Jump to content


Let's get acquainted!


  • Please log in to reply
476 replies to this topic

zeur0sis #461 Posted 25 April 2018 - 07:11 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18833 battles
  • 1,152
  • [-1]
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016

View PostRibbleStripe, on 25 April 2018 - 08:57 AM, said:

 

Don't frighten newcomers, Maverick )
Running multiple accounts is not forbidden.

 

wait what?

 

"Mm sucks just like u r face.    Now Go cry on tissue not here." ~ raj

 


NoobieDude #462 Posted 25 April 2018 - 08:27 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3014 battles
  • 1,749
  • [CYRUS]
  • Member since:
    11-29-2017

View PostRibbleStripe, on 25 April 2018 - 05:57 AM, said:

 

Don't frighten newcomers, Maverick )
Running multiple accounts is not forbidden.

HEY RIBBLE. just change this one very stupid rule in your rule book, to have multiple accounts.and the problem is solved.

 


Edited by NoobieDude, 25 April 2018 - 08:27 PM.


acrisis #463 Posted 25 April 2018 - 11:35 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20198 battles
  • 9,410
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 25 April 2018 - 08:57 AM, said:

 


Running multiple accounts is not forbidden.

 

 

One of the oldest rules known to Blitzers, which has been enforced in the past ... 

 

 

Block Quote

 

1. General Provisions

1.01. In order to register, players must be thirteen (13) years of age or older, and are allowed only one account registered per server.

 

Source: 

 

https://wotblitz.com/en/content/docs/user_agreement/

 

 


 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
BCC Discord invite | BCC Forum Thread
Looney Tooners | Triarii | Blitz University | Basic Training  | Mentor
2.8 Blitz EconomyGot lag? =>  Pingplotter thread 


Silver_Lions #464 Posted 26 April 2018 - 04:01 AM

    Illegitimi non Carborundum

  • Players
  • 16952 battles
  • 1,077
  • [GHOST]
  • Member since:
    11-22-2014

And once again, proving another theorum-  Devs dont play the game, Marketing Dept clueless, and the mods don’t know the Rules/EULA.     

 

But Vodka, yeah baby, they know vodka........

 

This platform is doomed.....



RibbleStripe #465 Posted 26 April 2018 - 07:43 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 241 battles
  • 541
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017
All the actual legal documentation is here - http://legal.na.wargaming.net/en/ 
EULA was updated 2 years ago - there is no rule you all quote. 

It took a while to understand why do you guys refer to an old EULA. In-game link will be updated as well.

zeur0sis #466 Posted 26 April 2018 - 11:45 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18833 battles
  • 1,152
  • [-1]
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016
OMK, aka player#1234567890 will be happy to hear this.   

Edited by zeur0sis, 26 April 2018 - 11:45 AM.

 

"Mm sucks just like u r face.    Now Go cry on tissue not here." ~ raj

 


iRaikkonen #467 Posted 26 April 2018 - 12:43 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26762 battles
  • 483
  • [SCAMO]
  • Member since:
    11-03-2014

View PostBorisBaddenov, on 25 April 2018 - 06:03 PM, said:

 

We all should care when a WG Employee makes a statement that seems to invalidate the EULA.

 

lol you thought

 


PanzertroopenVT #468 Posted 26 April 2018 - 01:30 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10198 battles
  • 2,090
  • [PRDE]
  • Member since:
    07-12-2017

View PostBorisBaddenov, on 25 April 2018 - 01:03 PM, said:

 

We all should care when a WG Employee makes a statement that seems to invalidate the EULA.

 

If ur making sense, and it hurts their ears........I need popcorn

Panzerwaffe, later also Panzertruppe (German for "Armoured Force", "Armoured Arm" or "Tank Force". Waffe[combat] "arm"

Hey you—yes you, with all that moist, succulent meat in your mouth. Give all of it to me. succulentnmeals!

https://youtu.be/XebF2cgmFmU


slayer_____ #469 Posted 27 April 2018 - 04:31 AM

    Spray and Pray

  • Players
  • 35656 battles
  • 2,674
  • [ATA2D]
  • Member since:
    07-10-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 25 April 2018 - 08:57 AM, said:

 

Don't frighten newcomers, Maverick )
Running multiple accounts is not forbidden.

 

I’m sure this was changed to generate revenue. 

Zuke76 #470 Posted 27 April 2018 - 07:25 PM

    Zuke le grand

  • Players
  • 14767 battles
  • 1,945
  • [SR-71]
  • Member since:
    06-25-2017

View PostPanzertroopenVT, on 26 April 2018 - 01:30 PM, said:

 

If ur making sense, and it hurts their ears........I need popcorn

 

​Have all ya want :popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn:

 

 

A Part of the Training Room Police Department(TRPD) thanks to __Seal__


originalmadkilla #471 Posted 27 April 2018 - 08:10 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 15517 battles
  • 3,199
  • [OMK]
  • Member since:
    04-02-2014

View Postzeur0sis, on 26 April 2018 - 06:45 AM, said:

OMK, aka player#1234567890 will be happy to hear this.   

 

He would.:justwait:

Quantitative_Methods #472 Posted 28 April 2018 - 12:22 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 16542 battles
  • 13
  • [LDS]
  • Member since:
    07-31-2013

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 01 August 2017 - 08:07 AM, said:

I don't think that Wargaming understands the rage that is simmering below the surface with many of their long time players.

 

The issue is, and always will be, that the number of highly engaged players like you (and me to a lesser extent) are in the minority. 80/20 kind of thing. Changing equipment was 1/10th for game balance (no more running binocs and camo net to make oneself lord TD master of the map). I whole heartedly agree with that aspect, and with allowing a more nuanced approach to equipment loadouts by having 9 slots for a broader set of options and more combinations. 

 

The other 9/10ths so WG could make people wait through 9 timers, which means 9 opportunities to have people spend gold. Without seeing the real data, I’d wager that a much larger portion of the player base is willing to spend 7,500 gold a handful at a time by impulse buying their way out of the last few hours of timers as compared to the handful of us that are willing to shell that much out all at once to buy a Löwe or IS-6 or T-34. 

 

It’s all about the impulse buy man. 

 

Move been playing since wayyyyy back in the day, and I too had many tanks with full equipment load out prior to 3.8. While the compensation for the silver spent on those parts was admittedly prett weak, it was nonetheless compensation for currency earned by playing the game, not from a cash payment. I wasn’t stoked either. However, you should be outraged every time WG nerfs a tech tree tank that you bought since you paid BOTH silver and XP for that, and it’s no longer the same. 

 

Was the implementation sub-optimal? Yes. But I kept track, and was able to mount more equipment using that compensation than I had installed before the patch. We just couldn’t get everything back to full equipment because there were 9 slots instead of 3. We could all get more stuff mounted than we had before. You’re getting upset because they changed something to give us more slots. 

 

Also, WG getting more revenue from Blitz is great because more revenue = more resources. More resources = more game development. 

 

All ghat said, don’t get me started on the container thing that started with the MBT 70. Containers are a cancer in the game, and should be eliminated. Though I’m sure WG makes plenty of money from them. 



alex1467 #473 Posted 28 April 2018 - 06:35 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 12591 battles
  • 1
  • [URSUS]
  • Member since:
    04-20-2016

View PostZIoydd, on 01 August 2017 - 10:31 AM, said:

Hello tankers,

 

It's time for us to get to know each other better. From now on, we (Zloydd and MaXSty1er) will communicate with you on this forum together with our colleagues. We represent the RU region and play on the RU server, so don’t let our zero battle stats confuse you—we’re experienced players and know our favorite game inside and out.

 

Our aim is to give you first-hand information about the game. You can come to us with any questions about updates, new features, or in-game mechanics. If we don’t have an answer, we’ll ask the developers sitting next door!

 

In return, we expect your constructive comments on our game. You are free to praise the things you like or complain about the things you dislike. We’ll do our best to give you prompt feedback on problematic issues. But please remain polite when criticizing to avoid misunderstandings.

 

Currently, we have no plans for changing the forum structure; everything will remain as it is. However, if you have any suggestions as to forum structure improvements, we will consider them.

We understand that time differences may hinder communication, but we will try to catch time intervals when everyone is awake, or will answer your questions while it is night in America.

At the moment, we will support English only. We are aware that it is not ideal for non-native English speakers (it’s not ideal for us either). But we’re doing this to provide you with even more information on the project so that you understand how and in what direction it develops. Communicating in the same language will allow us to give you the most accurate information faster, avoid mistakes in release notes. In future, we are planning to add support for other languages as well.

 

We’re looking forward to our productive cooperation. And excuse us if our English isn't that good.

 

Mobilize!

 

Hi, when is  the

test update 5.0??? 



AllahuSnakbar #474 Posted 29 April 2018 - 10:46 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 92 battles
  • 7
  • Member since:
    04-29-2018
I figured this is as good of place as any to say hello.  I'm new but I'm trying my best.  I hope to see you guys in game soon. :)

I_Maverick_I #475 Posted 30 April 2018 - 05:25 AM

    Ribble4Prez2020

  • Players
  • 18012 battles
  • 1,474
  • [_V_]
  • Member since:
    06-13-2016

View PostAllahuSnakbar, on 29 April 2018 - 02:46 PM, said:

I figured this is as good of place as any to say hello.  I'm new but I'm trying my best.  I hope to see you guys in game soon. :)

 

hi

Techincal Difficulties


NoobieDude #476 Posted 30 April 2018 - 06:56 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3014 battles
  • 1,749
  • [CYRUS]
  • Member since:
    11-29-2017

Nice to see this rule change. although i really don't care about players that re-roll or not. the player is no better than he/she was before there re-roll. just there stats are more inline with there game play. and really the only reason for this....it stops the belittling of posters making comments on poor stats. good one WG.

 

also it stops the rule police types from spouting there trivial  B.S


Edited by NoobieDude, 30 April 2018 - 06:59 PM.


AllahuSnakbar #477 Posted 02 May 2018 - 03:38 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 92 battles
  • 7
  • Member since:
    04-29-2018

View PostI_Maverick_I, on 30 April 2018 - 12:25 AM, said:

 

hi

Hi






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users