Jump to content


Update 4.6 - Overview


  • Please log in to reply
169 replies to this topic

DaBushWookie #101 Posted 10 January 2018 - 08:20 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 12492 battles
  • 83
  • [PNCR]
  • Member since:
    10-29-2017

View Postacrisis, on 10 January 2018 - 01:32 PM, said:

Nerf the T-62A ???????

I just bought it, have not even driven it yet ( stupid timers ) ...

 

Like the medium nerfs weren’t bad enough ... a T-54 is just about useless these days in tier X games. 

 

Based on the other tanks listed, IF they’re all in the category of getting improved, I’d say a buff of sorts. 

There’s no way the 268 gets a buff. Gun is amazing, depression is amazing, keeps up to tier 10 meds, trolly as fck



Ookla_the_Mok #102 Posted 10 January 2018 - 08:29 PM

    Team Brisket

  • Players
  • 28238 battles
  • 5,505
  • [BRSKT]
  • Member since:
    07-03-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 10 January 2018 - 07:36 AM, said:

 

 

 

If there is no bad news, let's think something up, right? 

 

This sounds like a nice little quip, but with spare parts being so hard to come by and the damned timers to even use them... the nerf to a high tier tank really sucks. I find it hard to believe all of the changes are going to be buffs and the 268 could well be nerfed, which is going to suck for my investment. Heck, the whole idea of new tanks has had the life sucked out of it by spare parts.

[BRSKT] may or may not be recruiting you. 

Our Discord is now 72% Gritty content.

 


RommelTanker #103 Posted 10 January 2018 - 08:48 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3204 battles
  • 2,609
  • [_DX2_]
  • Member since:
    09-03-2017

View PostFu_Manchu_, on 10 January 2018 - 09:46 AM, said:

 

The DPM is ridiculously high but it has low pen which should offset that.

 

View Postrichdubz, on 10 January 2018 - 09:32 AM, said:

If they nerf the Jagdpanzer IV it will be because of the freakin’ Bushka video where he complained that it was OP.  The only other explanation for a nerf would be because I fully equipped it, I really enjoy driving it, and because WG wants to hurt me again in the same way they hurt me with the VK28.01 nerf.

 

It currently has more DpM than the E25 at Tier VII using its 75mm PaK and even MORE DpM than the E25 using its 88mm PaK. Not to mention that if you put the damn thing in a DpM race with most Tier IXs it would win on a consistent basis when shooting at tanks. DpM like that at Tier VI is completely broken, no arguments otherwise.

Blitz Forums' resident Leopard PT A main.

I have discovered the glory of the Tiger 1. 

He who types many stupid essays and boasts about bad Leopard PT A stats.

I'm probably one of the only players in the game with over 5,500 WN8 in a Tier 1 tank. If that's not the most useless achievement ever I dunno what is.

HE does more damage than AP... in loopy land. 


NateDawg2k16 #104 Posted 10 January 2018 - 08:53 PM

    Swedish Mafia Captain

  • Players
  • 13565 battles
  • 3,175
  • [META]
  • Member since:
    01-23-2016
If Indien and 62A get buffed I will be happy!

"If you're gonna go out, go out with a bang." - Nobody said this. But somebody should have. 


luckb0x #105 Posted 10 January 2018 - 09:19 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19544 battles
  • 418
  • [KIND]
  • Member since:
    06-24-2016

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 10 January 2018 - 06:59 PM, said:

The idea is that there would be a light next to a players name in your friends list. This light would let you know if they are or are not already in a platoon.

 

It would let you know who to invite and who to leave alone.

 

At least that's my understanding of it.

 

But what if you prefer to lie to that 40% whose friendship you accepted because you didn't want to offend.  I for one like being able to say "I'm in a platoon" when I really just don't want to.

 

I also bought 62A a month ago, have not driven yet due to equipment and now questioning.  Seems this is happening a lot (Borsig, french auto loaders, etc)



minitel_NA #106 Posted 10 January 2018 - 09:23 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 454 battles
  • 5,129
  • [EUREF]
  • Member since:
    12-19-2015

View PostLtPork, on 10 January 2018 - 01:42 PM, said:

I imagine so, a nerf would kill it. 

 

can’t possibly kill something that wasn’t alive to begin with. Or can they ?

Minitelrose visiting from EU, occasional player/forumer in the NA

 


_Duncan_Idaho_ #107 Posted 10 January 2018 - 09:31 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 38435 battles
  • 512
  • [DUNE_]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2015

I just got legendary camo for T62a too. . .  

 

boosters for spare parts would be most welcome.

 

Also, ages ago, I made a suggestion that "Enriching" tanks should increase the spare part yield as well as the credits. This would encourage long time players to invest in a feature that is otherwise pointless and ridiculously over-priced. I actually suggested an enrichment feature before it was released, but it wasn't delivered as I asked (it was way too expensive and 3.8 changed the currency of the realm from credits to spare parts, so the point of enrichment became moot for anyone who can keep their damage ratio over 1.0.

 

*I did enrich one tank once. The Type 61 for the massive grind to the STB. It did work as intended - Instead of plummeting into debt, or having to alternate in my premium tanks, I was able to play only the Type 61 for the enrichment period after which, I had earned enough credits to buy the STB.


Edited by _Duncan_Idaho_, 10 January 2018 - 09:42 PM.

 

 


jkwon126 #108 Posted 10 January 2018 - 09:42 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 38338 battles
  • 1,717
  • [HUCK]
  • Member since:
    05-12-2016

View PostOokla_the_Mok, on 10 January 2018 - 04:29 PM, said:

 

This sounds like a nice little quip, but with spare parts being so hard to come by and the damned timers to even use them... the nerf to a high tier tank really sucks. I find it hard to believe all of the changes are going to be buffs and the 268 could well be nerfed, which is going to suck for my investment. Heck, the whole idea of new tanks has had the life sucked out of it by spare parts.

 

I think you're being too generous.

 

It was another trash post dripping with contempt for forumers.


 

 

[WOTBStars] [BlitzStars]

What was that?  Can't hear you over my freedom of speech -Blartch

Do not hold the symbol in higher regard than the freedom it represents. -DaBombV


anonym_V8W3k6dl2CNQ #109 Posted 10 January 2018 - 09:53 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 0 battles
  • 951
  • Member since:
    12-11-2018
The is7 is kinda op in current meta

Player_5773117413 #110 Posted 10 January 2018 - 09:54 PM

    Professional Tinfoil Hatter

  • Players
  • 29595 battles
  • 8,962
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014

View PostOokla_the_Mok, on 10 January 2018 - 02:29 PM, said:

 

This sounds like a nice little quip, but with spare parts being so hard to come by and the damned timers to even use them... the nerf to a high tier tank really sucks. I find it hard to believe all of the changes are going to be buffs and the 268 could well be nerfed, which is going to suck for my investment. Heck, the whole idea of new tanks has had the life sucked out of it by spare parts.

 

but they just buffed the 268 like two updates ago. Why are they toying around with it again? Did they miss something the first time around? It hasn't gotten op or anything.

"HULK SMASH[er]!!!"

^ Gotta derp around in Tier 7 before the inevitable nerf! ^

Just another demo account, nothing to see here

"Say what you like, but stop pissing on my back and telling me it's raining." Blartch


XxxSTAKillaxxX #111 Posted 10 January 2018 - 09:57 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7430 battles
  • 384
  • [TR0LL]
  • Member since:
    12-30-2016

View Postjkwon126, on 10 January 2018 - 09:42 PM, said:

 

I think you're being too generous.

 

It was another trash post dripping with contempt for forumers.  CUSTOMERS.  


Yeah it appears the standard disrespect by Ex Soviets (You are welcome by the way Ribble, I am sure Wargaming would have been possible under Communism.  You would be too busy picking potatoes in the fields or making sub standard steel in the factories.) towards anyone who is not Russian is never going to be dealt with.



dindincf #112 Posted 10 January 2018 - 10:00 PM

    Potato Rights Activist

  • Players
  • 23395 battles
  • 2,373
  • [CLEAR]
  • Member since:
    08-31-2014

View PostPlayer_5773117413, on 10 January 2018 - 01:54 PM, said:

 

but they just buffed the 268 like two updates ago. Why are they toying around with it again? Did they miss something the first time around? It hasn't gotten op or anything.

 

I am on the 704 right now so I hope they aren’t murdering it.


  https://www.blitzstars.com/player/com/dindincf                                            

#bringtankboomback

Tier X's: Leopard 1 / T110E4 /  T110E5 /  M48A1 Patton / Object 263 / IS-7 / Object 140 / T-62A / JPE-100 / AMX 50B

“At the moment, you should forget about the M60.”        -ZIoydd, on 01 August 2017 - 06:01 AM

 


xXZachAttackXx_EOG #113 Posted 10 January 2018 - 10:03 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24185 battles
  • 526
  • [RM-]
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015
Don't really see why the Jackson needs a buff. Even back when i last played it at 6k games and 51% wr I still managed to do very well in it. Oh well, maybe I get it back and get it to the upper 60s now.

I'm good at this game I promise


mehliveat #114 Posted 10 January 2018 - 10:07 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 300 battles
  • 3,196
  • Member since:
    08-05-2014

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 11 January 2018 - 01:14 AM, said:

Same.  I've lost track of the tanks that have been nerfed right after I get them fully equipped :angry:

 

Its the natural cycle.

 

People will only invest SP in good tanks, and the investment will make the tanks even better.

 

Once its even better, the tank will flood MM queue, and their performance will be above average.

 

Then the nerf hammer follows.



mehliveat #115 Posted 10 January 2018 - 10:09 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 300 battles
  • 3,196
  • Member since:
    08-05-2014

View PostxXZachAttackXx_EOG, on 11 January 2018 - 08:03 AM, said:

Don't really see why the Jackson needs a buff. Even back when i last played it at 6k games and 51% wr I still managed to do very well in it. Oh well, maybe I get it back and get it to the upper 60s now.

 

Because it has less pen, DPM, and worse gun handling than the ARL, despite it being "TD".

 

Then you add less HP and far worse armor.



xXZachAttackXx_EOG #116 Posted 10 January 2018 - 10:11 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24185 battles
  • 526
  • [RM-]
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015

View Postmehliveat, on 10 January 2018 - 10:09 PM, said:

 

Because it has less pen, DPM, and worse gun handling than the ARL, despite it being "TD".

 

Then you add less HP and far worse armor.

Well in that case I see why. Haven't played the Jackson since long before the arl was in the game and never knew that.


I'm good at this game I promise


CristianoRonaldo_7_RM #117 Posted 10 January 2018 - 10:18 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13731 battles
  • 157
  • [XCLB2]
  • Member since:
    04-11-2016

Ah wg, over buffing the dpm on a below avg tank that you love and have owned for 2 years, later just for it to be inevitability nerfed 2 patches later. Gg wg

 

 

 


Hullo

wannabeunicum #118 Posted 10 January 2018 - 10:27 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 34972 battles
  • 5,673
  • [-MM]
  • Member since:
    10-25-2015

View PostCristianoRonaldo_7_RM, on 10 January 2018 - 10:18 PM, said:

Ah wg, over buffing the dpm on a below avg tank that you love and have owned for 2 years, later just for it to be inevitability nerfed 2 patches later. Gg wg

 

 

 

they will still keep the mobility buffs is my guess. 
That would be fair. 



THE_Viajero #119 Posted 10 January 2018 - 10:32 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24439 battles
  • 468
  • [F8TAL]
  • Member since:
    04-03-2016

It will be nice if the CGC gets a nerf (sorry) buff in the armor to levels of Churchill VII, and a over all nerf to the gun.

 

and I hope that one of thous non featured changes so the changes to the gun of bout cent 7/1 and FV (if I remember corecly, the idea was to put a new gun whit HESH as premium and other whit HEAT as premium, and also buff the DPM)


Edited by THE_Viajero, 11 January 2018 - 11:26 PM.

Viajero means Traveler 

:B

People complain when the ping goes to 100 but I have always play whit 150~ of ping 

ps: I'm a not native English speaker, so, sorry for any mistakes (or maybe the autocorrector trolled me XD) 

 


CristianoRonaldo_7_RM #120 Posted 10 January 2018 - 10:35 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13731 battles
  • 157
  • [XCLB2]
  • Member since:
    04-11-2016

View Postwannabeunicum, on 10 January 2018 - 02:27 PM, said:

they will still keep the mobility buffs is my guess. 
That would be fair. 

 

thats my guess to but i honestly feel that the gun should still be better than it was pre buff.
Hullo




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users