Jump to content

Quick Tournaments

  • Please log in to reply
40 replies to this topic

RexyComandante #41 Posted 08 February 2019 - 08:12 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Administrator
  • 0 battles
  • 123
  • Member since:

View PostThompsonTennino, on 08 February 2019 - 12:18 AM, said:


I guess that depends upon your definition of "the best" or "strongest".  If you're randomly placed against weak teams, and not peer-to-peer, and win the tournament, does that really make you the best or strongest?  (Isn't that more like a scene you might see in some Will Ferrell movie - where he'd only play basketball against little kids?)


For a while, the tournament formats included "peer-to-peer level of gaming".  As the tournament progressed, the best still ended up winning, but they did it playing against comparable teams.   That's what's missing.  That's what I was asking about.  



We've modified format where was peer-to-peer seeding in this off-season, because there were much teams which didn't come to the battles in previous off-season, moreover a part of the groups didn't have battles at all, because they were receiving technical loose/win. That's why we decided to add one more stage with "strongest - weakest" seeding, we don't want that players come to tournament and have no battles.

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users