Jump to content


Upcoming balance adjustments


  • Please log in to reply
1269 replies to this topic

Eurodogofwar #401 Posted 18 April 2018 - 04:18 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 34706 battles
  • 5
  • [G0DZ]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2016
Can you stop with the rigged games? They are a waste of time and way too obvious.

RibbleStripe #402 Posted 18 April 2018 - 08:38 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 739
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostBrickSniper33A, on 14 April 2018 - 10:32 PM, said:

Thank you for the answers ribble. Very insightful.

 

I would like to ask a question of my own,

 

Wargaming has stated in the past that they do not have any plans in the near future to update the graphics or physics of the game for the playability of the older device wielding percent of the player-base. I would be very interested personally to see a graph of some sort illustrating the percent of people that play on different generations of devices. 

 

I have the sneaking suspicion that you guys at WG have some form of graph, because I am pretty sure all of you lick your lips at the chance of HD graphics as much as all of us, and you probably wouldn't hold back for the time being on that without substantial evidence. 

 

We don't provide such graphs.

 

View Posttherealrattler, on 17 April 2018 - 12:31 AM, said:

Another question for Ribble-
I saw on a thread in general discussion about the Chinese heavies being the last f2p line. After the recent 30b crate incident, is it true that WG is going to sell supposed to be tech tree tanks as 4% chance "enriched" crate tanks. BTW, horrible decision to add these 2 as cash grab tanks. Y'all are lucky enough to have a player base dumb enough to buy into this crap

 

I don't get it at all - we never said 30B will be added to tech tree. And i don't see any reasons for such conclusions. 

 

View PostOnly_Monica, on 17 April 2018 - 03:17 AM, said:

The T-34-3, how does it look across servers statistics wise? Is it under performing, Overperforming? 

 

It's quite early to judge its efficiency. When we get actual stats i'll let you know.

 

View PostOnly_Monica, on 17 April 2018 - 03:17 AM, said:

Also (a bit of a spoiler request, don't have to answer "yes" to any of the list just curious) will any popular premium tanks from other platforms be added to the game. (T-34-88, Aufkl Panther)
Will there ever be any addition to prem tanks that can be purchased through the tech tree (E 25, Ram II, FCM36PAK40)?
 
 

 

I can't name certain tanks, but new vehicles will be added.

 

View PostOnly_Monica, on 17 April 2018 - 03:17 AM, said:

Will vehicle enrichment costs ever be lowered?

 

Maybe - as a part of event.


 

 


RibbleStripe #403 Posted 18 April 2018 - 08:53 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 739
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View Postfangs58, on 18 April 2018 - 06:54 AM, said:

Thanks for the answers. Now I am curious about which tech tree other than China will be getting addtional tanks. Are we ever going to get a tier 5 Soviet light tank for instance?

 

No, Soviets won't be expanded in near future. Just wait a bit and we'll share our plans with you.

 

 


SpartacusDiablo #404 Posted 18 April 2018 - 09:20 AM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 26067 battles
  • 7,913
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
RibbleStripe,

Currently when I partake in a "Death from above" (using terrain to set my tank on top of an enemy tank) my tank will take damage at or near the same rate as the enemy tank.  In my opinion this should be changed.  The tank that is sitting on top of another tank should take minimal damage while the tank that is being sat upon should take the brunt of the damage.  Are there any plans to change the way that the damage is dealt in a "death from above" type of situation?

Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]

Rest in Peace CJ.  You will be missed.


Posit1ve_ #405 Posted 18 April 2018 - 10:00 AM

    Credits Master

  • Players
  • 55198 battles
  • 5,613
  • [_V_]
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011

View PostRibbleStripe, on 18 April 2018 - 03:53 AM, said:

 

No, Soviets won't be expanded in near future. Just wait a bit and we'll share our plans with you.

 

Hmmmm. If the Soviets aren't being expanded, and new nations aren't being added then that rules out tier X lights (because that would necessitate T100 lt being added to the Soviet tree), Obj 430, and all the new crazy OP Soviet tanks (Obj 268 v4, Obj 430U, Obj 705A, and Obj 257), and of course Swedes, and Czechs. WG also said we won't be getting Chinese lights

 

So that leaves us with the following options:

 

FV4005 line

Type 5 heavy line

Pzkpfw VII/Maus line reworks.

 

If I were to rank in order of most likely to least likely, I'd say Pzkpfw VII is the most likely, followed by the Type 5, and FV4005. Both FV4005 line and Type 5 heavy line seem to be unlikely, so I'd reason we'll get the Pzkpfw VII line next, especially since WG likes to "make grinding lines consistent". It's also only a few additions so it'll be quick to add

 

Hello VK 100.01P, Mauschen, and Pzkpfw VII.

 

Admittedly, I'm not really excited because all 3 seem rather boring.


Edited by Posit1ve_, 18 April 2018 - 10:04 AM.

336 tanks in the garage!

 

Your local friendly credits guru: http://forum.wotblit...__fromsearch__1  (Most upvoted post on the forums!!!!)

Certified Batignolles Chatillon 25t addict


therealrattler #406 Posted 18 April 2018 - 01:17 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 363
  • [22ND]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View PostPosit1ve_, on 18 April 2018 - 10:00 AM, said:

 

Hmmmm. If the Soviets aren't being expanded, and new nations aren't being added then that rules out tier X lights (because that would necessitate T100 lt being added to the Soviet tree), Obj 430, and all the new crazy OP Soviet tanks (Obj 268 v4, Obj 430U, Obj 705A, and Obj 257), and of course Swedes, and Czechs. WG also said we won't be getting Chinese lights

 

So that leaves us with the following options:

 

FV4005 line

Type 5 heavy line

Pzkpfw VII/Maus line reworks.

 

If I were to rank in order of most likely to least likely, I'd say Pzkpfw VII is the most likely, followed by the Type 5, and FV4005. Both FV4005 line and Type 5 heavy line seem to be unlikely, so I'd reason we'll get the Pzkpfw VII line next, especially since WG likes to "make grinding lines consistent". It's also only a few additions so it'll be quick to add

 

Hello VK 100.01P, Mauschen, and Pzkpfw VII.

 

Admittedly, I'm not really excited because all 3 seem rather boring.

With all these new tank lines possibly coming, I'd like to see more diversity in battle. I know that 15v15 is unrealistic but what about and 10v10 or 9v9



therealrattler #407 Posted 18 April 2018 - 01:18 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 363
  • [22ND]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 18 April 2018 - 09:20 AM, said:

RibbleStripe,

Currently when I partake in a "Death from above" (using terrain to set my tank on top of an enemy tank) my tank will take damage at or near the same rate as the enemy tank. In my opinion this should be changed. The tank that is sitting on top of another tank should take minimal damage while the tank that is being sat upon should take the brunt of the damage. Are there any plans to change the way that the damage is dealt in a "death from above" type of situation?

I saw something that flipping is coming in 5.0. is this true?!



Viper8757NC #408 Posted 18 April 2018 - 02:03 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24827 battles
  • 2,058
  • [III-S]
  • Member since:
    07-04-2014

View PostEurodogofwar, on 18 April 2018 - 04:18 AM, said:

Can you stop with the rigged games? They are a waste of time and way too obvious.

 

THIS.  ^^^

 

Also, stop please stop using bot tanks to fill out battle rosters.  There is no way that real human beings could be as dumb as some of the 40% WR bots I consistently encounter in-game.



SpartacusDiablo #409 Posted 18 April 2018 - 02:21 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 26067 battles
  • 7,913
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View Posttherealrattler, on 18 April 2018 - 08:18 AM, said:

I saw something that flipping is coming in 5.0. is this true?!

I hope not.  I stopped playing console because of that stupidity.


Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]

Rest in Peace CJ.  You will be missed.


SpartacusDiablo #410 Posted 18 April 2018 - 02:27 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 26067 battles
  • 7,913
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostEurodogofwar, on 17 April 2018 - 11:18 PM, said:

Can you stop with the rigged games? They are a waste of time and way too obvious.

Sigh.

Spoiler

 


Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]

Rest in Peace CJ.  You will be missed.


SpartacusDiablo #411 Posted 18 April 2018 - 02:56 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 26067 battles
  • 7,913
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
I know it's early but any chance Wargaming could make the commanders hatch on the Chieftain just a little less of a weak spot.  A little more armor or maybe trim down the size a bit... Right now it feels like a M3 Lee with a turret.  You might as well paint it day-glow orange and put a bullseye on it.

Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]

Rest in Peace CJ.  You will be missed.


therealrattler #412 Posted 18 April 2018 - 03:58 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 363
  • [22ND]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 18 April 2018 - 02:56 PM, said:

I know it's early but any chance Wargaming could make the commanders hatch on the Chieftain just a little less of a weak spot. A little more armor or maybe trim down the size a bit... Right now it feels like a M3 Lee with a turret. You might as well paint it day-glow orange and put a bullseye on it.

But then there'd be a competitive british tank that could give IS tanks a run for their money. Shame on you, you know we can't have that



Viper8757NC #413 Posted 18 April 2018 - 06:08 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24827 battles
  • 2,058
  • [III-S]
  • Member since:
    07-04-2014
AND PLEASE BUFF THE BULLDOG!


therealrattler #414 Posted 18 April 2018 - 07:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 363
  • [22ND]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View PostViper8757NC, on 18 April 2018 - 06:08 PM, said:

AND PLEASE BUFF THE BULLDOG!

We are closely monitoring this tank™



SpartacusDiablo #415 Posted 18 April 2018 - 07:29 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 26067 battles
  • 7,913
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostViper8757NC, on 18 April 2018 - 01:08 PM, said:

AND PLEASE BUFF THE BULLDOG!

I already feel OP in the Bulldog...as such I welcome any additional buffs.


Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]

Rest in Peace CJ.  You will be missed.


theFANTASTICfox #416 Posted 18 April 2018 - 11:02 PM

    DRINK!

  • Players
  • 21319 battles
  • 1,253
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 18 April 2018 - 09:27 AM, said:

Sigh.

Spoiler

 

 

http://forum.wotblit...-rigged-games/ 

 

I'm sorry but you set yourself up for that one :D


#4 in the LeKpz 41 (with TwisterCup camo), #6 in the M41 Walker-Bulldog, and #8 in the T37

This is what BlitzStars is reporting, so I might be reading something incorrectly...

 

Certified Anti-FV215b 183 Extremist


RibbleStripe #417 Posted 19 April 2018 - 01:02 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 739
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 18 April 2018 - 12:20 PM, said:

RibbleStripe,

Currently when I partake in a "Death from above" (using terrain to set my tank on top of an enemy tank) my tank will take damage at or near the same rate as the enemy tank. In my opinion this should be changed. The tank that is sitting on top of another tank should take minimal damage while the tank that is being sat upon should take the brunt of the damage. Are there any plans to change the way that the damage is dealt in a "death from above" type of situation?

 

Both vehicles get the same damage in such cases because it's not normal for models to interact like this. This is why sudden jump from above on an almost destroyed tanks is fine, but one tank riding another is not )

 

View Posttherealrattler, on 18 April 2018 - 04:18 PM, said:

I saw something that flipping is coming in 5.0. is this true?!

 

Nope.

 

 


SpartacusDiablo #418 Posted 19 April 2018 - 01:03 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 26067 battles
  • 7,913
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 19 April 2018 - 08:02 AM, said:

 

Both vehicles get the same damage in such cases because it's not normal for models to interact like this. This is why sudden jump from above on an almost destroyed tanks is fine, but one tank riding another is not )

Where's the fun in that?


Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]

Rest in Peace CJ.  You will be missed.


RibbleStripe #419 Posted 19 April 2018 - 02:08 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 739
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 19 April 2018 - 04:03 PM, said:

Where's the fun in that?

 

What do you mean?


 

 


SpartacusDiablo #420 Posted 19 April 2018 - 02:13 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 26067 battles
  • 7,913
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 19 April 2018 - 09:08 AM, said:

 

What do you mean?

Squashing reds is fun.  The squasher taking the same damage as the tank being squashed is no fun.  If my tank is setting on top of a tank I should come through with far less damage then the guy getting squished.

 

Also "Death from Above" is an award on Console.  Any chance we could have it awarded here?  It is hands down my favorite way to kill a red.


Edited by SpartacusDiablo, 19 April 2018 - 02:14 PM.

Find me on Discord, [SpartacusDiablo#7879]

Rest in Peace CJ.  You will be missed.





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users