Jump to content


Shoud Swedish Tanks be Added


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

Poll: Should Swedish Heavies be Added (29 members have cast votes)

Should they

  1. yes (27 votes [93.10%])

    Percentage of vote: 93.10%

  2. no (2 votes [6.90%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.90%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

Pastaguy2003 #1 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:14 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5434 battles
  • 822
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017
So I really love the amx 50b, and so a pc vid of the krakvagn (or whatever it is called) and sorely wish it was in blitz.  12 degrees of gun depression, and over 300mm of effective armour using the gun depression.  I would be so happy if it was added.

Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver


_Panzer_V #2 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:24 AM

    Aficionado of Noobery

  • Players
  • 24436 battles
  • 752
  • [PHOBO]
  • Member since:
    07-05-2015

Yes, another impenetrable heavy and unstoppable TD are exactly what we need in tier X games.

 

To end the sarcasm, the mode changing strv tanks would be fun to experiment with.


“If you can’t beat it, HEAT it.” --MarkGFL

More detailed stats>https://www.blitzstars.com/player/com/_Panzer_V

№1 NA Damage record in LeKpz. M 41 90 (6,078)

  


VikkoTheTusken #3 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:24 AM

    URoRRuR'R'R

  • Players
  • 19226 battles
  • 3,551
  • [III-H]
  • Member since:
    01-03-2015
I'm eager to give em' a go...more so than the Terracotta garbage coming soon.

Rage Quit? Bad Teams? MM got you down? Click HERE for my Blitz Guide to better tanking

Twitter     Facebook     YouTube

My presence here on the forums is over. You can find me at the links above and on various Discord servers. If you're curious or feel like trolling, peruse [This Thread]

 


THE_Viajero #4 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:27 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 23190 battles
  • 452
  • [F8TAL]
  • Member since:
    04-03-2016

Heavy tanks whit an impenetrable toured 12 degrees do gun deprecccion and an autoloader? 

:unsure:

Who dosent what's that?

:justwait::trollface::teethhappy:;)


Viajero means Traveler 

:B

People complain when the ping goes to 100 but I have always play whit 150~ of ping 

ps: I'm a not native English speaker, so, sorry for any mistakes (or maybe the autocorrector trolled me XD) 

 


Big_Tidday_Goth_GF #5 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:27 AM

    plz pm me

  • Players
  • 22909 battles
  • 2,865
  • [KATAR]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

No

 

 

Sweedish TDs are OP AF but that's beside the point:  they are designed to fit into a game that is based around being slower paced and long distance.  They are OP only in that many of the tanks we have are not yet buffed up to goodness in PC, but that's a much deeper problem (power creep, very stupid matchmaking algorithm, horrendous map design you wouldn't believe, etc).

 

The heavies are like the French that are worse in every way EXCEPT they have nearly impenetrable turrets (from the front) and much smaller size.  In other words, it's a 50 B designed for mongs.  

 

They would be brad for the game if they came to Blitz.


E 50 M: "Gungnir" T-62A: "Charon" Leopard 1: "Tyrfing" Obj. 140: "Deimos" E 100: "Gram" M48 Patton: "Justice" STB-1: "Muramasa" FV4202: "Narsil" FV 215b: "Anduril"  Grille 15: "Mystletainn" IS-4: "Scamander" IS-7 "Ionia" T110E5: "Eclipse" Maus: "Tarnhelm" Obj. 263: "Aristeia" AMX 50 B: "Durandel" Foch 155: "Joyeuse" M60: "Traveller"


_ArmoredGlassCannon #6 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:43 AM

    Lieutenant

  • Players
  • 16820 battles
  • 1,565
  • [IRD]
  • Member since:
    12-17-2015
YES!

"Give an anime fan any object, and they will find a way to want to stick their ***k in it" — Gigguk

 

"IDF super op military uses ancient M103 and makes them bullet proof with sand bags. F****ing op military moments." — mike82198

 


Rockracer #7 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:45 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 9231 battles
  • 2,550
  • Member since:
    12-20-2016
they better balance em properly

I played TDs before it was cool. It was also never cool to begin with.


Big_Tidday_Goth_GF #8 Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:56 AM

    plz pm me

  • Players
  • 22909 battles
  • 2,865
  • [KATAR]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014

They are unbalanceable.  They are borken.  It is slow so turning the wrong way means doom and that you can't get to where you need to go.  They have horrible handling, so they will be missing more than the 50 B.

lissen - I'm a 50 B loyalist and the gun handling is not what people make it out to be.  You got struck down three times and destroyed by the brave 50 B because you made a mistake.  The gun takes a special feel to use.

 

The turret is mega strong so they can sit there and not be hurt and eventually do harm if people are dumb enough to pull out in front of it, but that isn't what makes a tank good - its ability to punish mongs.  Glorious 50 B punishes the arrogant but it has the speed and the justice to force such situations.


E 50 M: "Gungnir" T-62A: "Charon" Leopard 1: "Tyrfing" Obj. 140: "Deimos" E 100: "Gram" M48 Patton: "Justice" STB-1: "Muramasa" FV4202: "Narsil" FV 215b: "Anduril"  Grille 15: "Mystletainn" IS-4: "Scamander" IS-7 "Ionia" T110E5: "Eclipse" Maus: "Tarnhelm" Obj. 263: "Aristeia" AMX 50 B: "Durandel" Foch 155: "Joyeuse" M60: "Traveller"


AOT_Jaeger2 #9 Posted 13 January 2018 - 01:40 AM

    Grand Emperor of Derpenburg

  • Players
  • 15583 battles
  • 3,159
  • [ASLAN]
  • Member since:
    06-16-2015

View Post_Panzer_V, on 12 January 2018 - 07:24 PM, said:

Yes, another impenetrable heavy and unstoppable TD are exactly what we need in tier X games.

 

To end the sarcasm, the mode changing strv tanks would be fun to experiment with.

 

The Kranvagn has horrible hull armor...

Strv. 103B i don’t think could be added to blitz. It’s too papery, it relies on long range sniping, and the suspension system might be too complicated for mobile.


Garage: T7 CC, R35, Light VIC, Tetrarch, M4A2E4, PzKpfw. IV Anko SP, KV-2, Strv. 74A2, LTTB, SU-122-44, IS-3, IS-5, KV-5, Lowe.

Was #24 VK 30.01 (P) Player in NA, #32 in Luchs

Stats:http://www.blitzstar...com/AOT_Jaeger2

Youtuber? I guess?


Pastaguy2003 #10 Posted 13 January 2018 - 06:16 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5434 battles
  • 822
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View PostBolo_MkXX_Tremendous_DMD, on 13 January 2018 - 12:56 AM, said:

They are unbalanceable.  They are borken.  It is slow so turning the wrong way means doom and that you can't get to where you need to go.  They have horrible handling, so they will be missing more than the 50 B.

lissen - I'm a 50 B loyalist and the gun handling is not what people make it out to be.  You got struck down three times and destroyed by the brave 50 B because you made a mistake.  The gun takes a special feel to use.

 

The turret is mega strong so they can sit there and not be hurt and eventually do harm if people are dumb enough to pull out in front of it, but that isn't what makes a tank good - its ability to punish mongs.  Glorious 50 B punishes the arrogant but it has the speed and the justice to force such situations.

 

That's what would balance it.  The bad gun handling.

Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver


redmanm #11 Posted 01 February 2018 - 06:07 AM

    Vader's Fist

  • Players
  • 23319 battles
  • 398
  • [501DV]
  • Member since:
    03-04-2014
I would like to see the Swedish heavy line at some point. The TDs could be good, but I don't know how well they would work in blitz with small teams and small maps. 

 

#betaproud


SanguinaryDan #12 Posted 09 February 2018 - 09:47 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 15439 battles
  • 1,232
  • [III-R]
  • Member since:
    07-06-2014
I don’t play on PC so I can’t say wether they would translate well to Blitz. I just want more tanks. :teethhappy:
The point of the game is to win.  The purpose of the game is to have fun.  They are not mutually exclusive.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users