Jump to content


COLLABORATION WITH WARHAMMER 40,000!


  • Please log in to reply
271 replies to this topic

wrecker1968 #201 Posted 15 August 2017 - 06:57 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 40394 battles
  • 675
  • [HOUSE]
  • Member since:
    04-13-2016
question 1. Do you like the spare parts program? question 2. Do you think the spare parts program was made for your enjoyment or so WOTB could make more money off you?

Kiser_Sosei #202 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:03 PM

    Who is Kiser Sosei?!?

  • Players
  • 30883 battles
  • 1,489
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    11-12-2014

View PostZIoydd, on 15 August 2017 - 11:27 AM, said:

I respect each of you and i respect your opinion. But Warhammer, Sega and other it's global cooperation, which very important for WG. 

 

You may be unhappy, but this will not change anything in this situation. 

 

Your opinion is still very important to me and when we speak about game feature, i collect your posts and discuss with our developer about your feedback.

 

early i collected feddb only on RU, but i can collect feedback from all regions now.

 

If you really respected us you would have already held a survey and a town hall meeting before making up your mind. You have not, and by your answers this is clearly NOT true. (See below)

 

This "You may be unhappy, but this will not change anything in this situation. " this is the opposite of respect. 

 

This is our Answer Forumers: "But Warhammer, Sega and other it's global cooperation, which very important for WG. "

 

Meaning this collaboration will lead to more players signing up and lead to more sales of IS-6s to noobs. WG cares absolutely about nothing else than that quick sale. $$$

So our desire for a great game has completely lost all hope. They have repeatedly demonstrated since 2.8 that this game is for making quick money. It is not about the tank gaming experience. 

 

There is actually no point in having a forum. Why does WG even have it? 

 

But Seriously Zloydd. Thanks for your straight answers and letting us know that neither you nor anyone at WG actually plays or loves Blitz.

Our misery intensifies. 

 

 

 


Edited by Kiser_Sosei, 15 August 2017 - 07:05 PM.

"MM may not be rigged but RNGesus only answers the prayers of one team."
My WOTB Youtube Channel.

https://www.blitzsta...com/Kiser_Sosei


t4four #203 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:12 PM

    Fix the cigarette lighter

  • Players
  • 34030 battles
  • 1,694
  • [SPUDX]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014
A theory: WG will keep adding any new tank they can get licensing for to this version. It will become the Super Smash Brothers of the tanking world and the kids will love it. Then, a few months down the road, they will release Blitz II: The Golden Era. They will in effect reset the clock. Everything that sucked us in the first time. They may even promise to keep it completely historical. All the older crowd will be happy. You can start all your grinds again. Buy the premium tanks & time again. Just to escape the bloat. It will be the largest mass reroll of all time. WG can have its cake and eat it too.
I like turtles

zeur0sis #204 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:24 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24663 battles
  • 1,354
  • [-1]
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016

Hey.    They gotta make money some how.   Just wait till sponsors start showing up on tanks.    Pepsi Pershing, anyone?


 

"Mm sucks just like u r face.    Now Go cry on tissue not here." ~ raj

 


Bullveigh25 #205 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:27 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 40594 battles
  • 270
  • [-CFR-]
  • Member since:
    06-12-2013
why cant wg just introduce partnership camos instead of these odd vehicles, i would probably pick up camos more than a new vehicle these days.

Kiser_Sosei #206 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:31 PM

    Who is Kiser Sosei?!?

  • Players
  • 30883 battles
  • 1,489
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    11-12-2014
When a blitz player finally realizes their purpose in the game. 


"MM may not be rigged but RNGesus only answers the prayers of one team."
My WOTB Youtube Channel.

https://www.blitzsta...com/Kiser_Sosei


WipWapJaws #207 Posted 15 August 2017 - 08:47 PM

    Clanless Scrub

  • Players
  • 44360 battles
  • 3,576
  • [WKD]
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014

View PostDark_Magician_Girl, on 16 August 2017 - 04:19 AM, said:

I'll bet money WG staff goes town on middleburg.

 

lol

_Zenshin #208 Posted 15 August 2017 - 08:49 PM

    Vladimir-Taichou no Tanku

  • Players
  • 25093 battles
  • 766
  • [PURPL]
  • Member since:
    09-21-2014
This is entertaining-

Tier X: IS-7, IS-4, Object 140, Grille 15, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, E 100, Obj 268, T57 Heavy, Maus, FV215b (183), T-62a, Vk 72.01 k

First MAHOU/ANEKI member to reach Diamond League


_Prammospammer #209 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:13 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5812 battles
  • 190
  • Member since:
    12-12-2015

can we please go back to 2.5? back when the game was good...+2-2, mediums that we loved and no aùtistic fantasy tanks that nobody likes....

EDIT: i would like my skill rounds back please.


Edited by _Prammospammer, 15 August 2017 - 09:15 PM.

 

OOF > PNDA 

 


Three60Mafia #210 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:34 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13079 battles
  • 5,171
  • [FLOOP]
  • Member since:
    01-04-2015

Dear WG, please keep in mind that certain forum members don't speak for all of us. Some of us are a long-time Warhammer 40k fans, and would love to actually play a game where you would be able to drive the famous W40K tanks.


HOWEVER, that being said... the tanks in W40k universe are so powerful that you would effectively have to completely change what they are in order to have them be playable in Blitz. 

 

Lazer guns, multi-meltas, etc etc... plus not to mention most of these tanks are the size of 2 TOG2's glued together. 


Maybe you guys are better off creating a separate game for Warhammer 40k Blitz, or a special game mode where you can actually do justice to the Warhammer tanks, without ruining them completely by adjusting their weapons and stats to fit current Blitz. 

And when you have to change so much about Warhammer tanks, are they even worth being named as W40K tanks?


Edited by Three60Mafia, 15 August 2017 - 09:37 PM.

Click on signature to be taken to full stat page!


p30_1 #211 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:38 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31973 battles
  • 677
  • [OI1ST]
  • Member since:
    07-20-2014
So will this new game mode add more lag . I know our gamefile  getting bigger and alot of ppl are using older devices that cant handle what we got now

_GhostPepper #212 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:40 PM

    Spicy HESHed Potato Pies, Inc.

  • Players
  • 37070 battles
  • 493
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

View PostZIoydd, on 15 August 2017 - 09:46 AM, said:

 

Oh :) Give more anger! We would not do this if we did not know that most players like this. It should be understood that the forum is not all the players of the server

 

What a juvenile and pathetic response. From a "mod" no less. Talk about disrespecting en masse. This is how you respond to a nearly 100% negative reaction to WG's stupid idea? I guess it shouldn't come as a surprise should it.. and as long as we are talking about "most players" liking this? Let's see the proof then. Or did WG go out and poll a bunch of 10 year olds?

Three60Mafia #213 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:49 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13079 battles
  • 5,171
  • [FLOOP]
  • Member since:
    01-04-2015

View Post_GhostPepper, on 15 August 2017 - 04:40 PM, said:

 

What a juvenile and pathetic response. From a "mod" no less. Talk about disrespecting en masse. This is how you respond to a nearly 100% negative reaction to WG's stupid idea? I guess it shouldn't come as a surprise should it.. and as long as we are talking about "most players" liking this? Let's see the proof then. Or did WG go out and poll a bunch of 10 year olds?

 

Old men objecting to new things is nothing new. WG always ignored these rants, and they will continue to do so, and absolutely nothing will happen. 

Click on signature to be taken to full stat page!


_GhostPepper #214 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:53 PM

    Spicy HESHed Potato Pies, Inc.

  • Players
  • 37070 battles
  • 493
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

View PostThree60Mafia, on 15 August 2017 - 03:49 PM, said:

 

Old men objecting to new things is nothing new. WG always ignored these rants, and they will continue to do so, and absolutely nothing will happen. 

 

...yes, I suppose you are correct. And that is the sad reality. 

Three60Mafia #215 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:57 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13079 battles
  • 5,171
  • [FLOOP]
  • Member since:
    01-04-2015

View Post_GhostPepper, on 15 August 2017 - 04:53 PM, said:

 

...yes, I suppose you are correct. And that is the sad reality. 

 

There was this exact same type of thread from the same people about the anime tanks, about hellsing and dracula, about the Defender etc etc And not just on this forum. On Ru and EU. 

 

And yet, here we all are. 

 

At this point its either accept it as fact or leave it. Or play WoWS Blitz. Though that game will also have anime tie-ins, just as the PC version had. 

 

 


Edited by Three60Mafia, 15 August 2017 - 09:57 PM.

Click on signature to be taken to full stat page!


WriterDude #216 Posted 15 August 2017 - 10:19 PM

    My Posts Are Forum Prammo

  • Players
  • 23053 battles
  • 4,373
  • Member since:
    10-09-2014

View PostThree60Mafia, on 15 August 2017 - 02:34 PM, said:

Maybe you guys are better off creating a separate game for Warhammer 40k Blitz, or a special game mode where you can actually do justice to the Warhammer tanks, without ruining them completely by adjusting their weapons and stats to fit current Blitz. 

 

If only someone had suggested that at some point... http://forum.wotblitz.com/index.php?/topic/83766-collaboration-with-warhammer-40000/page__st__160__pid__1282243#entry1282243


Worthy of focus fire by SPUDX.  Potato Cred Link

  

"In Blitz, there's a certain value in expeditiously moving to the inevitable." -WriterDude


Richie_McCaw #217 Posted 15 August 2017 - 10:33 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7582 battles
  • 375
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011
It's a business decision, WG has milked what they can from the loyal players. Those that are still playing will likely still play no matter what changes WG makes.

WG knows this, they have no direct competition on mobile. Adding Warhammer is a no brainer for them in attracting new players who are more likely to spend $$$. Most of us veterans are not spending anymore anyway so they need a new source of revenue.

It's best just to enjoy the game for what it is. Getting upset and ranting on this forum will achieve nothing.

Player_39363936 #218 Posted 15 August 2017 - 11:06 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 66531 battles
  • 4,176
  • [EWENS]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014

The delusions expressed in this thread are remarkable.

 

I work for a major corporation.   Our one and only function is to make as much money as fast as we possibly can.  This is how all corporations function, and it's how wargaming functions.

 

The idea that a unicums opinion is more important than anyone elses, is laughable.   How well you play the game is irrelevant.

 

How much money you spend on the game is tthe one and only thing that matters.

 

They don't care that you want the game to be a world war 2 simulator.   It never was, and it's not ever going to be.

 

This collaboration is going to make wargaming a pile of money.

 

And they will continue to do anything and everything they can to make more piles of money.

 

That's how corporations work.



DrFerd #219 Posted 15 August 2017 - 11:20 PM

    Certified BlitzWeather Forecaster

  • Players
  • 37998 battles
  • 738
  • [III-S]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014

View PostRichie_McCaw, on 15 August 2017 - 05:33 PM, said:

It's a business decision, WG has milked what they can from the loyal players. Those that are still playing will likely still play no matter what changes WG makes.

WG knows this, they have no direct competition on mobile. Adding Warhammer is a no brainer for them in attracting new players who are more likely to spend $$$. Most of us veterans are not spending anymore anyway so they need a new source of revenue.

It's best just to enjoy the game for what it is. Getting upset and ranting on this forum will achieve nothing.

 

Triggered


YouTube & Blog  https://ferdsquad.com 


_GhostPepper #220 Posted 15 August 2017 - 11:38 PM

    Spicy HESHed Potato Pies, Inc.

  • Players
  • 37070 battles
  • 493
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    04-25-2015

View Postplayer39364645, on 15 August 2017 - 05:06 PM, said:

The delusions expressed in this thread are remarkable.

 

I work for a major corporation.   Our one and only function is to make as much money as fast as we possibly can.  This is how all corporations function, and it's how wargaming functions.

 

The idea that a unicums opinion is more important than anyone elses, is laughable.   How well you play the game is irrelevant.

 

How much money you spend on the game is tthe one and only thing that matters.

 

They don't care that you want the game to be a world war 2 simulator.   It never was, and it's not ever going to be.

 

This collaboration is going to make wargaming a pile of money.

 

And they will continue to do anything and everything they can to make more piles of money.

 

That's how corporations work.

 

You, sir, are so very spot-on correct, sort-of...

 

With that being said, I think we all (even non-unicorns like myself) develop a false sense that WG loves us as much as we love them. We play and play, get new things, spend money (each in their own ways and amounts) and we (again, falsely) presume our daddy, WG, loves its prodigal children so much that we can demand it's ear. And then we harshly find out that we were never so far from our perceptions of this skewed relationship. That's a hard concept for us to accept. How could a company treat us so badly after we have loved her so passionately with our thumbs and wallets?


Edited by _GhostPepper, 16 August 2017 - 01:03 AM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users