Jump to content


If you threaten a player with sexual assult, should you get a lifetime ban?


  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

Poll: graphic communication result in a permanent ban? (74 members have cast votes)

You have to complete 5 battles in order to participate this poll.

Should one time sexual graphic communication from player to player result in a permanent ban?

  1. Yes (63 votes [84.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 84.00%

  2. No (12 votes [16.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.00%

Vote Hide poll

someguyfromPitt #1 Posted 14 September 2017 - 11:05 AM

    Jeez Louise that one bounced

  • Players
  • 36781 battles
  • 3,405
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    07-12-2014

So yesterday a few players sent verbally harassing comments to a fellow clan mate.  No the "you suck," or "drink bleech," but discriptive comments of what they would like to do to this m player.  This clan mate is also female, which doesnt matter because either way its no ok to say it to anyone.

 

My question to the community is if one player texts another player graphic sexual comments of what they would want to do to another player, should that one communication be enough to permantly ban that player for life feom Blitz?

 

 

What if that said player who communicates these messages then carries out the act?  Would War Gaming have any liability for keeping communication methods open to allow further harassment?

 

 

I believe communications with sexual and or graphic discriptions have NO PLACE in blitz.  War Gaming needs to draw a hard line on this issue and have a 1 and done policy.  If not, players who then communicate messages, and in some cases to minors, could then submit the communications to local law enforment, then this program would have to be flagged.  Submit the evidence to Apple or Android to raise the rating to a " M rating" as it has the ability to communicate graphic messages.

 

 

So community, and War Gaming mods, do you believe that one graphic sexual post should result in a permanent ban from the game?


Tier 10's: FV 183, T110E3, T110E4, T110E5, T57, Patton M48, IS-4, IS-7, T-62a, Obj 140

 

There is only one TD and 183 is her name. 

I drive Joseph Stallon (IS) tanks for the win.


VikkoTheTusken #2 Posted 14 September 2017 - 11:19 AM

    URoRRuR'R'R

  • Players
  • 18903 battles
  • 2,880
  • [III-H]
  • Member since:
    01-03-2015

I agree. Permaban for the lot of em'. 

 

I'd be careful though, I caught a 3 day forum ban for holding [those we dont speak of] accountable - on a thread filled with EULA violations. 



GenericMIKE #3 Posted 14 September 2017 - 11:35 AM

    The Most Generic Tanker in Blitz

  • Players
  • 22014 battles
  • 5,242
  • [IRD]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2013
I approve this message.

 

 

You can visit Blitz Guru for current news, updates, map guides, tank guides and more!


Tomio_Hara #4 Posted 14 September 2017 - 11:43 AM

    Monteagle madness

  • Players
  • 19965 battles
  • 3,319
  • [XWING]
  • Member since:
    07-31-2014

View PostVikkoTheTusken, on 14 September 2017 - 05:19 AM, said:

I agree. Permaban for the lot of em'. 

 

I'd be careful though, I caught a 3 day forum ban for holding [those we dont speak of] accountable - on a thread filled with EULA violations. 

 

I got a 2 day ban for posting a simple meme with no swearing or suggestive themes at all on a similar thread.

Going to OP's post, I would say that a good long chat ban would do for the first time, and if they did it again a permanent ban would be deserved. Got to remember that the player who sent it is probably 12 or 13, but some harsh punishment is needed. Possibly a report to the FBI as well..


Edited by Tomio_Hara, 14 September 2017 - 11:49 AM.

 

Tomio Hara was the chief of Japanese tank development during the pre war period and WWII

Want to cap base? Read this!


__Crusader6__ #5 Posted 14 September 2017 - 11:47 AM

    BANNED

  • Players
  • 44038 battles
  • 6,607
  • [III]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

Pitt - ping me offline with the info and I can get them 'a tad more'. 

 

Electronic stuff like this falls under HSI.  


Join the BCC, let's make Blitz great again together https://discord.gg/cdDdKMw

Certified Tank Hoarder: 306 tanks in Garage (52 now equipped thx 3.8), 291/308 aced (Mk1 and T49A repo), and ~wallet warrior

WANTED: SPARE PARTS...

 


Wolfsbane1_1 #6 Posted 14 September 2017 - 11:54 AM

    The Whiskey Rose~

  • Players
  • 29551 battles
  • 450
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    09-08-2014

I agree to this, these players need to be banned. I'm pretty sure everyone here is used to the "your mom" comments, but those are too far. I had one fellow a few days ago (before the update, no screenshots :/) spam me like nobody's business a slew of Sexual, and I'm pretty sure terroristic threats against me. The reason? Because I had a KpfPz 70. I submitted a ticket to WG, and they said that they would check the chat history. This player hasn't logged any games in 5 days, so I'm guessing they got a permaban handed down. But anyways- Some of these kids (and sadly, some older players) of blitz have a serious issue with spamming sexual threats and the like. I'm one of the few female players in Triarii, and the amount of hate I get is unbelievable. If the option from WG came down to leave it to the forum users to decide on this issue, my vote would surely be in the "Make it happen" column. This is enough of a rant, before I get into a topic our Russian Mod Overlords find a reason to hand me a 3-day forum ban. o7

 

-Wolfsbane1_1/Alexis "The Whiskey Rose~"


Premium Tank Collection~~ Type 59, Type 62 (Dragon) IS-3 Defender, Pz. IV Ankō SP, Kuro Mori Mine, T2 Light, Excelsior, PZ.38H, M22 Locust, Panther/M10, BT-SV, Angry Connor,T7 Car, LTP, Tetrarch, Cromwell B, FCM 50 t, SU-76I Ice Claw, E 25, T6 Dracula, Helsing HO, PZ.V/IV, T-127, M4A2E4, PZ. IV Hydro., PZ.B2, PZ.II J, Shinobi, PZ. IV Starchaser, Pz.S35,BT-7Arty, Strv 74A2, M4A3E8 Fury, T34 (1776), T26E4 SuperPershing, Glacial 112, WZ Blaze, AMX CDC (Libertie), VK 45.03, M6A2E4 EXP, IS-2Sh, IS-5, M3 Light, Lupus, Hetzer Kame SP, T-15, A-32, Löwe~~

  Stridsvagn 74A2 "Steve" #1 Top Damage Holder! 3,821 Damage!   http://imgur.com/a/SZyDW 

 

 


XplosivEnema #7 Posted 14 September 2017 - 12:01 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7947 battles
  • 371
  • Member since:
    12-13-2016
Ands someone voted no, the sexual harasser has a forum account! :D

player_1234567890 #8 Posted 14 September 2017 - 12:01 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19789 battles
  • 3,476
  • [OMK]
  • Member since:
    05-09-2015
Serial AFKers are still worse in my opinion.:justwait:

bloodjackal #9 Posted 14 September 2017 - 12:20 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17684 battles
  • 737
  • [CHRM]
  • Member since:
    12-20-2014

I could not possibly give less of a [edited], the things I get called and threatened with regularly online are laughable. welcome to the internet.


"Bring orn the nukes" - paul parkey

 

I wouldn't say I'm violent. I'd say I'm rather vicious personality wise. 


WizoGT379 #10 Posted 14 September 2017 - 12:39 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5770 battles
  • 931
  • [RUDY]
  • Member since:
    07-08-2016
Wg should just have a system that when a word gets **** out that it checks it and once the player gets a certain amount of those with EXTREMELY bad words they get a warning or small chat ban then the next time they get chat banned forever, then finally they get a permaban

You can't outsmart stupid, it just doesn't work like that - TengenToppaPotatoLagann


DrFerd #11 Posted 14 September 2017 - 12:42 PM

    Certified BlitzWeather Forecaster

  • Players
  • 29878 battles
  • 592
  • [LI-TR]
  • Member since:
    06-29-2014
Replays, coming Soon™. Problem [might] resolve itself [to some degree] with time [except we will always have lowlifes lurking].

YouTube & Blog  https://ferdsquad.com 


Ruby_Rose_ #12 Posted 14 September 2017 - 12:58 PM

    I don't need help growing up! I Drink Milk!

  • Players
  • 9729 battles
  • 1,907
  • [SKXLL]
  • Member since:
    09-14-2013

View Postplayer_1234567890, on 14 September 2017 - 08:01 AM, said:

Serial AFKers are still worse in my opinion.:justwait:

 

Dude
Really?
Someone who is easy bait for the team is better than having a Cybercrime happen?


Made by Panbun

"Efficiency is Just Clever Laziness" 

Want a RWBY signature? Here

    Clan Recruitment: TRHRD  Discord: TRHRD
TRHRD Officer

 


___ez_e___ #13 Posted 14 September 2017 - 01:03 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 51163 battles
  • 1,843
  • [GORT]
  • Member since:
    03-15-2015

I would image that the victim of the threat of sexual assault could and should contact the authorities.  

 

Its that serious and should not be taken lightly.  

 

That's what I would do.   


Edited by ___ez_e___, 14 September 2017 - 01:04 PM.


_34 #14 Posted 14 September 2017 - 01:25 PM

    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )

  • Players
  • 20305 battles
  • 1,392
  • [-TK]
  • Member since:
    11-04-2014
Welcome to the internet :sceptic:

_OSIRIS #15 Posted 14 September 2017 - 01:34 PM

    something

  • Players
  • 24066 battles
  • 365
  • [501DV]
  • Member since:
    04-30-2015

View Post__Crusader6__, on 14 September 2017 - 07:47 AM, said:

Pitt - ping me offline with the info and I can get them 'a tad more'. 

 

Electronic stuff like this falls under HSI.  

 

You're Homeland Security? Nice to see a fellow Fed



BOOMROCKA #16 Posted 14 September 2017 - 01:42 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14942 battles
  • 536
  • [BNGER]
  • Member since:
    06-30-2014

View Postplayer_1234567890, on 14 September 2017 - 07:01 AM, said:

Serial AFKers are still worse in my opinion.:justwait:

 

I completely disagree with your opinion. Someone who verbally attacks someone else is not only a violation of the game, but a violation on that person's mental well being. 

 

There are people who play this game, and understand that it's a game. You will win, and you will lose. There are other people who play this game and forget that it's a game. You're WR and maybe your pride will be affected by OTHER PLAYERS as well as your own game performance. Please know this before you hit the battle button.



GableHawk #17 Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:11 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10519 battles
  • 756
  • [F_S]
  • Member since:
    07-09-2017

I would "assume" WG would have zero tolerance for something like this.

 

If this person continued to act this way I could see a potential lawsuit against WG.

 

At least that's how the real world works.



StuartV8TWIN #18 Posted 14 September 2017 - 02:19 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 1429 battles
  • 33
  • [WWII]
  • Member since:
    08-15-2017

There will always be people like that out there. But...it is also the internet.

 

At the same time, I do not approve at all, and WG will eventually build up this policy to the best of their knowledge.

Hopefully sooner than later.


 


 Mecharrior Clan(Black Death) Favorite MechWarrior MADCAT)) WOTB Clan (WWII) Favorite Tank M4Sherman and CRUSADER


 


 


 


jkwon126 #19 Posted 14 September 2017 - 03:02 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 22454 battles
  • 1,377
  • [HUCK]
  • Member since:
    05-12-2016

Problem with permanent bans is that it doesn't leave any opportunities to change or improve.

 

What then happens is that the person carries that ban or label with them so to speak, and is in fact more likely to act out or embrace the behaviour that we disapprove of.

 

If we put someone in the hooligan box and nail it shut they're always going to be hooligans, and with a big chip on their shoulder for being boxed in.

 

 


 

 

[WOTBStars] [BlitzStars]

What was that?  Can't hear you over my freedom of speech -Blartch


BobboEvans #20 Posted 14 September 2017 - 03:14 PM

    The Society is Real

  • Players
  • 37734 battles
  • 1,865
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014
Who chooses where the line is drawn?  Keep it up and chat goes back to a place no one liked.

Not condoning any poor behavior but I think it's a bit naive to think every player who crosses a line should be banned.  The game is likely to get very... quiet.

Just say 'NO' to Vanity





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users