Jump to content


Upcoming balance adjustments


  • Please log in to reply
998 replies to this topic

Akadeadlytank #921 Posted 09 January 2019 - 06:43 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18232 battles
  • 283
  • [WR2]
  • Member since:
    07-15-2015

View PostRibbleStripe, on 09 January 2019 - 02:12 AM, said:

 

I guess i understand what you mean. But can you give me replay with such issue just in case?

 

how do i add a replay?

 

 

 

 

 

 

mY fAvOr!tE kEy On mY kEyBoArD iS 2

 

                                           

Spoiler

 


hangingchad #922 Posted 09 January 2019 - 08:12 PM

    Private

  • Players
  • 22221 battles
  • 2
  • [AU]
  • Member since:
    10-28-2015
I sold my Loewe because it sucked so bad. Now WG gonna buff it after complaiuts? WTH will they make me a deal to buy it back?! I bet not

chicken_stiffer #923 Posted 09 January 2019 - 09:02 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 16759 battles
  • 247
  • [DEF_6]
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014

View Posthangingchad, on 09 January 2019 - 11:12 AM, said:

I sold my Loewe because it sucked so bad. Now WG gonna buff it after complaiuts? WTH will they make me a deal to buy it back?! I bet not

 

Dude you are replying to a post made more then a year ago.  The Lowe was BUFFED last Jan. 2018!!!!!!!   and became an awesome credit grinder.

AnotherBIRDAddict #924 Posted 09 January 2019 - 09:29 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 8208 battles
  • 32
  • [TYCHE]
  • Member since:
    07-01-2017

View Postas15eternal, on 09 January 2019 - 05:10 AM, said:

This game has became super laging i dont even know why if its sever

Some dude posted another forum complaining about the connection. Apparently they moved to Chicago? I have my questions eg. that weren't they already at Chicago? Doesn't matter, yes the lagging is retarded as of rn though I agree.



RibbleStripe #925 Posted 10 January 2019 - 07:39 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 628
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017

View PostAkadeadlytank, on 09 January 2019 - 09:43 PM, said:

 

how do i add a replay?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Send me a PM with replay attached. 

 

 


I_Maverick_I #926 Posted 10 January 2019 - 07:43 AM

    Ribble4Prez2020

  • Players
  • 19943 battles
  • 1,938
  • Member since:
    06-13-2016

View PostAkadeadlytank, on 09 January 2019 - 10:43 AM, said:

 

how do i add a replay?

 

 

 

 

 

 

PM it to him over Discord. Ribble's discord username is RibbleStripe#2701

Trust me, it's easier than trying to attach something to this forum. You get like 500 KB. I don't even think that's enough for a replay, actually.


Edited by I_Maverick_I, 10 January 2019 - 07:44 AM.


(Credits to SparticusDiablo for the signature)
Get to know me on Discord: Maverick#3656
Join this Discord server while you're at it: 
sR2X6Hp
 


WipWapJaws #927 Posted 10 January 2019 - 01:46 PM

    Clanless Scrub

  • Players
  • 42684 battles
  • 3,499
  • [WKD]
  • Member since:
    07-24-2014

Ribble,

Is their any way to delete the attachments from my garage?  Its not really my thing and its making a mess of my ordered certificates



Akadeadlytank #928 Posted 10 January 2019 - 08:26 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 18232 battles
  • 283
  • [WR2]
  • Member since:
    07-15-2015

View PostRibbleStripe, on 10 January 2019 - 02:39 AM, said:

 

Send me a PM with replay attached. 

 

alrighty

 

and as mav said,  im gonna send it though discord


mY fAvOr!tE kEy On mY kEyBoArD iS 2

 

                                           

Spoiler

 


tanker070 #929 Posted 12 January 2019 - 05:27 AM

    The Nitwit

  • Players
  • 50619 battles
  • 1,014
  • [SRT-A]
  • Member since:
    07-11-2014

View PostWipWapJaws, on 10 January 2019 - 07:46 AM, said:

Ribble,

Is their any way to delete the attachments from my garage?  Its not really my thing and its making a mess of my ordered certificates

 

mate thats too much orderly shiz     
But i do wish i could sell a few.:coin:

.....

ahredstealth said: "while money can't buy happiness, it can rent it."


Davedt #930 Posted 13 January 2019 - 03:08 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20239 battles
  • 255
  • [_OPS_]
  • Member since:
    01-19-2015

a bit off topic but hoping Ribble will pass it on: please stop wasting containers on goofy avatars especially ones I already have several of... the event was ok for a WG event but enough already...

 



SuperMax812 #931 Posted 14 January 2019 - 04:10 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14205 battles
  • 125
  • [BOS]
  • Member since:
    07-16-2015
Will there be more British premiums or tech trees coming soon?

Rule Britannia! ! !

May Britannia prosper ! ! !

May we live in freedom ! ! !

https://www.youtube....h?v=sSnJSUU_7q0


j0nn0 #932 Posted 14 January 2019 - 06:16 PM

    F2P Skrub

  • Players
  • 16996 battles
  • 2,719
  • [XREGZ]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2014

View PostSuperMax812, on 13 January 2019 - 08:10 PM, said:

Will there be more British premiums or tech trees coming soon?

 

I think there'll be plenty of bouncing back and forth as WG attempts to balance low tiers right nownow so big reveals like new lines might take a while. Then again, I'm out of the loop so I may be wrong

Sometimes, you just gotta sit back and watch them all burn. Don't forget to bring popcorn. You're going to need a snack.


Oicraftian #933 Posted 16 January 2019 - 03:38 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14988 battles
  • 819
  • Member since:
    12-19-2014

View Postverhe, on 08 January 2019 - 11:26 PM, said:

 

Your comments are false, Th program development was canceled for cost and bad team work relationships, Germany pull out the program after the increased cost, America failed in his cannon 150 mm, please if you’re making opinions put some information validated it.

Sorry for my grammar,

 

No this really isn't an opinion.

The armor is tinfoil, being barely better than a Leopard 1. In World of Tanks, the armor would be even worse, because the 38mm outer plate would get overmatched.

The 152mm gun was trash because it's kinetic shot was garbad in an era where HEAT was rapidly declining in armor nuke ability.

The 105mm L7, when it was already not enough against T-64 in mid 1960's, out-performs the 152mm's kinetic shot equivalent.

 

Future tank? more like over priced trash. If this travesty actually made it into the 1970's, it would have screwed American tankers. Instead of struggling to kill early T-64's, they would be struggling to kill a base T-54.

And getting one shot by a T-34 85's 85mm gun seems to be a consistent feature.

 

And this is before you consider 100mm D-10T has more power than 105mm L7

 

Balance wise, it is not hard to make it a tier 9/10 RU-251. Being covered in anti HE spaced armor isn't about to make it any worse either.


Edited by Oicraftian, 16 January 2019 - 04:06 PM.

65% scrublord

Remember only tier 8/9/10 stats mean anything


Oicraftian #934 Posted 18 January 2019 - 03:34 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14988 battles
  • 819
  • Member since:
    12-19-2014

IS-6 DPM gun needs a penetration buff on AP and APCR shells to remain competitive. An increase of exactly 4% on both to counter the enemy building armor is necessary.

 

In this world the AP shot has to be competitive.

 

Another issue is the IS-6's side "spaced armor", which should be removed. It is making the tank too strong against tier 7 enemies


Edited by Oicraftian, 18 January 2019 - 03:40 PM.

65% scrublord

Remember only tier 8/9/10 stats mean anything


Morphman11 #935 Posted 24 January 2019 - 08:38 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26 battles
  • 282
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011

View PostI_Maverick_I, on 10 January 2019 - 07:43 AM, said:

 

PM it to him over Discord. Ribble's discord username is RibbleStripe#2701

Trust me, it's easier than trying to attach something to this forum. You get like 500 KB. I don't even think that's enough for a replay, actually.

 

Replays are very small file sizes they will fit.

Morphman11 #936 Posted 24 January 2019 - 08:47 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26 battles
  • 282
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011

View PostOicraftian, on 18 January 2019 - 03:34 PM, said:

IS-6 DPM gun needs a penetration buff on AP and APCR shells to remain competitive. An increase of exactly 4% on both to counter the enemy building armor is necessary.

 

In this world the AP shot has to be competitive.

 

Another issue is the IS-6's side "spaced armor", which should be removed. It is making the tank too strong against tier 7 enemies

 

An increase of 4% on the dpm gun won't be competitive. If they make the base pen on the AP rounds 190 and on the APCR 230-240 then the gun would be competitive. While the spaced armor on the side is not a good idea as even tier 9s can experience trouble with it because Soviet RNG, you can't deny the fact that if the tier 7s load gold then they can butter the front. The sides are slightly unbalanced but the frontal weakness kinda makes up for it.



Morphman11 #937 Posted 24 January 2019 - 08:49 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26 battles
  • 282
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011

View PostSuperMax812, on 14 January 2019 - 04:10 AM, said:

Will there be more British premiums or tech trees coming soon?

 

Another Chinese line is being introduced, the tds. Basically the Soviet 268 line except the 704 and 268 are replaced with chunky ISUs.

verhe #938 Posted 24 January 2019 - 03:30 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 32905 battles
  • 90
  • [OWA]
  • Member since:
    03-17-2016

View PostOicraftian, on 16 January 2019 - 03:38 PM, said:

 

No this really isn't an opinion.

The armor is tinfoil, being barely better than a Leopard 1. In World of Tanks, the armor would be even worse, because the 38mm outer plate would get overmatched.

The 152mm gun was trash because it's kinetic shot was garbad in an era where HEAT was rapidly declining in armor nuke ability.

The 105mm L7, when it was already not enough against T-64 in mid 1960's, out-performs the 152mm's kinetic shot equivalent.

 

Future tank? more like over priced trash. If this travesty actually made it into the 1970's, it would have screwed American tankers. Instead of struggling to kill early T-64's, they would be struggling to kill a base T-54.

And getting one shot by a T-34 85's 85mm gun seems to be a consistent feature.

 

And this is before you consider 100mm D-10T has more power than 105mm L7

 

Balance wise, it is not hard to make it a tier 9/10 RU-251. Being covered in anti HE spaced armor isn't about to make it any worse either.

 

Please boy, 
Spaced armour 
Two layers spaced with 127mm, the inner a softer steel that also served as a spall liner (46mm), and the outer of harder cold-rolled steel (34mm).


Oicraftian #939 Posted 24 January 2019 - 09:35 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 14988 battles
  • 819
  • Member since:
    12-19-2014

38mm + 46mm laid back 60* from vertical. Combined thickness 84mm. So it's combined thinner than T-44 frontal armor. But remember, this is before you point out the armor is much weaker than that because they are two separate armor plates.

 

Realistically speaking the resistance is almost negligible

 

By comparison realistic IS-3 has better upper side hull armor than the MBT-70 has UFP.


Edited by Oicraftian, 24 January 2019 - 09:36 PM.

65% scrublord

Remember only tier 8/9/10 stats mean anything


RibbleStripe #940 Posted 25 January 2019 - 09:01 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 247 battles
  • 628
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017
Guys, i've got 5.6 balance charts but only for RU server. Do you want to see and discuss them?

 

 





7 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users