Jump to content


Upcoming balance adjustments


  • Please log in to reply
1140 replies to this topic

__Crusader6__ #81 Posted 11 December 2017 - 09:35 PM

    ACE Chaser

  • Players
  • 58313 battles
  • 11,239
  • [-C6-]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PosttheFANTASTICfox, on 11 December 2017 - 03:26 PM, said:

BatChat 25t viewrange buff? Its a light tank and has less viewrange than the rest of the other tier 10 mediums...

 

What he said.  Plus the camp value

   Pretty sad when an Obj-140 tends to output you and it's go worse view range.


 
Tank Hoarder: 364 tanks in Garage:  365/367 aced (AMX 30B, Mk1 and T49A repo),    wallet warrior.  Loyal M60 owner
I think 5.5 was good for the game - But I also want my Kenny OP nerfed. 
Sorry I haven’t aced the Smasher yet - So I’m still ruining tier 6-8 

 


wannabeunicum #82 Posted 11 December 2017 - 11:29 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 32685 battles
  • 5,606
  • [CURSD]
  • Member since:
    10-25-2015

ribble I can understand not nerfing the 183. Even as a non owner I wouldn't see a need to nerf an arguably balanced tank. However is there not a need to lower the number players using it? Why not nerf the credit coefficient and repair to pre 2.8 levels. This would lower the number of 183s on the battlefield and do so in a natural way.



_Ntwadumela #83 Posted 12 December 2017 - 12:19 AM

    Ribble4Prez2020

  • Players
  • 21927 battles
  • 2,277
  • [_V2_]
  • Member since:
    06-13-2016
Where’s my Grille camo buff? It LITERALLY gets spotted easier than the 183. Paper tanks NEED their camo value, otherwise, they can get HE’ed. The 183 cannot be penned with HE by any 15 cm, or 152/155mm cannon. And it does more alpha, and gets spotted easier. The camo value for the Grille specifically needs a buff for the moving AND the non-moving value. The value after firing doesn’t matter as much.

Edited by I_Maverick_I, 12 December 2017 - 05:32 AM.


(Credits to SparticusDiablo for the signature)
Get to know me on Discord: Maverick#3656
Join this Discord server while you're at it: 
sR2X6Hp
 


iRaikkonen #84 Posted 12 December 2017 - 05:26 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 29421 battles
  • 488
  • [PRAMO]
  • Member since:
    11-03-2014

Let’s just calm down a bit. There’s no need to yell at Ribble here. He’s a great guy, I met him in Minsk. 

 

I also met the map creators and tank balancers. I was genuinely in awe of how aware they were about problems in the game and how they were already working to fix them before we asked about them. We all walked away with a much different view of wg after twister cup. I assure you they know about the grille and they are either working on it or running tests as to how to edit things to make it more balanced. Just have faith


 


KingxChuck #85 Posted 12 December 2017 - 05:54 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 17304 battles
  • 1,221
  • [MSRY]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2016

View PostiRaikkonen, on 11 December 2017 - 09:26 PM, said:

Just have faith

 

But I lost mine after 3.8...

                                                                   Me going hill

                                                                           

  

                                  ↳                    Morons who go town                     ↵


_Ntwadumela #86 Posted 12 December 2017 - 06:26 AM

    Ribble4Prez2020

  • Players
  • 21927 battles
  • 2,277
  • [_V2_]
  • Member since:
    06-13-2016

View PostKingxChuck, on 11 December 2017 - 09:54 PM, said:

 

But I lost mine after 3.8...

 

2.8...3.8...i wonder what 4.8 is gonna be like. hopefully it releases sometime over next summer, although that's unlikely. i have plans to quit the game by next summer...

Edited by I_Maverick_I, 12 December 2017 - 06:26 AM.


(Credits to SparticusDiablo for the signature)
Get to know me on Discord: Maverick#3656
Join this Discord server while you're at it: 
sR2X6Hp
 


Chariot_Solace #87 Posted 12 December 2017 - 07:32 AM

    Stug Life

  • Players
  • 38190 battles
  • 2,743
  • [_STR8]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2016

View PostRibbleStripe, on 08 December 2017 - 02:08 AM, said:

 

We plan tier 7 changes, it's pretty possible for St Emil to get some attention. But no promises and concrete terms right now.

 

 

Ok. I just want to say, that the Emil should have the same top engine as the VK 30.01 H (Maybach HL 150). They are based on the same chassis after all.

Tier Xs; E100, E50M, JgPzE100, Maus, Grille, IS-7, AMX 50B, WZ-113, STB-1, VK 72.01(K). Lines I'm Grinding: 121(VIII), FV215B(VIII), FV4202(VII), IS-4(VIII), T-62A(VIII), Obj. 268(VII) Favorite Tank: E75. Top 100 Tanks: AMX M4 45, ARL 44, IS-2Sh, Chi-To, Chi-Nu, M41 90mm, Sturer Emil, Pz Sfl IV C, Type 58, Panzer IV Anko, Nashorn, BT-SV, Panzerjager I, IS-2, WZ-110, Type T-34, T-34-1, BDR G1B, Sherman V, Chieftain/T95, Pz IV Hydrostat, STRV 74A2, 112 Glacial, IS-2 Berlin, Kuro Mori Mine, M6A2E1, Panzer IV S, T-44-100, Black Prince, AC IV Sentinel, SU85i, T-34-2, Firefly, VK 100.01(P), Jagdtiger 10.5cm, Dicker Max, VK 45.03, T34 Indy, T-150, Type 64, AMX M4 49, Skorpion G, WZ-111 1-4, Ram II, Jackson, Super Pershing, T-44, T-43, Mäuschen, AMX 30 Proto, Lorraine 40t, WZ-113, WZ-135G FT Blaze,


RibbleStripe #88 Posted 12 December 2017 - 11:41 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 677
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostMayoNasalSpray, on 11 December 2017 - 06:34 PM, said:

Anything on the FCM36PAK40? It's really bad. 

We will consider low-tier changes after mid and high-tier adjustments.

 

View PostWMd76, on 11 December 2017 - 07:01 PM, said:

Ferdinand changes planned? 

Quite possible.

 

View PosttheFANTASTICfox, on 11 December 2017 - 11:26 PM, said:

BatChat 25t viewrange buff? Its a light tank and has less viewrange than the rest of the other tier 10 mediums...

LT performance depends not only on view range. Batchat does its job well enough. Anyway we keep an eye on it.

 

View Post_The_Tactition_, on 12 December 2017 - 12:05 AM, said:

Will JG. PZ. IV be nerfed?

Also possible. It need to be analyzed a bit later.


 

 


_Ntwadumela #89 Posted 12 December 2017 - 06:03 PM

    Ribble4Prez2020

  • Players
  • 21927 battles
  • 2,277
  • [_V2_]
  • Member since:
    06-13-2016
Is there any consideration of improving the camo values on the Grille though? 


(Credits to SparticusDiablo for the signature)
Get to know me on Discord: Maverick#3656
Join this Discord server while you're at it: 
sR2X6Hp
 


NateDawg2k16 #90 Posted 12 December 2017 - 08:47 PM

    Swedish Mafia Captain

  • Players
  • 13490 battles
  • 3,175
  • [META]
  • Member since:
    01-23-2016
What about the Vindictator?

"If you're gonna go out, go out with a bang." - Nobody said this. But somebody should have. 


reluctanttheist #91 Posted 12 December 2017 - 08:59 PM

    Canuck Didactics

  • Players
  • 24415 battles
  • 6,105
  • [III-H]
  • Member since:
    01-12-2015
I'll mention one thing that's annoyed me since forever - the turret armor profile on the FV4202 is just plain wrong.  Measurements on the FV at Bovington have determined that the armor all around the gun is over 200mm thick.  In game, only the lower part of the turret is 196mm, and the upper part of the turret is a measly120mm!  This ends up making the FV turret weaker than the Cent 7/1, which makes no sense at all.  It explains why a lot of people would just stop at the Cent 7/1 since the FV4202 turret has been inaccurately modeled, and nerfs the value of the FV such as to make it unplayable.  Would WG give it its proper armor, we might even see it used in WG tourneys. 

Tanks:  _X: T110E5, T110E3, FV215b(183), IS-7, Obj.140  _IX: M103, T-54  _VIII: IS-6, T34, Lowe, T-44, IS-6, IS-3D  _VII: T-43, Comet, E25, AT-15A, SU-122-44
Usually on in the evenings Pacific time.  Intake Contact for Triarii Clan (PM for details)
Be a better player  |  Click here if you have lag  |  Graphics Settings for iOS  |  Check your ping with Pingplotter  |  Get good: watch Bushka!  |  Check out tanks on Tank Compare  and  BlitzHangar


anonym_VEIjQQSdxvEw #92 Posted 15 December 2017 - 04:35 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 27
  • Member since:
    08-08-2018

Didn't see the Lowe on the list 4.5 today. Changed your mind? I hope not.



specialist5 #93 Posted 15 December 2017 - 04:50 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4415 battles
  • 111
  • [GOD77]
  • Member since:
    07-05-2016

View PostRibbleStripe, on 06 December 2017 - 11:09 AM, said:

Hey everyone!

 

We'd like to share our plans for upcoming vehicles changes. So, this is what will happen in near future:

 

T110E5 will be rebalanced - long-awaited cupola changes are coming.

Lowe should be and will be improved. The details will be revealed later.

Indien-Panzer is one more German to be buffed. Its gun will be more comfortable.

We'll keep refining tier 6 TDs. M36 Jackson, Churchill Gun Carrier and ARL V39 are the next candidates. 

Pz.Sfl.IV will become more comfortable.

 

Feel free to leave comments about upcoming changes. More news to come!

 



specialist5 #94 Posted 15 December 2017 - 04:54 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4415 battles
  • 111
  • [GOD77]
  • Member since:
    07-05-2016
The Lowe was not on the list today for upgrade 4.5. thought it was to be on there?

wolfpack1941 #95 Posted 15 December 2017 - 06:35 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13257 battles
  • 112
  • [J_F_2]
  • Member since:
    12-20-2015

View PostRibbleStripe, on 12 December 2017 - 06:41 AM, said:

We will consider low-tier changes after mid and high-tier adjustments.

 

Quite possible.

 

LT performance depends not only on view range. Batchat does its job well enough. Anyway we keep an eye on it.

 

Also possible. It need to be analyzed a bit later.

 

The list today did not show the Lowe. Thought is was to be on there. 

Meat_Locker #96 Posted 17 December 2017 - 04:24 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 34567 battles
  • 891
  • [TITAN]
  • Member since:
    08-27-2014

It is time to give the E25 a penetration and damage per round buff. It is becoming less competitive. It used to be a terror and still holds the reputation, but it simply can’t pen a great number of tanks @ tiers 7&8. 

It has no turret and is also now COD’d by light tanks.

 

Times have changed. Buff the E25 and make it the battlefield terror it used to be.


 


RibbleStripe #97 Posted 18 December 2017 - 06:54 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 677
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017
Lowe will be buffed later. We didn't plan it for 4.5. Nobody changed his mind )

 

 


blindsniper74 #98 Posted 18 December 2017 - 12:17 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 40775 battles
  • 962
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    08-30-2014

View Postreluctanttheist, on 12 December 2017 - 02:59 PM, said:

I'll mention one thing that's annoyed me since forever - the turret armor profile on the FV4202 is just plain wrong.  Measurements on the FV at Bovington have determined that the armor all around the gun is over 200mm thick.  In game, only the lower part of the turret is 196mm, and the upper part of the turret is a measly120mm!  This ends up making the FV turret weaker than the Cent 7/1, which makes no sense at all.  It explains why a lot of people would just stop at the Cent 7/1 since the FV4202 turret has been inaccurately modeled, and nerfs the value of the FV such as to make it unplayable.  Would WG give it its proper armor, we might even see it used in WG tourneys. 

This ^^^



blindsniper74 #99 Posted 18 December 2017 - 12:19 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 40775 battles
  • 962
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    08-30-2014

View PostMeat_Locker, on 17 December 2017 - 10:24 AM, said:

It is time to give the E25 a penetration and damage per round buff. It is becoming less competitive. It used to be a terror and still holds the reputation, but it simply can’t pen a great number of tanks @ tiers 7&8. 

It has no turret and is also now COD’d by light tanks.

 

Times have changed. Buff the E25 and make it the battlefield terror it used to be.

 

it was given apcr a bit ago, and buffed I believe 


Bullveigh25 #100 Posted 18 December 2017 - 08:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 40594 battles
  • 270
  • [-CFR-]
  • Member since:
    06-12-2013
can we get the glacial ap pen up to at least 200mm of pen? ideally 211mm would be great but give us at least 200mm. the prammo nerf rendered the 112 irelevant with only 174mm base ap pen




5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users