori MineAC IV Sentinel, SU-100YStridsvagn 74A2, Panzer IV Anko SP, Churchill III, T-34, Hetzer Kame SP, A-32, DW 2, Panzer S35, BT-SV, BT-7 Artillery, SU-76i, T-15M3 LightT2 LightT7 Combat CarLight Mk. VIC.


christian1470 #17 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:49 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 38892 battles
  • 4,763
  • Member since:
    10-05-2014

View PostKjam0918, on 06 April 2017 - 07:40 AM, said:

I'll give them the benefit of the doubt since it could make for interesting game-play with 9 enhancements as opposed to the 3 max. I believe they said one could not buy the extra slots but could earn them through missions? Could be good, could be bad...more info needed.

 

remember camo introduction? Before camo, your tank had a rating and you could get a boost from a camo net. Camo gets introduced, all values get nerfed, and we all ended up spending credits to get back to the same values that we previously had for free. This will be no different, and I'm sure there will be gold involved as well. Stupid. 

WipWapJaws #18 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:49 PM

    Clanless Scrub

  • Players
  • 45399 battles
  • 3,624
  • [WKD]
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014

Seriously WG if ur going to favour the Russian server over everyone else and give them info way before the rest of us gets it, the least u could do is put English subtitles on ur official videos.

 

This company sometimes, it's like they have monkeys in their communication department 



Nick_Merines #19 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:50 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 9792 battles
  • 51
  • [YEAH]
  • Member since:
    04-20-2015
I think that we should have the PC versions equipment system... 

 

I.. Um.. Like tanks I guess?

nick_merines_leo_eng.jpeg


christian1470 #20 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:51 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 38892 battles
  • 4,763
  • Member since:
    10-05-2014

View PostBorisBaddenov, on 06 April 2017 - 07:47 AM, said:

Interesting.

 

Here's my take.

 

When WG implemented missions - they thought that would be a big hit with us.  It wasnt.   In my opinion, many players ignore missions, I know I do.  The reward for mission is just not enticing enough to make me pay attention to them, let alone focus on completing missions.

 

So WG came up with grind events that focus on missions - now that idea is losing steam, with many players (such as myself) ignoring the current grind - and therefor back to ignoring missions.

 

WG notices this - and discusses ways to drive us to the missions - so at least for a while - until I have all 9 levels unlocked - I will be FORCED to work missions.

 

That's the only part I don't like - we see what happens during the grind event - noobs chasing missions -- now that will be an every day occurrence.  

 

Game play further deteriorates - all because of this idea.

 

DogFace - what do you think?  (he wont answer)

 

Peace-

Boris

 

 

I agree,  it the question left remaining is WHY does WG want us to complete missions so badly? They get no bemefit($) from it, as far as I can see. 




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users