Jump to content


Supersamov OFFICIAL THREAD


  • Please log in to reply
78 replies to this topic

NateDawg2k16 #21 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:02 PM

    Swedish Mafia Captain

  • Players
  • 12413 battles
  • 3,170
  • [AWING]
  • Member since:
    01-23-2016

View PostMAJIME, on 10 January 2018 - 09:38 PM, said:

https://www.blitzsta.../com/Supersamov

 

First time seeing someone with a negative wn7. :ohmy:

 

Wait, that's possible?

"If you're gonna go out, go out with a bang." - Nobody said this. But somebody should have. 


RibbleStripe #22 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:18 PM

    Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 237 battles
  • 432
  • Member since:
    10-04-2017
Official thread dedicated to banned user? Not gonna happen )
 
Discord - RibbleStripe#2701

acrisis #23 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:20 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20077 battles
  • 9,269
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

Make no mistake, the person is NOT a “ noob “ but a BOTTER who leeches / AFKs for housands of games in NA and RU.

 

Dozens of tickets with screenshots and even video have been submitted.

 

WG has yet to act oppropriately, considering past promises and assurances about “ anti - AFK “ ( 06:35 )

 

 

 


Edited by acrisis, 11 January 2018 - 12:20 PM.

 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
BCC Discord invite | BCC Forum Thread
Wargaming Community Discord inviteWorld of Warships Community Discord invite        

Looney Tooners | Triarii | Blitz University | Basic Training  | Mentor
2.8 Blitz EconomyGot lag? =>  Pingplotter thread 
 |  Mission Poll  | Goose Event Poll  | ...


minitel_NA #24 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:34 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 451 battles
  • 3,190
  • [EUREF]
  • Member since:
    12-19-2015

Wow. I was going to issue some sort of joke around  “no name and shame “ until I clicked...

i have never seen lower than that in my past 60.000 battles and 4 years.

 

just wow.


Minitelrose visiting from EU, occasional player/forumer in the NA

 


acrisis #25 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:45 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20077 battles
  • 9,269
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 11 January 2018 - 07:18 AM, said:

Official thread dedicated to banned user? Not gonna happen )
 

 

We know we are not supposed to talk publicly about BOTS and WG’s penalties, but this BOT is not banned.

 

The BOT was in battle yesterday.

The BOT is in battle today. 

The BOT is running his LOWE for 21 battles already TODAY ... leeching freexp and credits. 

 

 

 

 


 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
BCC Discord invite | BCC Forum Thread
Wargaming Community Discord inviteWorld of Warships Community Discord invite        

Looney Tooners | Triarii | Blitz University | Basic Training  | Mentor
2.8 Blitz EconomyGot lag? =>  Pingplotter thread 
 |  Mission Poll  | Goose Event Poll  | ...


SanguinaryDan #26 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:46 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13606 battles
  • 1,102
  • [2PINT]
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 11 January 2018 - 07:18 AM, said:

Official thread dedicated to banned user? Not gonna happen )
 

Does this mean he’s actually been BANNED?  Or did you actually mean “banning a user”?


The point of the game is to win.  The purpose of the game is to have fun.  They are not mutually exclusive.

acrisis #27 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:53 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20077 battles
  • 9,269
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

10000 AFK battles in two months.

 

The only time there may have been a ban was two months ago. 

 

Proving that when I sent in the video with my ticket a few weeks ago, that WG did nothing.

 

Same thing with the dozens of ticket created by clan members and forum users. 

 

If this person were to be banned as per WG’s own rules and statements, there would be more gaps in his history and he would be GONE by now. 

 

 

 

 


 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
BCC Discord invite | BCC Forum Thread
Wargaming Community Discord inviteWorld of Warships Community Discord invite        

Looney Tooners | Triarii | Blitz University | Basic Training  | Mentor
2.8 Blitz EconomyGot lag? =>  Pingplotter thread 
 |  Mission Poll  | Goose Event Poll  | ...


acrisis #28 Posted 11 January 2018 - 12:58 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20077 battles
  • 9,269
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

Bit it seems like, as soon as there is a premium tank purchased, suddenly bots are a protected class of user ... 

 

 


 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
BCC Discord invite | BCC Forum Thread
Wargaming Community Discord inviteWorld of Warships Community Discord invite        

Looney Tooners | Triarii | Blitz University | Basic Training  | Mentor
2.8 Blitz EconomyGot lag? =>  Pingplotter thread 
 |  Mission Poll  | Goose Event Poll  | ...


SanguinaryDan #29 Posted 11 January 2018 - 01:05 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13606 battles
  • 1,102
  • [2PINT]
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014
I really don’t get why this person even has an account.  It’s not like he’s using the afk Löwe games to pay for playing a credit losing tank’s games. He just afk games over and over. To what end?
The point of the game is to win.  The purpose of the game is to have fun.  They are not mutually exclusive.

acrisis #30 Posted 11 January 2018 - 01:05 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20077 battles
  • 9,269
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

... as evidenced by ... 

 

 

> 100 THOUSAND AFK games ... never banned ... still running around ... and now actually playing legit on the back of all that leeched freexp and those leeched credits 

 

 


 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
BCC Discord invite | BCC Forum Thread
Wargaming Community Discord inviteWorld of Warships Community Discord invite        

Looney Tooners | Triarii | Blitz University | Basic Training  | Mentor
2.8 Blitz EconomyGot lag? =>  Pingplotter thread 
 |  Mission Poll  | Goose Event Poll  | ...


acrisis #31 Posted 11 January 2018 - 01:07 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20077 battles
  • 9,269
  • [III-X]
  • Member since:
    12-27-2014

View PostSanguinaryDan, on 11 January 2018 - 08:05 AM, said:

I really don’t get why this person even has an account.  It’s not like he’s using the afk Löwe games to pay for playing a credit losing tank’s games. He just afk games over and over. To what end?

 

He is saving the credits and building up freexp to get to some tier viii ix or x without having to actually play through a whole line. 

 

You can look at this guy, who botted 100000 battles, then started to use the credits and freexp, plays blue and purple in tanks he likes, then just AFKs whatever he does not want to play. Sort by WR to see all tier tier 4 5 7 ... that are out of,line with somebody who can play 60%. https://www.blitzstars.com/player/asia/Player_6899258356


Edited by acrisis, 11 January 2018 - 01:11 PM.

 

   Blitz   Community   Coalition   
BCC Discord invite | BCC Forum Thread
Wargaming Community Discord inviteWorld of Warships Community Discord invite        

Looney Tooners | Triarii | Blitz University | Basic Training  | Mentor
2.8 Blitz EconomyGot lag? =>  Pingplotter thread 
 |  Mission Poll  | Goose Event Poll  | ...


__Crusader6__ #32 Posted 11 January 2018 - 01:25 PM

    BANNED

  • Players
  • 50774 battles
  • 8,425
  • [III]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View Postfluffyteddy763, on 10 January 2018 - 10:47 PM, said:

While you're thread was good intent-wise, it's too bad that the only thing that's going to come out of this is a "name and shame" ban on OP by our communist mods.

 

View PostLuc____, on 10 January 2018 - 10:47 PM, said:

 

I still haven't received a warning either :trollface::trollface::trollface:

Ribble, if you're looking at this, can we please have a blind eye?

 

View Posttedg5, on 11 January 2018 - 02:55 AM, said:

This is true, as soon as they see it they’re pretty quick with the ol’ Ban-hammer.

 

I got my second and third strike here with Moist_Mut - but he did get perms-banned.

 (they did reverse my fourth strike)

 

At the end of the day -- we as former need to take a stand on the serial AFK/Bot's


 

Tank Hoarder: 327 tanks in Garage:  330/330 aced (AMX 30B, Mk1 and T49A repo), wallet warrior.  Loyal M60 

WANTED: Head of the idiot that introduced chests 

 


Rockracer #33 Posted 11 January 2018 - 01:38 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9172 battles
  • 2,464
  • Member since:
    12-20-2016

View PostRibbleStripe, on 11 January 2018 - 09:18 AM, said:

Official thread dedicated to banned user? Not gonna happen )
 

 

is it just me or did WG actually do something about it


I played TDs before it was cool. It was also never cool to begin with.


Zuke76 #34 Posted 11 January 2018 - 01:41 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11716 battles
  • 1,460
  • [SAD21]
  • Member since:
    06-25-2017

https://www.unknownc...arming-bot.html

 

Maybe he uses something like this


Edited by Zuke76, 11 January 2018 - 01:42 PM.

 

 

A Part of the Training Room Police Department(TRPD) thanks to __Seal__


__Crusader6__ #35 Posted 11 January 2018 - 01:41 PM

    BANNED

  • Players
  • 50774 battles
  • 8,425
  • [III]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 11 January 2018 - 07:18 AM, said:

Official thread dedicated to banned user? Not gonna happen )
 

 

I hope so (him being banned).

 

   He is working on Marcos's for botting. - my assumption is he is trying auto aim's or hit skin cheats.

 

 


 

Tank Hoarder: 327 tanks in Garage:  330/330 aced (AMX 30B, Mk1 and T49A repo), wallet warrior.  Loyal M60 

WANTED: Head of the idiot that introduced chests 

 


Howitzer_155 #36 Posted 11 January 2018 - 02:15 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 43691 battles
  • 4,505
  • [DD]
  • Member since:
    01-11-2015

View Postfluffyteddy763, on 10 January 2018 - 10:47 PM, said:

While you're thread was good intent-wise, it's too bad that the only thing that's going to come out of this is a "name and shame" ban on OP by our communist mods.

Mods?  LOL. do they even exist anymore?  i think they are automated bots as well. 



ahredstealth #37 Posted 11 January 2018 - 02:45 PM

    King Tater

  • Players
  • 18423 battles
  • 8,399
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    01-25-2015

Why would WG'ing ever ban a person who has purchased in game content?

 

I know what you guys are looking for, and why you are looking for it.

 

But you have to understand that fair play and balance has never been a top concern.

 

Look at the priorities, and you'll see why the action (or lack there of) has been the way it has been (and will be).


Dear Naps,

I'm sorry I was mean to you in Kindergarten.
Sincerely Sorry,
ahredstealth


SpartacusDiablo #38 Posted 11 January 2018 - 02:48 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 14522 battles
  • 6,013
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostRibbleStripe, on 11 January 2018 - 07:18 AM, said:

Official thread dedicated to banned user? Not gonna happen )
 

 

An official administrator commenting in a thread that is a flagrant violation of the "name and shame" policy instead of locking it.

 



__Crusader6__ #39 Posted 11 January 2018 - 02:59 PM

    BANNED

  • Players
  • 50774 battles
  • 8,425
  • [III]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 11 January 2018 - 09:48 AM, said:

 

An official administrator commenting in a thread that is a flagrant violation of the "name and shame" policy instead of locking it.

 

 

Technically when the Bot's violate the EULA, they lose protection from the N&S.

   It is a community service then, not Naming and Shaming.

 

 


 

Tank Hoarder: 327 tanks in Garage:  330/330 aced (AMX 30B, Mk1 and T49A repo), wallet warrior.  Loyal M60 

WANTED: Head of the idiot that introduced chests 

 


SpartacusDiablo #40 Posted 11 January 2018 - 03:01 PM

    Highly Illogical

  • Players
  • 14522 battles
  • 6,013
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View Post__Crusader6__, on 11 January 2018 - 09:59 AM, said:

 

Technically when the Bot's violate the EULA, they lose protection from the N&S.

   It is a community service then, not Naming and Shaming.

 

 

Even bots have names. :( 

 

;)






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users