M6 armor is good but it is all flat, it needs at least pretty good frontal armor and have weak side armor as balancing---OR--- have same armor profile, but have stronk turret like T29. Anyone agree?
Edited by matty_162, 14 January 2018 - 05:10 AM.
0
14 replies to this topic
#2 Posted 14 January 2018 - 05:12 AM
-
- Players
- 22481 battles
-
1,660
-
Member since:
10-30-2015
die
Personally I think it's OK where it is - a buff would be nice but it's pretty good. The 90mm is a good gun and it has good mobility
Edited by MudkipAtWar, 14 January 2018 - 05:12 AM.
Hello
https://www.blitzsta.../1016605416.png
Clan list in order of join date: TBNT, 22ND, 22ND2, FSA, FSX, ZNTH, FLEET, FL-TH
#3 Posted 14 January 2018 - 05:40 AM
-
- Players
- 10238 battles
-
2,328
- [MAHOU]
-
Member since:
04-30-2015
First Sergeant
A mantle as thick as a T29 wouldn’t make any sense
Right..?
Junko tank
The updated-updated story of a_cookie
Play the single word game here
Official Grammar Nazi, here to help!
He still owes me 100 warchests B1, The destroyer of worlds T-10M, The destroyer of universes Chen shall rise again Junko tank is best tank
#4 Posted 14 January 2018 - 06:40 AM
-
- Players
- 17888 battles
-
1,367
- [-ZF]
-
Member since:
03-21-2016
LOOΠΔ
I suggest buffing the mobility of the tank by a tad and improving gun characteristics to make the tank competitive for its tier.
#5 Posted 14 January 2018 - 09:28 AM
-
- Players
- 50857 battles
-
3,708
- [WKD]
-
Member since:
07-24-2014
Clanless Scrub
It’s fine, just not in the hands of those who don’t believe in angling their tank......
#6 Posted 14 January 2018 - 11:29 AM
-
- Players
- 9228 battles
-
1,209
-
Member since:
03-10-2017
First Sergeant
Sides are already crap. Dont nerf them any more. Maybe buff the hull armor in certain parts, kind of like a midtier Russian heavy in a way (KV-1, KV-1S, T-150). Or maybe like a stronger jumbo. Idk just a thought.
"Newer Player"
I'm working to improve my winrate. Currently: 45% 46% 47% 48% 49% 50% 51%ish >>> 30 days is 60% ... Currently working to become a unicum, and all tips are appreciated!
#7 Posted 14 January 2018 - 02:39 PM
-
- Players
- 926 battles
-
4
- [SMRIC]
-
Member since:
08-16-2016
Private
a_cookie, on 14 January 2018 - 05:40 AM, said:
A mantle as thick as a T29 wouldn’t make any sense
Right..?
Im not saying making it AS strong as the t29's, but like a kv-1 where its not impossible to pen but its hard
Edited by matty_162, 14 January 2018 - 02:43 PM.
#8 Posted 14 January 2018 - 04:12 PM
-
- Players
- 17259 battles
-
1,237
- [III-P]
-
Member since:
07-06-2014
First Sergeant
I don’t see it. For a Tier VI Heavy it’s got decent frontal armor and a viable turret. The hull sides are weak but the only gun that can overmatch them is the 152mm. Mobility is solid and even traverse speeds aren’t awful.
What exactly is wrong with this tank that careful play doesn’t cover?
The point of the game is to win. The purpose of the game is to have fun. They are not mutually exclusive.
#9 Posted 15 January 2018 - 10:59 PM
-
- Players
- 0 battles
-
350
-
Member since:
09-19-2021
Sergeant
WipWapJaws, on 14 January 2018 - 09:28 AM, said:
It’s fine, just not in the hands of those who don’t believe in angling their tank......
Even angling doesn't work that well, because the side armor is paper.
#10 Posted 16 January 2018 - 05:07 AM
-
- Players
- 50857 battles
-
3,708
- [WKD]
-
Member since:
07-24-2014
Clanless Scrub
NWasabi, on 16 January 2018 - 08:59 AM, said:
Even angling doesn't work that well, because the side armor is paper.
No you dont side scape in it. You angle its flattish front and hope you catch a few in the tracks
#11 Posted 16 January 2018 - 09:29 AM
-
- Players
- 0 battles
-
350
-
Member since:
09-19-2021
Sergeant
WipWapJaws, on 16 January 2018 - 05:07 AM, said:
No you dont side scape in it. You angle its flattish front and hope you catch a few in the tracks
eh . . . at the cost of exposing your side
#12 Posted 16 January 2018 - 07:37 PM
-
- Players
- 50857 battles
-
3,708
- [WKD]
-
Member since:
07-24-2014
Clanless Scrub
NWasabi, on 16 January 2018 - 07:29 PM, said:
eh . . . at the cost of exposing your side
if that’s what ur doing then ur doing it wrong...
just wiggle the front
#13 Posted 17 January 2018 - 06:35 PM
-
- Players
- 35818 battles
-
217
- [GZR]
-
Member since:
04-25-2016
Junior Sergeant
My best tier 6 heavy, the tank I use to break a losing streak. Shoot, ram, and shoot again and you can kill many tanks.
#14 Posted 18 January 2018 - 09:47 AM
-
- Players
- 0 battles
-
350
-
Member since:
09-19-2021
Sergeant
WipWapJaws, on 16 January 2018 - 07:37 PM, said:
if that’s what ur doing then ur doing it wrong...
just wiggle the front
You can do this in any tank, doesn't even have to be a heavy. That doesn't make the armor good, unless your opponents don't know how to aim.
#15 Posted 30 June 2018 - 02:25 PM
-
- Players
- 2852 battles
-
31
-
Member since:
10-10-2015
Lance-corporal
A side armor buff will be great, everyone can pen his lateral!
"Overkill" - Bruna
Most Americans know absolutely nothing about the more than 25,000 men of the Brazilian Expeditionary Force that fought in Italy in 1944-45. They and one Brazilian Air Force squadron of P-47s were the only overseas contribution of Latin America in WW2.
Also tagged with armor
Blitz Staff Corner → Suggestions & Feedback → Ammo type identificationStarted by Admiral_Kipper2, 31 Dec 2021 Armor, AP, APCR, HE, HEAT and 3 more...
|
|
|
||
Blitz Staff Corner → Suggestions & Feedback → Buff VK45.03Started by LuckyNed75, 29 Jan 2021 balance, buff, OP, bad tank and 6 more...
|
|
|
||
Game Discussion → General Discussion → Vehicle Bay → Soviet Tanks → IS-5 needs a buffStarted by Jr7_Gamer, 09 Jul 2020 Is5, Weapon, Gun, Buff and 3 more...
|
|
|
||
Game Discussion → General Discussion → Player Guides and Information → Why some armors are higher for 2 same vehicules?Started by OSMANLITORUNU, 09 Dec 2019 Tank, Armor, Level, Tier, T1heavy and 2 more...
|
|
|
||
Game Discussion → General Discussion → IS-2Sh armor bugged?Started by IS2_1, 27 Sep 2019 IS-2Sh, Armor, bug
|
|
|
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
