Jump to content


The British tier ten replacements/addons


  • Please log in to reply
24 replies to this topic

dport02 #21 Posted 01 March 2018 - 03:53 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 28955 battles
  • 935
  • [-FE4R]
  • Member since:
    11-22-2014

I wish if you had the FV4202 they would give you AX, like on PC.



redmanm #22 Posted 01 March 2018 - 06:53 PM

    Vader's Fist

  • Players
  • 25166 battles
  • 398
  • [DEF_V]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2014

View Postdport02, on 01 March 2018 - 09:53 AM, said:

I wish if you had the FV4202 they would give you AX, like on PC.

 

Most likely will be an alternate tier 10 to the FV4202


 

#betaproud


anonym_2ZNiJLJL8ln2 #23 Posted 28 March 2018 - 03:05 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 940
  • Member since:
    06-16-2019

View PostDominator702, on 26 February 2018 - 04:15 PM, said:

 

Well you need to balance it to the Russian t62 witch has good armor good pen good mobility and some of the best soft stats in the game some how right

 

No, it is half armored against standard ammo, half protected with mostly HE proof armor, it has mediocre pen, it has good mobility, but not for the class, also with an unimpressive max speed. It has weak flex, and the alpha is unimpressive too. The gun also is 100mm which makes overmatch a nigh impossibility. 

 

The tank has a good gun to make up for it's weak flex, which you probably aren't good enough to exploit in the first place. To expect the Soviet medium tanks to have similar flex is a bit unreasonable, as they tend to have poor gun depression.

 

Also the T-62A has very poor statistical performance in the tier 10 mediums, which is not because it is underpowered. But because it is very difficult to flex, and many players fail at it.

In truth, it is a good tank, a very good tank, it is now a Soviet tank, on the level of, I daresay, the M48 Patton, which has dominated the medium class after the Object 140 was obliterated, and the T-62A reduced to a footnote. There is no "Russian bias" in WOT, the only "Russian bias" is the inability of the devs to allow tanks that should be at a higher tier, to be at a higher tier. Or just not in the game in the first place.

 

ie:

T-54 should pick between being a T-54 m1947 or something later, because it's some strange mix of earlier and later models. In my opinion, it should pick between the run and gun tank, or the proper heavium tank the Soviets envisioned, that still prevails to this very day.

 

Whereas the T-55 should present itself as a distinct tier 10 split, Object 140 being a secondary option, without the T-62A.

 

Either way, all of their armor protection is significantly underperforming.



wrec #24 Posted 28 April 2018 - 01:53 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 6829 battles
  • 15
  • [-WWII]
  • Member since:
    01-26-2016

View PostOicraftian, on 06 February 2018 - 07:12 PM, said:

The problem is, that our FV 4202 used to outclass the Action X in virtually every single respect... So actually the AX is, in many ways, inferior to the former FV 4202.

 

Inferior armor, module layout, it's bigger, the turret is marginally better, but it's also larger, with much bigger weakspots.

Now if WG gives the PC's *buffed* AX, I think it would be nerfed through the floor.

Actually the AX has better dispersion and has better ground resistance, its more like a semi stock Leo P



anonym_2ZNiJLJL8ln2 #25 Posted 09 May 2018 - 04:40 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 940
  • Member since:
    06-16-2019

View Postwrec, on 28 April 2018 - 01:53 PM, said:

Actually the AX has better dispersion and has better ground resistance, its more like a semi stock Leo P

 

Which the FV 4202 has on Blitz already. The answer is, no.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users