1703 replies to this topic

[_Crusader6_]

theFANTASTICfox, on 11 December 2017 - 03:26 PM, said:

BatChat 25t viewrange buff? Its a light tank and has less viewrange than the rest of the other tier 10 mediums...

 

What he said.  Plus the camp value

   Pretty sad when an Obj-140 tends to output you and it's go worse view range.

[wannabeunicum]

ribble I can understand not nerfing the 183. Even as a non owner I wouldn't see a need to nerf an arguably balanced tank. However is there not a need to lower the number players using it? Why not nerf the credit coefficient and repair to pre 2.8 levels. This would lower the number of 183s on the battlefield and do so in a natural way.

[__Frostbite]

Where’s my Grille camo buff? It LITERALLY gets spotted easier than the 183. Paper tanks NEED their camo value, otherwise, they can get HE’ed. The 183 cannot be penned with HE by any 15 cm, or 152/155mm cannon. And it does more alpha, and gets spotted easier. The camo value for the Grille specifically needs a buff for the moving AND the non-moving value. The value after firing doesn’t matter as much.

Edited by I_Maverick_I, 12 December 2017 - 05:32 AM.

[iRaikkonen]

Let’s just calm down a bit. There’s no need to yell at Ribble here. He’s a great guy, I met him in Minsk. 

 

I also met the map creators and tank balancers. I was genuinely in awe of how aware they were about problems in the game and how they were already working to fix them before we asked about them. We all walked away with a much different view of wg after twister cup. I assure you they know about the grille and they are either working on it or running tests as to how to edit things to make it more balanced. Just have faith

[KingxChuck]

iRaikkonen, on 11 December 2017 - 09:26 PM, said:

Just have faith

 

But I lost mine after 3.8...

[__Frostbite]

KingxChuck, on 11 December 2017 - 09:54 PM, said:

 

But I lost mine after 3.8...

 

2.8...3.8...i wonder what 4.8 is gonna be like. hopefully it releases sometime over next summer, although that's unlikely. i have plans to quit the game by next summer...

Edited by I_Maverick_I, 12 December 2017 - 06:26 AM.

[Chariot_Solace]

RibbleStripe, on 08 December 2017 - 02:08 AM, said:

 

We plan tier 7 changes, it's pretty possible for St Emil to get some attention. But no promises and concrete terms right now.

 

 

Ok. I just want to say, that the Emil should have the same top engine as the VK 30.01 H (Maybach HL 150). They are based on the same chassis after all.

[RibbleStripe]

MayoNasalSpray, on 11 December 2017 - 06:34 PM, said:

Anything on the FCM36PAK40? It's really bad. 

We will consider low-tier changes after mid and high-tier adjustments.

 

WMd76, on 11 December 2017 - 07:01 PM, said:

Ferdinand changes planned? 

Quite possible.

 

theFANTASTICfox, on 11 December 2017 - 11:26 PM, said:

BatChat 25t viewrange buff? Its a light tank and has less viewrange than the rest of the other tier 10 mediums...

LT performance depends not only on view range. Batchat does its job well enough. Anyway we keep an eye on it.

 

_The_Tactition_, on 12 December 2017 - 12:05 AM, said:

Will JG. PZ. IV be nerfed?

Also possible. It need to be analyzed a bit later.

[__Frostbite]

Is there any consideration of improving the camo values on the Grille though? 

[NateDawg2k16]

What about the Vindictator?

[reluctanttheist]

I'll mention one thing that's annoyed me since forever - the turret armor profile on the FV4202 is just plain wrong.  Measurements on the FV at Bovington have determined that the armor all around the gun is over 200mm thick.  In game, only the lower part of the turret is 196mm, and the upper part of the turret is a measly120mm!  This ends up making the FV turret weaker than the Cent 7/1, which makes no sense at all.  It explains why a lot of people would just stop at the Cent 7/1 since the FV4202 turret has been inaccurately modeled, and nerfs the value of the FV such as to make it unplayable.  Would WG give it its proper armor, we might even see it used in WG tourneys. 

[anonym_VEIjQQSdxvEw]

Didn't see the Lowe on the list 4.5 today. Changed your mind? I hope not.

[specialist5]

RibbleStripe, on 06 December 2017 - 11:09 AM, said:

Hey everyone!

 

We'd like to share our plans for upcoming vehicles changes. So, this is what will happen in near future:

 

T110E5 will be rebalanced - long-awaited cupola changes are coming.

Lowe should be and will be improved. The details will be revealed later.

Indien-Panzer is one more German to be buffed. Its gun will be more comfortable.

We'll keep refining tier 6 TDs. M36 Jackson, Churchill Gun Carrier and ARL V39 are the next candidates. 

Pz.Sfl.IV will become more comfortable.

 

Feel free to leave comments about upcoming changes. More news to come!

 

[specialist5]

The Lowe was not on the list today for upgrade 4.5. thought it was to be on there?

[wolfpack_41]

RibbleStripe, on 12 December 2017 - 06:41 AM, said:

We will consider low-tier changes after mid and high-tier adjustments.

 

Quite possible.

 

LT performance depends not only on view range. Batchat does its job well enough. Anyway we keep an eye on it.

 

Also possible. It need to be analyzed a bit later.

 

The list today did not show the Lowe. Thought is was to be on there. 

[Meat_Locker]

It is time to give the E25 a penetration and damage per round buff. It is becoming less competitive. It used to be a terror and still holds the reputation, but it simply can’t pen a great number of tanks @ tiers 7&8. 

It has no turret and is also now COD’d by light tanks.

 

Times have changed. Buff the E25 and make it the battlefield terror it used to be.

[RibbleStripe]

Lowe will be buffed later. We didn't plan it for 4.5. Nobody changed his mind )

[blindsniper74]

reluctanttheist, on 12 December 2017 - 02:59 PM, said:

I'll mention one thing that's annoyed me since forever - the turret armor profile on the FV4202 is just plain wrong.  Measurements on the FV at Bovington have determined that the armor all around the gun is over 200mm thick.  In game, only the lower part of the turret is 196mm, and the upper part of the turret is a measly120mm!  This ends up making the FV turret weaker than the Cent 7/1, which makes no sense at all.  It explains why a lot of people would just stop at the Cent 7/1 since the FV4202 turret has been inaccurately modeled, and nerfs the value of the FV such as to make it unplayable.  Would WG give it its proper armor, we might even see it used in WG tourneys. 

This ^^^

[blindsniper74]

Meat_Locker, on 17 December 2017 - 10:24 AM, said:

It is time to give the E25 a penetration and damage per round buff. It is becoming less competitive. It used to be a terror and still holds the reputation, but it simply can’t pen a great number of tanks @ tiers 7&8. 

It has no turret and is also now COD’d by light tanks.

 

Times have changed. Buff the E25 and make it the battlefield terror it used to be.

 

it was given apcr a bit ago, and buffed I believe 

[Bullveigh25]

can we get the glacial ap pen up to at least 200mm of pen? ideally 211mm would be great but give us at least 200mm. the prammo nerf rendered the 112 irelevant with only 174mm base ap pen