Jump to content


A legitiment MM complaint


  • Please log in to reply
64 replies to this topic

RommelTanker #1 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:11 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 671 battles
  • 597
  • [FLPN]
  • Member since:
    09-03-2017

*fixes tin foil hat atop head*

 

So before we start there's a reason I kept this out of the MM thread. It's because this falls under a different category of issue.

 

https://imgur.com/a/prY8O

 

As you can clearly see from the listed pictures, there are 5 heavies on either team in all five pictures, and at least 1 heavy on the opposing team. This is not acceptable at all, for two reasons:

 

The medium tank nerf of 3.6 allowed this to happen. Pre nerf, heavies were scared of mediums because they knew if they made a wrong move they'd be ripped to shreds, for good reason too. However, post nerf, the "heavy meta" has been further and further reinforced as players try to avoid being HESHstar'd in the sides and being shot to death by mediums from the front.

 

The recent public matchmaking changes. These were said to change how teams were comprised, specifically that there would be no more than 4 (four) of any given type of tank on either team. However, there are clearly 5 heavies on those team. There's also the fact that those matches were all queued in less than 30sec, a sure fire sign that the match maker knew EXACTLY what it was doing. Wargaming has said in the past that the match maker will disregard ALL parameters for match making after the queue time exceeds 5 (five) minutes.

 

*removes tin foil hat*

 

You may now converse among yourselves regarding this.

 


I'm a filthy reroll. Fight me.

My original signature got me banned for supporting facism because apparently you can't respect Erwin Rommel. Thanks WG, your moderation model is fantastic. (Obvious sarcasm)


BorisBaddenov #2 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:18 PM

    3.8 Made me quit

  • Players
  • 18937 battles
  • 5,201
  • [NOGUD]
  • Member since:
    12-11-2015

View PostRommelTanker, on 14 February 2018 - 08:11 AM, said:

*fixes tin foil hat atop head*

 

So before we start there's a reason I kept this out of the MM thread. It's because this falls under a different category of issue.

 

https://imgur.com/a/prY8O

 

As you can clearly see from the listed pictures, there are 5 heavies on either team in all five pictures, and at least 1 heavy on the opposing team. This is not acceptable at all, for two reasons:

 

The medium tank nerf of 3.6 allowed this to happen. Pre nerf, heavies were scared of mediums because they knew if they made a wrong move they'd be ripped to shreds, for good reason too. However, post nerf, the "heavy meta" has been further and further reinforced as players try to avoid being HESHstar'd in the sides and being shot to death by mediums from the front.

 

The recent public matchmaking changes. These were said to change how teams were comprised, specifically that there would be no more than 4 (four) of any given type of tank on either team. However, there are clearly 5 heavies on those team. There's also the fact that those matches were all queued in less than 30sec, a sure fire sign that the match maker knew EXACTLY what it was doing. Wargaming has said in the past that the match maker will disregard ALL parameters for match making after the queue time exceeds 5 (five) minutes.

 

*removes tin foil hat*

 

You may now converse among yourselves regarding this.

 

 

WG has admitted to making changes in order to impact the meta.   They have even said that they purposefully have made changes to make this years meta more heavy friendly.  They alluded to additional changes so that next years meta would not be the same as this years.  I believe they said they wanted to make sure the game did not get stale; that it was always changing.

 

/shrug

Boris

 

 


I’ve noticed a strong lack of Spare Parts. Is that intended?

No, it is not. This problem will solve itself with time. Many players have several dozens of vehicles in their Garages, so they don’t have enough Spare Parts for the entire vehicle fleet. But you will gradually collect enough Spare Parts to unlock new slots for purchased tanks in time.


RommelTanker #3 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:19 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 671 battles
  • 597
  • [FLPN]
  • Member since:
    09-03-2017

View PostBorisBaddenov, on 14 February 2018 - 08:18 AM, said:

 

WG has admitted to making changes in order to impact the meta.   They have even said that they purposefully have made changes to make this years meta more heavy friendly.  They alluded to additional changes so that next years meta would not be the same as this years.  I believe they said they wanted to make sure the game did not get stale; that it was always changing.

 

/shrug

Boris

 

 

 

Yes but 6-8 heavies each game? That's too many.

I'm a filthy reroll. Fight me.

My original signature got me banned for supporting facism because apparently you can't respect Erwin Rommel. Thanks WG, your moderation model is fantastic. (Obvious sarcasm)


SpartacusDiablo #4 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:21 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12056 battles
  • 4,720
  • [VF-1]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014
I see the same thing happening with tank Destroyers. Wargaming went and messed up the meta so now we see big armor big gun tanks being primarily played.  Granted those tanks should be equally balanced out between teams.  I have no clue why this isn't happening.

Pastaguy2003 #5 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:21 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3491 battles
  • 624
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

I am never happy to have 5 heavies on my team and 1 on the other.  We just get flanked, and out dpm'ed.

 


I may be a moron for liking top tier British meds, but I am not a moron for doing this:

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=URdrMnM8KRs


AVCM_AW #6 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:25 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 45286 battles
  • 433
  • [RAIDR]
  • Member since:
    09-01-2014

Yesterday I'm driving a TD in a match with 1 light, 1 medium and 5 TDs on my side; 1 light, 1 med and 5 heavies on the other. We lost, go figure... oh, and like yours, <30secs in cue. 

I'm wondering if the foil is "Reynolds" or a knock-off generic brand... as it renders the topic moot.


Clan Lead - DD Raiders [RAIDR]

Retired Sailor - Liberty Call, Liberty Call...

(ML-20 mod.1931/37 spewing HE can do a lot for your day)

 


Pastaguy2003 #7 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:32 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3491 battles
  • 624
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View PostAVCM_AW, on 14 February 2018 - 04:25 PM, said:

Yesterday I'm driving a TD in a match with 1 light, 1 medium and 5 TDs on my side; 1 light, 1 med and 5 heavies on the other. We lost, go figure... oh, and like yours, <30secs in cue. 

I'm wondering if the foil is "Reynolds" or a knock-off generic brand... as it renders the topic moot.

 

You do realize MM prevents a team from having more than 3 td's

I may be a moron for liking top tier British meds, but I am not a moron for doing this:

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=URdrMnM8KRs


RommelTanker #8 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:33 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 671 battles
  • 597
  • [FLPN]
  • Member since:
    09-03-2017

View PostPastaguy2003, on 14 February 2018 - 08:32 AM, said:

 

You do realize MM prevents a team from having more than 3 td's

 

Matchmaking is also supposed to prevent a team from having more than 4 heavies, but clearly that isn't working either, is it?

I'm a filthy reroll. Fight me.

My original signature got me banned for supporting facism because apparently you can't respect Erwin Rommel. Thanks WG, your moderation model is fantastic. (Obvious sarcasm)


Fu_Manchu_ #9 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:36 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3983 battles
  • 496
  • [K1LC0]
  • Member since:
    10-03-2017

View PostPastaguy2003, on 14 February 2018 - 09:32 AM, said:

 

You do realize MM prevents a team from having more than 3 td's

 

 

Wrong. It might be meant to do that, but it does not do that.


Edited by Fu_Manchu_, 14 February 2018 - 04:36 PM.

One RNG to rule them all,

One RNG to find them;

One RNG to bring them all and in the darkness bind them.

 


glass2707 #10 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:38 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 28854 battles
  • 2,950
  • [GRIM]
  • Member since:
    09-27-2014

View PostPastaguy2003, on 14 February 2018 - 04:32 PM, said:

 

You do realize MM prevents a team from having more than 3 td's

 

source?


Pastaguy2003 #11 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:42 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3491 battles
  • 624
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View PostRommelTanker, on 14 February 2018 - 04:33 PM, said:

 

Matchmaking is also supposed to prevent a team from having more than 4 heavies, but clearly that isn't working either, is it?

Idk, never found that.

View Postglass2707, on 14 February 2018 - 04:38 PM, said:

 

source?

 

There is a cool website called the wotblitz forums.  

 

But anyways it was on this link but now it does not show anything.

 

https://wotblitz.com...n-update-4-6/#/


Edited by Pastaguy2003, 14 February 2018 - 04:45 PM.

I may be a moron for liking top tier British meds, but I am not a moron for doing this:

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=URdrMnM8KRs


Pastaguy2003 #12 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:45 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3491 battles
  • 624
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View PostFu_Manchu_, on 14 February 2018 - 04:36 PM, said:

 

 

Wrong. It might be meant to do that, but it does not do that.

 

I have never been on a team with more than 3 td's since 4.6.

I may be a moron for liking top tier British meds, but I am not a moron for doing this:

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=URdrMnM8KRs


SpartacusDiablo #13 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:46 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12056 battles
  • 4,720
  • [VF-1]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostPastaguy2003, on 14 February 2018 - 11:32 AM, said:

 

You do realize MM prevents a team from having more than 3 td's

No.

 

I saw 5 on one team a few days ago.  What a fun and dynamic game that was.



RommelTanker #14 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:48 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 671 battles
  • 597
  • [FLPN]
  • Member since:
    09-03-2017

View PostPastaguy2003, on 14 February 2018 - 08:45 AM, said:

 

I have never been on a team with more than 3 td's since 4.6.

 

Then don't make wild assumptions that the match maker has been designed to prevent more than 3 TDs on a single team.

I'm a filthy reroll. Fight me.

My original signature got me banned for supporting facism because apparently you can't respect Erwin Rommel. Thanks WG, your moderation model is fantastic. (Obvious sarcasm)


Pastaguy2003 #15 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:48 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3491 battles
  • 624
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View PostSpartacusDiablo, on 14 February 2018 - 04:46 PM, said:

No.

 

I saw 5 on one team a few days ago.  What a fun and dynamic game that was.

 

Well WG has scammed us yet again.  They tell us one thing, and don't end up doing it.

I may be a moron for liking top tier British meds, but I am not a moron for doing this:

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=URdrMnM8KRs


Pastaguy2003 #16 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:49 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3491 battles
  • 624
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View PostRommelTanker, on 14 February 2018 - 04:48 PM, said:

 

Then don't make wild assumptions that the match maker has been designed to prevent more than 3 TDs on a single team.

 

Well I have played about 300 battles since 4.6 and not one with more than 3 td`s per team so excuse me for assuming WG did implement that system.

Edited by Pastaguy2003, 14 February 2018 - 04:51 PM.

I may be a moron for liking top tier British meds, but I am not a moron for doing this:

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=URdrMnM8KRs


SpartacusDiablo #17 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:50 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 12056 battles
  • 4,720
  • [VF-1]
  • Member since:
    02-17-2014

View PostPastaguy2003, on 14 February 2018 - 11:48 AM, said:

 

Well WG has scammed us yet again.  They tell us one thing, and don't end up doing it.

They did it for a day or so, it completely wrecked matchmaking, and then they turned it off.  It's one of the reasons I think the "rigged matchmaking" argument is crap.  If wargaming can't successfully limit the number of Tank Destroyers in a match there is no way they can implement the rigged system that some players have dreamed up.



glass2707 #18 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:51 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 28854 battles
  • 2,950
  • [GRIM]
  • Member since:
    09-27-2014

View PostPastaguy2003, on 14 February 2018 - 04:48 PM, said:

 

Well WG has scammed us yet again.  They tell us one thing, and don't end up doing it.

 

Source?  For WG to have “scammed” anyone they would have had to have claimed something that isn’t true.  Please show us where they claim to limit the types of tanks per side in regular games on Blitz.


Pastaguy2003 #19 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:54 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 3491 battles
  • 624
  • [COD-R]
  • Member since:
    08-24-2017

View Postglass2707, on 14 February 2018 - 04:51 PM, said:

 

Source?  For WG to have “scammed” anyone they would have had to have claimed something that isn’t true.  Please show us where they claim to limit the types of tanks per side in regular games on Blitz.

 

Sigh.  read my above post.  I have a link.  The page is not showing anything now.  And maybe read spartacus`s comment.

I may be a moron for liking top tier British meds, but I am not a moron for doing this:

 

https://www.youtube....h?v=URdrMnM8KRs


reluctanttheist #20 Posted 14 February 2018 - 04:55 PM

    Canuck Didactics

  • Players
  • 20919 battles
  • 4,872
  • [III-H]
  • Member since:
    01-12-2015

View Postglass2707, on 14 February 2018 - 08:51 AM, said:

Source?  For WG to have “scammed” anyone they would have had to have claimed something that isn’t true.  Please show us where they claim to limit the types of tanks per side in regular games on Blitz.

 

Indeed, this was posted by a WG staffer on the forums a while back - like several patches ago.  And for a short while, it did work - teams were balanced in terms of composition.  The wheels seems to have fallen off since then.

Tanks:  _X: T110E5, T110E3, FV215b(183), IS-7, Obj.140  _IX: M103, T-54  _VIII: IS-6, T34, Lowe, T-44, IS-6, IS-3D  _VII: T-43, Comet, E25, AT-15A, SU-122-44
Usually on in the evenings Pacific time.  Intake Contact for Triarii Clan (PM for details)
Watch the WoTB Users Manual Series  | Click here if you have lag  |  The best settings for your iOS device |  Check your ping with Pingplotter  | Get good: watch Bushka! | Check out tanks on Tank Compare





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users