Jump to content


Are they worth it? Lupus, Edelweiss, Nameless?

Lupus Edelweiss Nameless

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

Padre_ShadowRider #1 Posted 22 September 2017 - 03:11 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17998 battles
  • 374
  • [18TH]
  • Member since:
    04-02-2016

Okay, they are now on sale.  I note that the Lupus is extremely hard to find an area you can ping due to the color aberrations, same for the nameless.   But overall, are any of these tanks worth the money ? 

 

 

 



crazychimp69 #2 Posted 22 September 2017 - 03:14 AM

    Clubs Wargaming

  • Players
  • 25778 battles
  • 7,337
  • [PR3MO]
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014
No. Don't add to the terrible stream of fantasy tanks.

There is always next year.

 
 

Gladsfur #3 Posted 22 September 2017 - 03:16 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 48838 battles
  • 299
  • [INRI]
  • Member since:
    03-22-2015
Yes they are worth it.

zeur0sis #4 Posted 22 September 2017 - 03:51 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13201 battles
  • 864
  • [CRUEL]
  • Member since:
    09-17-2016
If you don’t mind the fantasy aspect of it. All three tanks are pretty decent 

 

 

"Mm sucks just like u r face.    Now Go cry on tissue not here." ~ raj

 


Shadow__Lugia #5 Posted 22 September 2017 - 05:08 AM

    Let the salt flow

  • Players
  • 45596 battles
  • 1,603
  • [501ST]
  • Member since:
    03-19-2014
Lupus, basically a tiger 1 hull modified a bit for more sloping with -12degrees of depression but only 5degrees elevation. IS +15% better I’d say in most aspects. Edelweiss, a T20 with better hull armour by about 20% and a great turret. Gun tends to shoot a little low it seems. Nameless, a tiger II with about 10-15% weaker hull armour with a smaller turret and weaker gun handling. This is cliff notes version. If wanted, I could do a vid with gameplay only highlighting how the tanks should be played, just pm me and I could do it in about a day or so.

Edited by Shadow__Lugia, 22 September 2017 - 05:09 AM.


dayton07277 #6 Posted 22 September 2017 - 05:45 AM

    (SMH)

  • Players
  • 12568 battles
  • 3,382
  • [CROWN]
  • Member since:
    09-13-2015

View Postcrazychimp69, on 21 September 2017 - 07:14 PM, said:

No. Don't add to the terrible stream of fantasy tanks.

 



Player_5773117413 #7 Posted 22 September 2017 - 07:31 AM

    Professional Tinfoil Hatter

  • Players
  • 25695 battles
  • 6,862
  • [IRD]
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014

I got nameless last time around. It's kinda good. The armor layout is almost identical to the tiger 2 from a tier above, and the wierd proportions make it super troll. Im imagining the lupus is even better in this respect. However, gun handling is the opposite of impressive on these two, but that's one bummer against a lot of strong points.

 

Edelweis seems to be liked by the unicums. Looks like a very versatile med. All three are probably stat padder material (like the is6), so I don't think they're a risky purchase, unlike a lot of the other prems introduced lately.


Many Tier 10s Already Researched, Many Tier 10s I Won't Bother to Research. Just going for DeathStar before its nerf

Just another demo account, nothing to see here

Done Posting. Joining Stealy in the ex-forumer club     Nvrmnd, Going for 7,777 posts first!

Hey WG, can we get those ATGMs for the MBT-70 now?


_The_Tactition_ #8 Posted 22 September 2017 - 11:17 AM

    The Best Tactician

  • Players
  • 16802 battles
  • 1,313
  • [CRUEL]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2015

No for two reasons. 

1. It gives WG money 

2. It's a fantasy tank


Member of the Training Room Police Department

 

 

 


Ruby_Rose_ #9 Posted 22 September 2017 - 12:49 PM

    I don't need help growing up! I Drink Milk!

  • Players
  • 10063 battles
  • 2,144
  • [-TKKS]
  • Member since:
    09-14-2013
Ya'll need to stop being salty about fantasy tanks, it's getting tiring.
And for OP's question, I'd say Lupus or Nameless. Edelweiss looks flimsy.


Made by Panbun

"Efficiency is Just Clever Laziness" 

Want a RWBY signature? Here

 

 


Rockracer #10 Posted 22 September 2017 - 01:33 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7429 battles
  • 2,061
  • [POARS]
  • Member since:
    12-20-2016

They are all worth it as in competitive and good tanks, but I won't be getting any because I have no money to spend in WoT.

 

I usually don't like fantasy tanks, but 0-47, Helsing and now the Nameless opened an exeption.


Edited by Rockracer, 22 September 2017 - 01:34 PM.

"Soviet TDs all the way, komrade."

"I'm a master at it."

 

ok im not

happy now?


Tomio_Hara #11 Posted 26 September 2017 - 11:50 AM

    Monteagle madness

  • Players
  • 20300 battles
  • 3,401
  • [XWING]
  • Member since:
    07-31-2014
Looking at them in a purely objective manner, yes, they are worth it. Very good tanks.

 

Tomio Hara was the chief of Japanese tank development during the pre war period and WWII

Want to cap base? Read this!


Duke_87 #12 Posted 26 September 2017 - 12:29 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 25309 battles
  • 935
  • [MOMS]
  • Member since:
    07-05-2014
My lupus is extremely solid; very troll armor profile, and the gun hits hard.  The awful gun elevation will definitely catch you out at times, and the turret traverse feels glacial, but used in the right way / situations, it can carry with ease as a +1, and holds its own as a -1. I don't have the others, but frontally they all seem pretty stout.

Goal: Suck incrementally less, day by day


willsoldier1 #13 Posted 01 October 2017 - 04:14 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 4967 battles
  • 24
  • [TMZ_0]
  • Member since:
    10-19-2013

View PostdrGiggless, on 26 September 2017 - 11:54 AM, said:

No. Don't add to the terrible stream of fantasy tanks.

 


Edited by willsoldier1, 01 October 2017 - 04:15 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users