

COLLABORATION WITH WARHAMMER 40,000!
#201 Posted 15 August 2017 - 06:57 PM
#202 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:03 PM
ZIoydd, on 15 August 2017 - 11:27 AM, said:
I respect each of you and i respect your opinion. But Warhammer, Sega and other it's global cooperation, which very important for WG.
You may be unhappy, but this will not change anything in this situation.
Your opinion is still very important to me and when we speak about game feature, i collect your posts and discuss with our developer about your feedback.
early i collected feddb only on RU, but i can collect feedback from all regions now.
If you really respected us you would have already held a survey and a town hall meeting before making up your mind. You have not, and by your answers this is clearly NOT true. (See below)
This "You may be unhappy, but this will not change anything in this situation. " this is the opposite of respect.
This is our Answer Forumers: "But Warhammer, Sega and other it's global cooperation, which very important for WG. "
Meaning this collaboration will lead to more players signing up and lead to more sales of IS-6s to noobs. WG cares absolutely about nothing else than that quick sale. $$$
So our desire for a great game has completely lost all hope. They have repeatedly demonstrated since 2.8 that this game is for making quick money. It is not about the tank gaming experience.
There is actually no point in having a forum. Why does WG even have it?
But Seriously Zloydd. Thanks for your straight answers and letting us know that neither you nor anyone at WG actually plays or loves Blitz.
Our misery intensifies.
Edited by Kiser_Sosei, 15 August 2017 - 07:05 PM.
"MM may not be rigged but RNGesus only answers the prayers of one team."
My WOTB Youtube Channel.
#203 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:12 PM
#204 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:24 PM
Hey. They gotta make money some how. Just wait till sponsors start showing up on tanks. Pepsi Pershing, anyone?
“ Mm sucks just like u r face. Now Go cry on tissue not here.” ~ raj
#205 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:27 PM
#206 Posted 15 August 2017 - 07:31 PM

"MM may not be rigged but RNGesus only answers the prayers of one team."
My WOTB Youtube Channel.
#208 Posted 15 August 2017 - 08:49 PM
Tier X: IS-7, IS-4, Object 140, Grille 15, Leopard 1, AMX 50 B, E 100, Obj 268, T57 Heavy, Maus, FV215b (183), T-62a, Vk 72.01 k
First MAHOU/ANEKI member to reach Diamond League
#209 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:13 PM
can we please go back to 2.5? back when the game was good...+2-2, mediums that we loved and no aùtistic fantasy tanks that nobody likes....
EDIT: i would like my skill rounds back please.
Edited by _Prammospammer, 15 August 2017 - 09:15 PM.
OOF > PNDA
#210 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:34 PM
Dear WG, please keep in mind that certain forum members don't speak for all of us. Some of us are a long-time Warhammer 40k fans, and would love to actually play a game where you would be able to drive the famous W40K tanks.
HOWEVER, that being said... the tanks in W40k universe are so powerful that you would effectively have to completely change what they are in order to have them be playable in Blitz.
Lazer guns, multi-meltas, etc etc... plus not to mention most of these tanks are the size of 2 TOG2's glued together.
Maybe you guys are better off creating a separate game for Warhammer 40k Blitz, or a special game mode where you can actually do justice to the Warhammer tanks, without ruining them completely by adjusting their weapons and stats to fit current Blitz.
And when you have to change so much about Warhammer tanks, are they even worth being named as W40K tanks?
Edited by Three60Mafia, 15 August 2017 - 09:37 PM.
#211 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:38 PM
#212 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:40 PM
ZIoydd, on 15 August 2017 - 09:46 AM, said:
Oh

What a juvenile and pathetic response. From a "mod" no less. Talk about disrespecting en masse. This is how you respond to a nearly 100% negative reaction to WG's stupid idea? I guess it shouldn't come as a surprise should it.. and as long as we are talking about "most players" liking this? Let's see the proof then. Or did WG go out and poll a bunch of 10 year olds?

#213 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:49 PM
_GhostPepper, on 15 August 2017 - 04:40 PM, said:
What a juvenile and pathetic response. From a "mod" no less. Talk about disrespecting en masse. This is how you respond to a nearly 100% negative reaction to WG's stupid idea? I guess it shouldn't come as a surprise should it.. and as long as we are talking about "most players" liking this? Let's see the proof then. Or did WG go out and poll a bunch of 10 year olds?
Old men objecting to new things is nothing new. WG always ignored these rants, and they will continue to do so, and absolutely nothing will happen.
#214 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:53 PM
Three60Mafia, on 15 August 2017 - 03:49 PM, said:
Old men objecting to new things is nothing new. WG always ignored these rants, and they will continue to do so, and absolutely nothing will happen.
...yes, I suppose you are correct. And that is the sad reality.

#215 Posted 15 August 2017 - 09:57 PM
_GhostPepper, on 15 August 2017 - 04:53 PM, said:
...yes, I suppose you are correct. And that is the sad reality.
There was this exact same type of thread from the same people about the anime tanks, about hellsing and dracula, about the Defender etc etc And not just on this forum. On Ru and EU.
And yet, here we all are.
At this point its either accept it as fact or leave it. Or play WoWS Blitz. Though that game will also have anime tie-ins, just as the PC version had.
Edited by Three60Mafia, 15 August 2017 - 09:57 PM.
#216 Posted 15 August 2017 - 10:19 PM
Three60Mafia, on 15 August 2017 - 02:34 PM, said:
Maybe you guys are better off creating a separate game for Warhammer 40k Blitz, or a special game mode where you can actually do justice to the Warhammer tanks, without ruining them completely by adjusting their weapons and stats to fit current Blitz.
If only someone had suggested that at some point... http://forum.wotblitz.com/index.php?/topic/83766-collaboration-with-warhammer-40000/page__st__160__pid__1282243#entry1282243
Worthy of focus fire by SPUDX. Potato Cred Link
"In Blitz, there's a certain value in expeditiously moving to the inevitable." -WriterDude
#217 Posted 15 August 2017 - 10:33 PM
WG knows this, they have no direct competition on mobile. Adding Warhammer is a no brainer for them in attracting new players who are more likely to spend $$$. Most of us veterans are not spending anymore anyway so they need a new source of revenue.
It's best just to enjoy the game for what it is. Getting upset and ranting on this forum will achieve nothing.
#218 Posted 15 August 2017 - 11:06 PM
The delusions expressed in this thread are remarkable.
I work for a major corporation. Our one and only function is to make as much money as fast as we possibly can. This is how all corporations function, and it's how wargaming functions.
The idea that a unicums opinion is more important than anyone elses, is laughable. How well you play the game is irrelevant.
How much money you spend on the game is tthe one and only thing that matters.
They don't care that you want the game to be a world war 2 simulator. It never was, and it's not ever going to be.
This collaboration is going to make wargaming a pile of money.
And they will continue to do anything and everything they can to make more piles of money.
That's how corporations work.
#219 Posted 15 August 2017 - 11:20 PM
Richie_McCaw, on 15 August 2017 - 05:33 PM, said:
WG knows this, they have no direct competition on mobile. Adding Warhammer is a no brainer for them in attracting new players who are more likely to spend $$$. Most of us veterans are not spending anymore anyway so they need a new source of revenue.
It's best just to enjoy the game for what it is. Getting upset and ranting on this forum will achieve nothing.
Triggered
YouTube & Blog https://ferdsquad.com
#220 Posted 15 August 2017 - 11:38 PM
player39364645, on 15 August 2017 - 05:06 PM, said:
The delusions expressed in this thread are remarkable.
I work for a major corporation. Our one and only function is to make as much money as fast as we possibly can. This is how all corporations function, and it's how wargaming functions.
The idea that a unicums opinion is more important than anyone elses, is laughable. How well you play the game is irrelevant.
How much money you spend on the game is tthe one and only thing that matters.
They don't care that you want the game to be a world war 2 simulator. It never was, and it's not ever going to be.
This collaboration is going to make wargaming a pile of money.
And they will continue to do anything and everything they can to make more piles of money.
That's how corporations work.
You, sir, are so very spot-on correct, sort-of...
With that being said, I think we all (even non-unicorns like myself) develop a false sense that WG loves us as much as we love them. We play and play, get new things, spend money (each in their own ways and amounts) and we (again, falsely) presume our daddy, WG, loves its prodigal children so much that we can demand it's ear. And then we harshly find out that we were never so far from our perceptions of this skewed relationship. That's a hard concept for us to accept. How could a company treat us so badly after we have loved her so passionately with our thumbs and wallets?
Edited by _GhostPepper, 16 August 2017 - 01:03 AM.

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users