Jump to content


AMX 13 75: needs buff?

frenchtanks autoloaders amx1375

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

Rio_Grande #1 Posted 12 January 2018 - 04:08 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10856 battles
  • 449
  • [AFT]
  • Member since:
    03-16-2015

When i mean buff, I mean the drum size. For a tank with such a mediocre power/weight ratio I find it hard to justify playing the 13 75 when you have an m41 bulldog that's faster, more agile, has a higher penetration gun, and the same drum size.

 

This also brings me to the the title: As far as the 13 75 is concerned, I think it should get 1 more drum in the clip. Because for one, even if you hit and penetrate all of your shots, you're only doing 480 damage on average. Not to mention, 3 shells in the drum is the same as the tier 6 12T. In fact, it's the EXACT same gun, SA50 if i'm not mistaken.

 

You have to spend some time exposing yourself to unload your clip. I'd have no problem with this, if the reward for penetrating all your shots was a bit higher. I mean, the PC 13 75 had 6, so i don't think adding one more to make 4 shells is asking for too much.

 

Or i'm a total donkey and can't play the tank right. Either way, thanks for reading.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spoiler

 


Hans, get the Luger.

 

Link to my trash discord server: https://discord.gg/tauu3d6

 


VikkoTheTusken #2 Posted 12 January 2018 - 04:15 PM

    URoRRuR'R'R

  • Players
  • 19131 battles
  • 3,345
  • [III-H]
  • Member since:
    01-03-2015
You're right. Its a power creep dumpster fire.

Rage Quit? Bad Teams? MM got you down? Click HERE for my Blitz Guide to better tanking

 

Twitter     Facebook     YouTube

 


Pastaguy2003 #3 Posted 12 January 2018 - 04:18 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4697 battles
  • 822
  • [EXECS]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

I think this tank is excellent.  I love the gun, and I have a good aim time, with only the first 2 rows.  I usually never had a problem with the gun.

 

As for mobility, I love it.  easily CoD's things.


Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver


wannabeunicum #4 Posted 12 January 2018 - 04:36 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26205 battles
  • 5,400
  • Member since:
    10-25-2015
Im very high in favor of higher clip potential but in reality for the 13 75 just needs 1.5 second interclip

Rio_Grande #5 Posted 12 January 2018 - 04:48 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 10856 battles
  • 449
  • [AFT]
  • Member since:
    03-16-2015

View Postwannabeunicum, on 12 January 2018 - 10:36 AM, said:

Im very high in favor of higher clip potential but in reality for the 13 75 just needs 1.5 second interclip

 

now that you mention it, yeah,

Hans, get the Luger.

 

Link to my trash discord server: https://discord.gg/tauu3d6

 


_Duncan_Idaho_ #6 Posted 12 January 2018 - 05:35 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31613 battles
  • 245
  • [DUNE_]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2015

the 13 75 was hit hard with the nerf bat in 4.4. I read the news and ground through the tank before the nerfing hit resulting in the 1375 being my highest win rate tank ever. . . now, I struggle with the max 1390 which was also nerfed hard. I pasted both nerf logs below:

 

   AMX 13 75

For the 75 mm SA49 gun:
Aiming time was increased from 4 to 4.5 s.
For the 75 mm SA50 gun:
Reload time of the magazine was increased from 1.33 to 2 s.
Aiming time was increased from 3.5 to 4.4 s.


   AMX 13 90

For the 75 mm SA50 gun:
Reload time of one shell was increased from 1.33 to 2 s.
Reload time of the magazine was increased from 11.75 to 12.73 s.
Aiming time was increased from 3.4 to 4.4 s.
For the 90 mm F3 gun:
Reload time of one shell was increased from 2 to 2.5 s.
Reload time of the magazine was increased from 16.64 to 17.62 s.
Aiming time was increased from 3.9 to 4.4 s.


 

 


Viper8757NC #7 Posted 16 April 2018 - 08:42 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20757 battles
  • 1,766
  • [III-S]
  • Member since:
    07-04-2014

The 13 75 is hot garbage now.

 

Why do I always start these tanks after they have been nerfed.



Pastaguy2003 #8 Posted 17 April 2018 - 08:36 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4697 battles
  • 822
  • [EXECS]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View PostViper8757NC, on 16 April 2018 - 01:42 PM, said:

The 13 75 is hot garbage now.

 

Why do I always start these tanks after they have been nerfed.

 

It's actually very good.  When you learn how to play it, it is a beast.  Got it back a few days ago with a 50wr, and now it is at just about 60

Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver


_Duncan_Idaho_ #9 Posted 19 April 2018 - 10:32 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 31613 battles
  • 245
  • [DUNE_]
  • Member since:
    06-27-2015
Actually, I have circled back to the AMX 1390 after getting both bat chats and I have to say the bat chat experience has made me a better driver of the 1390. . . .maybe my expectations were just too high to begin with since my pre-nerf experience on the 1375 was so epic.

 

 


Oicraftian #10 Posted 20 April 2018 - 01:45 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12443 battles
  • 610
  • [PNCR]
  • Member since:
    12-19-2014

View PostPastaguy2003, on 17 April 2018 - 08:36 PM, said:

 

It's actually very good.  When you learn how to play it, it is a beast.  Got it back a few days ago with a 50wr, and now it is at just about 60

No it's not. Take it from someone who averaged 2.2k in the tank pre nerf.

The tanks performance ceiling has been obliterated. You can't tell because you're too far from it.

 

Personally the 12t is superior to the 13 75 as is.

View Post_Duncan_Idaho_, on 19 April 2018 - 10:32 PM, said:

Actually, I have circled back to the AMX 1390 after getting both bat chats and I have to say the bat chat experience has made me a better driver of the 1390. . . .maybe my expectations were just too high to begin with since my pre-nerf experience on the 1375 was so epic.

No, the 13 90 still is mediocre now. It's just not as bad as the 13 75 tier for tier. The 13 75 could be in tier 6 and still be bad.


65% scrublord

Remember only tier 8/9/10 stats mean anything


Pastaguy2003 #11 Posted 20 April 2018 - 07:32 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 4697 battles
  • 822
  • [EXECS]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View PostOicraftian, on 20 April 2018 - 06:45 AM, said:

No it's not. Take it from someone who averaged 2.2k in the tank pre nerf.

The tanks performance ceiling has been obliterated. You can't tell because you're too far from it.

 

Personally the 12t is superior to the 13 75 as is.

No, the 13 90 still is mediocre now. It's just not as bad as the 13 75 tier for tier. The 13 75 could be in tier 6 and still be bad.

 

No, it is a good tank.  The 12t is a pos.  The 13 75 has a 10 sec clip reload, which is very good.  I did not end up playing pre shell delay nerf, but this tank is one of my favorite tanks.

Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver






Also tagged with frenchtanks, autoloaders, amx1375

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users