Okay, they are now on sale. I note that the Lupus is extremely hard to find an area you can ping due to the color aberrations, same for the nameless. But overall, are any of these tanks worth the money ?
3
Are they worth it? Lupus, Edelweiss, Nameless?
Started by Padre_ShadowRider, Sep 22 2017 03:11 AM
Lupus Edelweiss Nameless
12 replies to this topic
#1 Posted 22 September 2017 - 03:11 AM
-
- Players
- 56680 battles
-
615
- [GETIT]
-
Member since:
04-02-2016
Senior Sergeant
#2 Posted 22 September 2017 - 03:14 AM
-
- Players
- 32377 battles
-
7,369
- [-ARN-]
-
Member since:
07-24-2014
Clubs Wargaming
No. Don't add to the terrible stream of fantasy tanks.
#3 Posted 22 September 2017 - 03:16 AM
-
- Players
- 113617 battles
-
466
- [INRI]
-
Member since:
03-22-2015
Sergeant
Yes they are worth it.
#4 Posted 22 September 2017 - 03:51 AM
-
- Players
- 51176 battles
-
2,007
- [SRT]
-
Member since:
09-17-2016
That fine line between constructive criticism and a forum strike
If you don’t mind the fantasy aspect of it. All three tanks are pretty decent
“ Mm sucks just like u r face. Now Go cry on tissue not here.” ~ raj
#5 Posted 22 September 2017 - 05:08 AM
-
- Players
- 68662 battles
-
1,673
- [DEF_6]
-
Member since:
03-19-2014
Let the salt flow
Lupus, basically a tiger 1 hull modified a bit for more sloping with -12degrees of depression but only 5degrees elevation. IS +15% better I’d say in most aspects. Edelweiss, a T20 with better hull armour by about 20% and a great turret. Gun tends to shoot a little low it seems. Nameless, a tiger II with about 10-15% weaker hull armour with a smaller turret and weaker gun handling. This is cliff notes version. If wanted, I could do a vid with gameplay only highlighting how the tanks should be played, just pm me and I could do it in about a day or so.
Edited by Shadow__Lugia, 22 September 2017 - 05:09 AM.
#6 Posted 22 September 2017 - 05:45 AM
-
- Players
- 32588 battles
-
4,152
- [CROWN]
-
Member since:
09-13-2015
(SMH)
crazychimp69, on 21 September 2017 - 07:14 PM, said:
No. Don't add to the terrible stream of fantasy tanks.
#7 Posted 22 September 2017 - 07:31 AM
-
- Players
- 35670 battles
-
9,638
- [DEF_6]
-
Member since:
07-16-2014
Theorist of Dubiously Coincidental Events
I got nameless last time around. It's kinda good. The armor layout is almost identical to the tiger 2 from a tier above, and the wierd proportions make it super troll. Im imagining the lupus is even better in this respect. However, gun handling is the opposite of impressive on these two, but that's one bummer against a lot of strong points.
Edelweis seems to be liked by the unicums. Looks like a very versatile med. All three are probably stat padder material (like the is6), so I don't think they're a risky purchase, unlike a lot of the other prems introduced lately.
Anni is more overpowered than missiles were...will it get removed, too?
Just another demo account, nothing to see here
"Say what you like, but stop pissing on my back and telling me it's raining." - Blartch
#8 Posted 22 September 2017 - 11:17 AM
-
- Players
- 32554 battles
-
3,176
- [CRUEL]
-
Member since:
02-06-2015
The Best Tactician
No for two reasons.
1. It gives WG money
2. It's a fantasy tank
Member of the Training Room Police Department
My YouTube:https://m.youtube.com/channel/UChFwqqu30_epeLO0q-BKEFw
Give us the IRON CROSS
#9 Posted 22 September 2017 - 12:49 PM
-
- Players
- 14229 battles
-
2,455
- [SCAMO]
-
Member since:
09-14-2013
I don't need help growing up! I Drink Milk!
Ya'll need to stop being salty about fantasy tanks, it's getting tiring.
And for OP's question, I'd say Lupus or Nameless. Edelweiss looks flimsy.
And for OP's question, I'd say Lupus or Nameless. Edelweiss looks flimsy.
#10 Posted 22 September 2017 - 01:33 PM
-
- Players
- 10807 battles
-
2,568
-
Member since:
12-20-2016
First Sergeant
They are all worth it as in competitive and good tanks, but I won't be getting any because I have no money to spend in WoT.
I usually don't like fantasy tanks, but 0-47, Helsing and now the Nameless opened an exeption.
Edited by Rockracer, 22 September 2017 - 01:34 PM.
I played TDs before it was cool. It was also never cool to begin with.
#11 Posted 26 September 2017 - 11:50 AM
-
- Players
- 23310 battles
-
3,470
- [SNEED]
-
Member since:
07-31-2014
Monteagle madness
Looking at them in a purely objective manner, yes, they are worth it. Very good tanks.
Tomio Hara was the chief of Japanese tank development during the pre war period and WWII
Want to cap base? Read this!
#12 Posted 26 September 2017 - 12:29 PM
-
- Players
- 35562 battles
-
1,578
- [MOM]
-
Member since:
07-05-2014
First Sergeant
My lupus is extremely solid; very troll armor profile, and the gun hits hard. The awful gun elevation will definitely catch you out at times, and the turret traverse feels glacial, but used in the right way / situations, it can carry with ease as a +1, and holds its own as a -1. I don't have the others, but frontally they all seem pretty stout.
Goal: Suck incrementally less, day by day
#13 Posted 01 October 2017 - 04:14 PM
-
- Players
- 5263 battles
-
24
- [TMZ_0]
-
Member since:
10-19-2013
Lance-corporal
drGiggless, on 26 September 2017 - 11:54 AM, said:
No. Don't add to the terrible stream of fantasy tanks.
Edited by willsoldier1, 01 October 2017 - 04:15 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
