Jump to content


Upcoming balance adjustments


  • Please log in to reply
1121 replies to this topic

Meat_Locker #1081 Posted 25 March 2019 - 03:48 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 33592 battles
  • 844
  • [TITAN]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014
Buff e25 pen. There is too much armor at tiers 7&8

 


j0nn0 #1082 Posted 25 March 2019 - 05:28 AM

    F2P Skrub

  • Players
  • 17534 battles
  • 2,824
  • [XREGS]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

View PostMeat_Locker, on 24 March 2019 - 07:48 PM, said:

Buff e25 pen. There is too much armor at tiers 7&8

 

Unless it's gotten a nerf within the past year, i'd like to think that its penetration is adequate since its last unnecessary penetration buff. It has mobility, camo, dpm, penetration and can face hug most things with little trouble if you know how to drive. The few times I could play it on a friend's account, it was hilarious with how much I could hit without any issues and minimal need to aim. If you're having trouble with penetrating things, I think you may be choosing the wrong targets or putting yourself in the wrong position.

Sometimes, you just gotta sit back and watch them all burn. Don't forget to bring popcorn. You're going to need a snack.


AOT_Jaeger2 #1083 Posted 26 March 2019 - 01:05 PM

    Grand Emperor of Derpenburg

  • Players
  • 16694 battles
  • 3,267
  • [ASLAN]
  • Member since:
    06-16-2015

@Ribble

 

Have you guys at WG even considered giving the Conqueror the Super Conq turret? It’s just a genuine question. While I feel the performance of this tank from a gun standpoint is impeccable amongst the Tier IX heavies, it lags behind heavily in durability. The line up to this point says two things: frontal armor with no gun depression and mobility up to VII, and then mobility and hulldown due to weak armor at VIII. The Conqueror can’t do either of those things. The hull armor is supposed to be weak, catching odd bounces here and there, i get that, but the turret gets penned by bloody everything. It can’t play as a heavy tank at all, it just can’t. And unlike the Kpf 70 (which has better frontal armor across the board) or AMX 50 120 (also needs some form of work) it doesn’t have enough of a mobility advantage to do anything about it.

 

Even if the Super never comes as its own tank, I feel the Conq at Tier IX needs a better turret.


Garage: T7 CC, R35, Light VIC, Tetrarch, M4A2E4, PzKpfw. IV Anko SP, KV-2, Strv. 74A2, LTTB, SU-122-44, IS-3, IS-5, KV-5, Lowe.

Was #24 VK 30.01 (P) Player in NA, #32 in Luchs

Stats:http://www.blitzstar...com/AOT_Jaeger2

Youtuber? I guess?


Oicraftian #1084 Posted 26 March 2019 - 04:29 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 15110 battles
  • 940
  • Member since:
    12-19-2014

View PostAOT_Jaeger2, on 26 March 2019 - 01:05 PM, said:

@Ribble

 

Have you guys at WG even considered giving the Conqueror the Super Conq turret? It’s just a genuine question. While I feel the performance of this tank from a gun standpoint is impeccable amongst the Tier IX heavies, it lags behind heavily in durability. The line up to this point says two things: frontal armor with no gun depression and mobility up to VII, and then mobility and hulldown due to weak armor at VIII. The Conqueror can’t do either of those things. The hull armor is supposed to be weak, catching odd bounces here and there, i get that, but the turret gets penned by bloody everything. It can’t play as a heavy tank at all, it just can’t. And unlike the Kpf 70 (which has better frontal armor across the board) or AMX 50 120 (also needs some form of work) it doesn’t have enough of a mobility advantage to do anything about it.

 

Even if the Super never comes as its own tank, I feel the Conq at Tier IX needs a better turret.

 

400 alpha gun tank at tier 9 with medium tank gun stats needs to have turret armor to make it hull down invincible is what you are saying?

 

This is why you are bad.

Get good baddie. Learn to play.


65% scrublord

Remember only tier 8/9/10 stats mean anything


AOT_Jaeger2 #1085 Posted 26 March 2019 - 10:58 PM

    Grand Emperor of Derpenburg

  • Players
  • 16694 battles
  • 3,267
  • [ASLAN]
  • Member since:
    06-16-2015

View PostOicraftian, on 26 March 2019 - 11:29 AM, said:

 

400 alpha gun tank at tier 9 with medium tank gun stats needs to have turret armor to make it hull down invincible is what you are saying?

 

This is why you are bad.

Get good baddie. Learn to play.

 

You have to be the most unnecessarily toxic, salty scumbag to ever sail the seven seas. I honest don’t understand if it’s a sense of bloated superiority or just a cry for attention, but you need to chill out and not be unnecessarily toxic for no reason.


Garage: T7 CC, R35, Light VIC, Tetrarch, M4A2E4, PzKpfw. IV Anko SP, KV-2, Strv. 74A2, LTTB, SU-122-44, IS-3, IS-5, KV-5, Lowe.

Was #24 VK 30.01 (P) Player in NA, #32 in Luchs

Stats:http://www.blitzstar...com/AOT_Jaeger2

Youtuber? I guess?


__ShootTheOtherGuy__ #1086 Posted 31 March 2019 - 12:23 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 32934 battles
  • 49
  • [VNGC]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2016

View PostAOT_Jaeger2, on 26 March 2019 - 01:05 PM, said:

@Ribble

 

Have you guys at WG even considered giving the Conqueror the Super Conq turret? It’s just a genuine question. While I feel the performance of this tank from a gun standpoint is impeccable amongst the Tier IX heavies, it lags behind heavily in durability. The line up to this point says two things: frontal armor with no gun depression and mobility up to VII, and then mobility and hulldown due to weak armor at VIII. The Conqueror can’t do either of those things. The hull armor is supposed to be weak, catching odd bounces here and there, i get that, but the turret gets penned by bloody everything. It can’t play as a heavy tank at all, it just can’t. And unlike the Kpf 70 (which has better frontal armor across the board) or AMX 50 120 (also needs some form of work) it doesn’t have enough of a mobility advantage to do anything about it.

 

Even if the Super never comes as its own tank, I feel the Conq at Tier IX needs a better turret.

I would give it a turret buff without the spaced armor. The space armor to me just ruins the sleek look of the Conqueror's turret. But still, if they will ever the buff the armor the Conqueror, might as well buff the M103 as well



RibbleStripe #1087 Posted 01 April 2019 - 07:09 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 671
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostAOT_Jaeger2, on 26 March 2019 - 04:05 PM, said:

@Ribble

 

Have you guys at WG even considered giving the Conqueror the Super Conq turret? It’s just a genuine question. While I feel the performance of this tank from a gun standpoint is impeccable amongst the Tier IX heavies, it lags behind heavily in durability. The line up to this point says two things: frontal armor with no gun depression and mobility up to VII, and then mobility and hulldown due to weak armor at VIII. The Conqueror can’t do either of those things. The hull armor is supposed to be weak, catching odd bounces here and there, i get that, but the turret gets penned by bloody everything. It can’t play as a heavy tank at all, it just can’t. And unlike the Kpf 70 (which has better frontal armor across the board) or AMX 50 120 (also needs some form of work) it doesn’t have enough of a mobility advantage to do anything about it.

 

Even if the Super never comes as its own tank, I feel the Conq at Tier IX needs a better turret.

 

I think such changes might be reasonable in case of FV215 / Super Conqueror swap. 
As far as i remember, Conqueror got a firmer turret in PC version along with dpm nerf. We don't think it is needed in Blitz.

 

 


wannabeunicum #1088 Posted 01 April 2019 - 03:31 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31935 battles
  • 5,592
  • [CURSD]
  • Member since:
    10-25-2015
Is there any idea of giving the t54e1 back 350 dmg?

STACNICHSPEN #1089 Posted 02 April 2019 - 04:50 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 11425 battles
  • 87
  • [SIX67]
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013
What tank will the new British line start at? Comet or Firefly?
wiggle wiggle wiggle wiggle wiggle yeah!

SpartacusDiablo #1090 Posted 02 April 2019 - 12:30 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 21010 battles
  • 7,635
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
Ribble,

Is there any chance that you guys could give a little bit of love to the type 64. Personally I think it could use a little bit more gun depression, especially considering that it is a open top tank. I also think it could use either a little bit better acceleration or a higher top-end speed.

Edited by SpartacusDiablo, 02 April 2019 - 12:31 PM.

Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]

Rest in Peace CJ.  You will be missed.


Akadeadlytank #1091 Posted 02 April 2019 - 09:41 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18938 battles
  • 387
  • [WR2]
  • Member since:
    07-15-2015

View PostSTACNICHSPEN, on 01 April 2019 - 11:50 PM, said:

What tank will the new British line start at? Comet or Firefly?

 

It will probabby go off the td line since they are tds.

mY fAvOr!tE kEy On mY kEyBoArD iS 2

                                 

Spoiler

i like changing my profile stuff alot 


conlopez #1092 Posted 03 April 2019 - 03:41 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 6927 battles
  • 25
  • [M1]
  • Member since:
    07-03-2014

No Smasher nerf?

 

 



Kiilu #1093 Posted 04 April 2019 - 12:35 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17486 battles
  • 498
  • [RLWAR]
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017
UFO in tank hanger,, cool.   What else? I'm liking it. Good work WG.  :trollface:

EternityDragon #1094 Posted 04 April 2019 - 02:11 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 7808 battles
  • 6
  • [Z-95]
  • Member since:
    01-20-2016
Finally Indien-Pz will be playable... One thing WG has done well lately lol

Tier 7: SP I C, JPanther,  Tiger 1

Tier 6: T-34-85, KV-1S, SU-100

pls help me with my 39% winrate ;-;


RibbleStripe #1095 Posted 04 April 2019 - 10:45 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 671
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostKiilu, on 04 April 2019 - 03:35 AM, said:

UFO in tank hanger,, cool.   What else? I'm liking it. Good work WG.  :trollface:

 

It's been there for 3 days :)

 

 


acrisis #1096 Posted 04 April 2019 - 04:07 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20278 battles
  • 10,497
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

Alien invaders watching our every move :)

 


 

Forum essentials:  > Desktop mode 
Check recent threads. Check WG staff threads. Use search.
    > WG Bugs and current update     > Feedback     > Vehicle Bay     > Guides     > Videos 

 

     BE  (+)   

    Got lag issues ?  >> Pingplotter thread  << 
Blitz Community Coalition | Looney Tooners | Triarii | Blitz University | Basic Training  | Mentor
 


Vantablack12 #1097 Posted 04 April 2019 - 06:59 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10089 battles
  • 134
  • [419]
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017
when will we get the new french line?
I cant find anything to put here.

InkaPanzer #1098 Posted 04 April 2019 - 07:15 PM

    Tanquista Peruano

  • Players
  • 49564 battles
  • 2,839
  • [DBLAT]
  • Member since:
    04-01-2016

View PostVantablack12, on 04 April 2019 - 01:59 PM, said:

when will we get the new french line?

 

What?

Saludos desde Perú!

 


xxblitzburghxx #1099 Posted 05 April 2019 - 11:19 AM

    Away From Keyboard

  • Players
  • 66849 battles
  • 87
  • [CLEAR]
  • Member since:
    07-31-2015
I just read that there putting the 105mm gun ( the T32 gun) on the tier 8 EXP in the upcoming update, why in the hell wld wg do that, it makes no sense to me

Vantablack12 #1100 Posted 05 April 2019 - 01:42 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10089 battles
  • 134
  • [419]
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017

View PostInkaPanzer, on 04 April 2019 - 02:15 PM, said:

 

What?

 

I meant the amx 30 proto and the amx 30 b being in the tech tree, but the amx 30 b has come out as a collector vehicle. Pay no attention to my last post. Im really sad about it not being in the tech tree.:(

Edited by Vantablack12, 05 April 2019 - 01:43 PM.

I cant find anything to put here.




3 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users