

#21 Posted 31 July 2017 - 01:50 AM
#22 Posted 31 July 2017 - 01:57 AM
Player60, on 30 July 2017 - 09:21 PM, said:
if it was implememted back,our entire match would be Reload 10 seconds>>wait oops e100 reload apcr 10 seconds.We only have 7 minutes,this idea is so stupid i dont believe anyone would suggest it
7 minutes is plenty of time for most tanks excepting autoloaders, even if you have to reload all the way.
I also explained that implementing such mechanic would suggest medium tanks having their penetration buffed, so you aren't going to switch ammo that often, thus time wouldn't be a problem anymore.
https://www.blitzstars.com/player/com/Pittoors_
Current garage: M48A1 Patton, IS-4, T110E5, E 50 Ausf. M, Leopard 1, T-62A, M46 Patton, T54E1, IS-8, IS-5, IS-6, Rheinmetall Borsig Waffentrager, T49, T23E3, Type 62, Helsing, T-34-1, Kuro Mori Mine, AC IV Sentinel, SU-100Y, Stridsvagn 74A2, Panzer IV Anko SP, Churchill III, T-34, Hetzer Kame SP, A-32, DW 2, Panzer S35, BT-SV, BT-7 Artillery, SU-76i, T-15, M3 Light, T2 Light, T7 Combat Car, Light Mk. VIC.
#23 Posted 31 July 2017 - 02:24 AM
#24 Posted 31 July 2017 - 02:32 AM
STAR1 NA top 10 all-time ranked player - Blitzstars NA top 10 most winning all-time ranked player - Blitzstars NA top 10 highest career WN8 all-time ranked player - #1 ranked driver E75 STAR1 - Blitzstars 49 different vehicles with top 10 all-time NA WN8 - 40 unique career 3000+ damage averages at high tiers - Captain of 5 top 8 NA tournament appearances - Content creator of map meta defining Blitz YT content - 1 of 3 Bushka masterclass candidates.
I am, the Dark Magician Girl
#25 Posted 31 July 2017 - 02:35 AM
when, I've been playing longer than you and I don't remember it that way ever. I do remember friendly fire though!
Edited by RoadKutter, 31 July 2017 - 02:37 AM.
Ghosting reds since 2014
#26 Posted 31 July 2017 - 02:57 AM
#27 Posted 31 July 2017 - 02:58 AM
80% of the time the FV is unspotted when it fires and often times across the map. Other 20% is risk taking which is understandable.
Dark_Magician_Girl, on 30 July 2017 - 08:32 PM, said:
Similar to when I made the Otsu nerf thread years ago. I am surprised by how many people don't want it nerfed despite how obvious it is ruining the gameplay at tier X.
Tomio Hara was the chief of Japanese tank development during the pre war period and WWII
Want to cap base? Read this!
#28 Posted 31 July 2017 - 03:02 AM
jarredondo040, on 30 July 2017 - 08:57 PM, said:
Tomio Hara was the chief of Japanese tank development during the pre war period and WWII
Want to cap base? Read this!
#29 Posted 31 July 2017 - 03:24 AM
Im kind annoyed at how much people ask for nerfs. BUT, this is an exception. I like playing my leopard 1, but i do not like playing against 183's in my leopard 1, so there may be some bias in this post.
Before WG nerfed the reticle bloom when turning by a large margin, then they buffed it because the tank was basically unplayable with so much bloom.
- I think the reload should be slowed down a little, but not too much
- Penetration on premium HESH should be reduced to somewhere between 180 and 200, because i think a td penning a heavy with a shell that does high explosive damage may be a LITTLE OP
- Regular hesh (90 or so pen i think) is okay
-damage should stay the same on all shells, FV already has bad dpm
- maybe a very slight nerf to turret traverse :/
Edit: i do not do terribly in a leo 1 against 183's, but sometimes it is borderline OP imo, i feel like a slight nerf should be given to it.
Edited by Pengui472, 31 July 2017 - 03:25 AM.
#30 Posted 31 July 2017 - 03:40 AM
RoadKutter, on 30 July 2017 - 10:35 PM, said:
when, I've been playing longer than you and I don't remember it that way ever. I do remember friendly fire though!
I'm not that old on the game, yes, but I found people on the forums discussing the ammo switch changes, here:
Sorry for taking so long, but it took me A LOT of time learning to use the search tool properly.
https://www.blitzstars.com/player/com/Pittoors_
Current garage: M48A1 Patton, IS-4, T110E5, E 50 Ausf. M, Leopard 1, T-62A, M46 Patton, T54E1, IS-8, IS-5, IS-6, Rheinmetall Borsig Waffentrager, T49, T23E3, Type 62, Helsing, T-34-1, Kuro Mori Mine, AC IV Sentinel, SU-100Y, Stridsvagn 74A2, Panzer IV Anko SP, Churchill III, T-34, Hetzer Kame SP, A-32, DW 2, Panzer S35, BT-SV, BT-7 Artillery, SU-76i, T-15, M3 Light, T2 Light, T7 Combat Car, Light Mk. VIC.
#31 Posted 31 July 2017 - 03:43 AM
G_O_O_S_E, on 30 July 2017 - 10:24 PM, said:
That would make the tank even less profitable than it already is, to a point a significant amount of people would start to use AP and HE more often to save credits.
Edited by Pittoors_, 31 July 2017 - 03:43 AM.
https://www.blitzstars.com/player/com/Pittoors_
Current garage: M48A1 Patton, IS-4, T110E5, E 50 Ausf. M, Leopard 1, T-62A, M46 Patton, T54E1, IS-8, IS-5, IS-6, Rheinmetall Borsig Waffentrager, T49, T23E3, Type 62, Helsing, T-34-1, Kuro Mori Mine, AC IV Sentinel, SU-100Y, Stridsvagn 74A2, Panzer IV Anko SP, Churchill III, T-34, Hetzer Kame SP, A-32, DW 2, Panzer S35, BT-SV, BT-7 Artillery, SU-76i, T-15, M3 Light, T2 Light, T7 Combat Car, Light Mk. VIC.
#32 Posted 31 July 2017 - 03:45 AM
Dark_Magician_Girl, on 30 July 2017 - 06:35 PM, said:
Right, because tanks that can HE a majority of targets at their battle tier for near full rolls will suddenly become underpowered.
KV-2, "underpowered." That's hilarious.
Its hilarious that people complain the 183 is overpowered but everyone immediately rushes over to defend some equally overpowered tanks for their respective tiers without a single hesitation. Case in point everyone including WarGaming is bias against the British and secretly throw darts at cups of Earl Grey Tea and pictures of the royal family.
Proud owner of Her Majesty's MBT the Centurion Mk 7/1
Armed with the Royal Ordnance 105 mm L7A1 Gun
#33 Posted 31 July 2017 - 03:49 AM
so you dont have the tank.... but want a nerf because you think its overpowered based on your encounters with the 183? Until you get the full experience behind the gun with the included mile long misses and paper armor, please dont start a petition to nerf a tank.
#34 Posted 31 July 2017 - 03:54 AM
Tomio_Hara, on 30 July 2017 - 09:58 PM, said:
Similar to when I made the Otsu nerf thread years ago. I am surprised by how many people don't want it nerfed despite how obvious it is ruining the gameplay at tier X.
The difference between the 183 and Ke-Ni Otsu is that the people paid money to get the Otsu. In terms of gameplay the Kenny should be severely nerfed. In terms of principle, it should not, given WG's policy on the balancing of premium tanks.
STAR1 NA top 10 all-time ranked player - Blitzstars NA top 10 most winning all-time ranked player - Blitzstars NA top 10 highest career WN8 all-time ranked player - #1 ranked driver E75 STAR1 - Blitzstars 49 different vehicles with top 10 all-time NA WN8 - 40 unique career 3000+ damage averages at high tiers - Captain of 5 top 8 NA tournament appearances - Content creator of map meta defining Blitz YT content - 1 of 3 Bushka masterclass candidates.
I am, the Dark Magician Girl
#35 Posted 31 July 2017 - 04:13 AM
Pittoors_, on 30 July 2017 - 07:40 PM, said:
I'm not that old on the game, yes, but I found people on the forums discussing the ammo switch changes, here:
Sorry for taking so long, but it took me A LOT of time learning to use the search tool properly.
now you should read it, a discussion doesn't mean it was ever a part of Blitz. On Pc you do have to reload when you switch ammo, but on Blitz it would make no sense due to short battles and small maps. The only good switch was having the ammo selector open instead of having to double tap it.....
Ghosting reds since 2014
#36 Posted 31 July 2017 - 04:30 AM
EdAWACSdenyY, on 31 July 2017 - 03:45 AM, said:
Its hilarious that people complain the 183 is overpowered but everyone immediately rushes over to defend some equally overpowered tanks for their respective tiers without a single hesitation. Case in point everyone including WarGaming is bias against the British and secretly throw darts at cups of Earl Grey Tea and pictures of the royal family.
But the KV2 doesnt ruin (((exaggerated))) gameplay at its tier. Its not very common compared to the FV183
Edited by Pengui472, 31 July 2017 - 04:31 AM.
#37 Posted 31 July 2017 - 04:51 AM
RoadKutter, on 31 July 2017 - 12:13 AM, said:
now you should read it, a discussion doesn't mean it was ever a part of Blitz. On Pc you do have to reload when you switch ammo, but on Blitz it would make no sense due to short battles and small maps. The only good switch was having the ammo selector open instead of having to double tap it.....
Do you imply that they are talking about Pc WoT? Not plausible, because there are quotes that clearly refer as something that was there, but got removed/changed. That feature was never removed nor changed on the Pc version, but it did on Blitz. Also, they would have mentioned that they were talking about the Pc version.
''Yup, the old days when you had to reload to a different shell type.''
''The moment that wargaming allowed players to be able to switch between ammunition without any penalty is the moment when heavy tanks and their armor became obsolete.''
''fix the changes you made so long ago''
Also, because mediums back then had much higher penetration, they didn't had to use prammo as often so time wasn't the issue.
https://www.blitzstars.com/player/com/Pittoors_
Current garage: M48A1 Patton, IS-4, T110E5, E 50 Ausf. M, Leopard 1, T-62A, M46 Patton, T54E1, IS-8, IS-5, IS-6, Rheinmetall Borsig Waffentrager, T49, T23E3, Type 62, Helsing, T-34-1, Kuro Mori Mine, AC IV Sentinel, SU-100Y, Stridsvagn 74A2, Panzer IV Anko SP, Churchill III, T-34, Hetzer Kame SP, A-32, DW 2, Panzer S35, BT-SV, BT-7 Artillery, SU-76i, T-15, M3 Light, T2 Light, T7 Combat Car, Light Mk. VIC.
#38 Posted 31 July 2017 - 04:56 AM
Hmm....Let's see here...
Pros:
- Huge alpha
- Good pen
- Good traverse
Cons:
- Paper armor
- Non fully traversable turret
- B A D terrain resistance, as fast as E100 on flat ground
- As big as an E100; terribad camo
- Terrible accuracy
- Very team dependent
- Very RNG dependent
- No gun depression
"And I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge, my fortress, my God in whom I trust."
WREAKING HAVOK
#39 Posted 31 July 2017 - 06:15 AM
#40 Posted 31 July 2017 - 06:23 AM
I completely disagree. I have no problem taking these tanks out in my IX Patton, They are slow and have terrible turret rotation speed. I can COD these things in a STOCK MODE PATTON. I do have the gun though. Anyways these things are awesome bringing a better variety to the game other than just heavies. Tank destroyers are called that for a reason, they destroy tanks. The thing is, they give medium tanks a purpose. Like a game of Rock Paper Scissors (obviously a bit more than that, but that's the general idea)
Heavies>Mediums
Mediums>Tank Destroyers
Tank Destroyers>Heavies
(No tier 9/10 lights)
If there were no high damage tanks heavies would have nothing to fear on the battlefield. I like it better this way
Also tagged with HESH, FV 215b 183, 183
Game Discussion → General Discussion → For the number of the Beast shall be 183!Started by SanguinaryDan, 09 Jul 2018![]() |
|
|
||
Game Discussion → General Discussion → The Plethora of Reasons to Hate the FV 215b 183Started by AOT_Jaeger2, 12 Jan 2018![]() |
|
|
||
Game Discussion → General Discussion → No mOar kemping in tier X!Started by _UrgleMcPurfle_, 27 Nov 2017![]() |
|
|
||
Game Discussion → General Discussion → FV215b 183 - 3k Avg Dmg SessionStarted by SPlCY, 23 Jul 2017![]() |
|
|
||
Game Discussion → General Discussion → Video Vault → Camping in the Wild: Episode 5Started by VikkoTheTusken, 14 Mar 2017![]() |
|
|
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users