Jump to content


New 3.8 Equipment System Complicated?


  • Please log in to reply
362 replies to this topic

BorisBaddenov #21 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:51 PM

    3.8 Made me quit

  • Players
  • 23259 battles
  • 7,654
  • [NOGUD]
  • Member since:
    12-11-2015

View PostWipWapJaws, on 06 April 2017 - 04:49 AM, said:

Seriously WG if ur going to favour the Russian server over everyone else and give them info way before the rest of us gets it, the least u could do is put English subtitles on ur official videos.

 

This company sometimes, it's like they have monkeys in their communication department 

 

It has sub-titles.

 

You have them turned off - not a WG issue.

 

Sorry WWJ - this is you thing.

 

Peace-

Boris


I’ve noticed a strong lack of Spare Parts. Is that intended?

No, it is not. This problem will solve itself with time. Many players have several dozens of vehicles in their Garages, so they don’t have enough Spare Parts for the entire vehicle fleet. But you will gradually collect enough Spare Parts to unlock new slots for purchased tanks in time.


concep #22 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:52 PM

    Stop Tunneling Me

  • Players
  • 33846 battles
  • 5,212
  • Member since:
    05-02-2011

More stupid grinding for simple things.

 

Another reason why I really need to quit this game.


Tier Xs (in order of unlocking): T110E5, M48 Patton, T-62A, IS-7, E50M, IS-4, FV4202, T110E3, FV215b, Obj. 268, T110E4, Leopard 1, Obj. 140, STB-1, Obj. 263, T57 Heavy, AMX 50B, Bat Chat 25t

                                                                                         Most played tank: T-62A (3,100 battles)

Favorite Quotes                       #BACKFROMTHEGRAVE                                   YouTube Channel!


BorisBaddenov #23 Posted 06 April 2017 - 12:52 PM

    3.8 Made me quit

  • Players
  • 23259 battles
  • 7,654
  • [NOGUD]
  • Member since:
    12-11-2015

View Postchristian1470, on 06 April 2017 - 04:51 AM, said:

 

I agree,  it the question left remaining is WHY does WG want us to complete missions so badly? They get no bemefit($) from it, as far as I can see. 

 

Missions were a big coding effort - and they are not being used.  So they are looking for ways to make Missions relevant.

 

(That's my guess)

 


I’ve noticed a strong lack of Spare Parts. Is that intended?

No, it is not. This problem will solve itself with time. Many players have several dozens of vehicles in their Garages, so they don’t have enough Spare Parts for the entire vehicle fleet. But you will gradually collect enough Spare Parts to unlock new slots for purchased tanks in time.


Killersqib #24 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:01 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 6948 battles
  • 292
  • [PFOTO]
  • Member since:
    02-25-2015

If I lose all my equipment and have to grind new ones?

First, this only makes the stock grind for tanks worse!

Second I BETTER get a FULL refund of credits that I spent for equipment if it disappears.

Third why don't they fix the missions First, garauntee I Will get at least two supremacy missions First thing?

 

Fourth that video to me was 10% understandable, I swear they were putting Russian words in with English, please just get a person who can speak English clearly to explain or tell them to slow down, it was "equipment the garbled English Russian mix."

 


Edited by Killersqib, 06 April 2017 - 01:12 PM.


spalling_apart #25 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:01 PM

    Oops, I spalled

  • Players
  • 29833 battles
  • 579
  • [III]
  • Member since:
    12-09-2014

View Postconcep, on 06 April 2017 - 07:52 AM, said:

More stupid grinding for simple things.

 

Another reason why I really need to quit this game.

 

^^ And I am THIS close.  Haven't played a single game outside of CW3 battles in over a week. Not the least bit interested in this grind and certainly not the newbury it brings with it.

Edited by spalling_apart, 06 April 2017 - 01:04 PM.


Gib_Savages #26 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:01 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27924 battles
  • 1,742
  • Member since:
    10-04-2014
If they want missions to be paid attention then let us select our choice of tier missions and don't offer supremacy missions when you have it disabled. I would pay more attention.


Player19696657 #27 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:02 PM

    Yes, I Shot You with Gold

  • Players
  • 32837 battles
  • 118
  • Member since:
    12-21-2014
This seems like a good way to over complicate something that is working fine, so there must be some profit to be had for all this effort.  Just saying 

Blartch #28 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:03 PM

    Causer of Unrest

  • Players
  • 57795 battles
  • 7,931
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015
Whatever.  Is game.  I not hef be med.

BorisBaddenov #29 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:08 PM

    3.8 Made me quit

  • Players
  • 23259 battles
  • 7,654
  • [NOGUD]
  • Member since:
    12-11-2015

View PostBlartch, on 06 April 2017 - 05:03 AM, said:

Whatever.  Is game.  I not hef be med.

 

Pravda !

I’ve noticed a strong lack of Spare Parts. Is that intended?

No, it is not. This problem will solve itself with time. Many players have several dozens of vehicles in their Garages, so they don’t have enough Spare Parts for the entire vehicle fleet. But you will gradually collect enough Spare Parts to unlock new slots for purchased tanks in time.


TengenToppaPotatoLagann #30 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:12 PM

    ᵐʸ ʰᵉˢʰ ʷᶦᶫᶫ ᵖᶦᵉʳᶜᵉ ᵗʰᵉ ʰᵉᵃᵛᵉᶰˢ﹗

  • Players
  • 52113 battles
  • 3,644
  • [RNSF]
  • Member since:
    03-31-2015

View PostBorisBaddenov, on 06 April 2017 - 07:52 AM, said:

 

Missions were a big coding effort - and they are not being used.  So they are looking for ways to make Missions relevant.

 

(That's my guess)

 

 

View PostGib_Savages, on 06 April 2017 - 08:01 AM, said:

If they want missions to be paid attention then let us select our choice of tier missions and don't offer supremacy missions when you have it disabled. I would pay more attention.

 

View PostAu197SP4M, on 06 April 2017 - 08:02 AM, said:

This seems like a good way to over complicate something that is working fine, so there must be some profit to be had for all this effort.  Just saying 

WG seems really keen on making missions a thing, yet they refuse to listen to the suggested fixes that we've all been begging for from the start... All the while furthering the frustrations of the player base by trying to shove missions down our throats.

 

Good business decisions, da!


>>>canine prints have claw marks, yet "mans best friend" camo does not; it would seem then that mans best friend is a cat... probably a leopard.

View Postminitel_NA, on 13 January 2018 - 03:06 AM, said:

when I’m tired I think I’m good.


Em707 #31 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:15 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 22411 battles
  • 38
  • [SRT]
  • Member since:
    03-08-2015

What does this mean for tanks that are already equipped when 3.8 goes live?



Blartch #32 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:18 PM

    Causer of Unrest

  • Players
  • 57795 battles
  • 7,931
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015

View PostEm707, on 06 April 2017 - 08:15 AM, said:

What does this mean for tanks that are already equipped when 3.8 goes live?

 

It means that _Crusader6_ is going to go absolutely insane

 

I do very much like the idea of (possibly) being able to easily change equipment based on the map/situation


Edited by Blartch, 06 April 2017 - 01:20 PM.


FluffyLittleUnicum #33 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:19 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 15158 battles
  • 89
  • Member since:
    02-25-2014

View PostEm707, on 06 April 2017 - 08:15 AM, said:

What does this mean for tanks that are already equipped when 3.8 goes live?

 

All equipment will be converted to gears. Better load up the equipment while you can.

Back to the PC version, much less hassle there.



Em707 #34 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:28 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 22411 battles
  • 38
  • [SRT]
  • Member since:
    03-08-2015
I have every tank fully equipped (70+ tanks), so I'm hoping that the current benefits will be retained through the update with this new system.........

dimzzy #35 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:33 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 39520 battles
  • 4,189
  • [-1]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014
I have ~260 fully equipped tanks...

dimzzy #36 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:38 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 39520 battles
  • 4,189
  • [-1]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014
Actually I have a pretty bad feeling about this because these binary choices could be in fact more limiting. For example my Leopard 1 has both binocs and optics; I assume that the new system will allow me to pick only one. Sigh.

Dark_Magician_Girl #37 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:40 PM

    #1 Reroll NA

  • Players
  • 33730 battles
  • 4,873
  • [_STR8]
  • Member since:
    10-02-2016

While I do not like the grinding, as long as I can still mount my Rammer, Vents, and Vstab at the same time they can add more equipment.  However, it looked like in the video they completely got rid of vents.

 

Actually what is more interesting is that it appears the system rewards good players inherently.  For example, people who rush to get a tier 10 will not be able to mount the same equipment, or the same number of equipment as players who know what they're doing.


Edited by Dark_Magician_Girl, 06 April 2017 - 01:44 PM.

I am now the #1 ranked E75 on the NA server!

 

 

 

 


tanker070 #38 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:43 PM

    The Nitwit

  • Players
  • 52438 battles
  • 1,108
  • [SRT-A]
  • Member since:
    07-11-2014

yes change can be tough after being use to so many battles (some 30k in my case).  Im looking forward to this new "feature" and lets see how it evolves over time.  its something we have to adapt since it was on the devs calendar for months.

If something exists, it exists for a reason   (good or bad)  Lets welcome it with open arms and not throw money at it right away

again....vote with your wallets.

 

-Nitwit


.....
To see my work search #tankerTalks

My projects: www.clan-skill.com   LoweringYourExpectations on Youtube   SRT-AGOGE   CreatorsClub

[SRT] https://discord.gg/ZDY4Dpk
"As long as there are those that remember what was, there will always be those, that are unable to accept what can be. They will resist." - The Mad Titan


PixelBucket #39 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:46 PM

    Level 90 Loser

  • Players
  • 21824 battles
  • 3,290
  • [PRT]
  • Member since:
    12-31-2014
This is stupid. Overly complicating something that does not need to be any more complex than it is.

My Top Tanks: Lowe (#880), Type 61 (#834), Helsing H0 (#797), Pz. S35 739 (#778), ARL 44 (#661), T7 Car (#654), STB-1 (#502), MT-25 (#442), Excelsior (ironically(#422), M22 Locust (#322), T23E3 (#223), Pz. 38 (t) nA (#211), Alecto (#197), Pz 35 (t) (#168),

T-25 (#166), Stridsvagn 74A2 (#151), Angry Connor (#63!), T-15 (#50!), Pz. 38 (t) (#31!)

In My Garage: T-25, Tetrarch, Pz 38 (t), Pz 35 (t),  SU-122-44, Helsing H0, Kuro Mori Mine, Pz IV Anko SP, E 50 M, T7 Car, T2 Light, Locust, T-15, Stridsvagn 74A2, T23E3, Angry Connor, Lowe, Leopard 1, 112, STB-1, AMX M4 45, Type 61, WT Auf Pz IV, T28 Proto

Lines I am currently grinding: T110E4 (Currently at T28 Proto), AMX 50B (Currently at AMX M4 45)

"As can likely be inferred, I am a sad, lonely excuse of a human being"


_stnick #40 Posted 06 April 2017 - 01:53 PM

    HO HO HO!

  • Players
  • 13131 battles
  • 210
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

If Dogface approves, then I approve!

 

Edit: In all seriousness, I'm going to wait to judge this until I understand it a little more. Personally it seems to me like they are over complicating something that isn't broken. Plus, what if I want to equip both optics and a camo net, can I do that???


Edited by _stnick, 06 April 2017 - 03:10 PM.

*Unless explicitly stated, all posts I make are not representative of the BCC or it's Workgroup*

 

-----Blitz University-----

Do you want to get better at Blitz? Join Blitz University here --> https://discord.gg/d3HHkz4





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users