Jump to content


Upcoming balance adjustments


  • Please log in to reply
855 replies to this topic

RibbleStripe #261 Posted 12 February 2018 - 11:52 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 241 battles
  • 540
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostChariot_Solace, on 04 February 2018 - 06:03 AM, said:

Zloydd or Ribble: When will The IS-2 get its rightful buff? We were expecting it this patch since it was accidentally left out when the rest of the tier 7 heavies got buffed.

 

If it was planned for 4.6 we would have told about it. IS-2 is still on the way, it's not forgotten.

Sturmgeschutz1 #262 Posted 15 February 2018 - 05:09 AM

    Jagd mich nicht!!

  • Players
  • 48430 battles
  • 223
  • [D_1]
  • Member since:
    12-11-2015
Play another game... ? Really? No.. just going to continue to rate this one and refine my reviews for other media outlets. When you ruin something and someone states it’s ruined, attempting to chastise or pacify their statement is so Eastern Bloc. May work over there but not here bud. It’s called telling it as you see it, don’t have to like the facts but they will be heard. Oppresso De Libre’

pot_luck #263 Posted 27 February 2018 - 09:07 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 30380 battles
  • 56
  • [H3II]
  • Member since:
    10-19-2016

I noticed they didn't mention the nerfs they are imposing.  The tier Vii tigers for example.  I don't know why they are always diminishing tanks performance.  Anyone can acquire these tanks and use them.  There is no unfair advantage if the tanks are available to all.  they should leave tanks alone once they have been acquired.  Players work for weeks or even months to get a certain tank because of it's performance only to have them nerfed; It's ridiculous! 

LEAVE OUR TANKS ALONE!



SpartacusDiablo #264 Posted 27 February 2018 - 09:30 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 16681 battles
  • 7,061
  • [III-P]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View Postpot_luck, on 27 February 2018 - 04:07 PM, said:

I noticed they didn't mention the nerfs they are imposing.  The tier Vii tigers for example.  I don't know why they are always diminishing tanks performance.  Anyone can acquire these tanks and use them.  There is no unfair advantage if the tanks are available to all.  they should leave tanks alone once they have been acquired.  Players work for weeks or even months to get a certain tank because of it's performance only to have them nerfed; It's ridiculous! 

LEAVE OUR TANKS ALONE!

 Please refer me to the post you made where you complained about the overkill buffs that these tanks received a couple of months back. 


Good players take RNG and MM into account when they make decisions in game.  They take what the game gives them and more often then not win in the end.  Bad players on the other hand come to the forum and whine because they are unable to adjust their playstyle to deal with the hand they have been dealt.  Don't be a bad player.

Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]


spartan6delta #265 Posted 27 February 2018 - 09:44 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 16866 battles
  • 13
  • [KMMNE]
  • Member since:
    05-24-2015
Yes, love kv-1...sorry wrong thread lol

Edited by spartan6delta, 27 February 2018 - 09:50 PM.


spartan6delta #266 Posted 27 February 2018 - 09:46 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 16866 battles
  • 13
  • [KMMNE]
  • Member since:
    05-24-2015
So any plans to revive is-3 with a buff?

spartan6delta #267 Posted 01 March 2018 - 12:40 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 16866 battles
  • 13
  • [KMMNE]
  • Member since:
    05-24-2015
wthI see tiger nerf didn’t do anything

spartan6delta #268 Posted 01 March 2018 - 12:41 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 16866 battles
  • 13
  • [KMMNE]
  • Member since:
    05-24-2015
Thought they were going to nerf tigers

spartan6delta #269 Posted 01 March 2018 - 12:57 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 16866 battles
  • 13
  • [KMMNE]
  • Member since:
    05-24-2015
Ok then I got a different question?
Does this graph differentiate between players in that group?

Lets say one tank is more appealing to lower skilled players in this group such as 55-57. Then the next tank is much more appealing to 63+ playerrs
The difference in skill is extremely different between a 55er and 65 percent player. So I am just wondering could we have a winrate graph curve?
I feel as if looking at a section of a tanks player without adjusting for how many of each different winrate play this tank is a bad way to balance. I can understand the 55-65 although I strongly disagree with it but not looking at the winrate curve would be bad


Any 55% player can be.a 65% player if he starts a new account....I feel like it’s cheating. But feel like you’re good lol

RibbleStripe #270 Posted 01 March 2018 - 11:02 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 241 battles
  • 540
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View Postspartan6delta, on 01 March 2018 - 03:57 AM, said:

Ok then I got a different question?
Does this graph differentiate between players in that group?

 

No, it does not.

therealrattler #271 Posted 01 March 2018 - 03:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7658 battles
  • 349
  • [ADEPT]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016
Ribble, I know it's early but any news on 4.8 balancing??

RibbleStripe #272 Posted 02 March 2018 - 06:37 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 241 battles
  • 540
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View Posttherealrattler, on 01 March 2018 - 06:28 PM, said:

Ribble, I know it's early but any news on 4.8 balancing??

 

Too early. As soon as we receive the stats we'll share the graph and future plans. 

Oicraftian #273 Posted 06 March 2018 - 05:57 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14458 battles
  • 642
  • [BNCR]
  • Member since:
    12-19-2014
Can the 121 actually perform well for a tier 10, not a tier 9?

65% scrublord

Remember only tier 8/9/10 stats mean anything


RibbleStripe #274 Posted 06 March 2018 - 10:42 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 241 battles
  • 540
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostOicraftian, on 06 March 2018 - 08:57 AM, said:

Can the 121 actually perform well for a tier 10, not a tier 9?

 

It performs pretty well for tier 10 vehicle. 



RibbleStripe #275 Posted 06 March 2018 - 11:33 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 241 battles
  • 540
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

This is what we plan for update 4.8:

- there will be no tier 9-10 changes due to upcoming important tournaments;

- some needless modules will be removed from tech tree and compensated with free xp;

- French LT's will get enlarged ammunition capacity:

- IS-2, ISU-122s and Rhm Borsing will be buffed.



40_Percent_Trash #276 Posted 06 March 2018 - 12:31 PM

    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

  • Players
  • 27497 battles
  • 4,084
  • [MSELF]
  • Member since:
    01-27-2015

View PostRibbleStripe, on 06 March 2018 - 07:33 AM, said:

This is what we plan for update 4.8:

- there will be no tier 9-10 changes due to upcoming important tournaments;

- some needless modules will be removed from tech tree and compensated with free xp;

- French LT's will get enlarged ammunition capacity:

- IS-2, ISU-122s and Rhm Borsing will be buffed.

 

Nothing for the FCM36PAK40?



SpartacusDiablo #277 Posted 06 March 2018 - 01:19 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 16681 battles
  • 7,061
  • [III-P]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 06 March 2018 - 06:33 AM, said:

This is what we plan for update 4.8:

- there will be no tier 9-10 changes due to upcoming important tournaments;

- some needless modules will be removed from tech tree and compensated with free xp;

- French LT's will get enlarged ammunition capacity:

- IS-2, ISU-122s and Rhm Borsing will be buffed.

Alright  you've recognized that the Borsig was over nerfed. Can we expect the T49 (a tank that was also over nerfed) to receive a buff soon?


Good players take RNG and MM into account when they make decisions in game.  They take what the game gives them and more often then not win in the end.  Bad players on the other hand come to the forum and whine because they are unable to adjust their playstyle to deal with the hand they have been dealt.  Don't be a bad player.

Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]


Tiger_2_Ausf_B #278 Posted 06 March 2018 - 01:24 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11931 battles
  • 176
  • [RUSE]
  • Member since:
    04-15-2016

View PostRibbleStripe, on 06 March 2018 - 11:33 AM, said:

This is what we plan for update 4.8:

- there will be no tier 9-10 changes due to upcoming important tournaments;

- some needless modules will be removed from tech tree and compensated with free xp;

- French LT's will get enlarged ammunition capacity:

- IS-2, ISU-122s and Rhm Borsing will be buffed.

Will you guys buff the JPZ E-100 to make it a more competitive tournament tank? It’s just so sluggish and mediocre, nobody uses it in tournaments to be honest. 


Edited by Tiger_2_Ausf_B, 06 March 2018 - 01:24 PM.


G0ClimbAR0ck #279 Posted 06 March 2018 - 02:00 PM

    Snoopy's Sopwith Camel

  • Players
  • 49358 battles
  • 412
  • [STORM]
  • Member since:
    10-31-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 06 March 2018 - 11:33 AM, said:

This is what we plan for update 4.8:

- there will be no tier 9-10 changes due to upcoming important tournaments;

- some needless modules will be removed from tech tree and compensated with free xp;

 

Hi Ribble, question for you referencing the bolded section of your quote above.

The past few times modules have been removed from the tech tree, people who researched those modules were compensated with free XP. Why were people who researched the top gun on the M48 back when it needed to be researched not compensated with free XP when the preceding gun module was removed? I don’t remember which patch that happened, but that was a required 50,000 XP grind or 50,000 free XP requirement to unlock the top gun on the M48.



RibbleStripe #280 Posted 06 March 2018 - 02:33 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 241 battles
  • 540
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 06 March 2018 - 04:19 PM, said:

Alright  you've recognized that the Borsig was over nerfed. 

 

If something is over nerfed (or buffed) we say it directly. Tigers, for example. 

Speaking of Borsig, we wanted to make 128 mm gun more popular. But since lots of players use 150 mm we will increase depression angles.

 

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 06 March 2018 - 04:19 PM, said:

Can we expect the T49 (a tank that was also over nerfed) to receive a buff soon?

 

T49 is fine.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users