Jump to content


Should the High-tier British tanks be buffed?


  • Please log in to reply
15 replies to this topic

Poll: Balance adjustments to high-tier British tanks (44 members have cast votes)

Should the tier 10 medium be buffed?

  1. Yes, it needs it (27 votes [61.36%])

    Percentage of vote: 61.36%

  2. It's fine where it is (11 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  3. No, it needs a nerf (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. It should be replaced (6 votes [13.64%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.64%

Should the tier 10 heavy be buffed?

  1. Yes, it needs it (20 votes [45.45%])

    Percentage of vote: 45.45%

  2. It's fine where it is (20 votes [45.45%])

    Percentage of vote: 45.45%

  3. No, it needs a nerf (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. It should be replaced (4 votes [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

Should the tier 10 TD be buffed?

  1. Yes, it needs it (8 votes [18.18%])

    Percentage of vote: 18.18%

  2. It's fine where it is (13 votes [29.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 29.55%

  3. No, it needs a nerf (11 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  4. It should be replaced (12 votes [27.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 27.27%

Vote Guests cannot vote Hide poll

KDEstroy_1 #1 Posted 07 February 2018 - 11:53 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5852 battles
  • 125
  • [FOKOV]
  • Member since:
    02-06-2017
Voice your opinions on the British tanks here.

Dan_Deerso #2 Posted 07 February 2018 - 11:57 PM

    Tankologist

  • Players
  • 21207 battles
  • 3,595
  • [MOMS]
  • Member since:
    11-13-2013

>Sees someone voted for 183 buff 



iRaikkonen #3 Posted 07 February 2018 - 11:59 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26739 battles
  • 483
  • [SCAMO]
  • Member since:
    11-03-2014

The FV 215 183 needs a major buff.  The aim time, accuracy and armor allow this tank to be penned. That is simply not acceptable. This tank needs Maus armor and the gun handling of a leopard 1. Furthermore the reload is dreadful. I suggest lowering it to 6.0 seconds in between shots. Now I know what you’re thinking right now... ammo capacity. This tank only carries 12 shells. This is a problem. Give the tank 50 shells and make the premium hesh 10 credits per round so the tank doesn’t get too expensive. Other than that I think we just buff the alpha to 1000 for ap and 1900 for hesh. Once you do all of these things, the 183 will be properly balanced. 


 


wannabeunicum #4 Posted 08 February 2018 - 12:01 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 27371 battles
  • 5,415
  • [PNCR]
  • Member since:
    10-25-2015

View PostiRaikkonen, on 07 February 2018 - 11:59 PM, said:

The FV 215 183 needs a major buff.  The aim time, accuracy and armor allow this tank to be penned. That is simply not acceptable. This tank needs Maus armor and the gun handling of a leopard 1. Furthermore the reload is dreadful. I suggest lowering it to 6.0 seconds in between shots. Now I know what you’re thinking right now... ammo capacity. This tank only carries 12 shells. This is a problem. Give the tank 50 shells and make the premium hesh 10 credits per round so the tank doesn’t get too expensive. Other than that I think we just buff the alpha to 1000 for ap and 1900 for hesh. Once you do all of these things, the 183 will be properly balanced. 

 

smh it needs the gun handling of the t62 and the MOBILITY of the leopard.

Pastaguy2003 #5 Posted 08 February 2018 - 12:03 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 5411 battles
  • 822
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View Postwannabeunicum, on 08 February 2018 - 12:01 AM, said:

 

smh it needs the gun handling of the t62 and the MOBILITY of the leopard.

 

View PostiRaikkonen, on 07 February 2018 - 11:59 PM, said:

The FV 215 183 needs a major buff.  The aim time, accuracy and armor allow this tank to be penned. That is simply not acceptable. This tank needs Maus armor and the gun handling of a leopard 1. Furthermore the reload is dreadful. I suggest lowering it to 6.0 seconds in between shots. Now I know what you’re thinking right now... ammo capacity. This tank only carries 12 shells. This is a problem. Give the tank 50 shells and make the premium hesh 10 credits per round so the tank doesn’t get too expensive. Other than that I think we just buff the alpha to 1000 for ap and 1900 for hesh. Once you do all of these things, the 183 will be properly balanced. 

 

Don't you mean the mobility of an ru251?

Lines I'm grinding: Obj. 268 (at ISU 152)  WZ-113 (at Type T34)

 

"To derp, or not to derp"

-Anonymous KV2 driver


iRaikkonen #6 Posted 08 February 2018 - 12:03 AM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 26739 battles
  • 483
  • [SCAMO]
  • Member since:
    11-03-2014

View Postwannabeunicum, on 08 February 2018 - 12:01 AM, said:

 

smh it needs the gun handling of the t62 and the MOBILITY of the leopard.

 

 

Finally. Someone that gets it. 


 


Defaultz #7 Posted 08 February 2018 - 01:26 AM

    Yolos get you Kolos

  • Players
  • 25482 battles
  • 973
  • [SCAMO]
  • Member since:
    01-30-2015
183 is clearly underpower. Look around. Everyone's driving JPe100 not 183s. The jpe100 has armor and faster reload, its a better tnak and is evidently greater in numbers than the 183. if they make 183 powerer more, they will play 183 and not jpe100, which will change game. The 183 needs camo buff its so hard to play. Its bigger than the heavy tank and this means its easy to see. its a sniper it needs to hide and not be see

_Doomy #8 Posted 08 February 2018 - 01:36 AM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 22025 battles
  • 93
  • [PRAMO]
  • Member since:
    08-29-2016
183 definitely needs some love. 220 pen for a premium shell is just ridiculously unfair, and it should be buffed to at least 340 pen. And look at the horrendous gun, it's even hard to work at close range, how are you supposed to snipe with it? Should give it the accuracy of a Grille so it can actually snipe. 

__The_Dude_30__ #9 Posted 08 February 2018 - 01:49 AM

    The Dude of Dudes

  • Players
  • 16479 battles
  • 2,026
  • [CRU2L]
  • Member since:
    09-30-2015
The 183 needs to be buffed to its PC variant’s alpha, I don’t want to be short changed here.

                           Signature by SpartacusDiablo   The king of signatures                                                                                                                       CRU2L Deputy. CRUEL/CRU2L discord: https://discord.gg/twdc4Dq

                                                                                                       o7 RatchetGod, R.I.P.

 


Storm216 #10 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:07 AM

    Wait, HEAT isn't standard ammo?!

  • Players
  • 25920 battles
  • 2,070
  • [PRIME]
  • Member since:
    08-23-2014

FV4202 - needs buff badly

215B - objectively fine but I would like to see a buff

183 - fine



CrazyHunter13 #11 Posted 08 February 2018 - 02:28 AM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7104 battles
  • 1,966
  • [BRNYC]
  • Member since:
    11-03-2013

View PostKDEstroy_1, on 07 February 2018 - 06:53 PM, said:

Voice your opinions on the British tanks here.

 

no British t10 tds definitely do not need a buff...the death star 1 shotting everything clearly shows why

7_3_PowerStroke #12 Posted 08 February 2018 - 01:12 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 6448 battles
  • 1,100
  • [MAHOU]
  • Member since:
    12-25-2014

View PostCrazyHunter13, on 07 February 2018 - 09:28 PM, said:

 

no British t10 tds definitely do not need a buff...the death star 1 shotting everything clearly shows why

 

We are joking m8...

Stats

I write fanfiction and watch anime. Deal with it.

 

formerly _Maho_Nishizumi_212


Gerogy_Zurkov #13 Posted 10 February 2018 - 07:23 AM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 13819 battles
  • 199
  • [WRDGZ]
  • Member since:
    01-08-2015
Replaced? For what a replacement that emphasis on more camping since it has near impenetrable fontal armor with very good side armor lol and a gun that will probably be the most dpm out of any tank. Plus you have the jagpanzer 17cm which is still more useful thanks to having actual useable armor. The nerfed armor on the 183 makes it a fast to destroy and anyway replace that and they use the next the next thing.

xXZachAttackXx_EOG #14 Posted 12 February 2018 - 08:37 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20919 battles
  • 520
  • [RM]
  • Member since:
    05-01-2015
The medium and heavy could use buffs. The 183 honestly just needs to be reworked. They can't replace it. Too many people would be up in arms. They can't just directly buff it's stats. Then others would be up in arms. What should be done is to bring it's armor up to PC standards, remove it's premium hesh shell and replace it with a heat/apcr, and adjust it's gun handling appropriately. That way it would still be able to do those hesh rolls with cheap hesh yet not have roflop pen on 1300 alpha rolls that encourage camping in spawn. And the armor would allow it to not get instakilled as soon as it gets spotted.

I'm good at this game I promise


killatank_marksman #15 Posted 23 February 2018 - 04:02 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 8665 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    10-27-2015

View Post_Doomy, on 08 February 2018 - 01:36 AM, said:

183 definitely needs some love. 220 pen for a premium shell is just ridiculously unfair, and it should be buffed to at least 340 pen. And look at the horrendous gun, it's even hard to work at close range, how are you supposed to snipe with it? Should give it the accuracy of a Grille so it can actually snipe. 

 

dude i agree with the pen buff but it doesn't need better accuracy, i have the tank and actually its pretty balanced. its the biggest gun in the game besides the jgpz e100, and if it had better accuracy then there would be more 183 in battles and then the game would be unfair. and honestly the pen is not that bad, if you cant pen something from the front thats means you have to move to get shots in which means 183 drivers are not sitting in the back all game. but on that note cannot wait for the badger!!

killatank_marksman #16 Posted 23 February 2018 - 04:09 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 8665 battles
  • 16
  • Member since:
    10-27-2015

View PostGerogy_Zurkov, on 10 February 2018 - 07:23 AM, said:

Replaced? For what a replacement that emphasis on more camping since it has near impenetrable fontal armor with very good side armor lol and a gun that will probably be the most dpm out of any tank. Plus you have the jagpanzer 17cm which is still more useful thanks to having actual useable armor. The nerfed armor on the 183 makes it a fast to destroy and anyway replace that and they use the next the next thing.

 

i mean replacing it would mean a lot, yeah sure the badger has highest dpm in game but you only get that damage if your able to keep shooting people, especially on blitz your not going to be able to constantly shoot. there are things like the maus and jgpze100 and e100 and other highly armored tanks can counter it, you act like its the end of the world, on pc the badger is balanced pretty good, and it actually matches the line its on, so replacing the 183 would be better for the player base. if you don't think that, that's ok because your entitled to your opinion, i'm only stating facts




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users