Jump to content


Bushka tries to sell another crummy tank to the community-T32


  • Please log in to reply
111 replies to this topic

therealrattler #41 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:22 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 363
  • [22ND]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View PostJonny_applesauce, on 16 May 2018 - 08:04 PM, said:

 

^^

 

the mark of a good player is being able to take a tank with less strengths that some others and still be effective by maximizing said strenths

Agreed, but don't try to sell a mediocre tank to be a keeper to newer players



Player_5773117413 #42 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:23 PM

    Professional Tinfoil Hatter

  • Players
  • 29962 battles
  • 8,991
  • [SPUD]
  • Member since:
    07-16-2014

View Post__The_Dude_30__, on 16 May 2018 - 08:05 AM, said:

 

The T29, T34, and T30 all have that commander's hatch you can pen, the T32 turret has no such thing.

 

Hatch is still vulnerable on t32 but it's a tiny target. Something with the dispersion of an e50 can endanger it at close range. It's even more at risk when facehugging against a tank that's slightly taller. 

 

T32 used to be cool because it was one of the most versatile tier 8 heavies. But the game changes brought out its poopy gun and I think it's a bit less relevant these days. Newer balanced variants of its peers like the T34 and Lowe have such strong suits that they outweigh that versatility on the t32


"HULK SMASH[er]!!!"

^ Gotta derp around in Tier 7 before the inevitable nerf! ^

Just another demo account, nothing to see here

"Say what you like, but stop pissing on my back and telling me it's raining." Blartch


therealrattler #43 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:25 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 363
  • [22ND]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View Post_AzorAhai, on 16 May 2018 - 09:21 PM, said:

First off, I don’t know how you can give an opinion of a tank you have barely played. Second of, you aren’t very good in any of your tier 8’s and it looks like you have basically just started to even get them. This is more or less a problem with you playing up a tier and probably expecting the same things to work.

Ah thank you for attacking my stats, always great fun. I actually grinded up this line when I was quite new and purchased a ridiculous amount of tier 8 prems. Now I'm staying away from higher tiers and really perfecting t7. But as always, thanks for trying to invalidate my argument by shaming my stats



_Ashardalon #44 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:30 PM

    The IT guy

  • Players
  • 42764 battles
  • 1,777
  • [PURPL]
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

View Posttherealrattler, on 16 May 2018 - 04:25 PM, said:

Ah thank you for attacking my stats, always great fun. I actually grinded up this line when I was quite new and purchased a ridiculous amount of tier 8 prems. Now I'm staying away from higher tiers and really perfecting t7. But as always, thanks for trying to invalidate my argument by shaming my stats

 

It’s not stat shaming, so you flat out just said it was like one of the first lines you played, you barely have any games in it, and are mainly playing tier 7. So please explain to me why you think you can call the T32 bad

LYE Discord: DUX2Pr4 | Void Discord: yNVEZSH | Blitz Discord sR2X6Hp  

 

Click Image for My YouTube Channel


_Ashardalon #45 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:30 PM

    The IT guy

  • Players
  • 42764 battles
  • 1,777
  • [PURPL]
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

LYE Discord: DUX2Pr4 | Void Discord: yNVEZSH | Blitz Discord sR2X6Hp  

 

Click Image for My YouTube Channel


_Ashardalon #46 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:31 PM

    The IT guy

  • Players
  • 42764 battles
  • 1,777
  • [PURPL]
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012
Statistically the T32 is out performing a variety of other tier 8 heavys in both average WR and damage.

LYE Discord: DUX2Pr4 | Void Discord: yNVEZSH | Blitz Discord sR2X6Hp  

 

Click Image for My YouTube Channel


therealrattler #47 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:35 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 363
  • [22ND]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View Post_AzorAhai, on 16 May 2018 - 09:30 PM, said:

Stats don't show everything. Notice the tanks it outperforms. They are either prems( which less experienced players can ruin stats in) or they are high skill ceiling tanks such as the 50-100. The 32 is just a middle o' the line at that will never be as competitive as some of its competition. Also notice these are only 55-65 stats, not player base


Edited by therealrattler, 16 May 2018 - 09:36 PM.


_Ashardalon #48 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:36 PM

    The IT guy

  • Players
  • 42764 battles
  • 1,777
  • [PURPL]
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

View Posttherealrattler, on 16 May 2018 - 04:35 PM, said:

Stats don't show everything. Notice the tanks it outperforms. They are either prems( which less experienced players can ruin stats in) or they are high skill ceiling tanks such as the 50-100. The 32 is just a middle o' the line at that will never be as competitive as some of its competition

 

if you look at the data sets you can notice the lowest WR is 55%, These came right from WG and only use 55%+ WR players

LYE Discord: DUX2Pr4 | Void Discord: yNVEZSH | Blitz Discord sR2X6Hp  

 

Click Image for My YouTube Channel


therealrattler #49 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:38 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 363
  • [22ND]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View Post_AzorAhai, on 16 May 2018 - 09:36 PM, said:

 

if you look at the data sets you can notice the lowest WR is 55%, These came right from WG and only use 55%+ WR players

That's literally what I just said



_Ashardalon #50 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:41 PM

    The IT guy

  • Players
  • 42764 battles
  • 1,777
  • [PURPL]
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

View Posttherealrattler, on 16 May 2018 - 04:38 PM, said:

That's literally what I just said

 

No it’s not, you said that it out shines a lot of premiums that bad players can get and ruin/bring down stats in. Which this data set doesn’t allow

LYE Discord: DUX2Pr4 | Void Discord: yNVEZSH | Blitz Discord sR2X6Hp  

 

Click Image for My YouTube Channel


_Ashardalon #51 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:41 PM

    The IT guy

  • Players
  • 42764 battles
  • 1,777
  • [PURPL]
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012
And 55%WR isn’t hard to get too, and really doesn’t qualify under High Skill Ceiling 

LYE Discord: DUX2Pr4 | Void Discord: yNVEZSH | Blitz Discord sR2X6Hp  

 

Click Image for My YouTube Channel


__Crusader6__ #52 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:44 PM

    Annoying Mod

  • Players
  • 59543 battles
  • 11,566
  • [-C6-]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View Posttherealrattler, on 16 May 2018 - 04:35 PM, said:

Stats don't show everything. Notice the tanks it outperforms. They are either prems( which less experienced players can ruin stats in) or they are high skill ceiling tanks such as the 50-100. The 32 is just a middle o' the line at that will never be as competitive as some of its competition. Also notice these are only 55-65 stats, not player base

 

I haven’t looked at your stats, but have you played the Caernarvon? 
 
Tank Hoarder: 383 tanks in Garage:  375/385 aced (Mk1 Heavy and T49A repo),    wallet warrior.  Loyal Original M60 owner
 
 
Sorry I haven’t aced the Smasher yet - So I’m still ruining tier 6-8 

 


_Ashardalon #53 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:45 PM

    The IT guy

  • Players
  • 42764 battles
  • 1,777
  • [PURPL]
  • Member since:
    05-25-2012

View Post__Crusader6__, on 16 May 2018 - 04:44 PM, said:

 

I haven’t looked at your stats, but have you played the Caernarvon? 

 

yes he has crusader, one of his better ones

LYE Discord: DUX2Pr4 | Void Discord: yNVEZSH | Blitz Discord sR2X6Hp  

 

Click Image for My YouTube Channel


MudkipAtWar #54 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:45 PM

    die

  • Players
  • 22146 battles
  • 1,619
  • [FL-TH]
  • Member since:
    10-30-2015
I’ve only ever fought and won with a t32 hulldown in one tank, and it is my lowe, with copious amounts of gold spammed at the hatch. Any tank without a sniper rifle with really good pen can do nothing. 

Hello

https://www.blitzsta.../1016605416.png

Clan list in order of join date: TBNT, 22ND, 22ND2, FSA, FSX, ZNTH, FLEET, FL-TH

 

 


__Crusader6__ #55 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:50 PM

    Annoying Mod

  • Players
  • 59543 battles
  • 11,566
  • [-C6-]
  • Member since:
    12-08-2014

View Post_AzorAhai, on 16 May 2018 - 04:45 PM, said:

 

yes he has crusader, one of his better ones

 

I ended up looking at his stats.  

 

OP, you have awful damage ratios. You aren’t ready for tier 7-8 or anything higher. 

 

 


 
Tank Hoarder: 383 tanks in Garage:  375/385 aced (Mk1 Heavy and T49A repo),    wallet warrior.  Loyal Original M60 owner
 
 
Sorry I haven’t aced the Smasher yet - So I’m still ruining tier 6-8 

 


NaDa_22 #56 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:52 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 37057 battles
  • 936
  • [_V2_]
  • Member since:
    03-27-2016

T32 is absolutely fine.

 

I would even argue it's better than T29 tier-per-tier. It might be slightly inferior to T34 only because 400 alpha is preferred over 310 for a heavy tank.  

 

View Posttherealrattler, on 16 May 2018 - 09:35 PM, said:

Stats don't show everything. Notice the tanks it outperforms. They are either prems( which less experienced players can ruin stats in) or they are high skill ceiling tanks such as the 50-100. The 32 is just a middle o' the line at that will never be as competitive as some of its competition. Also notice these are only 55-65 stats, not player base

 

No one cares about the entire player base stats, because aggregate results from clueless players amount to a little or no insight. At least 55-65% guys know how to play the game, so how they perform relatively for a given tank is a decent measure on how good or bad the tank is. And T32 is doing fine - as many here can attest to. 

 

AMX 50-100 is not a high ceiling tank. It just sucks in the current shape. I am genuinely confused why Caenarvon is performing so poorly, but otherwise that data set is more ore less accurate reflection. 



therealrattler #57 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:55 PM

    Sergeant

  • Players
  • 7953 battles
  • 363
  • [22ND]
  • Member since:
    12-24-2016

View Post__Crusader6__, on 16 May 2018 - 09:50 PM, said:

 

I ended up looking at his stats.  

 

OP, you have awful damage ratios. You aren’t ready for tier 7-8 or anything higher. 

 

 

Um I can do what I want. Caernarvon is a great tank, but as I have admitted multiple times in this thread, I'm not ready for tier 8 and am still training at tier 7. My tier 7 stats are actually quite good...



NaDa_22 #58 Posted 16 May 2018 - 09:58 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 37057 battles
  • 936
  • [_V2_]
  • Member since:
    03-27-2016

View Posttherealrattler, on 16 May 2018 - 09:55 PM, said:

Um I can do what I want. Caernarvon is a great tank, but as I have admitted multiple times in this thread, I'm not ready for tier 8 and am still training at tier 7. My tier 7 stats are actually quite good...

 

If you are not ready for tier 8, then what's the point of trying to argue against Bushka? 

Chariot_Solace #59 Posted 16 May 2018 - 10:01 PM

    Stug Life

  • Players
  • 43078 battles
  • 2,761
  • [_STR8]
  • Member since:
    12-06-2016

View Posttherealrattler, on 16 May 2018 - 03:21 PM, said:

Not really what I said....

Just don't try to sell a bad to mediocre tank to be a fantastic one. Instead, explain how to play it and keep your opinions to yourself, otherwise newer players will be tempted to go blow their hard-earned spare parts on a tank that'll let them down

 

Just because you think a tank is mediocre, it doesn’t mean that’s the case. He admitted and talked about the drawbacks thoroughly and I don’t think he overstated the strengths at all. He said it’s a hull down monster, which it is. It doesn’t fit into the status quo of typical boring trollwagons  like most tier 8 heavies and he talked about that too. If people go out and play this tank because of his video, that’s a good thing. There’s nothing wrong with telling people to try something different. Anything that promotes variety in the game is good. Back in the day everyone drove the same tanks because they could do everything and the game had no variety and it was boring and lame. Would you like to revisit those days? I certainly would not. No, you didn’t say that you would directly, but your argument is saying precisely that indirectly wether you realize it or not.

Tier Xs; E100, Maus, VK 72.01(K), E50M, JgPzE100, Grille, IS-7, IS-4, T-62A, Obj. 268, T110E3,  AMX 50B, WZ-113, STB-1 Lines I'm Grinding: WZ-121(IX), FV215B(IX), FV4202(VII), FV4005(IX), M48 Patton(VII)  Favorite Tank: E75. Top 100 Tanks: Sherman V, M6A2E1, Type T-34, ISU-122S, Pz IV Hydrostat, T-34-1, BT-SV, Chieftain/T95, AMX M4 49 Panzerjager I, T25 AT, SU-85i, IS-2, M36 Jackson, Mauschen, AC IV Sentinel, Chi-To, Ram II, Type 64, WZ-110, Lorraine 40T, Kuro Mori Mine, VK 45.03, Dicker Max, Sherman Firefly, AMX M4 45, T34 Independence, 8.8cm Pak 43 Jagdtiger, T-44-100, IS-2(1945), VK 100.01(P), Charioteer, Pz IV Schmalturm, Pz IV Anko Special, AMX 30 1er Proto, T-34-2, ISU-152, WZ 111 1-4, T23E3, T26E4 Super Pershing, Rheinmetall Skorpion G, Black Prince, Chi-Nu, Type 58, Nashorn, WZ 135G FT Blaze, ARL 44, BDR G1 B, T-43, WZ-113, Sturer Emil, Stridsvagn 74A2, IS-2Sh, 59 Patton, M6A2E1 EXP, VK 36.01(H),


Negaclaw #60 Posted 16 May 2018 - 10:30 PM

    Senior Sergeant

  • Players
  • 8790 battles
  • 887
  • Member since:
    12-10-2015

Dear OP,

 

your opinion is largely invalid

 

From,

the forums 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

shoot ur skeet and hit that yeet





2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users