Jump to content


AMX CDC.... Still disappointing.


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

karam_2014 #1 Posted 08 January 2018 - 10:09 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9031 battles
  • 141
  • [TITAN]
  • Member since:
    08-02-2014

So the AMX CDC got buffed, and it’s awesome, I like to play my AMX CDC way more than I ever did before update 4.6, But it’s still a crappy tank. I mean all it needs is a 250 Alpha damage gun on its AP shells, and I bet you no one will say it’s underpowered. So maybe we can get it buffed again?



Lt_gota #2 Posted 08 January 2018 - 10:14 PM

    OFFICIAL DOGFACE FOLLOWER

  • Players
  • 11155 battles
  • 859
  • Member since:
    02-28-2016
on the other hand, drac is still great :great:

Mastery badge: 1.MS-1(July 2016)  2.SP I C(9/1/16)  3.T-34(9/1/16) 4.STA-1(11/21/16) 5.SU-100(12/5/16) 6.Tiger ll(12/14/16)

7.lS-3(12/17/16) 8.SU-152(12/23/16) 9.Ru 251(12/25/16) 10.LTTB(2/2/17) 11.B1(2/24/17) 12.Rhm.-Borsig(3/4/17) 13.Waffentrager(3/25/17) 14.E25(3/30/17) 15.vk28(4/1/17) 16.locust(4/9/17) 17.Mardar ll(4/15/17) 18.Cruiser lll(4/16/17)

19.vk 16(12/7/17) 20.R35(12/24/17) 21.KV-2(12/25/17) 22.Obj.704(1/6/18)


Rum_Tanker #3 Posted 08 January 2018 - 10:16 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7204 battles
  • 1,514
  • Member since:
    10-08-2016
Yep, hate it. Rage sold it twice.....:trollface:


 


Luc____ #4 Posted 08 January 2018 - 10:17 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8810 battles
  • 1,209
  • [XWING]
  • Member since:
    03-10-2017
I think that would be fair. Like the churchill gun carrier gun maybe. It helps that the gun is the AC DCA 45, instead of the normal DCA 45. Therefore, it would be more acceptable if it had better alpha. Or maybe 240 like the german bulldog?
"Newer Player"

I'm working to improve my winrate. Currently: 45% 46% 47% 48%  49% 50% 51%ish >>> 30 days is 60% ... Currently working to become a unicum, and all tips are appreciated!

 


karam_2014 #5 Posted 08 January 2018 - 10:22 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9031 battles
  • 141
  • [TITAN]
  • Member since:
    08-02-2014

View PostLuc____, on 08 January 2018 - 05:17 PM, said:

I think that would be fair. Like the churchill gun carrier gun maybe. It helps that the gun is the AC DCA 45, instead of the normal DCA 45. Therefore, it would be more acceptable if it had better alpha. Or maybe 240 like the german bulldog?

 

both of those guns are balanced in my opinion.. but it took years for Wargaming to give the CDC it’s first ever buff.. I’m not expecting  buff in 4.7 :confused: but if they do buff it, then I’m gonna stop posting about the CDC once ever month.

Pastaguy2003 #6 Posted 08 January 2018 - 11:10 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4697 battles
  • 822
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017
I think you mean 4.5... unless... YOUR FROM THE FUTURE?!?!?!  DO WE HAVE PURPLE BANANAS YET???

Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver


outersketcher #7 Posted 08 January 2018 - 11:11 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12184 battles
  • 2,825
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    02-25-2016

Put red flames on it... 

Makes it go faster, and shoot harder. 

 

........................I swear..


Looking into the eyes of an infant is like staring into the heart of a star... Pure. And blazing.

 

Also.. it's never a pleasant experience to bite into a SlimJim, and discover a toenail. 

huhh.. there's another one.. 


fluffyteddy763 #8 Posted 09 January 2018 - 12:25 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4211 battles
  • 669
  • [CRU3L]
  • Member since:
    10-31-2015
No, I say give it a 100/105 mm.

All credit goes to the master of signatures- SpartacusDiablo 


karam_2014 #9 Posted 09 January 2018 - 12:29 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9031 battles
  • 141
  • [TITAN]
  • Member since:
    08-02-2014

View Postfluffyteddy763, on 08 January 2018 - 07:25 PM, said:

No, I say give it a 100/105 mm.

 

300/350 alpha Damage with its reload is way too unbalanced, but if they do they can’t nerf it it’s a premium :trollface: so I hope they do

fluffyteddy763 #10 Posted 09 January 2018 - 12:38 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4211 battles
  • 669
  • [CRU3L]
  • Member since:
    10-31-2015

View Postkaram_2014, on 09 January 2018 - 12:29 AM, said:

 

300/350 alpha Damage with its reload is way too unbalanced, but if they do they can’t nerf it it’s a premium :trollface: so I hope they do

 

No, I meant as a second gun.

All credit goes to the master of signatures- SpartacusDiablo 


karam_2014 #11 Posted 09 January 2018 - 12:40 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9031 battles
  • 141
  • [TITAN]
  • Member since:
    08-02-2014

View Postfluffyteddy763, on 08 January 2018 - 07:38 PM, said:

 

No, I meant as a second gun.

 

Nooo that wouldn’t help it be a better tank, just up the alpha to 240-250

fluffyteddy763 #12 Posted 09 January 2018 - 01:36 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4211 battles
  • 669
  • [CRU3L]
  • Member since:
    10-31-2015

View Postkaram_2014, on 09 January 2018 - 12:40 AM, said:

 

Nooo that wouldn’t help it be a better tank, just up the alpha to 240-250

 

I feel it would give it more punch. I'd be more wary as a red approaching a CDC with 280 alpha/310 alpha than what it's current alpha is.

All credit goes to the master of signatures- SpartacusDiablo 


Pastaguy2003 #13 Posted 09 January 2018 - 01:56 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4697 battles
  • 822
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017
I guess i was the only one who realized karam_2014 declared he was playing on 4.6...

Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver


PingJockey1 #14 Posted 09 January 2018 - 04:33 AM

    Private

  • Players
  • 6643 battles
  • 2
  • [SPADE]
  • Member since:
    07-03-2015

Cannot help but notice that most French tanks, notably the AMX line, are post Korean War.  Does Wargaming believe that tanks that these vehicles, which in WWII Germany would not have beaten so easily, are actually fair to others?  The designers of the AMX line were in diapers when the Pz IV s rolled into France.

 



Pastaguy2003 #15 Posted 09 January 2018 - 04:42 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4697 battles
  • 822
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View PostPingJockey1, on 09 January 2018 - 04:33 AM, said:

Cannot help but notice that most French tanks, notably the AMX line, are post Korean War.  Does Wargaming believe that tanks that these vehicles, which in WWII Germany would not have beaten so easily, are actually fair to others?  The designers of the AMX line were in diapers when the Pz IV s rolled into France.

 

 

I agree the french tanks are op, but thay have to have some tanks leading to tier x.  Imagine a 13 75 at tier x though.  

Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver


karam_2014 #16 Posted 10 January 2018 - 12:23 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9031 battles
  • 141
  • [TITAN]
  • Member since:
    08-02-2014

View PostPastaguy2003, on 08 January 2018 - 08:56 PM, said:

I guess i was the only one who realized karam_2014 declared he was playing on 4.6...

 

aren’t we all playing on 4.6?

Pastaguy2003 #17 Posted 10 January 2018 - 01:14 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4697 battles
  • 822
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View Postkaram_2014, on 10 January 2018 - 12:23 AM, said:

 

aren’t we all playing on 4.6?

 

Nope.  It isn't released yet.  

 

http://forum.wotblit...-45-discussion/

 

Notice the title.  4.6 discussion isn't out yet.


Edited by Pastaguy2003, 10 January 2018 - 01:15 AM.

Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver


___DEAN #18 Posted 10 January 2018 - 01:45 AM

    ~=(C/A=|Republic=~

  • Players
  • 22670 battles
  • 458
  • [DD-R]
  • Member since:
    12-23-2014
It needs a bigger buff IMHO

 

Tanks:

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users