Jump to content


I want to downvote as much as i can upvote!!!


  • Please log in to reply
18 replies to this topic

_WarBeast #1 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:17 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 18506 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    04-22-2017

This is my 2nd post about  this. On my first post i ranted at WG.. Let me try this the polite way...

 

Ok, why the **** can i upvote as much as i want but im limited to 5 downvotes. So many players deserve inactivity or unsportman like conduct.... and they deserve it!! Stop limiting it! Let them get a [edited]status for being incompetent or not caring on outcome and how they play. How does some one have the status of impeccable player when they are not even close to being one? Common sense wg... common sense... now... use it!

 

Allow me to downvote as much as i can upvote! Some players deserve the status of a newbie  just as much as good players deserve the  impeccable player status! 

 

Give those players negative stars or something... make them stand out.. like impeccable players do. 

 

 

anyways i want to downvote as much as i can upvote! Also add penalties to afks! Dont play if there is a high chance of you being afk. 

 

thats all....

 

 

 


Edited by _BeastTanker_, 27 February 2018 - 08:27 PM.


Bellatormonk #2 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:20 PM

    Tinfoil Knight

  • Players
  • 29895 battles
  • 1,320
  • [MASHU]
  • Member since:
    04-12-2011
Agreed.  However, you know and I know that WG just DGAF.

Andromeda_74 #3 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:28 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11364 battles
  • 464
  • [SEA-B]
  • Member since:
    11-11-2017
Probably because some players abuse it. Some think it’s fun to hand out down votes based solely off of being killed in battle. 

_WarBeast #4 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:30 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 18506 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    04-22-2017

View PostAndromeda_74, on 27 February 2018 - 08:28 PM, said:

Probably because some players abuse it. Some think it’s fun to hand out down votes based solely off of being killed in battle. 

 

i never get downvotes on my play... i get provocative communication sometimes because i call out idiots. Its all i ever get.

Andromeda_74 #5 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:35 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11364 battles
  • 464
  • [SEA-B]
  • Member since:
    11-11-2017

View Post_BeastTanker_, on 27 February 2018 - 08:30 PM, said:

 

i never get downvotes on my play... i get provocative communication sometimes because i call out idiots. Its all i ever get.

 

probably because they don’t have an option for “I’m a crybaby that got killed”, lol! (Not meant towards you) Seriously though, we should be able to downvote as much as upvote. But...it does get abused. Thankfully it takes 2 or more downvotes to matter, so maybe they should change it? 

wizo_ #6 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:36 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8808 battles
  • 1,874
  • Member since:
    07-08-2016

View PostAndromeda_74, on 27 February 2018 - 03:28 PM, said:

Probably because some players abuse it. Some think it’s fun to hand out down votes based solely off of being killed in battle. 

 

there needs to be enough downvotes against a single person I believe for it to be verified

I’m sampling the retiree life, of Blitz forums, not sure if I’ll be returning, but thanks for all of your advice and fun.

 

You can't outsmart stupid, it just doesn't work like that - TengenToppaPotatoLagann


Andromeda_74 #7 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:37 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 11364 battles
  • 464
  • [SEA-B]
  • Member since:
    11-11-2017
Now that I think of it, I may have played with you not to long ago. And I think you did call out some players. Surprisingly I wasn’t one of them. I deserve to get called out more often than not :/

_WarBeast #8 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:39 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 18506 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    04-22-2017

View PostAndromeda_74, on 27 February 2018 - 08:35 PM, said:

 

probably because they don’t have an option for “I’m a crybaby that got killed”, lol! (Not meant towards you) Seriously though, we should be able to downvote as much as upvote. But...it does get abused. Thankfully it takes 2 or more downvotes to matter, so maybe they should change it? 

I dont cry about being killed... i judge the game before it starts and i jugde where my team goes in order to make a decision on what i should do. Its no ones fault other then mine if i get killed or if i get outnumbered alone.



_WarBeast #9 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:41 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 18506 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    04-22-2017

View PostAndromeda_74, on 27 February 2018 - 08:37 PM, said:

Now that I think of it, I may have played with you not to long ago. And I think you did call out some players. Surprisingly I wasn’t one of them. I deserve to get called out more often than not :/

 

yes i have and still do call out people if they go somewhere alone and get killed in the first minute being out numbered... why do something like that?? Why go alone with no support... 

_WarBeast #10 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:43 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 18506 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    04-22-2017
If a team makes a call left or right or 2 bases in particular... dont be dumb and go die with no support in the first minute. Even if you are a medium or heavy.. you dont always have to go to the common heavy medium spots on maps with no support.

Edited by _BeastTanker_, 27 February 2018 - 08:52 PM.


_WarBeast #11 Posted 27 February 2018 - 08:54 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 18506 battles
  • 70
  • Member since:
    04-22-2017

View PostBellatormonk, on 27 February 2018 - 08:20 PM, said:

Agreed.  However, you know and I know that WG just DGAF.

 

Yea... sadly they dont.

Sean_Usmc_95 #12 Posted 27 February 2018 - 09:34 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 15495 battles
  • 245
  • Member since:
    03-07-2015
Agreed, we need to be able to down vote on every match. I find it rare that I don’t need one after a game.
Signature
sean_usmc_95_eng.png
 
 

Cy___ #13 Posted 27 February 2018 - 11:08 PM

    Lance-corporal

  • Players
  • 58310 battles
  • 76
  • Member since:
    01-29-2016
Oof...seems like something not to be overly concerned with.

Negaclaw #14 Posted 27 February 2018 - 11:36 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8790 battles
  • 887
  • Member since:
    12-10-2015

View Post_BeastTanker_, on 27 February 2018 - 01:17 PM, said:

Give those players negative stars or something... make them stand out.. like impeccable players do. 

3 or 4 star players stand out more than 5 star players 


shoot ur skeet and hit that yeet


40_Percenter #15 Posted 28 February 2018 - 12:31 AM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 48287 battles
  • 772
  • [H0B0S]
  • Member since:
    12-30-2016
Downvoting or upvoting....  It doesn't really matter, I've got my share of both but just demonstrate this fact the last downvote I got was from two morons who yolo'd off and died and then spent the rest of the game chastising me for not rushing to my death.  I wound up with the second highest damage on our team and most xp (I capped a base) but the two dumbest people on my team were successfully able to give me a pair of "unsporting conduct" downvotes because I didn't follow them into oblivion.  
Nobody likes 40 Percenters.  

little_brother_of_war #16 Posted 28 February 2018 - 01:33 AM

    ᎠᏁᏦᏗ ~ A-ne’-tso-di

  • Players
  • 16730 battles
  • 2,184
  • [FROST]
  • Member since:
    09-03-2014

MH is an insignificant function designed to keep reporting inboxes of WG staff from being cluttered and overwhelmed. I think most have figured that out by now. Both downvotes and upvotes won't get you either jail time or a tax break. There's really not much sense in obsessing over it.

 

If constant dissatisfaction of gameplay matters so much, maybe send reports to WG staff and let them determine the legitimacy of your complaints against other teammates you have a beef with. They can probably do something to accommodate you, if they agree you have been justifiably wronged.

 

Otherwise, there's probably not much to validate a need to handout infinite downvotes to everyone who's ever fortunate (or unfortunate) to be on your team. 

 


Old cowboy saying #1...

”Welp...it’s a mean ol’ world.”

Old cowboy saying #2...

”If it bothers you so much, why go on and on about it?”

>>>============> anet’sodi’ <============<<<


popisdead #17 Posted 28 February 2018 - 03:26 PM

    First Sergeant

  • Players
  • 20560 battles
  • 2,896
  • [ATC_]
  • Member since:
    06-28-2014
I don't down vote cause it seems needless.
I love kemping bush

_deathstalker_ #18 Posted 28 February 2018 - 03:48 PM

    Junior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 24388 battles
  • 119
  • [UBER]
  • Member since:
    03-08-2016
They should have a fing noob downvote

richdubz #19 Posted 28 February 2018 - 05:27 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 19338 battles
  • 894
  • [AJAX]
  • Member since:
    08-22-2016

The more a person wants additional downvotes, the more likely it is that the person will abuse the privilege and start doing ridiculous things like giving downvotes to other players just because the other players aren’t up the personal standards of the down-voter.  I’m all for down voting AFKers and jerks who purposefully act against their teammates, but down voting a guy just because he had a bad game or is playing above his level of competency (the guy with a 200 total battles and who is driving a tier 8 premium)?  No.

 

It absolutely would be abused.


Edited by richdubz, 28 February 2018 - 05:30 PM.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users