Jump to content


Upcoming balance adjustments


  • Please log in to reply
1217 replies to this topic

STACNICHSPEN #1101 Posted 05 April 2019 - 04:08 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12440 battles
  • 111
  • [SIX67]
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013
Japanese heavies, 120 alpha on tier 6 lights, 32 per on caernarvon...is that really happening, Ribble?
wiggle wiggle wiggle wiggle wiggle yeah!

Vantablack12 #1102 Posted 05 April 2019 - 07:46 PM

    Ugliest Player NA

  • Players
  • 11801 battles
  • 400
  • [K9]
  • Member since:
    08-26-2017
Why don't we have the detection and range finder circle on the minimap. I don't see any reason not to add it other than the minimap is to small.

Edited by Vantablack12, 05 April 2019 - 07:46 PM.

"In a man-to-man fight, the winner is he who has one more round in his magazine." -Erwin Rommel

RibbleStripe #1103 Posted 08 April 2019 - 08:30 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 712
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostSTACNICHSPEN, on 05 April 2019 - 07:08 PM, said:

Japanese heavies, 120 alpha on tier 6 lights, 32 per on caernarvon...is that really happening, Ribble?

 


 

 


STACNICHSPEN #1104 Posted 08 April 2019 - 04:09 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12440 battles
  • 111
  • [SIX67]
  • Member since:
    05-02-2013
lol, OK
wiggle wiggle wiggle wiggle wiggle yeah!

__ShootTheOtherGuy__ #1105 Posted 08 April 2019 - 11:08 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 35667 battles
  • 62
  • [_-X-_]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2016

@Ribble

 

 

Will there be any buffs concerning the AMX AC 48? It is currently an inferior WZ-120-1G FT. It has worse DPM (worst DPM of all tier 8 TDS), huge tumors on top, and the side and rear armor is non-existent. Also, about the WZ-120-1G FT, will there be any upcoming balance changes to it, because it is currently one of the most broken tanks of tier 8.



InkaPanzer #1106 Posted 08 April 2019 - 11:10 PM

    Tanquista Peruano

  • Players
  • 55268 battles
  • 2,839
  • [DBLAT]
  • Member since:
    04-01-2016

View Post__ShootTheOtherGuy__, on 08 April 2019 - 06:08 PM, said:

@Ribble

 

 

Will there be any buffs concerning the AMX AC 48? It is currently an inferior WZ-120-1G FT. It has worse DPM (worst DPM of all tier 8 TDS), huge tumors on top, and the side and rear armor is non-existent. Also, about the WZ-120-1G FT, will there be any upcoming balance changes to it, because it is currently one of the most broken tanks of tier 8.

 

Its a premium tank so I think NOPE!

Saludos desde Perú!

 


__ShootTheOtherGuy__ #1107 Posted 08 April 2019 - 11:36 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 35667 battles
  • 62
  • [_-X-_]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2016

View PostInkaPanzer, on 08 April 2019 - 11:10 PM, said:

 

Its a premium tank so I think NOPE!

 

They can turn the WZ-120-1G FT into a collector tank and nerf it from there. It’s simply a broken OP tank that probably never went into the supertester phase



InkaPanzer #1108 Posted 09 April 2019 - 12:00 AM

    Tanquista Peruano

  • Players
  • 55268 battles
  • 2,839
  • [DBLAT]
  • Member since:
    04-01-2016

View Post__ShootTheOtherGuy__, on 08 April 2019 - 06:36 PM, said:

 

They can turn the WZ-120-1G FT into a collector tank and nerf it from there. It’s simply a broken OP tank that probably never went into the supertester phase

 

and the sky can turn into green too.... :)

Saludos desde Perú!

 


Morphman11 #1109 Posted 09 April 2019 - 04:33 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26 battles
  • 785
  • [2WEAK]
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011
When people cry about being terrible when in reality they are fairly good. Conqueror turret too weak yet the tank is probably the best overall support heavy. Or comparing the Amx AC 48 to the Wz-120-ft. Its like comparing a lion to a baboon. One is a support vehicle that is better at using range to its advantage while the other is an assault tank. You can't substitute one for the other. Its been at least 4 years and these 70 IQ geniuses haven't realized that just because something is classified in a certain does NOT indicate that it should be an neigh impenetrable heavy, a medium that can do everything, a td that should solely camp, or a light that should only spot. Is it so hard to realize that vehicles limit the player, this isn't COD where you can run around doing anything you want.

__ShootTheOtherGuy__ #1110 Posted 12 April 2019 - 08:47 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 35667 battles
  • 62
  • [_-X-_]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2016

View PostMorphman11, on 09 April 2019 - 04:33 PM, said:

When people cry about being terrible when in reality they are fairly good. Conqueror turret too weak yet the tank is probably the best overall support heavy. Or comparing the Amx AC 48 to the Wz-120-ft. Its like comparing a lion to a baboon. One is a support vehicle that is better at using range to its advantage while the other is an assault tank. You can't substitute one for the other. Its been at least 4 years and these 70 IQ geniuses haven't realized that just because something is classified in a certain does NOT indicate that it should be an neigh impenetrable heavy, a medium that can do everything, a td that should solely camp, or a light that should only spot. Is it so hard to realize that vehicles limit the player, this isn't COD where you can run around doing anything you want.

 

Kek, calling people “70 IQ geniuses”, just proves who you are. Remember the T20 thread? You had the audacity to say it’s “OP” in it’s role. That thing has the worst DPM of all tier 7 mediums, armor is out of question, it’s nothing. It’s mobility can’t even help it. The Conqeuror? Smfh, you do realize other tanks are better at doing that specific job right? And the WZ-120-1G FT. You defending a tank that is downright OP, saying just “COD” it. Just look at the recent stats of it, best damage ratio, best win rate. Look at it’s armor profile, coupled with one of the best in class mobility of all tier 8 TDs, with a gun that can do over 3000 DPM, with good penetration,, but no, according to you, it’s more like “comparing a lion to a baboon”.

Posit1ve_ #1111 Posted 12 April 2019 - 08:17 PM

    Credits Master

  • Players
  • 52851 battles
  • 5,544
  • [_V_]
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011
Are there any plans to buff the M26 Pershing, like maybe a DPM buff?

311 tanks in the garage!

 

Your local friendly credits guru: http://forum.wotblit...__fromsearch__1  (Most upvoted post on the forums!!!!)

Certified Batignolles Chatillon 25t addict


__Frostbite #1112 Posted 14 April 2019 - 01:12 AM

    Ribble4Prez2020

  • Players
  • 23598 battles
  • 2,506
  • Member since:
    06-13-2016

View PostSTACNICHSPEN, on 01 April 2019 - 08:50 PM, said:

What tank will the new British line start at? Comet or Firefly?

 

Most likely the Firefly
Find me on the official Blitz discord server or send me a PM on the forums if you want to contact me. I quit playing. Yeah.

johnnyzim #1113 Posted 14 April 2019 - 01:30 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27623 battles
  • 313
  • [NORM]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

Ribble, 

 

Thanks for answering questions here. I see that in update 5.10 the Ram II is getting a serious nerfing. Since this is a premium tank that I paid for with real money, is there going to be any compensation to owners? Also, does this mean that all premiums are nerfable? I thought that wasn’t allowed?

 

Thanks again.

 

edited for spelling


Edited by johnnyzim, 14 April 2019 - 01:31 PM.

 

 


__Frostbite #1114 Posted 15 April 2019 - 06:53 AM

    Ribble4Prez2020

  • Players
  • 23598 battles
  • 2,506
  • Member since:
    06-13-2016

Guys, don't jump on blitzhanger's open test 5.10 changes so fast. These are not necessarily going to be implemented.


Find me on the official Blitz discord server or send me a PM on the forums if you want to contact me. I quit playing. Yeah.

RibbleStripe #1115 Posted 15 April 2019 - 08:25 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 712
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View Post__ShootTheOtherGuy__, on 09 April 2019 - 02:08 AM, said:

@Ribble

 

 

Will there be any buffs concerning the AMX AC 48? It is currently an inferior WZ-120-1G FT. It has worse DPM (worst DPM of all tier 8 TDS), huge tumors on top, and the side and rear armor is non-existent. Also, about the WZ-120-1G FT, will there be any upcoming balance changes to it, because it is currently one of the most broken tanks of tier 8.

 

We'll discuss possible buff for AC 48.

 

View Postjohnnyzim, on 14 April 2019 - 04:30 PM, said:

Ribble, 

 

Thanks for answering questions here. I see that in update 5.10 the Ram II is getting a serious nerfing. Since this is a premium tank that I paid for with real money, is there going to be any compensation to owners? Also, does this mean that all premiums are nerfable? I thought that wasn’t allowed?

 

Thanks again.

 

edited for spelling

 

Please don't ask me to comment anything posted by unofficial sources. 


 

 


FussyRude #1116 Posted 15 April 2019 - 07:22 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4948 battles
  • 905
  • [AZUR]
  • Member since:
    02-14-2018

Why many tanks are different in blitz from PC?

 Just look Luchs, in blitz no 8 shots autoloader, WG is against autoloaders?

 AMX ELC BIS is stronger in blitz, like a lot of "hp"

 Lot of nations in PC, and stickers for your tanks, many stickers.


#LoveLuchs

Dan_Deerso #1117 Posted 15 April 2019 - 08:40 PM

    Tankologist

  • Players
  • 24970 battles
  • 3,959
  • [III]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2013

View PostFussyRude, on 15 April 2019 - 03:22 PM, said:

Why many tanks are different in blitz from PC?

 Just look Luchs, in blitz no 8 shots autoloader, WG is against autoloaders?

 AMX ELC BIS is stronger in blitz, like a lot of "hp"

 Lot of nations in PC, and stickers for your tanks, many stickers.

 

The maps are much smaller, the roles of tanks are much different, and everyone lemming trains. That's why the tanks are balanced differently.

johnnyzim #1118 Posted 15 April 2019 - 11:21 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27623 battles
  • 313
  • [NORM]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 15 April 2019 - 03:25 AM, said:

 

We'll discuss possible buff for AC 48.

 

 

Please don't ask me to comment anything posted by unofficial sources. 

 

my bad, I thought it was official. 
 

 


RibbleStripe #1119 Posted 16 April 2019 - 06:47 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 712
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostFussyRude, on 15 April 2019 - 10:22 PM, said:

Why many tanks are different in blitz from PC?

 Just look Luchs, in blitz no 8 shots autoloader, WG is against autoloaders?

 AMX ELC BIS is stronger in blitz, like a lot of "hp"

 Lot of nations in PC, and stickers for your tanks, many stickers.

 

Simple answer - Blitz is not WoT PC. It was made using WoT base but develops differently. 

 

 


SpartacusDiablo #1120 Posted 19 April 2019 - 01:32 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 24243 battles
  • 7,889
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

Ribble,

 

I'm having a really difficult time in finding the logic on how the Smasher was balanced.  I've ran the numbers between the Smasher and the T49 as well as other same and higher tier tanks.  For now I'll focus on the T49. When it comes to gun performance the Smasher comes out ahead in nearly every metric.  This simply doesn't seem right. 

 

Comparing this data a number of conclusions could be made.

 

1. The T49 as well as the KpfPZ are woefully underpowered when compared to the Scavenger.

2.  The Scavenger is over powered and either needs a Nerf or to be moved up a tier... or both.

 

It pains me to say this but as it currently stands the Smasher seems blatantly like a pay 2 win tank to me.  

 

Does the Blitz team have any plans to address this issue?

HE 

HEAT


Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]

Rest in Peace CJ.  You will be missed.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users